Verizon Wireless: Paying Online Is More Convenient, So Now You Have To Pay $2 To Do So [Updated]

from the say what now? dept

Phone companies are pretty notorious for their regular additions of all kinds of silly fees, and Verizon Wireless seems to be even more renowned than others for putting in place all sorts of crazy fees (and then denying those fees even exist… until they suddenly have to pay back $90 million in bogus charges). Its latest is that it’s going to start charging a $2 “convenience fee” for those who pay their bills online or by the phone. The company claims it is doing so in order to provide you the “best wireless experience.” At this point, you have to wonder if there are just some jokers at Verizon Wireless wondering just what they can get away with. Not that I’m a VZW customer, but perhaps some consumers could look into charging the company a reverse fee for “customer appreciation” in order to help the customer get the “best customer service experience.”

Update… and backtrack. It’s amazing. Does Verizon Wireless employ even semi-competent marketing people who can think through how these things happen?

Filed Under: , ,
Companies: verizon wireless

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Verizon Wireless: Paying Online Is More Convenient, So Now You Have To Pay $2 To Do So [Updated]”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
62 Comments
:Lobo Santosays:

Paper!

Every time some company I do business with decides to pull some BS like this, I stop paying online or by phone and mail them (ye aulde) money order.

Which, of course, ends up costing them more time and money having somebody process the paper money order than it would have taken by me paying online.

Their choice–carrot & stick and all that…

One reason to be grateful for crappy ATT

If I were a Verizon wireless customer, I’d be tempted to start a movement to have all other Verizon wireless customers pay in pennies, mailed in, registered mail. If they require this for my Verizon home phone, I’m switching — to another scumbag company that doesn’t require it (re: scumbag — I’m a realist).

Gwizsays:

Re: Re: Auto Payment

The fee doesn’t apply if you are on auto pay. This is what they want. Sure, they don’t mind collecting an extra $2 from everyone, but what they really want is for everyone to be setup on auto pay so they can get their money faster and automatically.

I heard a report about this yesterday and that is exactly what they are trying to do.

Personally, I stay away from automated scheduled payments. My pay is bi-weekly and most automated pay systems are monthly and I can tell you from personal experience that a couple of days difference between the two can quickly add up hundreds of dollars in “insufficient funds” charges from the banks.

Anonymoussays:

Where I live, once cell phone provider bought out it’s competition. So now they want to charge $4 to accept payment in cash, check, or money order.

The idea is they want in your checking account with automatic deduction. Screw them. First time there is an error in billing and you get charged by mistake then the usual is that when it is finally straightened out, companies want instead of sending you a refund, they want to take it out against future charges.

I dropped them like a hot potato and now have another provider.

Jeffrey Nonkensays:

Re: Re:

I don’t like ANY of the carriers. Used to like Cingular, now they’re part of AT&T. Used to like T-Mobile, but their customer service has suffered over the last couple years, they broke a promise to my wife and when I took over the account they signed me up for a less favorable (read: more expensive with fewer features) plan. And no way to get the same plan, even paying more money.

“Dear loyal customer: your business is important to us, so we’re going to go out of our way to make sure you hate our guts. Love, T-Mobile.”

Maybe I should just forget having a phone at all.

tsavorysays:

Re: Re:

Well where the hell is your post that was faster?
Just got to LOVE the AC’s that do everything they can to discredit or belittle Mike.
If they hate him so damn much why are they here day in and day out?

\Don’t like what someone writes DON’T READ IT

I hope that this will help those of you who hate what TechDirt has to say but find it hard not to come back and belittle the writers and other grateful users.

It is simple go to C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc in that location there is a file called hosts right click it click the edit and at the very bottom of that put
127.0.0.1 techdirt.com
127.0.0.1 http://www.techdirt.com
and save
you will never have to read another article from techdirt again.

Mr bad examplesays:

Shysters

This would be the same company that not only sold me a phone on a pre-paid wireless plan that had a phone number recycled from someone who had stopped using the number less than a month earlier, but says it’s not their fault when the bill collectors, mislead one-night stands, co-workers and relatives of the former number user continue to call my phone and send text messages to him. And no surprise-they refuse to refund the cost of those calls as well, despite the fact that the bill collectors, in particular, call three to four times a month from different locations around the US.
Not only that, but every so often, when I make a payment through my bank account, I’ll notice on my next statement from the bank that there’s a second $1 charge from Verizon at the same time as my payment, but not only does Verizon not know what the payment was for, they deny that the transaction even took place, even though the account name, routing number and other info is the exact match, according to the bank.
Now while a $1 charge may not seem like much, it strikes me that if they do this on as wide a scale as Verizon is capable of, it generates several millions of dollars every time they do it…all illegal profits.
So this latest announcement doesn’t surprise me-but I am wondering when the Justice Department is going to open a RICO investigation against the executives in charge of Verizon, but I forgot-they’re too busy denying dying people the right to use medical marijuana.

TtfnJohnsays:

Re: Re: Shysters

Evidently they don’t deny recreational marjuana to Verizon execs or marketers, though.

This happens to be the same Verizon that holds the controlling interest in Canadian telco Telus who, not so long ago, gave an employee a cell with a number recently belonging to someone who sold drugs out of his home and then delivered them. Didn’t take long for this guy to figure that out but THEN the wireless arm of Telus decided it wanted to charge the employee for the change of number on the cell.

Couple of grievance meetings later and the very real threat of going public with this cockup and they changed the number for free.

There’s the book on how to do things and then there’s intelligence. At Verizon/Telus there is no intersection point between the two at the executive, marketing or billing levels.

Anonymous Anonymous Cowardsays:

Quality of Cash

“This note is legal tender for all debts, public and private”

That’s what is says on the face of the one dollar bill I am looking at. How the hell do they get off charging a fee for the use of these notes? The same thing is printed on all US currency, yet some places have the gall to claim they do not accept $50 or $100 dollar bills? I know there is an issue with counterfeiting, but are they too lazy to learn how to check the bills? And I believe I heard that this attitude is OK. Not to me.

I see the above and the Verizon thing, and other like it as a fraud upon the people.

btr1701says:

Re: Re: Quality of Cash

“This note is legal tender for all debts, public and private”

That doesn’t mean a business is legally required to accept cash. It means they’re legally required to accept dollars.

Your local McDonalds, for example, can’t charge you 5 Euros for a Big Mac and Home Depot can’t require payment for that lumber in Yen. They have to accept dollars. However, they’re free to accept those dollars in any form they choose. It can be cash only, credit only, checks, or any combination of payment methods.

So yes, they can decline to accept cash altogether or say they won’t accept $50 bills or whatever. Perfectly legal.

btrussellsays:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Quality of Cash

“So yes, they can decline to accept cash altogether or say they won’t accept $50 bills or whatever. Perfectly legal.”

Perfectly illegal!

“People are willing to accept paper money in exchange for valuable goods and services because other people are willing to accept it from them in exchange for goods and services. The declaration in law that our currency is legal tender has helped to increase its general acceptability. This is so because declaring money to be legal tender means that if it is offered in payment of a debt, it must be accepted; otherwise, the debt is considered to be legally discharged. Fiat money is legal tender.”
Macroeconomics 5th edition
Elijah M. James

2nd bolding set is mine.

Not the same paragraph I quoted to my MPP, but similar.

btr1701says:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Quality of Cash

Perfectly illegal!
Macroeconomics 5th edition

Your economics text book is wrong. Wouldn’t be the first time, either.

I’m a lawyer and a federal agent and I work specifically in financial crimes. I know what the US Code requires and what it does not.

But don’t take my word for it. Here’s the US Treasury’s official response:

http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/faqs/Currency/Pages/legal-tender.aspx

The pertinent portion of law that applies to your question is the Coinage Act of 1965, specifically Section 31 U.S.C. 5103, entitled “Legal tender,” which states: “United States coins and currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues.”

This statute means that all United States money as identified above are a valid and legal offer of payment for debts when tendered to a creditor. There is, however, no Federal statute mandating that a private business, a person or an organization must accept currency or coins as for payment for goods and/or services. Private businesses are free to develop their own policies on whether or not to accept cash unless there is a State law which says otherwise. For example, a bus line may prohibit payment of fares in pennies or dollar bills. In addition, movie theaters, convenience stores and gas stations may refuse to accept large denomination currency (usually notes above $20) as a matter of policy.

btrussellsays:

Re: Re: Re:2 Re: Re: Re: Re: Quality of Cash

They don’t have to accept cash, and you will know that going in. Their are golf courses here that only accept credit cards and is acceptable as you know that going in.

Bus lines accept all denominations to purchase tokens/tickets. They also accept bills on the buses to insert into box, but you won’t get any change.

Most stores have no such policy. Either they accept cash or they do not. Without informing me first, you are stating that you don’t trust the government to back the bills.

For what reason can they refuse fifty dollar bills?
Cash on hand? Too much business for that excuse to last more than 30 minutes.

Counterfeit? Back to not trusting the government. If money is no good to a corporation, what good is it to me?

In that case, I need to be paid in gold. Paper money is no good. Is this what the government wants?
First they declare it is legal tender then they say a store can refuse it? Make up my mind. Which is it? Because if a store can refuse it, it is not legal tender and is not being backed by the government. Remove the writing from the bills.

I trust the combination of plastic cards, computers and banks much less than I fear paper bills.

Anonymoussays:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Quality of Cash

They cannot decline cash as payment for a debt. They can, though, refuse to sell anything for cash.

In other words, Verizon can’t refuse cash as a payment for an amount you already owe them; but they could, say, refuse to sell you a new phone for cash. Once money is owed, cash has to be accepted; but prior to the transaction, a seller can decline to accept cash.

ikesays:

Ontario has similar convenience fees

Mall kiosks for services offered by the Canadian province of Ontario (e.g. renewing license plate registration) have a similar service fee. Sure, there are fees associated with running the kiosk, but they have to be less than the cost of supporting the overworked staffers at the service centres. If the kiosks exist to lessen the load on the service centres, it makes no sense to charge extra to use them!

TtfnJohnsays:

Re: Re: Ontario has similar convenience fees

Is this like the HST in Ontario where you guys got stuck with it and we out here in BC had a small revolution over it and told them to stuff it?

They tried that out here a couple of decades ago so people refused to pay the surcharge or went home, came back and counted out the entire fee plus surcharge in pennies. Lasted a couple of weeks before the surcharge was withdrawn.

The surcharge was dropped. OK, we’re kinda loopy out here in Lotus Land but we can also be cranky. ๐Ÿ˜‰

Tom Landrysays:

I get a kick out of how phone snobs denigrate pre-paid phone users as being “ghetto” or “white trash” but at least we aren’t stuck in a 2 year contract while paying less overall for the same level of service. On top of that you are rewarded with this kind of rape they are allowed to perform on you at will.

I’ll keep my Virgin Mobile and Metro PCS, thank you very much.

Invisible_Jester89says:

Oh, I don’t know about jokers in Verizon’s company, but I know this is such Insane Joker Logic that even the titular Batman villain can only look at this in astonishment and go, “What. The. F**k.”

On second thought, AT&T, despite how stupidly your Modem reset system works (why on earth do I need THREE DAMN SECURITY QUESTIONS to reset a modem, and if I get them wrong once or fail to answer correctly in 5 minutes I get locked out of the account and have to call you fools to fix it? I just want to set up a new wireless router, it’s not the keys to the United States nuclear defense system!), you guys are not half as bad as the morons over at Verizon.

Richardsays:

Paying Verizon Online

Here is how you pay your Verizon bill online: You log in to your account on the Verizon or myverizon website, or through the link in the email they send to tell you how much your charges are for the month. You see a page showing the charges and a link to Pay. You click Pay and get a request to log in. You repeat this cycle six times, then drive to the mall and pay at the Verizon store on their terminal.
I’ve done the above for the past three months. I did the above for the Verizon store manager. She then called someone who assured me that the onlime payment problem would be rsolved soon. I also requested to receive a paper bill in the mail so I could mail a check every month and not drive to the mall.
After three months they have not repaired the online problem nor have they switched me to a paper bill.
In six months my contract runs out. I will leave Verizon as soon as I can.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop ยป

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Report this ad??|??Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...
Older Stuff
12:25 Australian Privacy Commissioner Says 7-Eleven Broke Privacy Laws By Scanning Customers' Faces At Survey Kiosks (6)
10:50 Missouri Governor Doubles Down On 'View Source' Hacking Claim; PAC Now Fundraising Over This Bizarrely Stupid Claim (45)
10:45 Daily Deal: The All-in-One Microsoft, Cybersecurity, And Python Exam Prep Training Bundle (0)
09:43 Want To Understand Why U.S. Broadband Sucks? Look At Frontier Communications In Wisconsin, West Virginia (8)
05:36 Massachusetts College Decides Criticizing The Chinese Government Is Hate Speech, Suspends Conservative Student Group (71)
19:57 Le Tigre Sues Barry Mann To Stop Copyright Threats Over Song, Lights Barry Mann On Fire As Well (21)
16:07 Court Says City Of Baltimore's 'Heckler's Veto' Of An Anti-Catholic Rally Violates The First Amendment (15)
13:37 Two Years Later, Judge Finally Realizes That A CDN Provider Is Not Liable For Copyright Infringement On Websites (21)
12:19 Chicago Court Gets Its Prior Restraint On, Tells Police Union Head To STFU About City's Vaccine Mandate (158)
10:55 Verizon 'Visible' Wireless Accounts Hacked, Exploited To Buy New iPhones (8)
10:50 Daily Deal: The MacOS 11 Course (0)
07:55 Suing Social Media Sites Over Acts Of Terrorism Continues To Be A Losing Bet, As 11th Circuit Dumps Another Flawed Lawsuit (11)
02:51 Trump Announces His Own Social Network, 'Truth Social,' Which Says It Can Kick Off Users For Any Reason (And Already Is) (100)
19:51 Facebook AI Moderation Continues To Suck Because Moderation At Scale Is Impossible (26)
16:12 Content Moderation Case Studies: Snapchat Disables GIPHY Integration After Racist 'Sticker' Is Discovered (2018) (11)
13:54 Arlo Makes Live Customer Service A Luxury Option (8)
12:05 Delta Proudly Announces Its Participation In The DHS's Expanded Biometric Collection Program (5)
11:03 LinkedIn (Mostly) Exits China, Citing Escalating Demands For Censorship (14)
10:57 Daily Deal: The Python, Git, And YAML Bundle (0)
09:37 British Telecom Wants Netflix To Pay A Tax Simply Because Squid Game Is Popular (32)
06:41 Report: Client-Side Scanning Is An Insecure Nightmare Just Waiting To Be Exploited By Governments (35)
20:38 MLB In Talks To Offer Streaming For All Teams' Home Games In-Market Even Without A Cable Subscription (10)
15:55 Appeals Court Says Couple's Lawsuit Over Bogus Vehicle Forfeiture Can Continue (15)
13:30 Techdirt Podcast Episode 301: Scarcity, Abundance & NFTs (0)
12:03 Hollywood Is Betting On Filtering Mandates, But Working Copyright Algorithms Simply Don't Exist (66)
10:45 Introducing The Techdirt Insider Discord (4)
10:40 Daily Deal: The Dynamic 2021 DevOps Training Bundle (0)
09:29 Criminalizing Teens' Google Searches Is Just How The UK's Anti-Cybercrime Programs Roll (19)
06:29 Canon Sued For Disabling Printer Scanners When Devices Run Out Of Ink (41)
20:51 Copyright Law Discriminating Against The Blind Finally Struck Down By Court In South Africa (7)
More arrow