Why Is The FCC Only Holding Net Neutrality Meetings In DC?

from the there's-a-big-country-out-there dept

On Friday, the FCC announced plans to host a bunch of “open internet roundtable discussions” as it continues to explore the rules that it will put in place. That’s a good idea… until you realize that all of the meetings will be held in Washington DC. And, of course, by doing that, it more or less guarantees that the space will be filled by lobbyists and friends, rather than the actual public. EFF is asking the FCC to get out of Washington DC and to talk to real people, rather than just telco insiders — pointing out that it’s done so before and can easily do so again. While I’m sure the big broadband players would still seek out “friendly” seat-fillers at any location around the country, getting the debate outside the beltway would do a lot towards actually getting a more honest discussion going.

Filed Under: , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Why Is The FCC Only Holding Net Neutrality Meetings In DC?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
28 Comments
Anonymoussays:

Anybody heard of the internet?

Duh, even if schedules are tight for the Very Serious People maybe they could use that internetty thingywob that they’ve probably (possibly, maybe?) heard of and have meetings via web presence.

Unless their internet bills are too high for them to afford anything over 384kb of course. Maybe they could set up a Paypal donations button.

That One Guysays:

Re: Re:

Given the issue affects everyone, not just those few that can travel to DC, yeah, something like this needs to be done on a larger scale.

Only having the ‘discussions’ in DC means the only people who will be able to attend, and give their opinions/arguments during the ‘discussions’, are those few who work there, or have the free time and money to travel there, meaning the public, those most affected by the ultimate outcome, are pretty much out of luck, and without a voice at the table.

‘In plain view’ means little when the idea is to discuss things and get differing opinions and arguments. Doesn’t do you much good to see what’s going on, if you can’t do anything to affect it.

Whateversays:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

Doesn’t do you much good to see what’s going on, if you can’t do anything to affect it.

They have these things called cars, planes, trains, and buses… all of them go to DC. Anyone who wants to go to that city can go, just like any other place in the US.

No matter what they do (short of going door to door all over the US), the meetings will always be somewhat away from some people. Moreover, going on a nationwide fact finding type mission tends to end up killing the point and turning it into self-supporting and self-justifying process with little in the way of real end of the line results. You can literally consult stuff to death.

Now, I would agree that they might want to have a session in Silicon Valley, as an example. Then again, most of those guys have the money and the time to go to Washington to whine, or are at least paying professional whiners (lawyers and lobbyists) to do it for them.

That One Guysays:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

‘Somewhat’ is quite different than ‘significantly’. By only hosting the meetings in one location, it will always be equally distant to people that might have otherwise been able to go, if there were meetings spread out over the country.

They wouldn’t even need to have too many, half a dozen would give them the ability to have meetings fairly spread out across the US, where if someone really wanted to go, odds are at least one of the meetings would be within a reasonable distance, such that people wouldn’t need to take a week off of work, find a plane, and all the fun that goes with that, but could instead drive.

Then again, most of those guys have the money and the time to go to Washington to whine, or are at least paying professional whiners (lawyers and lobbyists) to do it for them.

Certainly hope that in the interest of fairness you think the same of the ISP/cable companies and their ‘professional whiners’.

Whateversays:

Re: Re: Re:2 Re: Re: Re: Re:

Certainly hope that in the interest of fairness you think the same of the ISP/cable companies and their ‘professional whiners’.

I consider all professional whiners the same, regardless of their bosses. I think that people on all sides generally whine, rather than working to get anything done. So yeah, they are all about the same.

Michaelsays:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

They have these things called cars, planes, trains, and buses… all of them go to DC. Anyone who wants to go to that city can go, just like any other place in the US.

Unless, of course, you find yourself one of the large percentage of people on the terrorist watch list with no terrorist affiliations, then you can go f*** yourself.

Anonymoussays:

"Discussion" is code word for "corruption"

There is nothing to discuss. The rules needed to make the Internet be accessible to all websites and protocols equally, and to put into place punishments for ISPs that don’t deliver what they promise or that don’t obey that neutrality, is all that is needed.

You don’t sit down with a murderer and ask them how they would like to be punished, or how the laws pertaining to murder should be written.

TestPilotDummysays:

another catch 22; don't want to GO to DC cuz it's POLICE STATE

The Stateless District
Yeah, that will represent the public interest. Which State of people is being represented here?

aside: As a kid growing up, I would have LOVED to visit DC.

But today, I wouldn’t ever want to visit DC until all this unconstitutional crap is gone anyway. I want blue skys, and police who don’t look like STORM TROOPERS. Talking to congress right now is like finger painting with the enemy. Who knows when you might paint something wrong color and then they backstab ya with the NDAA or other crap.

Perfect for them. They’ll never have to waste their time listening to it.

Anonymoussays:

For all due credit, Washington DC is a common place for government organizations like the FCC to hold meetings. The location is also close to Ashburn, VA which is a major network hub on the East Coast and has many companies from Telecom to Service providers, so it will hopefully have both major sides of the debate.
Ideally, I would like to see them also hold a meeting or two on the West Coast, but as you stated it wouldn’t stop lobbyists from having a presence either way.

John Fendersonsays:

Re: Re:

“The location is also close to Ashburn, VA which is a major network hub on the East Coast and has many companies from Telecom to Service providers, so it will hopefully have both major sides of the debate.”

Sigh. You’ve overlooked the most important side of the debate: the people. There are more than two sides, you know.

Anonymoussays:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

How many comments were made to the FCC discussion? Now imagine trying to have a legitimate debate with over a million people, some of which would probably submit another Dishwasher manual. Not trying to sound critical, but it just seems almost impossible to include everyone with a vested interest. What is need is an educated debate on the limits of corporations and government and where the line is drawn. Perhaps a good webcast for the general public and allow public interest groups to participate (which I’m sure they are) would be a much more feasible answer.

John Fendersonsays:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

” it just seems almost impossible to include everyone with a vested interest.”

This is true. However, the approach that is being taken is to pretty much exclude the most important stakeholder completely. That doesn’t seem right, either.

I agree that this is a large problem. It could be solved if our government were actually functioning properly (so our representatives actually, you know, represented the people).

I have no short-term fix for this.

Anonymoussays:

Actually, it makes a lot of sense. There is no need for the government to waste millions of dollars (as you have often reminded us in the past) to travel all over the place to get public input, when the lobbyists and corporations will spend the travel costs willingly to get to DC if they’re not already there. Plus, you are assuming those DC lobbyists would not attend if the conference were elsewhere, which is not even close to a valid assumption. You can be sure that Comcast will be there, no matter where it’s held. I’m tired of hearing about government waste. Let the private sector fund the travel.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Report this ad??|??Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...
Older Stuff
06:31 DOJ Drops Ridiculous Trump-Era Lawsuit Against California For Passing Net Neutrality Rules (13)
06:27 The Wall Street Journal Kisses Big Telecom's Ass In Whiny Screed About 'Big Tech' (13)
10:45 New Interim FCC Boss Jessica Rosenworcel Will Likely Restore Net Neutrality, Just Not Yet (5)
15:30 Small Idaho ISP 'Punishes' Twitter And Facebook's 'Censorship' ... By Blocking Access To Them Entirely (81)
05:29 A Few Reminders Before The Tired Net Neutrality Debate Is Rekindled (13)
06:22 U.S. Broadband Speeds Jumped 90% in 2020. But No, It Had Nothing To Do With Killing Net Neutrality. (12)
12:10 FCC Ignores The Courts, Finalizes Facts-Optional Repeal Of Net Neutrality (19)
10:46 It's Opposite Day At The FCC: Rejects All Its Own Legal Arguments Against Net Neutrality To Claim It Can Be The Internet Speech Police (13)
12:05 Blatant Hypocrite Ajit Pai Decides To Move Forward With Bogus, Unconstitutional Rulemaking On Section 230 (175)
06:49 FCC's Pai Puts Final Bullet In Net Neutrality Ahead Of Potential Demotion (22)
06:31 The EU Makes It Clear That 'Zero Rating' Violates Net Neutrality (5)
06:22 DOJ Continues Its Quest To Kill Net Neutrality (And Consumer Protection In General) In California (11)
11:08 Hypocritical AT&T Makes A Mockery Of Itself; Says 230 Should Be Reformed For Real Net Neutrality (26)
06:20 Trump, Big Telecom Continue Quest To Ban States From Protecting Broadband Consumers (19)
06:11 Senators Wyden And Markey Make It Clear AT&T Is Violating Net Neutrality (13)
06:31 Net Neutrali-what? AT&T's New Streaming Service Won't Count Against Its Broadband Caps. But Netflix Will. (24)
06:23 Telecom's Latest Dumb Claim: The Internet Only Works During A Pandemic Because We Killed Net Neutrality (49)
13:36 Ex-FCC Staffer Says FCC Authority Given Up In Net Neutrality Repeal Sure Would Prove Handy In A Crisis (13)
06:27 Clarence Thomas Regrets Brand X Decision That Paved Way For The Net Neutrality Wars (11)
06:17 The FCC To Field More Comments On Net Neutrality. Maybe They'll Stop Identity Theft And Fraud This Time? (78)
08:56 AT&T, Comcast Dramatically Cut Network Spending Despite Net Neutrality Repeal (16)
06:18 Ajit Pai Hits CES... To Make Up Some Shit About Net Neutrality (24)
06:24 Mozilla, Consumer Groups Petition For Rehearing of Net Neutrality Case (22)
06:49 AT&T Exec Insists That No Broadband Company Is Violating Net Neutrality Even Though AT&T Is Absolutely Violating Net Neutrality (18)
06:45 Shocker: ISPs Cut Back 2020 Investment Despite Tax Breaks, Death Of Net Neutrality (61)
06:28 Ajit Pai Whines About The Numerous State-Level Net Neutrality Laws He Just Helped Create (47)
06:37 States Rush To Protect Net Neutrality On Heels Of Court Ruling (19)
06:21 Former FCC Boss Wheeler Says New Court Ruling Won't Stop Net Neutrality (14)
10:50 Court Says FCC Can't Stop States From Protecting Net Neutrality (63)
09:37 One More Time: Just Because The Internet Didn't Explode Doesn't Mean Killing Net Neutrality Was A Great Idea (45)
More arrow