Judge Not Amused By ACS:Law Stunts; Forcing Cases To Continue

from the be-fair-warned-us-copyright-group dept

The saga of ACS:Law and its mass P2P user shakedown campaign continues. Despite claiming to have shut down completely in an attempt to avoid any possible sanctions for its disastrous strategy, the judge is forcing the cases to continue, saying that ACS:Law and its partner MediaCAT cannot just drop the cases in an attempt to “avoid public scrutiny.” The judge clearly sees the shakedown scam for what it is:

I cannot imagine a system better designed to create disincentives to test the issues in court…. Why take cases to court and test the assertions when one can just write more letters and collect payments from a proportion of the recipients?

The judge appears to have also slammed ACS:Law and Andrew Crossley for claiming that one reason for dropping the cases were that necessary documents were in storage and they didn’t want to retrieve them. The judge saw through that excuse:

“If true, it is extraordinary,” said the ruling. “A party who keeps key documents which are cited in the particulars of claim in storage is not a party anxious to progress their claim in court.”

Once again, those firms in the US copying this strategy should probably take note of what’s happening over in the UK.

Filed Under: , ,
Companies: acs:law, mediacat

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Judge Not Amused By ACS:Law Stunts; Forcing Cases To Continue”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment

Copyright owners shooting themselves in the foot

Copyright owners shooting themselves in the foot and loosing Billions by small-mindedness:

Many musicians and record companies are in fact loosing out, as they will not allow the use of their music to be played as a backing track. The key reason I say this is most people when editing even a family video like to place a piece of music as a suitable backing track to enhance the effect.

If record companies and musicians allowed their music to be used as backing tracks more people would hear the music and more sales could be made as only when you have heard the music which you may like will you decide to purchase. I have bought most of my music only by first hearing it on a backing-track.

For example there were three beautiful compositions of both music and visual effects on this website Dorset Visual Guide /Swanage area photos and info.
http://dorsetvisualguide.co.uk/swanage.htm but only Corfe Triplet second movement can be played via Youtube. For unfortunately Corfe Triplet first movement and Corfe Triplet third movement which were considered to be the best cannot be viewed due to alleged Copyright infringement of the backing track owned by EMI. Had these three Music Videos been made available for sale I would have paid willingly to own such beautiful pieces of both picture and sound.

Marketing is all about getting your product seen or heard by as wide an audience as is possible this small-mindedness is detrimental to sales. But copying of entire Music CD’s I do not agree with it is blatant theft.

Signed Carl Barron Chairman of agpcuk


Re: Re: Copyright owners shooting themselves in the foot

“If record companies and musicians allowed their music to be used as backing tracks more people would hear the music and more sales could be made as only when you have heard the music which you may like will you decide to purchase.”

Two problems with just that one statement. The first fear and no vision affect the record labels preventing this. They will not change until it is to late. Its the nature of the “Industry”. The second is slowly we are seeing people open up to the creative commons and very soon a large amount of independant artists are going realize that all recorded music is, is a tool for (self) promotion. When that occurs, it will be to late for the labels, they will not be positioned to use this to their advantage. You see when recorded music becomes nothing more than a promotional tool there are no more purchases of music. It essentially becomes free.


Re: Re: Re: Re: Copyright owners shooting themselves in the foot

I still believe one bone of contention with CC licensing is that a lot of artists don’t want businesses to play their music.

The NC and ND options still seem to be rather restrictive for no other reason than because they’re there.

My entire problem with this paradigm is that it will be the next thing that causes problems once we get the copyright issue sorted out.


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Copyright owners shooting themselves in the foot

I understand. Eventually I think there will be a registry, much like the copyright office with usage rights and fees for commercial usage all listed in one place. That one thing is a competative advantage and value added. It is something the record labels won’t do until its to late.

“the next thing that causes problems once we get the copyright issue sorted out.”

There really isn’t a next thing. How can there be? The record labels are going to fail. No one will be willing to pay for the catalogs, the price will just be to high. The price for digital music will, for the most part, drop to zero for the consumer, and be used for promotion.


Re: Re: Copyright owners shooting themselves in the foot

“But copying of entire Music CD’s I do not agree with it is blatant theft.”

Charging me a levy on blank media is theft.
Copying something I bought is not theft.

Most software recommends making a back-up in case anything happens to the original, easily damaged, disc.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Report this ad??|??Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Older Stuff
12:25 Australian Privacy Commissioner Says 7-Eleven Broke Privacy Laws By Scanning Customers' Faces At Survey Kiosks (6)
10:50 Missouri Governor Doubles Down On 'View Source' Hacking Claim; PAC Now Fundraising Over This Bizarrely Stupid Claim (45)
10:45 Daily Deal: The All-in-One Microsoft, Cybersecurity, And Python Exam Prep Training Bundle (0)
09:43 Want To Understand Why U.S. Broadband Sucks? Look At Frontier Communications In Wisconsin, West Virginia (8)
05:36 Massachusetts College Decides Criticizing The Chinese Government Is Hate Speech, Suspends Conservative Student Group (71)
19:57 Le Tigre Sues Barry Mann To Stop Copyright Threats Over Song, Lights Barry Mann On Fire As Well (21)
16:07 Court Says City Of Baltimore's 'Heckler's Veto' Of An Anti-Catholic Rally Violates The First Amendment (15)
13:37 Two Years Later, Judge Finally Realizes That A CDN Provider Is Not Liable For Copyright Infringement On Websites (21)
12:19 Chicago Court Gets Its Prior Restraint On, Tells Police Union Head To STFU About City's Vaccine Mandate (158)
10:55 Verizon 'Visible' Wireless Accounts Hacked, Exploited To Buy New iPhones (8)
10:50 Daily Deal: The MacOS 11 Course (0)
07:55 Suing Social Media Sites Over Acts Of Terrorism Continues To Be A Losing Bet, As 11th Circuit Dumps Another Flawed Lawsuit (11)
02:51 Trump Announces His Own Social Network, 'Truth Social,' Which Says It Can Kick Off Users For Any Reason (And Already Is) (100)
19:51 Facebook AI Moderation Continues To Suck Because Moderation At Scale Is Impossible (26)
16:12 Content Moderation Case Studies: Snapchat Disables GIPHY Integration After Racist 'Sticker' Is Discovered (2018) (11)
13:54 Arlo Makes Live Customer Service A Luxury Option (8)
12:05 Delta Proudly Announces Its Participation In The DHS's Expanded Biometric Collection Program (5)
11:03 LinkedIn (Mostly) Exits China, Citing Escalating Demands For Censorship (14)
10:57 Daily Deal: The Python, Git, And YAML Bundle (0)
09:37 British Telecom Wants Netflix To Pay A Tax Simply Because Squid Game Is Popular (32)
06:41 Report: Client-Side Scanning Is An Insecure Nightmare Just Waiting To Be Exploited By Governments (35)
20:38 MLB In Talks To Offer Streaming For All Teams' Home Games In-Market Even Without A Cable Subscription (10)
15:55 Appeals Court Says Couple's Lawsuit Over Bogus Vehicle Forfeiture Can Continue (15)
13:30 Techdirt Podcast Episode 301: Scarcity, Abundance & NFTs (0)
12:03 Hollywood Is Betting On Filtering Mandates, But Working Copyright Algorithms Simply Don't Exist (66)
10:45 Introducing The Techdirt Insider Discord (4)
10:40 Daily Deal: The Dynamic 2021 DevOps Training Bundle (0)
09:29 Criminalizing Teens' Google Searches Is Just How The UK's Anti-Cybercrime Programs Roll (19)
06:29 Canon Sued For Disabling Printer Scanners When Devices Run Out Of Ink (41)
20:51 Copyright Law Discriminating Against The Blind Finally Struck Down By Court In South Africa (7)
More arrow