Can Some Internet Memes Finally Get Congress To Pass New Legislation To Protect Your Privacy Online?

from the the-last-time-we-reformed-our-privacy-laws... dept

For many, many years, we’ve been talking about the need for ECPA reform. ECPA — the Electronic Communications Privacy Act — is an incredibly outdated piece of legislation from the 1980s that governs law enforcement’s ability to access email and other electronic communications. This was the era before the internet was anywhere close to the mainstream (though it did exist). Among the various weird parts of the law, it says that any communication that is over 180 days old and still on a server is considered “abandoned” so that the government can access it without a warrant. Think about that in this era when you keep all your communications online. It was written when lawmakers thought people would “download” the messages off a server. That’s just the most noteworthy problem — there are all sorts of different definitions based on messages that have been opened or not opened and other oddities as well, almost none of which make sense.

Last year we noted that more than half of the House was co-sponsoring a bill put forth by Reps. Kevin Yoder and Jared Polis to reform ECPA in a big way. But even with so many supporting the law, it failed to move. A big hurdle? Both the IRS and SEC (note: not your standard law enforcement agencies) like the fact that they can use ECPA to snoop through electronic communications (without a warrant — which those agencies can’t get on their own anyway).

Yoder and Polis are back again with another attempt, and it’s matched by a similar legislation in the Senate from Senators Patrick Leahy and Mike Lee. To get attention for the bill, Yoder, Polis and some other supporters took to Twitter in a bit of a meme fest, highlighting some historical facts to demonstrate just how long it’s been since ECPA became law. It’s worth scrolling through them all (though, there are a lot), because some are pretty funny:

At this point, it’s a complete travesty that such a bill hasn’t become law. People have explained the need for it for well over a decade, and more than half of Congress was signed on to co-sponsor it in the last Congressional term. Already this new bill has 228 additional co-sponsors in the House and another 6 co-sponsors in the Senate. The IRS and SEC’s objections are simply ridiculous. Having more convenient access to someone’s emails is no excuse for not better protecting the privacy of our online communications.

Of course, this isn’t the only effort going on to protect privacy. Reps. Zoe Lofgren, Ted Poe and Suzan DelBene have also introduced a bill to update ECPA. It’s pretty clear that Congress knows that the law needs to be updated, and it’s time to get past whatever objections there are and actually start protecting our privacy.

Filed Under: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Can Some Internet Memes Finally Get Congress To Pass New Legislation To Protect Your Privacy Online?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
21 Comments
That One Guy (profile) says:

No need to be polite

The IRS and SEC’s objections are simply ridiculous. Having more convenient access to someone’s emails is no excuse for not better protecting the privacy of our online communications.

Don’t call it ‘more convenient access’, call it what it is, ‘warrantless access’. That’s the real sticking point for the IRS/SEC, the ability to go snooping without leaving a paper trail showing just what they are looking for, or having to convince a judge that they have sufficient evidence to go browsing in the first place.

AJ says:

Horse before the Cart?

Before we go updating laws and adding new privacy protections, we should probably work on convincing our government to follow the laws we already have. Otherwise were going to go through all this only to have a secret court, in a secret courtroom, sign a secret document, that secretly gives the government the right to secretly ignore these new laws protecting our privacy.

I guess what I’m getting at is if the government can legally bypass the very laws that we create to stop it from doing what it’s doing, what use were those laws in the first place?

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: I'm sensing a recurring theme in the selected memes..

i don’t use twitter so i didn’t recognize where in the screenshot the originator was. thanks for pointing it out. i guess his head is not as fully inserted in his ass as i thought, which was based on the content of his newsletters. also, the 80s were apparently good for Kansas.

Anonymous Coward says:

i would have thought that there were two highly important things needed. first, Senators and politicians who are not being ‘encouraged’ to vote so security forces can remove all of your privacy and freedom. second have those Senators and politicians who are not being encouraged by the security forces to learn for themselves what it’s like to have their privacy and freedom violated, at the drop of a hat, with no recourse. perhaps then there would be a serious updating of the laws concerning not just email, but other on-line activity regardless of whether it’s via a computer, laptop, tablet or mobile phone!!

nasch (profile) says:

But even with so many supporting the law, it failed to move. A big hurdle? Both the IRS and SEC (note: not your standard law enforcement agencies) like the fact that they can use ECPA to snoop through electronic communications (without a warrant — which those agencies can’t get on their own anyway).

Since when does Congress have to do what executive agencies tell them to?

John Fenderson (profile) says:

Re: Quite generous considering...

So I can just take anything you own that you’ve had more than 30 days? Somehow, I doubt that. It probably has to do with physical property that is left in a public space or somesuch.

Old emails are not being left in a public space, though. They are being left in private accounts that have a clear owner.

andyroo says:

All i want is to know that nobody is allowed to access my email without a court order,and my email is deleted when i delete it, not 6 months or 5 years later. and even then I want to read that court order and let them know if there is a problem with it, I don’t want to have all my private communications monitored because some cop made a “mistake” with a warrant.
No bulk email monitoring ever allowed, ever.

If the nsa or fbi or anyone else wants to monitor my email they must charge me with a crime first only then can they monitor my email and most defiantly not have access to anyone else using that email address.
Nothing else is necessary no other rules or laws necessary , email is private communication.

Anyone abusing the system and monitoring me and not charging me must be punished to the full extent and not allowed to seek monitoring of any more email accounts this included removing access to the NSA or FBI if they abuse the system.

nasch (profile) says:

Re: Re:

All i want is to know…

I’m pretty sure none of that stuff you want is actually true. Six month old emails stored on a server can be read without a warrant. Your email provider can decide to keep your deleted emails if they want to. The FBI can get a warrant and monitor your email without you knowing about it. The NSA pretty much scoops up all internet traffic. Sleep well.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...