Aretha Franklin Doesn't Get Satire: Plans To Sue Satirical News Site Over Joke Story

from the sock it to me dept

You would think that, at some point, people are finally going to get that there are such things as satirical news organizations and that they’re not serious in what they write. Yet it seems not a week goes by in which someone isn’t either fooled by a parody story or railing against it as some kind of funny-demon that ought to be destroyed. The latest to be caught up in this web of barely-veiled humorous deception is the Queen of Soul, Aretha Franklin, who has threatened to sue satirical news site News Nerd over a fictional story about Patti LaBelle opening up a can of aged whoop-ass on her.

“The stories were not presented as satire or humor,” Franklin said through her publicist, Gwendolyn Quinn. “It was presented as a serious news story intended to depict me in a slanderous and derogatory way — defamation of character.”

And for that, she’s suggested she wants $10 million whole American dollars. The story that was not presented as satire or humor, according to Franklin, included such totally not funny or satirical lines as:

Onlookers say Labelle quickly removed her wig and earrings as she approached Franklin. Aretha, knowing that the removal of earrings is a tell-tale sign that a fight is about to ensue, attempted to prepare herself for the confrontation. Franklin was quickly struck with a Mayweather style right and left and stumbled backwards, landing awkwardly.

If you aren’t now laughing, check yourself into the nearest mental health center and ask them what happened to your sense of humor. If you don’t immediately realize that this is fictional, we, the people, politely request you promise us never to procreate and thereby poison the gene pool with your lack of basic comprehension and common sense. Or you could, you know, just check the bottom of any News Nerd page you might land upon, where it reads:

The stories posted on TheNewsNerd are for entertainment purposes only. The stories may mimic articles found in the headlines, but rest assured they are purely satirical.

And that should take care of that. It’s worth noting that no actual law suits yet appear to have been filed, so perhaps Franklin’s likely-frustrated lawyers have talked some sense into her. On the other hand, Franklin has been known in the past to demand respect, and that you think about what you’re trying to do to her. Meanwhile, the story has gone viral because of course it has, countermanding her wish entirely.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Aretha Franklin Doesn't Get Satire: Plans To Sue Satirical News Site Over Joke Story”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
15 Comments
Anonymous Anonymous Cowardsays:

Streisand Effect could make for good marketing

I can see a way where the Streisand effect was put into play, purely for marketing purposes. Maybe not in this case, but then maybe so. It has been said that there is no bad publicity. If, however, your light is fading, or has never shown, it certainly manages to shine a light. Of course, for it to have a positive impact, one must manage ones own histrionics.

weneedhelpsays:

I didnt think it was funny

“Onlookers say Labelle quickly removed her wig and earrings as she approached Franklin. Aretha, knowing that the removal of earrings is a tell-tale sign that a fight is about to ensue, attempted to prepare herself for the confrontation. Franklin was quickly struck with a Mayweather style right and left and stumbled backwards, landing awkwardly.”

Have you ever seen two African American ladies go at it? (I doubt it from your “If you don’t immediately realize that this is fictional… rant)
“If you don’t immediately realize that this is fictional”
Why? Its the way it goes… but they left out the shoes coming off.

You mean that disclaimer waaaaaaaaaay at the bottom of the page? Yes… because everyone always scrolls past the comments to read the bottom of the page. /s ­čśë

“Franklin has been known in the past to demand respect, and that you think about what you’re trying to do to her.” – He he he… thats like a dad joke.

“It’s worth noting that no actual law suits yet appear to have been filed” – Her lawyers DID scroll to the bottom of the page.

Anonymoussays:

Malice??

If I remember correctly the burden of proof for actual malice towards a public figure falls to the plaintiff. Lots o’ precident.

As tacky as I think this particular satire is, in the long run it’s probably better to protect the freedom of the press. Like it or not, the rules regarding satire and libel change when you’re famous. I think it’s still pretty low and sleazy though.

The Old Man in The Seasays:

Funny? Not Funny?

Onlookers say Labelle quickly removed her wig and earrings as she approached Franklin. Aretha, knowing that the removal of earrings is a tell-tale sign that a fight is about to ensue, attempted to prepare herself for the confrontation. Franklin was quickly struck with a Mayweather style right and left and stumbled backwards, landing awkwardly.

If you aren’t now laughing, check yourself into the nearest mental health center and ask them what happened to your sense of humor.

It’s as humourless as much of your purported humour. Not funny, not even in a mean spirited way. Though I do have to say that one man’s humour is another man’s cringe.

However, the reaction of AF to the story is still so overboard that she will eventually rue ever making mincemeat out of it.

Ryuugamisays:

Re: Re: Funny? Not Funny?

You shouldn’t conflate “not funny to me” and “taking it serious”. You can take a story seriously and still think it’s funny. Similarly, as is probably the case with the GP, you can recognize a satirical story for what it is, but not consider it funny.

FWIW, I also don’t think that paragraph is particularly chuckle-worthy, and I’m very easily amused. It just doesn’t tickle my funny bone, as they say. I can still recognize the attempt at being funny, unlike the lady sue-’em-all up there in the article.

Annonimussays:

You are an asshole

“If you aren’t now laughing, check yourself into the nearest mental health center and ask them what happened to your sense of humor.”

Really? I should check my self into the nearest mental health hospital because I don’t find satire funny? Fuck you. I know what satire is, I have had to do a double check on some satirical stories to check if they were real or just satire, but I have not found a lot of funny things in satire in the last 5 years. That kind of humor is just not for me.

Suggesting that not laughing at satire is a mental health issue makes you an asshole that has no respect for the problems people with actual mental health issues face.

And before anybody jumps on this post, I agree that suing for defamation over a satirical joke that goes out of its way to be over the top and even outright states that it is complete fiction at its end is stupid and likely to only Streisand the entire joke into the public eye.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop ┬╗

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...
Older Stuff
13:40 It's Great That Winnie The Pooh Is In The Public Domain; But He Should Have Been Free In 1982 (Or Earlier) (35)
12:06 Norton 360 Now Comes With Crypto Mining Capabilities And Sketchy Removal Process (28)
10:45 Chinese Government Dragnet Now Folding In American Social Media Platforms To Silence Dissent (14)
10:40 Daily Deal: The 2022 Ultimate Cybersecurity Analyst Preparation Bundle (0)
09:29 A Fight Between Facebook And The British Medical Journal Highlights The Difficulty Of Moderating 'Medical Misinformation' (9)
06:29 Court Ruling Paves The Way For Better, More Reliable Wi-Fi (4)
20:12 Eighth Circuit (Again) Says There's Nothing Wrong With Detaining Innocent Minors At Gunpoint (15)
15:48 China's Regulatory War On Its Gaming Industry Racks Up 14k Casualties (10)
13:31 Chinese Government Fines Local Car Dealerships For Surveilling While Not Being The Government (5)
12:08 Eric Clapton Pretends To Regret The Decision To Sue Random German Woman Who Listed A Bootleg Of One Of His CDs On Ebay (29)
10:44 ICE Is So Toxic That The DHS's Investigative Wing Is Asking To Be Completely Separated From It (29)
10:39 Daily Deal: The 2022 Complete Raspberry Pi And Arduino Developer Bundle (0)
09:31 Google Blocked An Article About Police From The Intercept... Because The Title Included A Phrase That Was Also A Movie Title (24)
06:22 Wireless Carriers Balk At FAA Demand For 5G Deployment Delays Amid Shaky Safety Concerns (16)
19:53 Tenth Circuit Denies Qualified Immunity To Social Worker Who Fabricated A Mother's Confession Of Child Abuse (35)
15:39 Sci-Hub's Creator Thinks Academic Publishers, Not Her Site, Are The Real Threat To Science, And Says: 'Any Law Against Knowledge Is Fundamentally Unjust' (34)
13:32 Federal Court Tells Proud Boys Defendants That Raiding The Capitol Building Isn't Covered By The First Amendment (25)
12:14 US Courts Realizing They Have A Judge Alan Albright Sized Problem In Waco (17)
10:44 Boston Police Department Used Forfeiture Funds To Hide Purchase Of Surveillance Tech From City Reps (16)
10:39 Daily Deal: The Ultimate Microsoft Excel Training Bundle (0)
09:20 NY Senator Proposes Ridiculously Unconstitutional Social Media Law That Is The Mirror Opposite Of Equally Unconstitutional Laws In Florida & Texas (25)
06:12 Telecom Monopolies Are Exploiting Crappy U.S. Broadband Maps To Block Community Broadband Grant Requests (7)
12:00 Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of 2021 At Techdirt (17)
10:00 Gaming Like It's 1926: Join The Fourth Annual Public Domain Game Jam (6)
09:00 New Year's Message: The Arc Of The Moral Universe Is A Twisty Path (33)
19:39 DHS, ICE Begin Body Camera Pilot Program With Surprisingly Good Policies In Place (7)
15:29 Remembering Techdirt Contributors Sherwin And Elliot (1)
13:32 DC Metro PD's Powerful Review Panel Keeps Giving Bad Cops Their Jobs Back (6)
12:11 Missouri Governor Still Expects Journalists To Be Prosecuted For Showing How His Admin Leaked Teacher Social Security Numbers (39)
10:48 Oversight Board Overturning Instagram Takedown Of Ayahuasca Post Demonstrates The Impossibility Of Content Moderation (10)
More arrow
This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it