New iPhone Connector Port Revealed, Thus Wiping Out Several Generations Of Accessories In One Fell Swoop

from the planned obsolesence dept

Clarification: As some people have pointed out, Apple themselves have not revealed this—the information comes from TechCrunch’s conversations with accessory manufacturers. The headline was misleading and has been updated.

As iPhones and iPads have gotten more powerful, they’ve been adopted for a lot of professional applications, and this has spawned a huge industry of compatible devices—not just accessories, but significant expansions that can run into the same price range as the iPhone/iPad itself. In music, for example, there are DJ controllers, audio interfaces, studio microphones, stompbox pedals and more—all utilizing the ubiquitous iPod/iPhone/iPad connector port that has remained the same for years. But now TechCrunch has confirmed that the new iPhone will feature a new mini connector with a yet-to-be-announced standard—which means the rest of the Apple line is sure to follow, and all those products are officially on the road to obsolescence.

Apple’s 30-pin ports have been the standard since Apple released the third generation iPod. The connectors offered structural stability when connecting to most accessories but it’s clear – especially with the introduction of the MagSafe 2 port – Apple is more concerned with space savings inside each device.

Three independent manufacturers all agreed that the 19-pin dock port is in the works and many accessory manufacturers are facing an uneasy few months as they wait for official news of the standard to be announced.

This is going to frustrate a lot of users—but despite TechCrunch’s suggestion, most manufacturers probably aren’t “uneasy”. For them, it’s a great cash-grab, and an apparently pointless one. Sometimes things have to become obsolete—but this doesn’t seem like one of those cases. There were no problems with the old connectors, and they weren’t causing any kind of technological bottleneck, so apart from the space-saving aspect, there doesn’t seem to be much to gain—certainly not for the user, and certainly not compared to what’s lost by abandoning such a well-established standard. This has led some to suggest that the accessory manufacturers were in fact the driving force behind the change:

Have you guys ever heard of ‘planned obsolescence?’ It’s a practice which encourages planning and designing a product so it’s only useful for a limited time, before becoming obsolete. It’s common practice, and used by many companies to create demand for the ‘newer, better’ model of the product. Yet this move is possibly prompted by the major accessory makers facing dwindling sales, as customers see no need to buy new accessories for a smartphone that had a universal dock system for 6 generations. What most tech blogs failed to address was the following question: Did the top accessory makers pad Apple’s pockets, or hardball negotiate for an incentive to drop the standard cable as a means of forcing consumers to buy new accessories? We’re inclined to think so.

Considering that three of the top accessory makers have been the first to confirm that they’re working on 19 pin accessories already for the launch of the iPhone 5, the motive is simple : Greed. And why not? It’s a fail safe business plan, designed to shake out the smaller accessory makers with tons of unsold ’30 pin’ stock and a good amount of people will probably conform to this odd decision without question.

Of course, Apple gets plenty of benefits too. The new connector will be yet another proprietary standard, following their typical walled-garden approach, which means most accessory developers will build Apple-first, everything-else-second-if-at-all, thus pushing more people towards Apple products. It’s not surprising, but it’s not a consumer-friendly decision either. Additionally, manufacturers/owners of some of the aforementioned professional accessories to do with music and photography get the worst deal—for them, iPhone/iPad compatibility is a great feature, but not central to their businesses/buying habits. Breaking the compatibility is a source of nothing but frustration, and will probably discourage a lot of such users from upgrading at all—while the manufacturers are slowly forced to leave them behind.

Filed Under: , , , , ,
Companies: apple

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “New iPhone Connector Port Revealed, Thus Wiping Out Several Generations Of Accessories In One Fell Swoop”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
119 Comments
That Anonymous Cowardsays:

Leigh, something I saw on this story earlier surfing around was the rebirth of the idea of the “Apple Approved” chip in the accessories, blocking non-chipped items from working.

Oh and the claim that it means it will be more water resistant, so no more false water damaged stickers for consumers.

Anonymoussays:

Re: Re: Re:

Pointing out that even with a “chip that blocks non chipped” accessories is a method of protection that will be easily circumvented…. is now “adding nothing constructive” to the conversation.

I call bullshit.

My saying “Applecrap” completely blinds you to the point I made. How shallow !

Anonymoussays:

Re:

They secretly love it.
Something else for them to feel elitist about.
Not that it’s only Apple customers that are like that, Win Vista was a fail of “obsolescence of xp software”.
Difference is, Apple customers are happy to downgrade because they are told it’s an upgrade.
1 button mouse V multiple button mouse.
Touch screen V buttons.
Stylus V finger.
Etc…. downgrades in control for the user. “UPGRADE” shouts Apple.

Celtic Froshsays:

Upgrades

“Difference is, Apple customers are happy to downgrade because they are told it’s an upgrade.
1 button mouse V multiple button mouse.
Touch screen V buttons.
Stylus V finger.”

I think you meant “Finger V Stylus”

Yeah, I know what you mean. I absolutely love my 18 button mouse; I get sooooooo much done that way… And the touch screen instead of physical buttons which can’t adapt to new software, and break? What was Apple thinking?

And don’t get me started on the senselessness of using a pointing device which is with me 24/7 instead of one that makes my device bigger and can be lost. I much prefer that kind of “upgrade”.

Wanker.

Apple should bring back the floppy disc too. If they put it in the iPhone, so much the better!

Paul Renaultsays:

The only thing that can stop this kind of crap...

…is a boycott. Just like how Windows power users boycotted Vista.

However, I don’t hold out much hope from Apple users. Their understanding of ‘think different’ is doing what Cupertino tells them to do.

Maybe that “Apple Approved” chip is really implanted in the fanbois, not the hardware.

drosloviniasays:

Re: The only thing that can stop this kind of crap...

Well I for one am shocked – SHOCKED!!! – that they would dare to change anything when releasing a new product. How dare Apple change things in any of their products? Don’t they know that they are the only technology company in the world that does this? Just look at all those Windows and Android devices that are exactly the same in every way as the original models. How DARE Apple break with tradition and actually change something in an as yet unreleased product? And then to not offer any adapters or ways to work with the new product too (which they’ve never done before)? It’s all just so shocking! How can they claim to be “innovative” when they insist on changing things every so often? And to think that we are all forced to buy things from them, too. Something MUST be done.

It’s great that we have Internet “reporters” spreading FUD to prevent this kind of thing from happening. Otherwise my IBM PCJr might start to become obsolete.

Almost Anonymoussays:

Re: Re: The only thing that can stop this kind of crap...

Good job completely sidestepping the point! 6/10 troll points.

Nobody, yet NOBODY, is knocking Apple for changing “things in any of their products”, I’m sure the new iPhone will come with many changes. However many people will be understandably upset when basically all of their current iJunk will no longer work with this newest wunderphone. Most see it as a cynical cash grab by accessory companies in forcing everyone to buy new iJunk. A select few, such as yourself, will attempt to make the change sound justified without actually providing any sort of justification other than “neener neener neener”. Sure, Apple can do what they want with their products, but they will also have to accept a lot of people are going to be pissed.

PaulTsays:

Re: Re: Re: The only thing that can stop this kind of crap...

“However many people will be understandably upset when basically all of their current iJunk will no longer work with this newest wunderphone.”

Which is a blind assumption based on a product that nobody has to upgrade to and has not had its features officially announced by the retailer.

If people are going hate Apple for upgrading their equipment, can we at least wait until they’ve announced that change?

“A select few, such as yourself, will attempt to make the change sound justified without actually providing any sort of justification other than “neener neener neener”.”

The justification suggested so far is the small form factor of the connector inside the case. There’s other justifications that can be assumed from the nature of the connector, but its usage has not been announced yet, there are only assumptions until it is.

Of course, this is stated elsewhere, I’m sorry that your reading comprehension is so poor that you can’t filter this as anything other than a childish insult (something that’s only being done by the anti-Apple obsessives so far).

Almost Anonymoussays:

Re: Re: Re: Re: The only thing that can stop this kind of crap...

If people are going hate Apple for upgrading their equipment, can we at least wait until they’ve announced that change?

You keep saying this. “It’s not official.” “We don’t know for sure.”

Here’s an idea: why don’t we, for the sake of argument, assume that Apple is going to change the connector, making it completely incompatible with all previous accessories. Now, I say, based on the previous assumption that is going to change the connector, “This sounds like a cash grab. I’m a pretty technical guy and I do realize there could be some actual technological benefits to changing the connector, it seems much more likely than not that this will be more of a windfall for a bunch of iJunk manufacturers.”

Your turn! Please remember, for the sake of this argument, the assumption is that Apple is going to change the connector, ok?

PaulTsays:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The only thing that can stop this kind of crap...

“Your turn!”

Erm, OK…

“Please remember, for the sake of this argument, the assumption is that Apple is going to change the connector, ok?”

That’s one assumption. Unfortunately, your attack is based on a large number of other assumptions as well. Let’s assume that the device as posted in the article is real. Well, we still don’t know the specs of the port. You seem to be assuming that there’s no other difference apart from the format of the connector, not even considering things like improved performance, direct compatibility with Thunderbolt and other devices, and so on.

You also assume that there’s not going to be an adapter supplied in the box, or supplied for free/at cost. You assume that no other changes are going to be announced at the same time, including real tangible immediate benefits for the new connection. You assume that the new connection format wasn’t necessary to include any other improvements that come with the phone. You assume that the change isn’t absolutely necessary for future development of the device (most such changes aren’t made for now, they’re made for changes over several years in the future). You assume that whatever changes are made are going to be invisible to the consumer. You also seem to make the strange assumption that people are somehow forced to upgrade

Need I go on? Your reaction is an overreaction, based on worst-case scenarios for a device which you don’t even know the tech specs of yet. That stikes me as being rather silly. Apple have faced wailing and gnashing of teeth before, from switching to Intel to opting not to include floppy drives in the iMac. Most of these have been non-issues or even smart forward looking moves in hindsight.

Long term, this will be a similar non-issue IMHO, but I’ll wait to see the device before I pass final judgement. Short term, you’re not forced to upgrade if you find the new connector unacceptable.

Anonymoussays:

Re: Re: Re: The only thing that can stop this kind of crap...

The cable is 10 freakin years old. Every other phone manufacturer has been making their cables smaller and smaller, god forbid Apple does the same. “Oh, but it means I won’t be able to connect the new iPhone 5 to my existing 8 year old hardware!” Then don’t buy it until your current accessories die. Apple isn’t making your old devices blow up and forcing you to buy the new iPhone. “Oh no, I’ll lose hipster cred for not having the iPhone 5 before it’s cool though!” It was too late when the first iPhone came out.

fogbugzdsays:

As much as I dislike proprietary standards, I must say that there are some good reasons for the change. Smartphone designers are obsessed with packing more features into smaller spaces and the new adapter does that. It is also safer for the phone and more water resistant. The 30 pin socket so was prone to damage and stability issues.

The bottom line to me is that if you choose to invest heavily in a proprietary system you can expect to have this type of issue. The only real surprise for me is that Apple stayed with the 30 pin connector as long as they did.

Re:

Did you know that most non-Apple devices use micro-USB cables? these ports are significantly smaller than the 30 pin Apple Connector and as best I can tell, significantly smaller than the Apple 19 pin connector.

And cables / power supplies are almost trivial to find. If Apple truly wanted something smaller, why didn’t it go for that?

fogbugzdsays:

Re: Re:

I am an Android user myself, so I am definitely familiar with micro-USB. The external parts of the new connector are larger, but the internal parts are smaller, and Apple is most concerned about the internal size. Apple doesn’t really care how large the external part of the adapter is as long as they can make it pretty.

The micro-USB does have some problems, including a higher risk of water and mechanical damage. But I suspect the real appeal of the new adapter is that it is shiny and made by Apple. Some people will buy anything if it is shiny and made by apple. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BnLbv6QYcA

fogbugzdsays:

Re: Re:

>What new hardware features require the additional space?

For Apple, a smaller phone is itself a feature. Anything that lets them shave a fraction of a millimeter is something they just can’t resist. The iPhone will certainly have some new features, but even if it doesn’t the drive for a more compact device would be compelling to Apple.

Androgynous Cowherdsays:

Re: Re: How long...

You can’t be serious. I can’t see a utility patent on “a 19-pin connector” being considered novel and non-obvious. Or on “a 30-pin connector”. Or on “a 19-pin to 30-pin adapter”. And if they try a copyright claim or anything similar, reverse engineering for interoperability is fair use.

Anonymoussays:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: How long...

Unless a company with serious clout would the one making the hypothetical adapter, they’d likely fold under legal threat rather than try to fight Apple.
It doesn’t matter that they’d have every legal right to make the adapter; Apple could just keep dragging them into court until they went bankrupt.

Anonymoussays:

Seriously, people are surprised by this?

Apple launches a new iPad and a new iPhone roughly every year. They can’t maintain a high volume of sales if they don’t somehow force people to switch over to the new shiny.

This is people’s fault really. They will all still flock to buy the new shiny anyway, giving more money to Apple and further encouraging this behaviour. Mindless idiots…

Reminds me of this:

http://xkcd.com/743/

PaulTsays:

Yawn… another excuse to launch attacks on Apple in the comments without adding anything to the discussion? Snore…

Nobody’s forced to upgrade, and there will almost certainly be adapters and dual-format connectors available in a short length of time. Who knows, Apple might even package a converter with the phone to mitigate complaints. It’s too early to tell.

So, instead of having a discussion of the pros and cons of this decision and what it might make possible going forward, we have another anti-fanboy wankfest over who can launch attacks on Apple first. Boring… Don’t like Apple? Don’t buy their products and stop whining.

That Anonymous Cowardsays:

Re:

hey now… be nice…
I brought up that it was also supposed to make the water damage sensors less likely to trip.

The rest of my responses have been my typical level of snark I use for everything.

I am curious if they will be using the chip in the cord thing or not and what that could mean in the longer term. If it is meant to keep the “low end” manufacturers from putting out devices Apple doesn’t approve of, or if Apple will use it to control like the app approval process.

I’m kinda entertained if they make the switch in more than just the next iPhone and across the whole iThingy line. Means more items on clearance that will work with my ancient iThingys.

PaulTsays:

Re: Re:

“There are no pro’s. None.”

I can think of at least two off the top of my head with little effort (the smaller form factor will free some space internally – mentioned in the damn article! – while the pinouts are different there might be some compatibility with Thunderbolt devices). Real debate would expose more, and then would enable people to weigh them against the cons.

What a shame that so many people are opposed to real debate and prefer just to write off everything with assumptions and attacks.

PaulTsays:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

“Sorry, the consumer friendly connector change would have been to use a standard connector such as mini or micro USB.”

Would it? Considering that the connector appears to be physically similar to Thunderbolt connectors, they don’t appear to be moving in the direction you think they are. Is the way Apple are planning this to be used even possible with those connectors? I don’t know, and neither do you.

“I agree w/ all the commenters that this is a consumer unfriendly move.”

Based on your own assumptions. FFS, you don’t even know if Apple are going to be supplying an adapter with the phone to maintain backward compatibility yet, let alone what the actual benefits going forward are. Stop pulling attacks out of your ass, and at least wait for them to formally announce what they’re going to be doing with the damn device before your impotent rage starts.

drosloviniasays:

Re:

The really humorous part in all this, to me, is that it helps separate seriously thoughtful people from the mindless haters. If Apple releases “more of the same,” they criticize and use it as an example of how someone else is better. If they make a change (even one that is only a rumor), they’ve launched us all on a path to a fiery apocalypse. When you love/hate something to the point of obsession, you’ve lost all capacity for rational thought. The real icing on the cake is to see these same people calling others “sheep” or “mindless idiots.” It reminds me of the classic picture of the guy with the sign that says “get a brain, morans!”

As you said, if you don’t like their products, don’t buy them and stop whining!

CSMcDonaldsays:

Apple didn't reveal anything here...

Techcrunch verified this by talking to manufacturers… Who have been wrong before.

Apple is most probably going with the smaller connector, but this story is still only speculation at this point.

I also don’t see it as a big deal – people will only be affected if they buy the device with the new connector – it’s not going to magically retrofit your old iPods and iPhones to a smaller connector (that if the picture in the tech crunch article is correct looks much more friendly than the 30pin connector)

Anonymoussays:

Re: Apple didn't reveal anything here...

“it’s not going to magically retrofit your old iPods and iPhones to a smaller connector”

No, but it will force you to magically cough up the dough for new accessories if you want to use them with the new device, even though your old accessories still work perfectly fine.

CSMcDonaldsays:

Re: Re: Apple didn't reveal anything here...

And the same thing would have happened if they had switched from a propietary connector to a USB connector – would that have been considered OK because they were now using open standards even though it made consumer’s 3rd party devices incompatible?

I still don’t see the big deal – if you don’t like it, don’t buy it. Most of the people who are gleefully leaping to condemn Apple on this would never buy an Apple product anyways.

DogBreathsays:

Re:

c’mon they are just following Masnicks advice 🙂

connect with fans, and reason to buy !!!!..

More like:

(dis)connect with fans (except those that have already been bitten… i.e. “Apple rabies”), and (force a) reason to buy!!!!..(by planned obsolescence… i.e. your “old” stuff will soon no longer work on “our” network). HAHA

united9198says:

Connector

I am not going to panic over the connector change. Sure I have a lot to stuff that fits that connector, but I also know there there will be a huge market for an adaptor that several people will sell and the price will be competitive.

I think back to Apple eliminating other connectors, dropping the floppy drive, dropping the CD/DVD drive, dropping the hard drive, and changing other ports and connectors. The panic that ensued was overdone for sure, but in the end it was the right thing to do.

There are people still running Windows 95 and unaware of the new world around them. The same with the new connector. Eventually we will buy it and life will go on. There are bigger things in the world than what kind of connector comes on and Apple device. We still have the option to buy or not.

Anonymoussays:

I love reading all the android/microsoft fanbois talk about apple fanbois like their the worse than they are. You can tell who’s who pretty simply by the inability to post any constructive facts without throwing a jab in. I own a MAC and a PC, an android phone, an iPhone and and iPad. Both platforms offer something to the end user. Its the end user who ultimately decides whats best for them. If you can’t see the benefits of both and lay out the facts as it is, watching the insults you sling makes me giggle with glee at your own fanboyism.

Coming back to the actual point. I think this is being made into a bigger deal than it actually is. If I were to listen to most of the crap your hearing, you would think that NOTHING is compatible any more with the new iPhone. Fact is it was only stuff that used the 30 pin connector. I’ve had an iPhone for 4 years now and the only thing that I have that uses the 30 pin connector is my power cable? And most consumers are in the position of what? having to buy a new clock radio? LoL… This single connector has been around for quite a long time, and a change from that for your average consumer isn’t going to mean much of anything.

I also think it might be a message apple is sending to the proprietary hardware makers out there that there is better technology that they can use to do the same thing. Take airplay for example. Lets say your the creator of a 30 pin to Composite cable. The consumer has to plug his iPhone or iPad into the 30pin cable which runs to the TV. This is very cumbersome. SO, knowing that their switching, you want to protect yourself against future changes like this, so you decide Hey, Apple has this thing called Airplay Mirroring. Lets make a box designed to hook into your TV, that does the same thing as that stupid cord, but it does it wirelessly. The creator is protecting themselves, by using tech thats more future proof than a 30 pin connector, and the consumer wins because who wants to sit 6 feet from their TV, controlling their phone?

Leigh Beadonsays:

Re:

I love reading all the android/microsoft fanbois talk about apple fanbois like their the worse than they are. You can tell who’s who pretty simply by the inability to post any constructive facts without throwing a jab in. I own a MAC and a PC, an android phone, an iPhone and and iPad. Both platforms offer something to the end user. Its the end user who ultimately decides whats best for them. If you can’t see the benefits of both and lay out the facts as it is, watching the insults you sling makes me giggle with glee at your own fanboyism.

I love reading all the people who project “fanboi” status onto others. I’m exactly like you, with a mix of devices both Apple and non. But I don’t see much to like in this particular change.

Your decision to call me an Android/Microsoft fanboi based on that is pretty arbitrary. It’s not about my inability to resist “throwing a jab in” – this is a commentary site, where we don’t just report facts but also explain what we think about them.

Zangetsusays:

So what?

Seriously, so Apple might introduce a new pin connector with the next iPhone. So what? If you want the new iPhone you buy new accessories. If you don’t want the new iPhone don’t buy it and use all your existing accessories. Some of the docks you could buy for a version 1 iPad don’t work with a version 3 iPad just two years later. I didn’t see mass protests in the streets and an Apple Spring occur.

To say that there is nothing to gain, when all that is even guessed at is the fact that it goes from 30 pins to 19 pins, seems to be more of a shot in the dark more than anything else. What if the new pin connection is required to allow it to implement new features that luddites have never dreamed of. To be honest, Leigh, this doesn’t sound like a typical TechDirt article, but more of a “I saw the Microsoft Surface and it uses standards so I hate Apple” article.

“Don’t innovate because that might leave people behind” is a quaint and antiquated idea, but if we followed your lead there would be little to no innovation in the world because at some point we would have had to leave people behind.

Now, if you’ll excuse me, the horses need watering before I hitch them up to the buggy and drive them to work.

Anonymoussays:

Well duh, what else should you expect from a greedy company like Apple?

Apple proved that they cared about nothing more then making money with overpriced products when they released the iPhone4, and then denied for a couple of weeks that there was even a problem with it dropping calls, all while telling their people running apple stores “no refunds”.

Dalane K. Braunschweigsays:

Really?

I have always found it so interesting that the Apple Haters pick non-issues to hate on. Every other phone/device manufacture puts a different connect on just about every device and that is cool, but Apple talks about changing their gaint connect (30pin) that only uses 4pin, and well now they are the devil. only interested in stealing your money. Please!

Leigh Beadonsays:

Re: Really?

I’m no “Apple hater”. I type this from a Macbook as we speak. I have an Android phone at the moment, but I like iPhones too. I was thinking about buying an iPad for some of those pro music devices I mentioned (though now I plan to wait and see what happens in terms of connector compatibility over the next year or so, before spending several hundred dollars on that stuff)

All I’m saying is, from a consumer perspective, I don’t see why I should be anything but annoyed by this news – and same goes for most people. You can come up with a bunch of reasons for them to make the change, but none of them really matter to the user, who isn’t getting much a direct benefit – just being forced to adopt a whole new standard for no particular reason.

Every other phone/device manufacture puts a different connect on just about every device and that is cool

Seems like the vast majority of android phones use the micro-USB standard, as do many many other mobile devices…

well now they are the devil. only interested in stealing your money

Did I say either of those things? No. I said this particular change seems like a cash grab and is not really friendly to users. I don’t think they’re the “devil” nor do I think they are “only” interested in “stealing” anyone’s money — I love Apple devices, I just don’t love their walled-garden approach to everything, and I am vaguely troubled by the anti-power-user direction a lot of their stuff seems to be headed (e.g. I’m cagey about upgrading my OS to Lion)

PaulTsays:

Re: Re: Really?

“just being forced to adopt a whole new standard for no particular reason.”

Well, this is the assumption I have a particular problem with. I’m sure that Apple have very specific reasons for changing the connection. I honestly don’t believe that Apple would have walked into this blind and expected not to have a backlash over the change – both from 3rd party manufacturers and from customers. It’s the sort of change that would have been focus grouped and discussed to within an inch of its life before being implemented. Apple have reasons, we just don’t know them yet.

Yet, here we are with the phone not having been officially announced, and the assumption everyone seems to be jumping to is that it’s either a pure profit grab or a completely arbitrary change to piss off customers.

Until they announce the actual product (which could include adapters and other things that make the current conspiracy theories moot), we don’t know the reasons. But, I can honestly say that “no particular reason” is a long, long way from their reasons for the change. Whether you personally like or accept the direction they’re changing in is a different matter, but nobody’s forcing you to upgrade if you prefer your old equipment or a competitor’s approach.

“I am vaguely troubled by the anti-power-user direction a lot of their stuff seems to be headed (e.g. I’m cagey about upgrading my OS to Lion)”

I’ve personally had very few issues upgrading and the non-power user stuff I’ve seen so far like the iOS-style Launchpad are completely optional and I find they don’t get used by myself TBH.

Hothmonstersays:

Re: Really?

Everyone else uses some size USB port on their laptop, tablet and phones. Apple loves to make their equipment with proprietary ports and sell adapter dongles for 80$. They do this for no other reason than to sell adapters and branded cables. The only proprietary port of theirs that is actual an improvement over the industry standard is their power jack on laptops.

S.Palmersays:

Makes switching to android that much easier

Not sure this is the best decision for Apple. One of the things that kept me from switching the last time I replaced the 5 phones in my family is that we have so many cables, clocks, etc… that we’ve bought over the years that work with all the iDevices. If I’m going to lose that benefit with iPhone 5 then it’s easier to make the switch to a Galaxy S III or some other Android phone.

George Bouchersays:

A little premature, no?

A few points: One, this is hardly ‘confirmed’. I would say it is likely, but it’s seems a bit silly to crucify Apple for a thing they haven’t announced, displayed, demoed or otherwise had the chance to explain themselves. Two, mostly, iDevice owners dislike the current dock and have for a long time, so this is possibly a welcome change. We will have to wait and see (see first point). Three, while I agree, a normal micro-usb connector would be ideal, back in the day, Apple actually started with FireWire, because they wanted the connection to be better than the original usb standard. The 30 pin connector was a part of that same thought process, where they imagined it would have head-room to grow. This (mostly) didn’t happen, and it was a mistake on Apple’s part. I am sure there is a bit of the ‘lock-in’ factor with the current (and possibly new) connector, but I think it is also a factor of Apple wanting to do something better than the current solutions. Possibly they will be wrong about this, too. I will reserve judgement on whether this is a good thing or a bad thing until such time as Apple themselves announce thing thing. Have a great day!

No Surprise

I was anticipating that would be the case when I heard a reviewer on TV use the buzz word “new”.

Also in the news: Microsoft: It?s official, Microsoft is not offering Windows Phone 8 to existing handsets.
Like Apple, Microsoft is purposely “obsoleting” existing devices.

In looking up the Window Phone 8 article, also ran accross this one: Microsoft to sites hosting leaked ?Xbox 720? document: Take it down

mikey4001says:

Re: No Surprise

That is pretty much the exact reason that I have an android rather than a Windows phone. Having previously admitted (reluctantly) that I own a ZuneHD, I can claim first hand experience with how Microsoft treats its customers. I love my Zune (again, admitted reluctantly), but I will NEVER buy another of their devices due to their universal non-support policy. With the possible exception of the X-box, pretty much every MS device I’ve ever seen was simply an unsupported test bed for their “next big thing” that’s going to “get them back into the game.” They release a device/standard that few buy into, so then they try something different and incompatible (repeatedly), leaving a trail of useless proprietary crap and pissed off customers in their wake. Then they wonder why no one wants to buy their new shiny.

As much as I despise Apple, you have to give them credit for having an ecosystem that has been (sort of) consistent and stable for 10+ years.

TimKsays:

  1. I don’t own any Apple products so I don’t care. But, having owned a dozen cell phones and having bought multiple chargers for each until the micro USB became standard…. I don’t feel too bad.
  2. Obviously adapters will become available so its not like every dock and charger becomes useless.
  3. Everyone who sells their iPhone 4 and 4s to upgrade to the 5 will simply include their chargers in the sale and buy new ones with the phone.
  4. Not EVERY iPhone owner is a lunatic who must have the next device immediately. Yes, many of them are, but more people won’t upgrade than will. That means the change won’t actually impact the majority of iPhone owners.

    Just for fun….

    Here’s a crazy theory: Maybe Apple is changing the dimensions of the new iPhone…perhaps its wider and taller and wouldn’t fit in some of the older docks…. so if the old docks wouldn’t fit the new phones anyway, now is the perfect time to switch connectors. hmmm….

Anonymoussays:

I originally had a com port mouse and AT connected keyboard on my first computer. Then I built a new computer but found out that I had to buy a new mouse and keyboard to fit the new ps/2 port. A few years later I built another computer and had to buy a new mouse and keyboard again since the new motherboard didn’t have ps/2. I also had to buy a new CD rom as the new motherboard only had SATA.
While it is a bummer that they are switching to a new adapter it will probably have some benefit. I don’t stay on top of Apple products but my guess is that it will be able to make full use of USB 3.0 or maybe they will also have a thunderbolt adapter for even faster transfer speeds. I have always expected Apple was going to change adapter types this is why I have always recommended accessories that are generic.

Dirt_is_Funsays:

And people want iPod interfaces in cars?

This reminds me of the dead end that navigation systems are. Why build a device with a two to three year lifespan into a car that will operate for three to five times longer? It doesn’t make any sense. Siri for the car is just a button that WON’T WORK after three years!! I’ve always respected Apple products,and have owned their high end laptop and desktops, but the cost is just too high. You can count on Apple making an OS or hardware design decision that strands you, forcing a significant outlay of cash to keep from falling behind. It is their business model and it is wildly profitable.

I believe this connector is a key reason why a universal standard like Bluetooth Audio has never been core to Apple’s strategy.They keep building walls. If they keep it up, at some point customers will stop climbing them and leave.

Anonymoussays:

All the Apple Apoligitards are just so fantastic here today. Defending Apple for making yet another anti-consumer move, that hurts the Apoligitards more than anyone else since they’re clearly the big spenders needing to justify their annual purchase of the next gen of iProducts, now with NEW Proprietary tech that is entirely indistinguishable in functionality and quality from previous iAccessories Except_for_the_Connector, well that darn well justifies anything! Because Apple can do no wrong. Good job fanboys: Apple totally wouldn’t fuck you over for a dollar, totally! 😀 (this is a totally sincere smile, BTW!!!! 🙂 🙂 🙂 )

Aaronsays:

Irony...

Microsoft (and several other software companies) have been pulling this off in the software world for well over a decade. Apple is now doing it blatantly with their hardware.
When Microsoft announced the Surface recently, Apple cultists screamed “theft!” over what they claimed was an iPad rip-off (despite the tablet PC being introduced by Microsoft a decade ago; a Start Trek: The Next Generation concept pre-dated even that.) Now that Apple is the one doing the “stealing” of Microsoft’s core software business practice idea (albeit applied to hardware,) it’s ok? Talk about double standards.

(On a side-note here, since we’re discussing Apple)
Word of the day:
Shinyware: noun. A generic piece of hardware, often behind current standards and non-upgradeable, polished and branded with the Apple logo. Nothing is really “extraordinary” about it, but is often proclaimed to be the next technological messiah.

PaulTsays:

Re: Irony...

“Talk about double standards.”

Quick question- are these actually the same people you’re referring to in both cases, or did one group of Apple users go gaga over MS and another defend MS and call the accusation pointless, as they are also saying about the connector change?

If the former, I’d like to see some links to such blatant hypocrisy, otherwise you’re just another asshole who pretends that anyone with a good word to say about Apple must be in some sort of cult.

Derek Kertonsays:

Not Obsolete: Adapters and Selloffs

This isn’t as bad as it sounds. Apple has offered some amazing port stability for over 6 years, so we should be somewhat grateful for that. At CES shows, I’ve noticed for years how the Apple accessory market vastly outstrips the RIM, Android, WinPho, Symbian, etc, EVEN as those makers have standardized largely on micro USB. The reason is that the Apple port has remained in the same place, centered on all devices. Android phones put their port on all four sides of the phone, in weird and varied locations.

Anyways, there will be cheap adapters on Amazon and eBay 2 months after the next iPhone port is launched, so many accessories will still be totally functional. Others will lose their “stand” function and may need have some fit issues, but will still work. So they’re not really obsolete.

Meanwhile, I’ve already noticed that a lot of iPhone docks and speakers are popping up as clearance items around the web and at Woot.com. Obviously, sellers are reducing inventory of the 30-pin items. It’s not a bad time to get a deal!!

Ninjasays:

I own an Asus Transformer TF201 and I am particularly annoyed by their proprietary connector (and the lack of where to buy the damn thing). My fault for not noticing this issue when I bought it. I got so excited with the features of the lil thing that this detail slipped away.

I believe this (proprietary connections) is a waste of money and natural resources and I do hope we all move towards standards despite Apple proprietary idiocy.

Now back to trying to find a place to buy spare cables to my tablet.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...
Older Stuff
13:40 It's Great That Winnie The Pooh Is In The Public Domain; But He Should Have Been Free In 1982 (Or Earlier) (35)
12:06 Norton 360 Now Comes With Crypto Mining Capabilities And Sketchy Removal Process (28)
10:45 Chinese Government Dragnet Now Folding In American Social Media Platforms To Silence Dissent (14)
10:40 Daily Deal: The 2022 Ultimate Cybersecurity Analyst Preparation Bundle (0)
09:29 A Fight Between Facebook And The British Medical Journal Highlights The Difficulty Of Moderating 'Medical Misinformation' (9)
06:29 Court Ruling Paves The Way For Better, More Reliable Wi-Fi (4)
20:12 Eighth Circuit (Again) Says There's Nothing Wrong With Detaining Innocent Minors At Gunpoint (15)
15:48 China's Regulatory War On Its Gaming Industry Racks Up 14k Casualties (10)
13:31 Chinese Government Fines Local Car Dealerships For Surveilling While Not Being The Government (5)
12:08 Eric Clapton Pretends To Regret The Decision To Sue Random German Woman Who Listed A Bootleg Of One Of His CDs On Ebay (29)
10:44 ICE Is So Toxic That The DHS's Investigative Wing Is Asking To Be Completely Separated From It (29)
10:39 Daily Deal: The 2022 Complete Raspberry Pi And Arduino Developer Bundle (0)
09:31 Google Blocked An Article About Police From The Intercept... Because The Title Included A Phrase That Was Also A Movie Title (24)
06:22 Wireless Carriers Balk At FAA Demand For 5G Deployment Delays Amid Shaky Safety Concerns (16)
19:53 Tenth Circuit Denies Qualified Immunity To Social Worker Who Fabricated A Mother's Confession Of Child Abuse (35)
15:39 Sci-Hub's Creator Thinks Academic Publishers, Not Her Site, Are The Real Threat To Science, And Says: 'Any Law Against Knowledge Is Fundamentally Unjust' (34)
13:32 Federal Court Tells Proud Boys Defendants That Raiding The Capitol Building Isn't Covered By The First Amendment (25)
12:14 US Courts Realizing They Have A Judge Alan Albright Sized Problem In Waco (17)
10:44 Boston Police Department Used Forfeiture Funds To Hide Purchase Of Surveillance Tech From City Reps (16)
10:39 Daily Deal: The Ultimate Microsoft Excel Training Bundle (0)
09:20 NY Senator Proposes Ridiculously Unconstitutional Social Media Law That Is The Mirror Opposite Of Equally Unconstitutional Laws In Florida & Texas (25)
06:12 Telecom Monopolies Are Exploiting Crappy U.S. Broadband Maps To Block Community Broadband Grant Requests (7)
12:00 Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of 2021 At Techdirt (17)
10:00 Gaming Like It's 1926: Join The Fourth Annual Public Domain Game Jam (6)
09:00 New Year's Message: The Arc Of The Moral Universe Is A Twisty Path (33)
19:39 DHS, ICE Begin Body Camera Pilot Program With Surprisingly Good Policies In Place (7)
15:29 Remembering Techdirt Contributors Sherwin And Elliot (1)
13:32 DC Metro PD's Powerful Review Panel Keeps Giving Bad Cops Their Jobs Back (6)
12:11 Missouri Governor Still Expects Journalists To Be Prosecuted For Showing How His Admin Leaked Teacher Social Security Numbers (39)
10:48 Oversight Board Overturning Instagram Takedown Of Ayahuasca Post Demonstrates The Impossibility Of Content Moderation (10)
More arrow
This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it