How Petty Patent Fights Can Get: Samsung Upset That Apple Gets Top Billing In Patent Suit

from the oh-come-on dept

It’s pretty clear that when two big tech companies go into patent nuclear war, it’s often just as much about egos as it is about anything legal. We’ve been covering the worldwide patent fight between Apple and Samsung for a while now, mostly siding with Samsung over Apple’s silly claims which seem to demonstrate an unwillingness to actually compete against other viable products in the marketplace. But, Samsung is no stranger to petty actions either. According to reporter Ina Fried, from AllthingsD (who is apparently covering the latest round of the trial in San Francisco), on the first day, the sign outside the court just showed “Apple vs. Samsung”, but Samsung objected, and so the sign has now been updated:

Yes, this is the kind of petty squabbling that comes out during patent fights.

Filed Under: ,
Companies: apple, samsung

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “How Petty Patent Fights Can Get: Samsung Upset That Apple Gets Top Billing In Patent Suit”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment

The real problem here us that the US is putting 100s of billions of dollars in economic growth and in some ways the future of technological progress in the hands of 10 ignorant jurors and 1 clearly biased judge.

Obviously it goes to appeal at least once, but the outcome of the original trial plays a huge part in that, as do the jury instructions that Apple Fangirl Koh makes.

Good show US.


there isn’t one company that hasn’t ‘stolen’ an idea from another company, claimed that idea as their own and used it, and that goes for Apple as well. from what i’ve read, Jobs was one of the worse for stealing ideas from others and using in Apple products, using the financial muscle to stop legal issues. when the situation was/is reversed. however, there is no company worse for chucking out patent infringement law suits. in the end, the only losers are the consumers. if someone likes Apple, they buy Apple. if they like Samsung or another company’s product, they buy it. instead of this pathetic squabbling every 2 weeks, think about the grief donned out to customers. sooner or later, they get pissed off and swap loyalties anyway!



Samsung – being a Korean Company – is likely to be sensitive about these thing.

Consider the border between North and South. At the border post there are flags representing the two sides in the peace talks that still continue:


“Each side tried to upstage the other by bringing to the talks larger and larger delegation flags, eventually dwarfing the delegations. A set of standards resolved this conflict. Or did it?

“Theirs is slightly taller,” says Hilton, “but ours has a bigger width tip on top. The North Korean base is three tiers, but ours has two big ones, so it’s the same size. Their flag is longer, but ours is wider.””


Correctly Identifying the case, not "top billing"

Cases are always named as “plaintiff v defendant”. Apple is suing Samsung but Samsung is also counter-suing Apple. Samsung was not being petty in complaining about not getting “top billing”, they were complaining (and rightly so) that both the suit and counter-suit be identified.

Anonymous Coward With A Unique Writing Stylesays:

I believe they gave opening statements yesterday. I was reading about them on several websites. Apple’s boiled down to, “We have Samsung quoted as saying it was beyond easy to copy the iPad.” And Samsung’s boiled down to, “We are in court arguing about rectangles and who patented them first. How ridiculous is that?”

I’ll try and find some links when I have a chance.

Mr Maxsays:

You have it all wrong

The reason for doing this is massive publicity and to block sales…. u think they really care about who coppied who?

No… they don’t!

Bad publicity is still publicity and the only two companies left in the game are apple and samsung.

Yes they spend a couple of million fighting each other, but think about everything that is happening.

Also, in my opinion Apple wants to break the patent system and show how ridiculous it is. A change needs to happen, and it should happen soon.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Report this ad??|??Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Older Stuff
12:25 Australian Privacy Commissioner Says 7-Eleven Broke Privacy Laws By Scanning Customers' Faces At Survey Kiosks (6)
10:50 Missouri Governor Doubles Down On 'View Source' Hacking Claim; PAC Now Fundraising Over This Bizarrely Stupid Claim (45)
10:45 Daily Deal: The All-in-One Microsoft, Cybersecurity, And Python Exam Prep Training Bundle (0)
09:43 Want To Understand Why U.S. Broadband Sucks? Look At Frontier Communications In Wisconsin, West Virginia (8)
05:36 Massachusetts College Decides Criticizing The Chinese Government Is Hate Speech, Suspends Conservative Student Group (71)
19:57 Le Tigre Sues Barry Mann To Stop Copyright Threats Over Song, Lights Barry Mann On Fire As Well (21)
16:07 Court Says City Of Baltimore's 'Heckler's Veto' Of An Anti-Catholic Rally Violates The First Amendment (15)
13:37 Two Years Later, Judge Finally Realizes That A CDN Provider Is Not Liable For Copyright Infringement On Websites (21)
12:19 Chicago Court Gets Its Prior Restraint On, Tells Police Union Head To STFU About City's Vaccine Mandate (158)
10:55 Verizon 'Visible' Wireless Accounts Hacked, Exploited To Buy New iPhones (8)
10:50 Daily Deal: The MacOS 11 Course (0)
07:55 Suing Social Media Sites Over Acts Of Terrorism Continues To Be A Losing Bet, As 11th Circuit Dumps Another Flawed Lawsuit (11)
02:51 Trump Announces His Own Social Network, 'Truth Social,' Which Says It Can Kick Off Users For Any Reason (And Already Is) (100)
19:51 Facebook AI Moderation Continues To Suck Because Moderation At Scale Is Impossible (26)
16:12 Content Moderation Case Studies: Snapchat Disables GIPHY Integration After Racist 'Sticker' Is Discovered (2018) (11)
13:54 Arlo Makes Live Customer Service A Luxury Option (8)
12:05 Delta Proudly Announces Its Participation In The DHS's Expanded Biometric Collection Program (5)
11:03 LinkedIn (Mostly) Exits China, Citing Escalating Demands For Censorship (14)
10:57 Daily Deal: The Python, Git, And YAML Bundle (0)
09:37 British Telecom Wants Netflix To Pay A Tax Simply Because Squid Game Is Popular (32)
06:41 Report: Client-Side Scanning Is An Insecure Nightmare Just Waiting To Be Exploited By Governments (35)
20:38 MLB In Talks To Offer Streaming For All Teams' Home Games In-Market Even Without A Cable Subscription (10)
15:55 Appeals Court Says Couple's Lawsuit Over Bogus Vehicle Forfeiture Can Continue (15)
13:30 Techdirt Podcast Episode 301: Scarcity, Abundance & NFTs (0)
12:03 Hollywood Is Betting On Filtering Mandates, But Working Copyright Algorithms Simply Don't Exist (66)
10:45 Introducing The Techdirt Insider Discord (4)
10:40 Daily Deal: The Dynamic 2021 DevOps Training Bundle (0)
09:29 Criminalizing Teens' Google Searches Is Just How The UK's Anti-Cybercrime Programs Roll (19)
06:29 Canon Sued For Disabling Printer Scanners When Devices Run Out Of Ink (41)
20:51 Copyright Law Discriminating Against The Blind Finally Struck Down By Court In South Africa (7)
More arrow