AP Uncovers More Than 100 FBI Spy Plane Flights, Originating From Shell Companies Located In Virginia

from the if-nothing-else,-FBI-lacks-the-imagination-of-the-NSA-when-naming-things dept

It’s not just the US Marshals Service flying spy planes over the US, loaded with cameras and/or cell tower spoofers. The flying “dirtboxes” of the Marshals came to light last year, and were swiftly neither confirmed nor denied by DOJ spokespeople, who also noted the flights that may/may not be happening are all perfectly lawful and very much not the now-(temporarily)-expired Section 215 program. (I am not making that last part up.)

Consequently, it comes as no surprise that another DOJ agency — the FBI — is doing the same thing.

The FBI is operating a small air force with scores of low-flying planes across the country carrying video and, at times, cellphone surveillance technology — all hidden behind fictitious companies that are fronts for the government, The Associated Press has learned.

The planes’ surveillance equipment is generally used without a judge’s approval, and the FBI said the flights are used for specific, ongoing investigations. The FBI said it uses front companies to protect the safety of the pilots and aircraft. It also shields the identity of the aircraft so that suspects on the ground don’t know they’re being watched by the FBI.

In a recent 30-day period, the agency flew above more than 30 cities in 11 states across the country, an AP review found.

The AP investigation tracked down documents relating to the FBI’s fleet of spy planes, ones that hide the FBI’s aircraft behind corporate registrations (i.e., not as easily traceable to the US government) and a variety of three-letter shell companies.

Here’s a screenshot of Cessna single-engine planes registered in the Bristow, VA area. (Bristow seems to be the “home” of federal spy planes.)

If this was just one name in a long listing, there would be nothing suspicious about it. But in a single page of search results, the following nonexistent companies can be found, all of them containing no more ownership information than a PO Box:

OTV Leasing
OBR Leasing
PXW Services
KQM Aviation
LCB Leasing
NBR Aviation
FVX Research
RKT Productions
NBY Productions
PSL Surveys
NG Research (an exception!)

A plane registered to PXW Services was spotted flying over Minneapolis, MN. The FBI may be able to hide its planes behind obviously phony companies, but it can’t keep its flight data secret. The flights show obvious surveillance patterns, rather than giving any appearance of “normal” behavior.

Despite the secrecy of the shell companies and the FBI’s hesitance to discuss its spy tech, the agency claims this is not a secret.

“The FBI’s aviation program is not secret,” spokesman Christopher Allen said in a statement. “Specific aircraft and their capabilities are protected for operational security purposes.” Allen added that the FBI’s planes “are not equipped, designed or used for bulk collection activities or mass surveillance.”

Except that mounting a camera on the plane (as seen on the FBI plane pictured in this article) or utilizing an airborne Stingray device provides the FBI the opportunity to do both.

And, as usual, the FBI notes that all of its operations are perfectly lawful, even if the public can’t actually verify for itself that this assertion is true.

The surveillance flights comply with agency rules, an FBI spokesman said. Those rules, which are heavily redacted in publicly available documents, limit the types of equipment the agency can use, as well as the justifications and duration of the surveillance.

Then there’s this:

The FBI asked the AP not to disclose the names of the fake companies it uncovered, saying that would saddle taxpayers with the expense of creating new cover companies to shield the government’s involvement, and could endanger the planes and integrity of the surveillance missions. The AP declined the FBI’s request because the companies’ names — as well as common addresses linked to the Justice Department — are listed on public documents and in government databases.

The fake companies used by the FBI can be “uncovered” through a simple Google search, which is how I arrived at the FAA’s listings late last week, before the AP’s story broke. (The line about the “expense” of dreaming up wholly-unimaginative “business” names and renting another block of PO Boxes is far too cute, though.) Sure, there’s nothing explicitly linking the two (until now), but if the public can be watched in public areas, so too can the FBI’s flights. All of this originated from tail numbers of planes seen circling overhead, the flight patterns of those planes and querying publicly-available databases. What’s good for the FBI (no expectation of privacy in public areas) is good for the public. The FBI shouldn’t be asking journalists to withhold publicly-available information, especially considering the only conceivable purpose it serves is to deprive the AP of evidence for its assertions.

Filed Under: , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “AP Uncovers More Than 100 FBI Spy Plane Flights, Originating From Shell Companies Located In Virginia”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment

Not terribly bright...

There would be a really easy way to keep this information from being exposed. All they would have to do is create actual legitimate aviation companies that offer aerial photography services to the public as a cover to their operations where the planes are used to fly their missions as well as some for the public. Fly enough for the public that no one suspects the company is a front for the FBI and the rest of the flights aren’t questioned.


Re: Re: Not terribly bright...

Soon to be in the air: Google Planes

Mission Statement: We are really only taking close up pictures of buildings for our 3D version of Google Maps (Note: please ignore the planes that continuously circle in one spot, as they must have had the sun in their eyes, or ran out of film and had to change the canisters, or used the wrong ISO, or pitched when they should have yawed, or fell asleep, or anything else but definitely not a government mission).


Re: Re: Re: Re: Not terribly bright...

Not what I said. Not contract existing companies. Instead of creating shell companies that do nothing, create companies that look like private companies that also do work for the public that supports their cover but are actually secretly fronts for their desired operations. Those companies could even make a profit in the market place.


Re: Re: Re:2 Re: Re: Re: Re: Not terribly bright...

…already well known and established company, no one would even give them a second glance…

Assuming said known and established company(ies) could obtain the required security clearance(s) AND sign some serious non-disclosure agreements.


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Not terribly bright...

I think you’re making the common mistake of assuming they give a rat’s ass what you or we think. They don’t need this to be secret. It’s just more convenient for them if it takes the like of AP or Tim to drag it out into the open.

Somebody needs to come up with an analog to that “minutes until nuclear winter” clock the atomic scientists have. Minutes until “1984” is in place and functioning; I put it at five, now that Congress let Sec. 215 lapse. It’s heartening, but we’re not out of the woods by any stretch of the imagination.


Re: Re:

Do I smell a Mickey Mouse citizen spying law coming down the pike (much like the Mickey Mouse copyright act)?

SCOTUS: The judgment stands that it is ok to spy on U.S. Citizens through private third-parties, and violate same U.S. Citizens Constitutions Rights, as long as it is done only for “limited times”.


You've spoiled the suprise...

The FBI asked the AP not to disclose the names of the fake companies it uncovered, saying that would saddle taxpayers with the expense of creating new cover companies to shield the government’s involvement, and could endanger the planes and integrity of the surveillance missions.

This is the stupidest statement ever, as the fact that everyone can hear their stupid planes circling overhead, and complain all the way up the chain until it even hits local news stations who can’t get any answers either.

This has been going on for years all across the country:







Plus, by using (allegedly) private companies, any metadata they collect was freely given to the (allegedly) third-party aircraft operating as cell tower spoofers, and as we all know any data given to a third party freely has no right to privacy collection from the government (at least according to them).


Re: Re: You've spoiled the suprise...

… any metadata they collect was freely given to the (allegedly) third-party aircraft operating as cell tower spoofers, and as we all know any data given to a third party freely has no right to privacy collection from the government (at least according to them).

We don’t yet really understand what Stingrays really can do. We know they force any phone which connects to them into 2G mode which is hackable.

Are they also hoovering off all the logs and metadata, personally identifying information, messages sent or received, and GPS data? We don’t know ’cause they aren’t talking. They leave it to us to speculate. I expect the worst, and hope for the best.


Sometimes I’m starting to think that the US is actually deeply afraid, of an enemy within, that is not the american citizenry, but that particular small nation by the Mediterranean near fields of death and war who are blackmailing America as a whole cos if not, they’ll go full Samson.

The tormented emulating their tormentors and becoming even more cynically evil than them is a story as old as world itself, isn’t it.

It’s the only reason sometimes to me that would explain all the extreme spying.


Semantic Error.

“And, as usual, the FBI notes that all of its operations are perfectly lawful”

Actually, based on your next block quote, that’s NOT what they said. They said that the flights “comply with agency rules.” So, whether the agency rules are lawful is the real question here, and it’s really anyone’s guess.


Re: Re:

Reminds me of a complaint about the spying and its subsequent revelations damaging therapy of paranoid schizophrenics because it confirmed their fears and lent credibility to persacuratory delusions. Beyond the realm of possibility even if the most pessimistic assumptions about government programs are taken as true.

Coyne Tibbetssays:

Simple question

A simple question to think about, based upon the flight data map above: How many foreign terrorists were the FBI watching in Minneapolis?

After you’ve thought about it for a while, those of you worried about foreign terrorists, it might occur to you that the FBI seems to spend a lot of time watching United States citizens and not much time at all watching foreign terrorists.


So its an open secret that the agencies dedicated to protecting americans are breaking the laws and making people less safe and yet fuck all is done about it.

maybe people will demand they be arrested or instead of waiting for someone else to do something about this, go and do it themselves before it gets to the point where police and other alphabet letter agencies start dragging people out of their homes for thought crimes against those in power.

It’s only a matter of time. This has happened so many times in history that it is pretty easy to see what will happen next.


The area they are circling is highly concentrated with Somalians. Unfortunately there has been a lot of concern about youth that have been influenced by ISIS in their community. I know a family friend who said the young man he was trying to help from Ethiopia felt torn because the mosque was preaching hate and mistrust of the white devils, while my friend had opened his house as safe place.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Report this ad??|??Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Older Stuff
12:25 Australian Privacy Commissioner Says 7-Eleven Broke Privacy Laws By Scanning Customers' Faces At Survey Kiosks (6)
10:50 Missouri Governor Doubles Down On 'View Source' Hacking Claim; PAC Now Fundraising Over This Bizarrely Stupid Claim (45)
10:45 Daily Deal: The All-in-One Microsoft, Cybersecurity, And Python Exam Prep Training Bundle (0)
09:43 Want To Understand Why U.S. Broadband Sucks? Look At Frontier Communications In Wisconsin, West Virginia (8)
05:36 Massachusetts College Decides Criticizing The Chinese Government Is Hate Speech, Suspends Conservative Student Group (71)
19:57 Le Tigre Sues Barry Mann To Stop Copyright Threats Over Song, Lights Barry Mann On Fire As Well (21)
16:07 Court Says City Of Baltimore's 'Heckler's Veto' Of An Anti-Catholic Rally Violates The First Amendment (15)
13:37 Two Years Later, Judge Finally Realizes That A CDN Provider Is Not Liable For Copyright Infringement On Websites (21)
12:19 Chicago Court Gets Its Prior Restraint On, Tells Police Union Head To STFU About City's Vaccine Mandate (158)
10:55 Verizon 'Visible' Wireless Accounts Hacked, Exploited To Buy New iPhones (8)
10:50 Daily Deal: The MacOS 11 Course (0)
07:55 Suing Social Media Sites Over Acts Of Terrorism Continues To Be A Losing Bet, As 11th Circuit Dumps Another Flawed Lawsuit (11)
02:51 Trump Announces His Own Social Network, 'Truth Social,' Which Says It Can Kick Off Users For Any Reason (And Already Is) (100)
19:51 Facebook AI Moderation Continues To Suck Because Moderation At Scale Is Impossible (26)
16:12 Content Moderation Case Studies: Snapchat Disables GIPHY Integration After Racist 'Sticker' Is Discovered (2018) (11)
13:54 Arlo Makes Live Customer Service A Luxury Option (8)
12:05 Delta Proudly Announces Its Participation In The DHS's Expanded Biometric Collection Program (5)
11:03 LinkedIn (Mostly) Exits China, Citing Escalating Demands For Censorship (14)
10:57 Daily Deal: The Python, Git, And YAML Bundle (0)
09:37 British Telecom Wants Netflix To Pay A Tax Simply Because Squid Game Is Popular (32)
06:41 Report: Client-Side Scanning Is An Insecure Nightmare Just Waiting To Be Exploited By Governments (35)
20:38 MLB In Talks To Offer Streaming For All Teams' Home Games In-Market Even Without A Cable Subscription (10)
15:55 Appeals Court Says Couple's Lawsuit Over Bogus Vehicle Forfeiture Can Continue (15)
13:30 Techdirt Podcast Episode 301: Scarcity, Abundance & NFTs (0)
12:03 Hollywood Is Betting On Filtering Mandates, But Working Copyright Algorithms Simply Don't Exist (66)
10:45 Introducing The Techdirt Insider Discord (4)
10:40 Daily Deal: The Dynamic 2021 DevOps Training Bundle (0)
09:29 Criminalizing Teens' Google Searches Is Just How The UK's Anti-Cybercrime Programs Roll (19)
06:29 Canon Sued For Disabling Printer Scanners When Devices Run Out Of Ink (41)
20:51 Copyright Law Discriminating Against The Blind Finally Struck Down By Court In South Africa (7)
More arrow