German Court Insults Free Speech, Bans Comedian From Mocking Turkish President

from the oh-come-on dept

The weird saga of the insanely thin-skinned Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan continues. As you’ll recall, he’s on a legal crusade against a German comedian who recited a purposely ridiculous insulting poem about Erdogan on TV (as a response to the stories about Erdogan’s thin skin). Erdogan’s lawyers found a little used (and little known) “lese majeste” law on the German legal books that makes it a crime to insult representatives of foreign nations. The comedian, Jan Bohmermann, admits that the poem in question was over the top, but that was the point. When you hear about a foreign leader spending so much effort on trying to sue anyone who insulted him, no matter how slight, it’s actually pretty tempting to add to the pile of insults.

For ridiculous geopolitical reasons, German Chancellor Angela Merkel has allowed the case to move forward, and now a Hamburg court has told Bohmermann that he has to stop repeating at least some of the poem so as not to offend the sensitive ears of Erdogan:


In Tuesday’s ruling the court found that “Erdogan does not have to put up with the expression of certain passages in view of their outrageous content attacking (his) honour.”

Why not? While it may sound flip, it’s a serious question. He’s the leader of a country of almost 80 million people. Shouldn’t we be at least a little concerned that he apparently turns into a cowering puddle of emotions the second people make fun of him? Most people put up with other people insulting them just fine, and we aren’t leaders of a major nation state. Why is a German court so willing to toss out any basic free speech rights around satire just to please a foreign leader who can’t take a joke?

The court didn’t ban the entire poem, but even just picking what can and can’t be said seems like a ridiculous thing for a court to be involved with at all:


The court ruled that only six lines of the 24-line poem by German comedian Jan Boehmermann could be recited, offering the Turkish leader a partial legal victory.

What a shameful ruling for Germany.

Filed Under: , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “German Court Insults Free Speech, Bans Comedian From Mocking Turkish President”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
44 Comments
Anonymoussays:

Re:

Already done:

http://justiz.hamburg.de/contentblob/6103298/6b1b7ae264e23809630af9d7716ef2fd/data/schmaehgedicht-jan-boehmermann-pdfanhang.pdf

The legal parts (well, legal according to the Hamburg court, which is kinda notorius):
– “dumb as a bag” (“Sod-dumb” seems to be what most translators agreed on)
– craven
– prude
– beating girls while wearing rubber masks
– Repressing minorities
– kicking Kurds
– hitting Christians

Illegal among others is the line “that is Recep Erdogan, the Turkish president”. Which I agree is extremely insulting to the poor people of Turkey.

Bergmansays:

Well in honor of the differences between the US and Germany...

Sod-dumb, cowardly and hesitant/ Is Erdogan the President/ His boner smells like D?ner/ Even a pig’s fart smells finer/ He’s the man who punches girls/ while wearing a bloody rubber mask/ Things he loves the most/ is shagging goats/ and oppressing minorities This kind of criticism would be illegal! Kicking Kurds, beating up Christians/ while watching child porn/ And in the evening instead of a nap/ Fellatio with a hundred sheep/ Erdogan is all things considered/ a President with a tiny wang/ I repeat this is an example of what would be illegal!

Anonymoussays:

“The court ruled that only six lines of the 24-line poem by German comedian Jan Boehmermann could be recited, offering the Turkish leader a partial legal victory.”

So, he’s still allowed to insult him, but only a little?
This is both an affront to free speech AND not much of a victory for Erdogen.

With this 3/4 of a silencing, does Erdogen now consider his diginity 3/4 restored? Is he only 1/4 of a thin-skinned prick now?

Anonymoussays:

Re:

Ir is kind of ridiculous to ban part of a work. Also, by only providing a snippet the court is using the same trick as media producers have used to sell products for years: Provide a taste to present something and people will be curious about the whole.

As for Erdogan it is all kinds of a pyrrhic win when it comes to the publication of the poem. I hope the judge is laughing at the irony of the judgement too!

Arthur Mooresays:

Re: But it is the LAW!

Germany doesn’t have the 1st Amendment, but they are part of the EU, which has some free speech protections.

It is the primary duty of every US judge to determine if a law is in compliance with the constitution. This was deliberately set up as a check and balance to prevent a simple majority from becoming tyrannical.

From things like this it certainly looks like German judges don’t have that ability.

DBsays:

The situation is a little more complex.

The chancellor has to agree to the prosecution. Which almost never happens. But right now Germany really needs Turkish help with the refugee crisis.

This is basically the court (and the government) saying “yes, we have to prosecute you because of politics. Here is the lightest possible wrist slap, and some free publicity for your trouble.”

Anonymoussays:

Is this the poem?

If so, it might describe Erdogan!

Sod-dumb, cowardly and hesitant/ Is Erdogan the President/ His boner smells like D?ner/ Even a pig’s fart smells finer/ He’s the man who punches girls/ while wearing a bloody rubber mask/ Things he loves the most/ is shagging goats/ and oppressing minorities This kind of criticism would be illegal! Kicking Kurds, beating up Christians/ while watching child porn/ And in the evening instead of a nap/ Fellatio with a hundred sheep/ Erdogan is all things considered/ a President with a tiny wang/ I repeat this is an example of what would be illegal!

Avatar28says:

Re: The actual poem

A couple of people have said this is (or may be) it:

Sod-dumb, cowardly and hesitant/ Is Erdogan the President/ His boner smells like D?ner/ Even a pig’s fart smells finer/ He’s the man who punches girls/ while wearing a bloody rubber mask/ Things he loves the most/ is shagging goats/ and oppressing minorities This kind of criticism would be illegal! Kicking Kurds, beating up Christians/ while watching child porn/ And in the evening instead of a nap/ Fellatio with a hundred sheep/ Erdogan is all things considered/ a President with a tiny wang/ I repeat this is an example of what would be illegal!

Anonymoussays:

Re: The actual poem

Dear M. Chermside, there you go. Signed, internet:
Jan B?hmermann – Schm?hgedicht / Schm?hkritik – Original – HD
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x452lof

German original. The actual satire starts at about 2:40 with “that is something you can’t do in Germany”. If it gets deleted search for the name without the “-“, “/” and “HD”.

Dave Cortrightsays:

Inanity like this just makes me want to hack the system

And by hack, I mean try out a bunch of different techniques to see what is allowed and what isn’t. First up, the asserting negative statements about topics that still ultimately brings up the topic and associates it with the person in question. For example:

Tayyip Erdogan is most definitely not a weak-minded, emotional tyrant who cannot effectively manage his own, pathetic life let alone an entire nation. And he isn’t one of those twisted sexual deviants who gets off on suck sweaty goat balls.

Or how about the “don’t shoot the messenger” technique?

I overheard other people saying Tayyip Erdogan is a immature, cantankerous, poopy face who has no tolerance for criticism. I don’t necessarily agree with them, but to each his own I suppose

censorship is damage to the system. route around it.

That One Guysays:

Objection!

In Tuesday’s ruling the court found that “Erdogan does not have to put up with the expression of certain passages in view of their outrageous content attacking (his) honour.”

You can’t harm something that doesn’t exist, and as such it’s impossible for any poem, words or action to attack or harm Erdogan’s ‘honor’.

Jeff Greensays:

It isn't always quite that simple ...

Personally I’m all in favour of free speech, BUT, it isn’t always that simple. I haven’t read the judgement in detail (my German’s not that good) but have seen a few summaries. What the court appears to have said is that makind fun of Erdogan being an egomaniac suppressor of criticism and the free press, but it isn’t OK to make totally unsubstantiated allegations of extreme sexual deviancy.
This is not a judgement I would make but I can see it as not totally unreasonable. As Americans you idolise free speech. That is your right but many others around the World think of Americans as totally weird and stupidly childish for parts of your law and constitution. The glory of this World is that we are all different and there is no right answer, merely millions of differently wrong ones.

Andreassays:

It is not a shameful ruling for Germany. It is a shameful law for Germany. The judge has to judge based on the laws that exist, and this law is totally outdated. Germany takes pride and having a very good balance of powers and it is good that no one is above the law.

But yeah, German law has so many paragraphs, some dating back 120 years afaik. So the legislation needs to speed up in updating from 19th -> 21st century.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...
Older Stuff
13:40 It's Great That Winnie The Pooh Is In The Public Domain; But He Should Have Been Free In 1982 (Or Earlier) (35)
12:06 Norton 360 Now Comes With Crypto Mining Capabilities And Sketchy Removal Process (28)
10:45 Chinese Government Dragnet Now Folding In American Social Media Platforms To Silence Dissent (14)
10:40 Daily Deal: The 2022 Ultimate Cybersecurity Analyst Preparation Bundle (0)
09:29 A Fight Between Facebook And The British Medical Journal Highlights The Difficulty Of Moderating 'Medical Misinformation' (9)
06:29 Court Ruling Paves The Way For Better, More Reliable Wi-Fi (4)
20:12 Eighth Circuit (Again) Says There's Nothing Wrong With Detaining Innocent Minors At Gunpoint (15)
15:48 China's Regulatory War On Its Gaming Industry Racks Up 14k Casualties (10)
13:31 Chinese Government Fines Local Car Dealerships For Surveilling While Not Being The Government (5)
12:08 Eric Clapton Pretends To Regret The Decision To Sue Random German Woman Who Listed A Bootleg Of One Of His CDs On Ebay (29)
10:44 ICE Is So Toxic That The DHS's Investigative Wing Is Asking To Be Completely Separated From It (29)
10:39 Daily Deal: The 2022 Complete Raspberry Pi And Arduino Developer Bundle (0)
09:31 Google Blocked An Article About Police From The Intercept... Because The Title Included A Phrase That Was Also A Movie Title (24)
06:22 Wireless Carriers Balk At FAA Demand For 5G Deployment Delays Amid Shaky Safety Concerns (16)
19:53 Tenth Circuit Denies Qualified Immunity To Social Worker Who Fabricated A Mother's Confession Of Child Abuse (35)
15:39 Sci-Hub's Creator Thinks Academic Publishers, Not Her Site, Are The Real Threat To Science, And Says: 'Any Law Against Knowledge Is Fundamentally Unjust' (34)
13:32 Federal Court Tells Proud Boys Defendants That Raiding The Capitol Building Isn't Covered By The First Amendment (25)
12:14 US Courts Realizing They Have A Judge Alan Albright Sized Problem In Waco (17)
10:44 Boston Police Department Used Forfeiture Funds To Hide Purchase Of Surveillance Tech From City Reps (16)
10:39 Daily Deal: The Ultimate Microsoft Excel Training Bundle (0)
09:20 NY Senator Proposes Ridiculously Unconstitutional Social Media Law That Is The Mirror Opposite Of Equally Unconstitutional Laws In Florida & Texas (25)
06:12 Telecom Monopolies Are Exploiting Crappy U.S. Broadband Maps To Block Community Broadband Grant Requests (7)
12:00 Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of 2021 At Techdirt (17)
10:00 Gaming Like It's 1926: Join The Fourth Annual Public Domain Game Jam (6)
09:00 New Year's Message: The Arc Of The Moral Universe Is A Twisty Path (33)
19:39 DHS, ICE Begin Body Camera Pilot Program With Surprisingly Good Policies In Place (7)
15:29 Remembering Techdirt Contributors Sherwin And Elliot (1)
13:32 DC Metro PD's Powerful Review Panel Keeps Giving Bad Cops Their Jobs Back (6)
12:11 Missouri Governor Still Expects Journalists To Be Prosecuted For Showing How His Admin Leaked Teacher Social Security Numbers (39)
10:48 Oversight Board Overturning Instagram Takedown Of Ayahuasca Post Demonstrates The Impossibility Of Content Moderation (10)
More arrow
This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it