Loretta Lynch Essentially Says The Ferguson Effect Is Bullshit

from the no-kidding dept

I have to be honest: I have no idea how this whole “Ferguson Effect” became a thing. The general claim by those touting the theory is that, after the backlash over the Michael Brown shooting and several other high-profile deaths at the hands of law enforcement, police are so fearful of the general public that they are no longer taking the risks necessary to do their jobs properly, which is resulting in an uptick in violent crime in several major cities. It’s a fascinating theory in that it is so often promoted by those who claim to be champions of the police, even as the theory itself claims that police are abdicating their primary responsibilities. As with any good theory built to draw on division and emotion, it only helps that this theory is essentially made up of a combination of anecdotal evidence and the simplistic reading of statistics without context.

Now, I won’t go so far as to say that anecdotal evidence is entirely worthless. Testimony, after all, is a form of evidence. But those touting the theory so vociferously ought to be able to point to some kind of empirical data as opposed to the rumor mill. Unfortunately, as US Attorney General Loretta Lynch indicated before the House Judiciary Committee, no such data-based evidence for the Ferguson Effect exists.

US attorney general Loretta Lynch said on Tuesday there was “no data” to support the idea that law enforcement officers are policing less aggressively because of increased scrutiny of their tactics following a series of highly publicized killings mostly of black men. Lynch spoke during a House judiciary committee hearing on Tuesday and discussed the controversial theory, termed the “Ferguson effect”, in the wake of the fatal police shooting of unarmed black teenager Michael Brown in the Missouri city last year.

“While certainly there may be anecdotal evidence there, as all have noted, there’s no data to support it,” she said during an oversight hearing on the Justice Department held by the committee.

Now, I’m sure nobody would want to suggest that we make policy in a climate completely lacking data for that policy, so this really should table any discussion of the Ferguson Effect pending any actual, you know, data coming to light. What data is available suggests that major cities in America, and indeed America as a whole, have ridden a downward trend in violent crime for at least a decade. In that context, a regression to the mean in violent crime shouldn’t be treated as particularly extraordinary. Crime can’t always trend downward ad infinitum, after all, and it would be trivially easy to associate any uptick in violence with whatever the news of the day might be. Which is exactly what’s happening.

Yet this doesn’t work in the other direction. Violence in media, for instance, has been on the rise at the same time as the general downward trend in violent crime, yet few want to argue there’s a correlation there. Why? There’s no real hard data to suggest that a correlation exists. We ought to treat purveyors of the Ferguson Effect theory the same way. It’s not enough to claim that police are too scared to do their jobs properly; they have to show their work.

Filed Under: , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Loretta Lynch Essentially Says The Ferguson Effect Is Bullshit”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
32 Comments
Anonymoussays:

Re: Re: Pedantically,

I thought the “Ferguson Effect” was more of a threat issued by certain groups that like the militarization of the police, as in” let us continue to kill indiscriminately with no consequences or we won’t do the job you pay us for” only, you know, changing the words to try to make it sound reasonable. Not that it ever could

The Groove Tigersays:

Re: Re: Pedantically,

Agreed.

An hypothesis would first need an observation. Like “crime is going up” and “police enforcement is becoming lax”, then formulate that maybe scrutiny is causing it. A theory would be a confirmation that the evidence supports the hypothesis enough and be peer reviewed.

But if there’s not data of those things even happening (other than expressions of butthurt policemen) we can’t even move into hypothesis.

tqksays:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Pedantically,

But if there’s not data of those things even happening (other than expressions of butthurt policemen) we can’t even move into hypothesis.

I’m sensing a trend. Ted Koppel can write a book based around nothing but talking points from Beltway politicians, and Amazon gives it a glowing review. Is this somebody’s crazy agenda at work, or are they just fools? Hard to tell sometimes.

Anonymoussays:

Re: Re:

If police are suddenly re-thinking their actions and changing behaviour then they must have realized their past actions are wrong. If what they have been doing is ok, there would be no reason for them to change.

So if there is this Ferguson Effect it only means that cops have realized the era of no accountability is over and are changing their tactics for the better to avoid ending up in jail themselfs.

orbitalinsertionsays:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

I don’t think they are so likely to change along those reasons, nor are they likely to be held very much more accountable in the near future.

If there is some back-off effect in actual policing, it isn’t due to their fear, it’s because they want to be jerks.

If there were a realization that they were more accountable, should such a thing actually be true, they wouldn’t be backing off from “aggressively policing”, but merely “policing with aggression”. Which is not what the claimed Ferguson Effect is, and doesn’t appear to be happening, either.

Anonymoussays:

“Now, I’m sure nobody would want to suggest that we make policy in a climate completely lacking data for that policy, so this really should table any discussion of the Ferguson Effect pending any actual, you know, data coming to light. “

Sure people want to suggest that we make policy in a climate completely lacking data all the time. That’s how we ended up in Iraq.

tqksays:

Re: Re:

My question is how many police officer’s commitment to protecting communities and desire to uphold law can be so easily undermined by a camera?

… which their politician employers are bending over backward to ensure none of that footage ever sees the light of day. Why would the cops be threatened by something nobody’s ever going to get to see? I smell paranoia, and police unions.

Just do your damned job, and re-read the constitution, ffs. You know, that thing you swore to defend?

Groakersays:

Some 60K soldiers were killed, 500K wounded in the Vietnam theater during that “little war.” 5M were present. So there was a 1.2% of dying, a 10% chance of being wounded. Many of these soldiers were draftees, or enlisted to avoid the draft. LBJ ended grad school deferments destroying life ambitions. Marriages were destroyed by long separations. For pay that was ridiculous.

Today’s cops have talked themselves into a belief that there is a war against them when the death rate of cops is about 100 per year — less than 1/5 that of taxicab drivers.

They are a bunch of self serving wusses who bully the defenseless, empire building and power seeking wretches.

Anonymoussays:

No correlation whatsoever

…Violence in media, for instance, has been on the rise at the same time as the general downward trend in violent crime, yet few want to argue there’s a correlation there…

I’ve seen stories that teen (and/or unwanted) pregnancies are down. Does that mean sex in the media has gone up?

See: I can correlate with the best of them. Can I correlate correctly? That’s another story ๐Ÿ™‚

John Ravensays:

Who Watches the Watchers

Let’s face it, there are dirty cops. It’s human nature – there’s dirty people in EVERY profession. The problem is the “fraternity” of police and the police unions make it difficult – if not outright impossible – to eliminate the bad apples.

I know some great cops – heck, my uncle’s a deputy sheriff and my grandfather was a sheriff. I also have a friend who had to quite a local police force after he wouldn’t do drugs – since all the other officers on the force (about a dozen) did drugs and that was his “initiation”.

The “don’t rat” concept is fine for criminals, but it is NOT fine for people who should be upholding the law. There is no place for criminals, bigots or bullies in the police force and as long as they REFUSE to police themselves, then they can expect that the sins of few will reflect on ALL.

tqksays:

Re: Re:

Fire them all.

The last stat I read was about 10% of them were dirty. If the 90% would do something about the 10%, we wouldn’t be talking about this.

Every prospective cop hire should be forced to watch Serpico. This isn’t a new problem, and body-cams have nothing to do with it.

Okay, fire all of NYPD maybe. They’ve always lionized dirty.

seedeeveesays:

Ferguson effect or just lazy

I know that here in San Jose the cops are just lazy and will tell you to your face they are not going to do shit until the city council gives them more money.

The only crimes they will “investigate” will be ones that have bodily injuries. NO blood no help. They, in all intents and purposes, are encouraging criminals so that they can get their %90 pensions and overstaffed department back.

Pronouncesays:

One Possible Data Point

I didn’t know that this was called the Ferguson Effect, but let me pass along what the school resource officer told my wife when she asked him about the uptick in gang related shootings that our nurse son is seeing in the trauma unit at the local hospital.

The officer said that in the past police administration allowed them to do random searches of known gang members, and the shooters knew this, and so wouldn’t carry guns on them. Now police administration is telling officers to not even touch a gang member, and the gang members know this and all of them are carrying guns.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop ยป

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Report this ad??|??Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...
Older Stuff
12:25 Australian Privacy Commissioner Says 7-Eleven Broke Privacy Laws By Scanning Customers' Faces At Survey Kiosks (6)
10:50 Missouri Governor Doubles Down On 'View Source' Hacking Claim; PAC Now Fundraising Over This Bizarrely Stupid Claim (45)
10:45 Daily Deal: The All-in-One Microsoft, Cybersecurity, And Python Exam Prep Training Bundle (0)
09:43 Want To Understand Why U.S. Broadband Sucks? Look At Frontier Communications In Wisconsin, West Virginia (8)
05:36 Massachusetts College Decides Criticizing The Chinese Government Is Hate Speech, Suspends Conservative Student Group (71)
19:57 Le Tigre Sues Barry Mann To Stop Copyright Threats Over Song, Lights Barry Mann On Fire As Well (21)
16:07 Court Says City Of Baltimore's 'Heckler's Veto' Of An Anti-Catholic Rally Violates The First Amendment (15)
13:37 Two Years Later, Judge Finally Realizes That A CDN Provider Is Not Liable For Copyright Infringement On Websites (21)
12:19 Chicago Court Gets Its Prior Restraint On, Tells Police Union Head To STFU About City's Vaccine Mandate (158)
10:55 Verizon 'Visible' Wireless Accounts Hacked, Exploited To Buy New iPhones (8)
10:50 Daily Deal: The MacOS 11 Course (0)
07:55 Suing Social Media Sites Over Acts Of Terrorism Continues To Be A Losing Bet, As 11th Circuit Dumps Another Flawed Lawsuit (11)
02:51 Trump Announces His Own Social Network, 'Truth Social,' Which Says It Can Kick Off Users For Any Reason (And Already Is) (100)
19:51 Facebook AI Moderation Continues To Suck Because Moderation At Scale Is Impossible (26)
16:12 Content Moderation Case Studies: Snapchat Disables GIPHY Integration After Racist 'Sticker' Is Discovered (2018) (11)
13:54 Arlo Makes Live Customer Service A Luxury Option (8)
12:05 Delta Proudly Announces Its Participation In The DHS's Expanded Biometric Collection Program (5)
11:03 LinkedIn (Mostly) Exits China, Citing Escalating Demands For Censorship (14)
10:57 Daily Deal: The Python, Git, And YAML Bundle (0)
09:37 British Telecom Wants Netflix To Pay A Tax Simply Because Squid Game Is Popular (32)
06:41 Report: Client-Side Scanning Is An Insecure Nightmare Just Waiting To Be Exploited By Governments (35)
20:38 MLB In Talks To Offer Streaming For All Teams' Home Games In-Market Even Without A Cable Subscription (10)
15:55 Appeals Court Says Couple's Lawsuit Over Bogus Vehicle Forfeiture Can Continue (15)
13:30 Techdirt Podcast Episode 301: Scarcity, Abundance & NFTs (0)
12:03 Hollywood Is Betting On Filtering Mandates, But Working Copyright Algorithms Simply Don't Exist (66)
10:45 Introducing The Techdirt Insider Discord (4)
10:40 Daily Deal: The Dynamic 2021 DevOps Training Bundle (0)
09:29 Criminalizing Teens' Google Searches Is Just How The UK's Anti-Cybercrime Programs Roll (19)
06:29 Canon Sued For Disabling Printer Scanners When Devices Run Out Of Ink (41)
20:51 Copyright Law Discriminating Against The Blind Finally Struck Down By Court In South Africa (7)
More arrow