Why Was The DOJ So Fearful Of Its Terrorist Watchlist Guidelines Being Made Public?

from the not-because-it-helps-terrorists dept

Having already discussed The Intercept’s publication of the federal government’s guidelines for declaring people terrorists to put on its various watchlists (including the infamous “no fly list”), it’s raising some serious questions about why the DOJ had been fighting so hard to keep these guidelines from coming out. As we’ve discussed, in basically any case challenging the various government watchlists, the DOJ has freaked out and claimed “state secrets” to try to get the cases thrown out entirely.

Just a few months ago, Attorney General Eric Holder directly claimed that revealing these guidelines would be helping the terrorists. In that legal filing, Holder does the “state secrets” dance and then says:


I agree with the FBI that the Watchlisting Guidance, although unclassified, contains national security information that, if disclosed, for the reasons discussed in the FBI’s classified declaration, could cause significant harm to national security…. If the Guidance were released, it would provide a clear roadmap to undermine the Government’s screening efforts, a key counterterrorism measure, and thus, its disclosure reasonably could be expected to cause significant harm to national security.

Of course, now that the Watchlisting Guidance is out, we can take a look and see if that’s actually true. And… Holder’s statements, not surprisingly, appear to be completely bogus. The Guidelines are so vague and so broad that it gives no real indication of how to get around them or whether or not any particular person is likely to be placed on the list.

What the guidelines do show, however, is the level of extra scrutiny people on the list are subject to. And, as we noted, much of that certainly appears to violate the 4th Amendment (or, at the very least, open itself up to a pretty clear 4th Amendment challenge in the courts). So, once again, it seems like Holder’s real reason to declare “state secrets” had little to do with “national security” and a hell of a lot to do with “DOJ security” in keeping its illegal and unconstitutional practices from further public and judicial scrutiny.

Filed Under: , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Why Was The DOJ So Fearful Of Its Terrorist Watchlist Guidelines Being Made Public?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
32 Comments
AricTheRedsays:

this revelation...

“…it seems like Holder’s real reason to declare “state secrets” had little to do with “national security” and a hell of a lot to do with “DOJ security” in keeping its illegal and unconstitutional practices from further public and judicial scrutiny.”

.gov guidelines are about as revelational as the ending of a Friday the 13th movie.

Shame on them!

Anonymoussays:

when anyone is up to ‘no good’, they want to keep things hidden. when a ‘governmental security force’, one that is supposed to be working for the good of the people, is up to no good, it will go to whatever lengths it must to cover that up, particularly if it has been doing something for a political individual or private industry!

Anonymoussays:

Re: Calling your bluff

How many techdirt posts have at least one commenter saying, “The time for revolution is now!” or “We need a revolution!”.

Empty words.

If you want to see real change, it is probably easier to affect change within the current system.

Now before anyone jumps all over that last statement, let me be clear: I’m not talking about calling your local representative or any of that nonsense.

I’m talking about trolling: Convert to Islam and start using the name “Eric Holder” as your alias.

Squirrels Without Borderssays:

If the Guidance were released, it would provide a clear roadmap to undermine the Government’s screening efforts, a key counterterrorism measure, and thus, its disclosure reasonably could be expected to cause significant harm to national security.

I think he is at least partially correct. It gives litigants a clear roadmap to [rightly] undermine the Government’s [illegal] screening efforts.

Anonymoussays:

Over classification is a drug addiction for government officials. They can’t get enough of it. Even discussions about over classification, are classified.

The real reason for over classification is secrecy. If laws and executive orders don’t full comply with the US Constitution, just keep those laws a secret.

If you’re blowing American taxpayer money left and right like a drunk sailor and using that money to spy on the very people funding the project. Just keep the Black Budget a secret.

Heck, even trade agreements are classified these days. If you’re attempting to bone people all over the world, by-passing their democratically elected representatives using international corporate tribunals. Just keep the trade agreements a secret.

Ruling from the shadows is so much easier. You can lie and deny everything… unless Edward Snowden comes along and starts shining a spot light round.

Anonymous Anonymous Cowardsays:

Parallel to that

Isn’t it obvious? He is using a parallel construction to prevent everyone from knowing about the parallel constructions where the Feds are telling LEO’s to lie in court about the sources that create the original parallels. If that does not work in state court, he just has the US Marshals steal the documents and remove them to a more cooperative, yet parallel federal facility.

Jasmine Chartersays:

Holder

Eric Holder is, like most of the current President’s appointees, the most incompetent person ever to hold the position he was appointed to.

And… yes… just this month, he played “the race card”… which like mentioning Nazi’s online… means you’ve already lost the argument.

If you can’t agree or disagree with someone’s philosophy, opinion, actions or otherwise without invoking race, or defend YOUR OWN philosophy, opinion, or actions without invoking race – then you’ve lost.

MonkeyFracasJrsays:

Re: race

Race is never a valid argument. Period.

I do not intend that point as an anti-racism argument. A person’s genetic ethnicity is WHOLLY IRRELEVANT. There are many cultural and societal differences among people, such as religious or financial background, access to education or relative learning ability (etc.), that may have strong bearing on a given situation. But to say that any of those cultural or societal differences are the strict result that a person is a member of any general genetic grouping is patently false.

“It’s not the color of a man’s skin it’s the man inside that you must know.” — Someone Said

Anonymoussays:

You have hit on the real reason already in the article. Time and again this has turned up to be the hidden purpose, is not National Security but rather the National Security requires this and that item to be secret to prevent exposure to just how badly the government has chosen to ignore the Constitutional protections granted every citizen and state.

The National Security card is a very easy and convenient way to remove cases from court without having to fight over it or reveal anything in the line of evidence.

Without exposure of just what they are doing, you can not bring a valid reason to court to fight it. When National Security doesn’t work, then stonewalling works pretty good to prevent it from coming out.

I am beginning to view the Obama administration in the same light as the Nixon administration. There’s just too much being hidden consistently, not to suspect there are some well hidden things going on that shouldn’t be. The more is revealed, the stronger my suspicions are. I dare say I am not the only one in this nation with this viewpoint.

ECAsays:

how many people in..

How many people in TOP positions have ANY training in that job??
After each name, All I tend to see is the word, LAWYER..which does not tell me if the person can Fill a bag with groceries..or balance HIS OWN check book.

i love the watch list..
A list of names, that could correspond to as many as 100 people..With no Identifiers as to the PERSON they are REALLY listing..
no picture, no finger prints, no descriptions..
JUST a name.. Thats like Yelling the name of a person in a MALL…”HEY BILL”, and 3-4 people turn to see who is yelling at them..

GEMontsays:

DOJ, doh!

“So, once again, it seems like Holder’s real reason to declare “state secrets” had little to do with “national security” and a hell of a lot to do with “DOJ security” in keeping its illegal and unconstitutional practices from further public and judicial scrutiny.”

Wow! Never saw that coming!

I mean…. hooda thunk it huh!!!

The Department of Justice, dealing in Injustice and Lying and Covering things up…. why, its enough to make one wonder just who the DOJ is actually working for and for that matter, exactly what their job really is.

Its pretty obvious who they’re working against, but its no longer readily apparent what their mandate actually is.

Too bad there’s no such thing as a Tax Strike.

You know, the kinda strike where everyone just withholds their taxes until such time as they get a legally binding assurance from the Most Transparent Administration In American History that no taxpayer’s money will be used to fund such agency corruption in future.

That’d really piss off the greedy bastards.

Sigh. Oh well, like Justice In America, a Tax Strike is a nice Fantasy to imagine.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...
This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it