Seagate: If Flash Drives Get Too Cheap, We'll Use Patents To Make Them Expensive

from the just-as-Thomas-Jefferson-intended dept

Back in 2005, we pointed out that Seagate’s CEO, Bill Watkins, should be worried about the future of flash solid state drives (SSDs) eventually replacing hard drives. It’s taken some time, but those SSDs are starting to show up in laptops like the MacBook Air and the Lenovo Thinkpad x300. Reader Nick Burns points out that Watkins appears to be singing the same old tune, with one slight adjustment. For the most part he’s doing the “nothing to see here, flash drives are still too expensive” song and dance — but people who understand the inevitable march of technology (and how the innovator’s dilemma works) are finally pointing out flash is getting much cheaper very, very quickly. So what’s Watkin’s response? If SSDs get really cheap, he’ll just sue everyone for patent infringement. Yes, even though SSDs are totally different technology than a standard hard drive, Seagate’s holding on to patents that cover “many of the ways a storage device communicates with a computer.” So, if solid state drives suddenly get popular, Watkins plans to sue. In other words, he’ll use patents to stop the competition of a totally different technology. It’s the same old story. When you’re losing in the marketplace, sue for patent infringement. If you want to know the point at which Seagate has realized it’s lost the battle, just look for when the infringement lawsuits come out. Just as Thomas Jefferson and James Madison envisioned.

Filed Under: , , , ,
Companies: seagate

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Seagate: If Flash Drives Get Too Cheap, We'll Use Patents To Make Them Expensive”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
31 Comments
DanCsays:

Re: Seagate still exists?

You’re probably thinking of Maxtor, which was bought out by Seagate in 2006. Now they’re the low end Seagate drives.

I wouldn’t be at all surprised to see the manufacturers filing for declaratory judgments to ensure any possible lawsuit stays out of Marshall (or the ITC).

This is the epitome of backwards thinking…”well, if anyone starts doing it better than us, we’ll just sue.” Yet another reason I don’t buy Seagate hard drives…

Hulsersays:

Totally different?

Yes, even though SSDs are totally different technology
than a standard hard drive, Seagate’s holding on to
patents that cover “many of the ways a storage device
communicates with a computer.”
First off, this definately sounds like an abuse of the patent system, but…even though the storage technologies are different, this doesn’t necessarily mean that Seagate’s “communicates with the computer” technology isn’t legitimately patented. It sounds like this kind of harddrive-to-computer interface tech is part of the standard architecture that all harddrives manufacturers use, but just by reading the post, there’s nothing to indicates that Seagate doesn’t have a legitimate claim in this area. Yes, the storage is “totally different”, but is the interface?

bobpaulsays:

Re: Totally different?

Then why aren’t they suing other drive manufacturers? And wouldn’t the interface just be SATA? I believe anyone who joins the SATA International Organization (SATA-IO) has legal rights to use SATA without additional royalties. IE, they might have to pay the SATA-IO per device, but they wouldn’t have to pay another SATA-IO member company.

Hulsersays:

Re: Re: Totally different?

And wouldn’t the interface just be SATA?
Perhaps. But that’s my point; based on the post, we don’t know if they’re talking about SATA or some other interface technology. Seagate are apparently saying that they have a patent on the technology that allows a storage device to communicate with the computer. Instead of pointing out the patent in question, the focus of the post seems to be the difference between the types of storage device, which appears to be irrelevant to Seagate’s patent claim.

Now, if I knew what the patent was, I might be able to judge whether it passes the “moron in a hurry test”, but even if I am sceptical that they really have a valid claim, without knowing what the patent is, I don’t think it’s fair to judge Seagate.

Jakesays:

Re: Re: Re: Totally different?

As far as I can tell, the article was less to do with the patent itself than the way Watkins seems to be intending to use it. According to the Fortune article,

He?s convinced, he confides, that SSD makers like Samsung and Intel (INTC) are violating Seagate?s patents. (An Intel spokeswoman says the company doesn?t comment on speculation.) Seagate and Western Digital (WDC), two of the major hard drive makers, have patents that deal with many of the ways a storage device communicates with a computer, Watkins says.

He doesn’t seem to have come out and said it, but the implication is obvious; Watkins is intending to use these patents -about whose details he appears to have been rather vague during his interview with John Fortt- for what amounts to blackmail. I sincerely doubt that’s even legal; it’s certainly immoral.

Stevesays:

Re: Totally different?

Unless every other MFG has been licensing the ATA spec from Seagate, I think the precident is set that you dont need to do that.

Besides… Who cares what the interface is. It would be trivial for someone to come up with another interface spec… We’ve been through this before, people… MFM, RLL, ESDI, SCSI, SCSI-II, FC, ATA, SATA, eSATA, iSCSI… If that’s Seagate’s trump card, then I consider that a last gasp of a sinking ship.. More likely, they’ll join the trend, and try to make them cheaper.

combomansays:

What does the patent cover?

If the patent covers things like ATA and SATA, then he may have a point. I’m assuming that flash drives use these interface standards to communicate with the PC and basically emulate (in hardware) a hard drive. The way around it is to come up with a new standard, but then you have to convince motherboard manufacturers to support it.

Michael Thwaitesays:

USB or firewire: that would be the “communicates with the computer” solution; either is already implemented, bootable and reliable.

Speed isn’t as good as SATA but then, SATA speeds are more theory than practical.

Last solution; direct attached storage; straight off the PCI bus with a BIOS implemented PATA emulation.

I don’t think that the SSD vendors are worried in the least – they’re far ahead; Seagate should be inovating and emulating instead!

MPT

Henrysays:

Business technique?

It seems more like a threat than something that Watkins would actually do. It’s simple. It just makes the flash drive makers have less of an incentive to develop flash drives much further. They will develop, but probably at a slower rate. This is because the developers would have the lawsuit risk so developing other technologies could be more financially appealing. Well, I think Watkins just wants to buy time, reel in the profits for hard drives while he can and then develop something else. If this lawsuit does happen, it will definitely hurt SeaGate’s reputation as already seen in some of the comments posted. Still, the flash drive develops cannot completely ignore the threat.

Lawrence D'Oliveirosays:

What's wrong?

A patent is a grant of a monopoly. Being a monopoly, it means you’re allowed to shut out competition. So if Seagate has patents that it can use to shut out competition, why shouldn’t it be allowed to use them? Isn’t that the essence of what patents are about? If you’re against that, you’re against patents.

Re:

Please get your facts right. I work for Seagate. Bill Watkins is no longer the CEO of Seagate and is in no way associated to Seagate. His words and actions have no bearing on Seagate.

Um, this post was written in March of 2008, when Watkins was absolutely CEO of Seagate. It’s true that he’s no longer CEO, but I’m not sure why you’re telling us we’re wrong on a post that you just found a year and a half late.

patents sucksays:

Lawyers are the only ones who win

The worst flaw of patent law is that anyone can sue you for infringement, regardless of whether or not you’re actually infringing. The patent holder doesn’t even necessarily have to cite the specific basis for infringement. It’s a completely backwards system (so much for “innocent until proven guilty”) under which innovation is stifled and billions of dollars are wasted on frivolous lawsuits. Furthermore, the technical people who can best explain why an invention is noninfringing are so far removed from the lawyers that they are never even consulted before a settlement is in the works. In the end, the only people who win are the lawyers. Everyone else loses, and the American taxpayers foot part of the bill without even knowing that someone just got away with murder.

Adamsays:

Why?

Why is Seagate choosing to ruin its image now? They make very reliable HDD’s, great warranties, great prices, and many HDD manufacturers barely even come close. And people will still choose Seagate HDD’s for a good while.

Can’t they get their brilliant engineers to make their own version of SSD’s to sell? I’m sure they’d do well. SSD’s have a few years to get to HDD capacity and price, more than ample enough time. No need for this patent threatening nonsense.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...
Older Stuff
13:40 It's Great That Winnie The Pooh Is In The Public Domain; But He Should Have Been Free In 1982 (Or Earlier) (35)
12:06 Norton 360 Now Comes With Crypto Mining Capabilities And Sketchy Removal Process (28)
10:45 Chinese Government Dragnet Now Folding In American Social Media Platforms To Silence Dissent (14)
10:40 Daily Deal: The 2022 Ultimate Cybersecurity Analyst Preparation Bundle (0)
09:29 A Fight Between Facebook And The British Medical Journal Highlights The Difficulty Of Moderating 'Medical Misinformation' (9)
06:29 Court Ruling Paves The Way For Better, More Reliable Wi-Fi (4)
20:12 Eighth Circuit (Again) Says There's Nothing Wrong With Detaining Innocent Minors At Gunpoint (15)
15:48 China's Regulatory War On Its Gaming Industry Racks Up 14k Casualties (10)
13:31 Chinese Government Fines Local Car Dealerships For Surveilling While Not Being The Government (5)
12:08 Eric Clapton Pretends To Regret The Decision To Sue Random German Woman Who Listed A Bootleg Of One Of His CDs On Ebay (29)
10:44 ICE Is So Toxic That The DHS's Investigative Wing Is Asking To Be Completely Separated From It (29)
10:39 Daily Deal: The 2022 Complete Raspberry Pi And Arduino Developer Bundle (0)
09:31 Google Blocked An Article About Police From The Intercept... Because The Title Included A Phrase That Was Also A Movie Title (24)
06:22 Wireless Carriers Balk At FAA Demand For 5G Deployment Delays Amid Shaky Safety Concerns (16)
19:53 Tenth Circuit Denies Qualified Immunity To Social Worker Who Fabricated A Mother's Confession Of Child Abuse (35)
15:39 Sci-Hub's Creator Thinks Academic Publishers, Not Her Site, Are The Real Threat To Science, And Says: 'Any Law Against Knowledge Is Fundamentally Unjust' (34)
13:32 Federal Court Tells Proud Boys Defendants That Raiding The Capitol Building Isn't Covered By The First Amendment (25)
12:14 US Courts Realizing They Have A Judge Alan Albright Sized Problem In Waco (17)
10:44 Boston Police Department Used Forfeiture Funds To Hide Purchase Of Surveillance Tech From City Reps (16)
10:39 Daily Deal: The Ultimate Microsoft Excel Training Bundle (0)
09:20 NY Senator Proposes Ridiculously Unconstitutional Social Media Law That Is The Mirror Opposite Of Equally Unconstitutional Laws In Florida & Texas (25)
06:12 Telecom Monopolies Are Exploiting Crappy U.S. Broadband Maps To Block Community Broadband Grant Requests (7)
12:00 Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of 2021 At Techdirt (17)
10:00 Gaming Like It's 1926: Join The Fourth Annual Public Domain Game Jam (6)
09:00 New Year's Message: The Arc Of The Moral Universe Is A Twisty Path (33)
19:39 DHS, ICE Begin Body Camera Pilot Program With Surprisingly Good Policies In Place (7)
15:29 Remembering Techdirt Contributors Sherwin And Elliot (1)
13:32 DC Metro PD's Powerful Review Panel Keeps Giving Bad Cops Their Jobs Back (6)
12:11 Missouri Governor Still Expects Journalists To Be Prosecuted For Showing How His Admin Leaked Teacher Social Security Numbers (39)
10:48 Oversight Board Overturning Instagram Takedown Of Ayahuasca Post Demonstrates The Impossibility Of Content Moderation (10)
More arrow
This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it