Antigua Still Threatening To Launch Its WTO-Endorsed Legal Piracy Site, But We've Heard That Before

from the any-day-now dept

In a dispute that’s dragged on for over a decade, it appears that Antigua is, once again, making noises about how this time it’s really, really, really going to do what the WTO has said it can do: set up a legal platform to infringe on American copyrights as a form of official payback for the US clearly violating a trade agreement with Antigua by outlawing online gambling. We’ve covered this dispute and all its twists and turns for years, but the short summary is that Antigua won at every turn, even as the US tried to once declare victory where it had lost. The US even tried to just say it could unilaterally change the trade agreement, which is not how those things work.

Of course, Antigua is a small country, so how does it “get back” at the US after such a win, when it’s clear that the US doesn’t care at all about the WTO saying it violated the agreement? Well, some folks had the bright idea that perhaps Antigua could just violate American copyrights, and pirate their way to the equivalent value of what the US should be paying. That idea was first floated around 2006, and it seemed like a joke. However, it continued to gain steam. Of course, the real idea behind these sorts of things is that Antigua and the WTO hope that this will make the RIAA and MPAA go running to the US government and beg them to come to some sort of settlement in which gobs of cash are sent from the US Treasury to Antigua. It’s a well-known trick in trade wars: co-opt some powerful lobbyists who really shouldn’t have any dog in the actual fight, and get them on your side. It happens in trade disputes quite often.

Of course, in the years since the WTO first gave its stamp of approval to this plan, what we’ve seen is every so often, Antigua makes a public statement along the lines of, “Hey! we’re really going to do it!” and the US responds with “You’d better not!” and then there’s silence for a year or two, and the dance starts all over again. Apparently it’s time for that dance again, because Antigua is making very public that it’s really, no really (do you hear that USTR?) really, really, really planning to move forward this time. No, really. They even had a meeting about it. And they’re going to set up a body to “manage and operate” the platform. They also claim that they’ll soon let private companies bid on participating. And… of course, they knock the US for “failing to negotiate.”

I imagine that at some point the US will do another “Oh no, you’d better not!” statement, and then we’ll be waiting around for another six to nine months before Antigua insists that it’s really, really, no really moving forward with it this time. Really. Guys. Really. We mean it this time.

Filed Under: , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Antigua Still Threatening To Launch Its WTO-Endorsed Legal Piracy Site, But We've Heard That Before”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment

This is 3rd partly liability that you approve of!

The US is judged guilty by (the globalist) WTO (that US politicians empowered with criminally insane treaty that reduces US sovereignty to detriment of We The People with), and entirely un-involved MPAA and RIAA get their products stolen!

Then Mike and his grifter pals and the little pirates start hoping they can “legally” steal products made by US producers.

It’s perfect example of how destructive those globalist “treaty” organizations are, that’s all.


Re: Re: This is 3rd partly liability that you approve of!

@ AC: “If WTO approved and agreed for Antigua to infringe on US copyright as compensation for sanctions then you should take the matter up WTO instead of moaning and complaining on here which does absolutely nothing for your cause.”

Which is like MIke’s assertion: “The US even tried to just say it could unilaterally change the trade agreement, which is not how those things work.” — Both believe that US sovereignty — which is the People’s — are subject to an international organization set up by “treaty”. As I stated, that’s the danger and destruction that those “treaties” cause; it’s the intended effect of globalists and the politicians who sold us out.

Of late, the former US of A has engaged in illegal foreign wars and had its former reputation rightly damaged. Our politicians have been shipping jobs overseas, and corporations have profited enormously from exploiting foreign labor while still selling in the former US market. But that’s ending with the bankers inflating the US money supply by $85 billion a month. In every way, the former US of A has been hollowed out and disgraced. All by intent. — But that doesn’t make the “treaties” right! — Nor should you cheer at the US collapse, as you will not remain free for long after the biggest falls…

Nor is it, as practical matter, that the US must surrender to the diktats of foreign criminal bankers. That’s why I include Mike’s assertion here, and include him as actually cheering this. — The US can unilaterally exit ANY and every treaty! Still the most militarized nation on earth, kids. The US could flatten Antigua in a matter of hours, NOT that I advocate more than the current ignoring.

This In answer to the swarm of ACs — I really must stop commenting here, only provide impetus for invective — It’s the WTO which must go, NOT US sovereignty!

Re: Re: Re: Re: This is 3rd partly liability that you approve of!

America goes into many trade agreements but does not abide by them expecting everyone else to, the WTO manages to in some instances hurt the US and force them to abide by rules they have demanded, If the WTO was disbanded then every trade agreement between the US and other countries could be ignored, imports from the US could become huge tax generators for countries and US trade would probably drop to the lowest levels ever seen, so in some ways what you say should happen is good but also bad, depending on who’s side you are on.


Re: Re: Re: This is 3rd partly liability that you approve of!

No, the US break the trade agreement that give, among other thing, validity to the declarations of copyrights by the US in the sovereign country of Antigua. So now the US has to pay restoration or the US copyrights will not be valid in Antigua until Antigua recover its money.

The US can exit unilaterally the WTO agreement whenever it wants but then its copyright will has no value in the rest of the WTO countries.

The US can not CHANGE the WTO agreement unilaterally.

That One Guysays:

Re: Re: Re: Re: This is 3rd partly liability that you approve of!

Possible, but if they were going to change, they’d have done it long ago, when it became obvious their old way of doing business, that of acting as gatekeepers that determined every facet of the business, would no longer work.

More likely is the current crop of parasites will eventually die off, as more and more people shift to better options, and a new crop will emerge, willing to meet customers on more even footing.

Then of course after a while they’ll get complacent and rooted in ‘what always worked’, they’ll die off and someone else will replace them, and the cycle will continue…

That One Guysays:

Re: This is 3rd partly liability that you approve of!

If you’ve got a better idea as to how to force the US’s hand, and get them to cough up the cash from the judgement against them, please, feel free to share, as it’s abundantly clear nothing else will even phase them in matters like this, and given the ‘cozy’ relationship the *AA’s have with a number of politicians, something like this would certainly get their attention.


Re: This is 3rd partly liability that you approve of!

But the US has repeatedly ignored the WTO’s decisions in other cases. So from now on, regardless of the facts, the US government should always be sided against, on principle. They should be ostracised as much as possible.

Let’s not forget, for one second, that the US is NOT living up to its legally-bound obligations under treaties with anyone else – treaties that it directly influenced to have these clauses such that it could have a massive advantage in the marketplace.


Re: Re: This is 3rd partly liability that you approve of!

The conclusion from this is that the US are hypocrits. They push trade agreements on others to further their own interests but refuse to abide by them whenever it doesn’t suit. The rest of the world should take note and stop making agreements with the US until there is some evidence that the US will act in good faith.


Re: This is 3rd partly liability that you approve of!

It’s perfect example of how destructive those globalist “treaty” organizations are, that’s all.

No it’s a perfect of example of US hypocrisy. All in favour of these trade organisations and treaties when they benefit the US but the moment they find themselves on the receiving end of what they dish out to others all the time they throw a hissy fit and try to pretend it’s not happening.


Re: This is 3rd partly liability that you approve of!

OOTB- Do you still need a remedial lesson to explain that this is in no way any form of stealing, theft or any other nonsensical theory you are paid to shill for?

If so save your money and remember this, It will never be possible to steal 1s and 0s no matter how many times you click your heels together 🙂

cpt kangarooskisays:

Re: This is 3rd partly liability that you approve of!

Are there any treaties which actually accomplish something, yet do not reduce US sovereignty in a similar manner?

A mutual defense treaty allows us to be dragged into a war because someone attacks a different country. A trade agreement allows foreign countries to bypass or get more advantageous tax treatment for their US imports and exports. And so on.

In every case, we could just ignore the treaty the second it became inconvenient for us to honor the promises we made in it, but if you do that too much, people stop making treaties with you, and besides, the US only has sovereignty over what happens in the US; often the reason for treaties is to allow us some ability to affect matters outside our jurisdiction, and if we don’t live up to our side, the other parties don’t have to live up to theirs.

US copyrights only apply to works within US territory. If the authors of those works want a copyright that applies in Antigua, they have to go, hat in hand, to the Antiguan government, which may or may not decide to give them one, as suits their interests. Treaties like Berne streamline the process by obligating Antigua to grant Antiguan copyrights to US works, but this imposes on our sovereignty in the US by obligating us to grant US copyrights on Antiguan works, rather than letting us have the full discretion to decide case by case. The enforcement mechanism is that if one side stops fulfilling its obligations, the other side can stop just as easily, and we’re back to the old way of doing things.

The WTO streamlines international trade amongst members and has various enforcement mechanisms, the ultimate one being that a country is no longer in the WTO and no longer gets the benefits of it. And anyone can choose to drop out at any time. That we haven’t indicates that the US is still getting a better deal out of this than if we stood alone, our sovereignty completely intact because we refused to compromise on anything for any reason.

If we really don’t like Antigua pirating US works, and we also really don’t like Internet gambling with foreign countries, we can shut this down fairly easily by banning all Internet gambling, including domestically. That will undercut the Antiguan case. Right now we’ve lost because we tried to have our cake and eat it too; we have to pick one option instead.

All this having been said, I too am concerned about treaties prioritizing trade over environmental protection, labor protection, and other matters. But it’s probably better to change the treaties to accommodate those things then to push for isolationism. Given that we pushed the damn things through to begin with, often upsetting our trading partners, it shouldn’t be too hard to push through changes that will suit them better, and hopefully suit us better too now that we understand that it’s a two-edged sword.

Oh, and also, there’ll be no ‘stealing’ of anything. Antigua is out to make money here. They’ll print up copies and sell them side by side with official copies, up to the allowed limit. They aren’t just going to set up an FTP server and say ‘download away.’

Anonymous Howardsays:


You’re quite sarcastic, Mike, but what the fuck would you do if you faced the nation with the biggest military budget, and is known for bombing political enem… I mean Terrorists without a second thought?

Would you not thread carefully?

You’re mocking the little guy for not daring to whack the bodybuilder bully.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Older Stuff
13:40 It's Great That Winnie The Pooh Is In The Public Domain; But He Should Have Been Free In 1982 (Or Earlier) (35)
12:06 Norton 360 Now Comes With Crypto Mining Capabilities And Sketchy Removal Process (28)
10:45 Chinese Government Dragnet Now Folding In American Social Media Platforms To Silence Dissent (14)
10:40 Daily Deal: The 2022 Ultimate Cybersecurity Analyst Preparation Bundle (0)
09:29 A Fight Between Facebook And The British Medical Journal Highlights The Difficulty Of Moderating 'Medical Misinformation' (9)
06:29 Court Ruling Paves The Way For Better, More Reliable Wi-Fi (4)
20:12 Eighth Circuit (Again) Says There's Nothing Wrong With Detaining Innocent Minors At Gunpoint (15)
15:48 China's Regulatory War On Its Gaming Industry Racks Up 14k Casualties (10)
13:31 Chinese Government Fines Local Car Dealerships For Surveilling While Not Being The Government (5)
12:08 Eric Clapton Pretends To Regret The Decision To Sue Random German Woman Who Listed A Bootleg Of One Of His CDs On Ebay (29)
10:44 ICE Is So Toxic That The DHS's Investigative Wing Is Asking To Be Completely Separated From It (29)
10:39 Daily Deal: The 2022 Complete Raspberry Pi And Arduino Developer Bundle (0)
09:31 Google Blocked An Article About Police From The Intercept... Because The Title Included A Phrase That Was Also A Movie Title (24)
06:22 Wireless Carriers Balk At FAA Demand For 5G Deployment Delays Amid Shaky Safety Concerns (16)
19:53 Tenth Circuit Denies Qualified Immunity To Social Worker Who Fabricated A Mother's Confession Of Child Abuse (35)
15:39 Sci-Hub's Creator Thinks Academic Publishers, Not Her Site, Are The Real Threat To Science, And Says: 'Any Law Against Knowledge Is Fundamentally Unjust' (34)
13:32 Federal Court Tells Proud Boys Defendants That Raiding The Capitol Building Isn't Covered By The First Amendment (25)
12:14 US Courts Realizing They Have A Judge Alan Albright Sized Problem In Waco (17)
10:44 Boston Police Department Used Forfeiture Funds To Hide Purchase Of Surveillance Tech From City Reps (16)
10:39 Daily Deal: The Ultimate Microsoft Excel Training Bundle (0)
09:20 NY Senator Proposes Ridiculously Unconstitutional Social Media Law That Is The Mirror Opposite Of Equally Unconstitutional Laws In Florida & Texas (25)
06:12 Telecom Monopolies Are Exploiting Crappy U.S. Broadband Maps To Block Community Broadband Grant Requests (7)
12:00 Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of 2021 At Techdirt (17)
10:00 Gaming Like It's 1926: Join The Fourth Annual Public Domain Game Jam (6)
09:00 New Year's Message: The Arc Of The Moral Universe Is A Twisty Path (33)
19:39 DHS, ICE Begin Body Camera Pilot Program With Surprisingly Good Policies In Place (7)
15:29 Remembering Techdirt Contributors Sherwin And Elliot (1)
13:32 DC Metro PD's Powerful Review Panel Keeps Giving Bad Cops Their Jobs Back (6)
12:11 Missouri Governor Still Expects Journalists To Be Prosecuted For Showing How His Admin Leaked Teacher Social Security Numbers (39)
10:48 Oversight Board Overturning Instagram Takedown Of Ayahuasca Post Demonstrates The Impossibility Of Content Moderation (10)
More arrow
This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it