Verizon Finally Releases Transparency Report Showing Many Requests, But Scale Of Those Requests Is Missing

from the details-please dept

After quite a lot of pressure, both Verizon and AT&T agreed last month to issue transparency reports like those that Google has offered for years, and which most of the other large internet companies have started offering in the last year or two. Verizon released its first one today, showing that it’s pretty busy handling government requests. These are the numbers from 2013:

  • Suboenas: 164,184
  • General court orders: 62,857
  • Pen Registers/Trap & Trace: 6,312
  • Wiretap orders: 1,496
  • Warrants: 36,696
  • “Emergency requests” from law enforcement: ~50,000
  • National Security Letters (NSLs): between 1,000 and 1,999

The report provides some further explanation. For example, it notes that over half of the subpoenas requested customer info — i.e., the name and address of someone based on a phone number or IP address. Verizon does not say how often it refuses to provide information in response to a subpoena. In terms of getting access to content, Verizon notes that 14,500 of the warrants were for “stored content” which would be things like emails or text messages stored on Verizon’s servers.

Of course, what this leaves out may be more interesting than what’s included. While it lists the numbers for these requests, it gives no indication how many of its users are targeted. A single subpoena could, for example, request information on everyone. While that may be an extreme example, the point is that the number of requests doesn’t really tell you very much overall. Or, perhaps not an extreme example. This report doesn’t show, for example, what Verizon hands over under orders from the FISC under Section 215 of the PATRIOT Act and Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act. We already know that Section 215 has resulted in FISA orders for metadata on every Verizon mobile phone customers. That’s probably counted as one single “court order” in that big list above. Similarly, as has been revealed in the past, the NSA works with telcos to directly tap the internet backbone for information. Where is that included in the list above?

Point being, this isn’t all that “transparent,” because bare numbers don’t really mean that much.

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: verizon

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Verizon Finally Releases Transparency Report Showing Many Requests, But Scale Of Those Requests Is Missing”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
12 Comments
out_of_the_bluesays:

Oh, now it's bare numbers don't really mean that much."

But you’ve run puff pieces on Google going to court (with you implying it has “First Amendment right”) to be able to put out some numbers as if meaningful.

Here’s related examples — BOTH of which were censored by the free-thinking, dissent-welcoming, always-polite fanboys here at Techdirt:

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20131008/12415724799/tech-companies-lawsuit-over-transparency-concerning-nsa-surveillance-put-hold-due-to-government-shutdown.shtml#c20

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130909/13290924456/internet-companies-renew-fight-to-publish-data-nsa-requests-1st-amendment-grounds-say-news-reports-are-false.shtml#c155

“like those that Google has offered for years” — A subtle promotion for Google by contrast, but as I’ve said often and according to your last sentence above, Google TOO simply puts out unverifiable meaningless crap.


All the news you saw last week on other sites, re-written to cherry pick points that fit Mike’s agenda.

12:36:07[n-297-7]

FM Hiltonsays:

The heart of a phone record

That Verizon even gave any numbers is rather surprising, but the fact that they don’t give anything other than those is not.

I can be willing to bet that they probably do not refuse many of the requests, no matter what the numbers are.

Because they were given retroactive immunity from any kind of punishment by any group for invasion of privacy a long time ago. Why should they care what we think?

It’s just metadata, you know.

And that’s the scariest part.

Remember that next time you pay your phone bill. Your information is being shared with the feds. Every single bit of it.

Disgusting, isn’t it?

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter




Techdirt Deals
Report this ad??|??Hide Techdirt ads

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...
This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it