Aretha Franklin Doesn't Get Satire: Plans To Sue Satirical News Site Over Joke Story

from the sock it to me dept

You would think that, at some point, people are finally going to get that there are such things as satirical news organizations and that they’re not serious in what they write. Yet it seems not a week goes by in which someone isn’t either fooled by a parody story or railing against it as some kind of funny-demon that ought to be destroyed. The latest to be caught up in this web of barely-veiled humorous deception is the Queen of Soul, Aretha Franklin, who has threatened to sue satirical news site News Nerd over a fictional story about Patti LaBelle opening up a can of aged whoop-ass on her.

“The stories were not presented as satire or humor,” Franklin said through her publicist, Gwendolyn Quinn. “It was presented as a serious news story intended to depict me in a slanderous and derogatory way — defamation of character.”

And for that, she’s suggested she wants $10 million whole American dollars. The story that was not presented as satire or humor, according to Franklin, included such totally not funny or satirical lines as:

Onlookers say Labelle quickly removed her wig and earrings as she approached Franklin. Aretha, knowing that the removal of earrings is a tell-tale sign that a fight is about to ensue, attempted to prepare herself for the confrontation. Franklin was quickly struck with a Mayweather style right and left and stumbled backwards, landing awkwardly.

If you aren’t now laughing, check yourself into the nearest mental health center and ask them what happened to your sense of humor. If you don’t immediately realize that this is fictional, we, the people, politely request you promise us never to procreate and thereby poison the gene pool with your lack of basic comprehension and common sense. Or you could, you know, just check the bottom of any News Nerd page you might land upon, where it reads:

The stories posted on TheNewsNerd are for entertainment purposes only. The stories may mimic articles found in the headlines, but rest assured they are purely satirical.

And that should take care of that. It’s worth noting that no actual law suits yet appear to have been filed, so perhaps Franklin’s likely-frustrated lawyers have talked some sense into her. On the other hand, Franklin has been known in the past to demand respect, and that you think about what you’re trying to do to her. Meanwhile, the story has gone viral because of course it has, countermanding her wish entirely.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Aretha Franklin Doesn't Get Satire: Plans To Sue Satirical News Site Over Joke Story”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
15 Comments
Anonymous Anonymous Cowardsays:

Streisand Effect could make for good marketing

I can see a way where the Streisand effect was put into play, purely for marketing purposes. Maybe not in this case, but then maybe so. It has been said that there is no bad publicity. If, however, your light is fading, or has never shown, it certainly manages to shine a light. Of course, for it to have a positive impact, one must manage ones own histrionics.

weneedhelpsays:

I didnt think it was funny

“Onlookers say Labelle quickly removed her wig and earrings as she approached Franklin. Aretha, knowing that the removal of earrings is a tell-tale sign that a fight is about to ensue, attempted to prepare herself for the confrontation. Franklin was quickly struck with a Mayweather style right and left and stumbled backwards, landing awkwardly.”

Have you ever seen two African American ladies go at it? (I doubt it from your “If you don’t immediately realize that this is fictional… rant)
“If you don’t immediately realize that this is fictional”
Why? Its the way it goes… but they left out the shoes coming off.

You mean that disclaimer waaaaaaaaaay at the bottom of the page? Yes… because everyone always scrolls past the comments to read the bottom of the page. /s ๐Ÿ˜‰

“Franklin has been known in the past to demand respect, and that you think about what you’re trying to do to her.” – He he he… thats like a dad joke.

“It’s worth noting that no actual law suits yet appear to have been filed” – Her lawyers DID scroll to the bottom of the page.

Anonymoussays:

Malice??

If I remember correctly the burden of proof for actual malice towards a public figure falls to the plaintiff. Lots o’ precident.

As tacky as I think this particular satire is, in the long run it’s probably better to protect the freedom of the press. Like it or not, the rules regarding satire and libel change when you’re famous. I think it’s still pretty low and sleazy though.

The Old Man in The Seasays:

Funny? Not Funny?

Onlookers say Labelle quickly removed her wig and earrings as she approached Franklin. Aretha, knowing that the removal of earrings is a tell-tale sign that a fight is about to ensue, attempted to prepare herself for the confrontation. Franklin was quickly struck with a Mayweather style right and left and stumbled backwards, landing awkwardly.

If you aren’t now laughing, check yourself into the nearest mental health center and ask them what happened to your sense of humor.

It’s as humourless as much of your purported humour. Not funny, not even in a mean spirited way. Though I do have to say that one man’s humour is another man’s cringe.

However, the reaction of AF to the story is still so overboard that she will eventually rue ever making mincemeat out of it.

Ryuugamisays:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Funny? Not Funny?

You shouldn’t conflate “not funny to me” and “taking it serious”. You can take a story seriously and still think it’s funny. Similarly, as is probably the case with the GP, you can recognize a satirical story for what it is, but not consider it funny.

FWIW, I also don’t think that paragraph is particularly chuckle-worthy, and I’m very easily amused. It just doesn’t tickle my funny bone, as they say. I can still recognize the attempt at being funny, unlike the lady sue-’em-all up there in the article.

Annonimussays:

You are an asshole

“If you aren’t now laughing, check yourself into the nearest mental health center and ask them what happened to your sense of humor.”

Really? I should check my self into the nearest mental health hospital because I don’t find satire funny? Fuck you. I know what satire is, I have had to do a double check on some satirical stories to check if they were real or just satire, but I have not found a lot of funny things in satire in the last 5 years. That kind of humor is just not for me.

Suggesting that not laughing at satire is a mental health issue makes you an asshole that has no respect for the problems people with actual mental health issues face.

And before anybody jumps on this post, I agree that suing for defamation over a satirical joke that goes out of its way to be over the top and even outright states that it is complete fiction at its end is stupid and likely to only Streisand the entire joke into the public eye.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop ยป

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Report this ad??|??Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...
Older Stuff
12:25 Australian Privacy Commissioner Says 7-Eleven Broke Privacy Laws By Scanning Customers' Faces At Survey Kiosks (6)
10:50 Missouri Governor Doubles Down On 'View Source' Hacking Claim; PAC Now Fundraising Over This Bizarrely Stupid Claim (45)
10:45 Daily Deal: The All-in-One Microsoft, Cybersecurity, And Python Exam Prep Training Bundle (0)
09:43 Want To Understand Why U.S. Broadband Sucks? Look At Frontier Communications In Wisconsin, West Virginia (8)
05:36 Massachusetts College Decides Criticizing The Chinese Government Is Hate Speech, Suspends Conservative Student Group (71)
19:57 Le Tigre Sues Barry Mann To Stop Copyright Threats Over Song, Lights Barry Mann On Fire As Well (21)
16:07 Court Says City Of Baltimore's 'Heckler's Veto' Of An Anti-Catholic Rally Violates The First Amendment (15)
13:37 Two Years Later, Judge Finally Realizes That A CDN Provider Is Not Liable For Copyright Infringement On Websites (21)
12:19 Chicago Court Gets Its Prior Restraint On, Tells Police Union Head To STFU About City's Vaccine Mandate (158)
10:55 Verizon 'Visible' Wireless Accounts Hacked, Exploited To Buy New iPhones (8)
10:50 Daily Deal: The MacOS 11 Course (0)
07:55 Suing Social Media Sites Over Acts Of Terrorism Continues To Be A Losing Bet, As 11th Circuit Dumps Another Flawed Lawsuit (11)
02:51 Trump Announces His Own Social Network, 'Truth Social,' Which Says It Can Kick Off Users For Any Reason (And Already Is) (100)
19:51 Facebook AI Moderation Continues To Suck Because Moderation At Scale Is Impossible (26)
16:12 Content Moderation Case Studies: Snapchat Disables GIPHY Integration After Racist 'Sticker' Is Discovered (2018) (11)
13:54 Arlo Makes Live Customer Service A Luxury Option (8)
12:05 Delta Proudly Announces Its Participation In The DHS's Expanded Biometric Collection Program (5)
11:03 LinkedIn (Mostly) Exits China, Citing Escalating Demands For Censorship (14)
10:57 Daily Deal: The Python, Git, And YAML Bundle (0)
09:37 British Telecom Wants Netflix To Pay A Tax Simply Because Squid Game Is Popular (32)
06:41 Report: Client-Side Scanning Is An Insecure Nightmare Just Waiting To Be Exploited By Governments (35)
20:38 MLB In Talks To Offer Streaming For All Teams' Home Games In-Market Even Without A Cable Subscription (10)
15:55 Appeals Court Says Couple's Lawsuit Over Bogus Vehicle Forfeiture Can Continue (15)
13:30 Techdirt Podcast Episode 301: Scarcity, Abundance & NFTs (0)
12:03 Hollywood Is Betting On Filtering Mandates, But Working Copyright Algorithms Simply Don't Exist (66)
10:45 Introducing The Techdirt Insider Discord (4)
10:40 Daily Deal: The Dynamic 2021 DevOps Training Bundle (0)
09:29 Criminalizing Teens' Google Searches Is Just How The UK's Anti-Cybercrime Programs Roll (19)
06:29 Canon Sued For Disabling Printer Scanners When Devices Run Out Of Ink (41)
20:51 Copyright Law Discriminating Against The Blind Finally Struck Down By Court In South Africa (7)
More arrow