Police End Up Paying $4k To Guy They Gave Bogus Traffic Tickets To After He Flipped Them Off

from the still-not-recommended dept

It’s probably not a good idea, in general, to give the middle finger to police officers you encounter in your everyday life. However, it’s also not illegal. So a guy who did it twice, and each time was then pulled over and given questionable citations then sued them for violating his civil rights. The Clackamas County police department in Oregon has now agreed to pay him $4,000 to settle the lawsuit, claiming that it was just cheaper to settle than to fight. Perhaps they also realized that they were likely going to lose as well.

Filed Under: , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Police End Up Paying $4k To Guy They Gave Bogus Traffic Tickets To After He Flipped Them Off”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
33 Comments
intervalsays:

Re: Re:

“I’m pretty sure it’s illegal to flip off or otherwise disrespect the police in the UK.”

And what exactly what would be the reasoning behind such a law? Respect for the color of authority or some other nebulous nonsense? I’m frequently amazed by the number of comments I see online from Europeans who openly mock the US tradition & constitutionality of our 1st amendment, as if its some anachronistic bit of uselessness. Its clear to me that such people don’t “get it”, and how blind acceptance of whatever authorities dictate is such a mistake. Yet this seems to be the norm over there.

KBsays:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

That’s absolute bollocks. People laugh at your 1st amendment because it’s only applied in cases which suit your government of the time. There’s only the perception of freedom of speech in the US (or anywhere else. Just because it’s written down in a fancy document that you hold as some sort of beacon of your superiority doesn’t mean that in actual, practical terms it really means anything.

Do you believe that, if a police officer were to come and speak to you for some reason, you should be able to say “Go f*** yourself you pug-eyed sack of sh*t”? I mean it’s freedom of speech, so why wouldn’t you?

Rose M. Welchsays:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

“Do you believe that, if a police officer were to come and speak to you for some reason, you should be able to say “Go f*** yourself you pug-eyed sack of sh*t”?”

Yes, and we do. Why shouldn’t we be able to?

Of course, we also don’t arrest and/or beat our photographers for taking photos of our police officers, and we don’t keep the parents behind a fence while their children play on our playgrounds.

harbingerofdoomsays:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

wow. way to be 100% wrong.

to say that its only applied in cases that suite the government at the time is very wrong as more often than not its actually used against the government to limit the governments ability to stifle speech.

and because its written down in a fancy document, to us that means that its a legal principal that is pretty much a cornerstone of US politics. so yeah, it actually does mean something… quite a lot really…

Do i believe i should be able to say go F yourself to a cop? personally, yes. while i do not think that its very smart, i also do not think that it should be any more illegal than telling ANYONE to F-off…

so F off.

TtfnJohnsays:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

There’s really nothing illegal about telling a cop in Canada to “go forth and reproduce thyself” (to quote Pierre Trudeau).

It’s certainly not the brightest thing you can do. From the sounds of it the reaction of the police wasn’t all that bright either. I’m sure there was enough mechanically and otherwise wrong with this man’s vehicle to give him a ticket or three. ONCE.

The U.S. First Amendment isn’t entirely at issue here.

What is questionable is that a nation like Great Britain which claims to be at the forefront of democracy and liberty would ever make insulting a police officer illegal.

Now THAT’s absolute bullocks!

Rose M. Welchsays:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

“People laugh at your 1st amendment because it’s only applied in cases which suit your government of the time.”

Yes, because the government ‘of the time’ hated the Pledge of Allegiance (WV v. Barnett) and our very own Congress (Reno v. ACLU), and loved Vietnam protesters, (Tinker v. Des Moines), the KKK (Brandenburg v. Ohio), and flag-burners (Texas v. Johnson). Also, the government ‘of the time’ openly loved the pornographer Larry Flynt and detested poor Baptist Jerry Falwell (Hustler Magazine v. Falwell).

Yeah, uh-huh. Right.

btr1701says:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

Do you believe that, if a police officer were to
come and speak to you for some reason, you should
be able to say “Go f*** yourself you pug-eyed sack
of sh*t”?

I’m a cop in America and that sort of thing happens all the time. If you can’t take being called names, you have no business in law enforcement.

And no, just because someone says something like you wrote above, that doesn’t mean I can arrest him/her absent any other evidence of actual criminal violation.

If I did, that person would have a helluva lawsuit against me for deprivation of civil rights under color of authority.

out_of_the_bluesays:

Comes out of county funds, NOT cop's pocket.

Police not only commit crimes while we pay them, after having taken an oath to defend us their employers, but when caught we pay for their defense and any damages. But so-called “conservatives” think that the “thin blue line” must be supported regardless of even crimes committed, and can never see the perverse incentives they make.

MrWilsonsays:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Comes out of county funds, NOT cop's pocket.

Don’t worry, you don’t have to stick up for the gubberment, just RTFCD (RTF Court Documents). He sued the sheriff’s office and the deputies who gave him citations. The suit alleges that the issue is systemic in the sheriff’s office since he got citations on different occasions from different sheriff’s deputies for flipping them off and then his complaints of this conduct were determined to be unfounded by the higher-ups in the sheriff’s office.

Overcastsays:

“And what exactly what would be the reasoning behind such a law? Respect for the color of authority or some other nebulous nonsense? I’m frequently amazed by the number of comments I see online from Europeans who openly mock the US tradition & constitutionality of our 1st amendment, as if its some anachronistic bit of uselessness. Its clear to me that such people don’t “get it”, and how blind acceptance of whatever authorities dictate is such a mistake. Yet this seems to be the norm over there.”

But said mocking will only continue – until the point it’s no longer legal – and just give that time, soon enough it will be illegal to not only flip off a cop, but to flip-off a CEO or a Banker – that’ll get you time too.

Just mark my words.

I think Orwell would be amazed at how bad it’s getting now.

The thought police are out in full force. Only problem is – who watches those that are doing the watching?

JonValJonsays:

I live in said county.. cops here are dicks. not nearly as bad as Portland next door, but close. until they spend more time dealing with actual problems, like domestic disturbances, robberies, gang activity, and general people actually causing a conflict with someone else, let em get the finger.

we pay their salaries. im not paying you to pull me over, I am not causing any conflicts. mission creep seems to have gone from protect and serve, to police and suppress. hell. they wont even look you in the eye and talk to you like a real person.

I know they are not all like that, I have a good friend who is a cop, and he is a good one. fixes problem when he is on duty, doesnt go out and create them. would look you in the eye and try to understand why you are him are talking if something did even come up when he was on duty. sadly he is a rare form.

so until cops start protecting and serving again.. I see nothing wrong with giving them a little reminder that they are not doing their actual job anymore..

,|,,>_

Revelatisays:

Forget all your laws, ethics, morality, amendments or stupid crap like that.

A cop is just a guy with a gun, and that’s why we do what they say.

Compare these two scenarios.

A cop pulls over your car, flips off the strap to his sidearm, stands outside of your car in a shooters stance and asks you to step out of the vehicle. 99% of people will step out of the vehicle without question weather they feel they deserve that sort of treatment or not.

A guy with a gun walks into a bank and asks everyone to give him their money. 99% of people will give up the money without hesitation.

See cops and robbers work on the same principle, compliance through brute force and superior firepower.

Anonymoussays:

Yeah, giving out a dubious ticket to that guy? Not the best idea.
If it were me, I’d just have him pull over, check his license, insurance, test for intoxication, that sort of thing. I’d be sure to jot down everything relevant about the guy; name, address, license plate number…
The real fun would come later. Revenge is a dish best served cold…

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Report this ad??|??Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...
Older Stuff
12:25 Australian Privacy Commissioner Says 7-Eleven Broke Privacy Laws By Scanning Customers' Faces At Survey Kiosks (6)
10:50 Missouri Governor Doubles Down On 'View Source' Hacking Claim; PAC Now Fundraising Over This Bizarrely Stupid Claim (45)
10:45 Daily Deal: The All-in-One Microsoft, Cybersecurity, And Python Exam Prep Training Bundle (0)
09:43 Want To Understand Why U.S. Broadband Sucks? Look At Frontier Communications In Wisconsin, West Virginia (8)
05:36 Massachusetts College Decides Criticizing The Chinese Government Is Hate Speech, Suspends Conservative Student Group (71)
19:57 Le Tigre Sues Barry Mann To Stop Copyright Threats Over Song, Lights Barry Mann On Fire As Well (21)
16:07 Court Says City Of Baltimore's 'Heckler's Veto' Of An Anti-Catholic Rally Violates The First Amendment (15)
13:37 Two Years Later, Judge Finally Realizes That A CDN Provider Is Not Liable For Copyright Infringement On Websites (21)
12:19 Chicago Court Gets Its Prior Restraint On, Tells Police Union Head To STFU About City's Vaccine Mandate (158)
10:55 Verizon 'Visible' Wireless Accounts Hacked, Exploited To Buy New iPhones (8)
10:50 Daily Deal: The MacOS 11 Course (0)
07:55 Suing Social Media Sites Over Acts Of Terrorism Continues To Be A Losing Bet, As 11th Circuit Dumps Another Flawed Lawsuit (11)
02:51 Trump Announces His Own Social Network, 'Truth Social,' Which Says It Can Kick Off Users For Any Reason (And Already Is) (100)
19:51 Facebook AI Moderation Continues To Suck Because Moderation At Scale Is Impossible (26)
16:12 Content Moderation Case Studies: Snapchat Disables GIPHY Integration After Racist 'Sticker' Is Discovered (2018) (11)
13:54 Arlo Makes Live Customer Service A Luxury Option (8)
12:05 Delta Proudly Announces Its Participation In The DHS's Expanded Biometric Collection Program (5)
11:03 LinkedIn (Mostly) Exits China, Citing Escalating Demands For Censorship (14)
10:57 Daily Deal: The Python, Git, And YAML Bundle (0)
09:37 British Telecom Wants Netflix To Pay A Tax Simply Because Squid Game Is Popular (32)
06:41 Report: Client-Side Scanning Is An Insecure Nightmare Just Waiting To Be Exploited By Governments (35)
20:38 MLB In Talks To Offer Streaming For All Teams' Home Games In-Market Even Without A Cable Subscription (10)
15:55 Appeals Court Says Couple's Lawsuit Over Bogus Vehicle Forfeiture Can Continue (15)
13:30 Techdirt Podcast Episode 301: Scarcity, Abundance & NFTs (0)
12:03 Hollywood Is Betting On Filtering Mandates, But Working Copyright Algorithms Simply Don't Exist (66)
10:45 Introducing The Techdirt Insider Discord (4)
10:40 Daily Deal: The Dynamic 2021 DevOps Training Bundle (0)
09:29 Criminalizing Teens' Google Searches Is Just How The UK's Anti-Cybercrime Programs Roll (19)
06:29 Canon Sued For Disabling Printer Scanners When Devices Run Out Of Ink (41)
20:51 Copyright Law Discriminating Against The Blind Finally Struck Down By Court In South Africa (7)
More arrow