Houston Law Firm Sues Student With Severe Back Injuries For $200k After She Posts Negative Reviews To Yelp, Facebook

from the lead-attorney-pours-gasoline-on-own-head,-lights-match,-hurls-self-into-nearest dept

A Houston law firm has decided to make its mark on the world much in the same way a rogue house pet makes its mark on an expensive Oriental rug. The Tuan A. Khuu law firm has decided it has “no choice” but to sue a 20-year-old student suffering from two broken bones in her back following a collision with two vehicles — one of them being the drunk driver who started the chain reaction.

The student (Lan Cai) first met representatives from the Khuu law office in her own bedroom, while still in her underwear.

Cai had never been in a major accident before, and she needed help from the attorneys while navigating insurance and proving her entitlement to damages. But when the attorneys came to her home, entered her bedroom (the attorneys maintain Cai’s mother told them to go in) and then ignored her phone calls and emails in the days immediately after Cai signed the contract, she felt like hiring them was a mistake.

The hiring was a mistake. The firing was apparently also a mistake, especially after Cai headed to her Facebook page and Yelp to express her displeasure with Khuu. These negative reviews resulted in multiple calls and emails from the firm threatening legal action if she did not remove the “dispariging (sic)” review. The firm would have “no choice” but to do this, despite really having no legal or rational reason to do so.

Here’s the entirety of the “dispariging” review the firm calls defamatory.

After 3 days, they didn’t tell me anything about the doctor I needed to go to. I was in a lot of pain. Not only that, they didn’t know where the hell my car was! And they came to my house and into my room to talk to me when I was sleeping in my underwear. Seriously, it’s super unprofessional! …I came in to the office to meet with my previous attorney, but he literally ran off.

Khuu attorney Keith Nguyen is the frontmouth for the firm and appears to regret nothing about suing a 20-year-old waitress who’s trying to put herself through school. He claims Cai’s review left out certain details and skewed others.

For example, when Cai says that her lawyer “literally ran off” when she showed up unannounced, Nguyen concedes he was on his way out the door, but took a moment to explain to her why there were liens on her insurance. The lawyers who went into her room had no idea she was in her underwear and say they were invited in, Nguyen explained. “It puts us in a bad light,” Nguyen said. “I said [to her], You can say that, but you need to add that we were invited. And she never did. She went ahead and wrote more bad things.”

It takes more than a difference in perspective to turn “bad things” into actionable defamatory statements. Nguyen is an attorney and presumably should know this. Nguyen also, presumably, is an inhabitant of this planet and partakes of the internet, so he should know what sort of effect is triggered by baseless legal bullying.

And, as part of the Khuu firm, he should also be aware that Cai isn’t an anomaly. Even before the internet backlash kicked in the door of the firm’s Yelp page (which now sports a warning from Yelp that it will remove positive/negative reviews that appear to be solely motivated by media coverage of the ongoing debacle), the law office wasn’t exactly known for its stellar customer service. Meagan Flynn of the Houston Press points out that the Khuu law offices’ Yelp pages are littered with negative reviews.

[G]ood reviews are hard to find, no matter which of the law firm’s three locations you search. A guy named Han in Richardson, Texas, wrote, “Duped and filthy legal services. They trap you in their plan and dupe you out for their own goods. Stay away to protect yourself and your family.” A guy named Kevin from Austin: “They like to delay responses and make excuses for not returning calls. Incompetent and unreliable are the words I would use to describe their staff.” Charlie from Houston: “I went in for a ‘free consultation’ and it became a decision I would soon regret.”

In addition to the inevitable Streisanding, the Khuu law firm has also jabbed a stick into a hornet’s nest of lawyers with low tolerance for bullying bullshit. So far, the law office’s decision to sue a student for $200,000 has already attracted offers of assistance from Popehat’s Ken White, First Amendment Badass (Texas Div.) Mark W. Bennett, and Scott Greenfield, whose undying curmudgeonliness (and undying AOL email address) are perfectly complemented by the number of fucks he gives about jabbing back at stupid attorneys. If this is just the initial response to the Khuu office legal threats, it’s time to invest heavily in popcorn futures.

The immediate good news is that Lan Cai is now represented, pro bono, by Houston attorney Michael Fleming. Fleming hopes to flip this bogus lawsuit back on the Khuu law firm by using Texas’ anti-SLAPP law — the Texas Citizens Participation Act — and extract $50,000 from the firm for the trouble it’s caused. He also points out that the firm’s reputation was pretty much an open sewage line well before Cai expressed her opinion, so it’s unlikely the office can prove yet another negative review caused any actual damage to the firm itself.

Filed Under: , , , , ,
Companies: yelp

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Houston Law Firm Sues Student With Severe Back Injuries For $200k After She Posts Negative Reviews To Yelp, Facebook”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
41 Comments
Mason Wheelersays:

He also points out that the firm’s reputation was pretty much an open sewage line well before Cai expressed her opinion, so it’s unlikely the office can prove yet another negative review caused any actual damage to the firm itself.

…which kind of makes me wonder, why did she go with them in the first place? If I needed representation, I’d do some research, and I’d talk with a friend of mine who’s an attorney (who doesn’t necessarily specialize in the area I need representation in, but probably knows a bunch of people that do) in order to find someone who’d be likely to do a good job.

When the concept of lawyers being sleazy by default is such a pervasive part of our culture that we have an entire genre of humor dedicated to it with its own Wikipedia page, even, it seems to me that hiring one without doing any due diligence is essentially akin to walking down a dark alley at night. You may or may not end up having a really bad experience, and if you do, the culpability lies squarely on the person(s) who victimized you, but even so… you really should have known better than to do that in the first place!

Mason Wheelersays:

Re: Re:

Counterpoint: If it were that urgent, it would be that much more important to get it right.

In such a case, I would most likely call up my attorney friend and ask him, “if you needed a personal injury lawyer right now, who would you call? Because I need one. Right now.” He’s a decent enough guy that I’m reasonably confident this would get good results.

Anonymoussays:

Re: Re: Re:

If it were that urgent, it would be that much more important to get it right.

You are assuming clear thinking, which for many people is very difficult in the aftermath of an accident, especially ion that results in injury. Also, not everyone has people with the relevant experience to call on, and family members, especially parents or children can be badly upset by your accident and not reliable sources of advice.

Anonymoussays:

Re: Re: Re:

Having a friend who is an attorney seems to indicate you speak from a position of privilege. As the previous anon says, not everyone knows has friends who are attorneys. I bet the number of 20 year old college students who don’t know who to contact in such a scenario who have working attorneys for friends is a very small portion of 20 year old college students.

PaulTsays:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

You missed the point being made repeatedly to you, I think.

The point is that by having a friend who is qualified and trustworthy to make such advice places you in a place of privilege over a 20 year old student who has no such friend.

Judging her from that position is disingenuous, to say nothing of the inevitable shock, pain and vulnerability resulting from the accident. You seem to be trying to blame the victim for making a bad choice, for no other reason than you would personally have better resources to call upon. Bravo. Not everyone’s so lucky.

Uriel-238says:

This suggests a good premise of a Hitchcockian movie

Scorned lawyer down on her luck gets hired by an accident victim who is so sloppy he’s begging to be conned. After modest investigation she figures out he’s trying to set her up, and hired her on the pretense that she was the sort who’d take advantage of an ignorant client.

Not saying that’s what’s going on in Lan Cai’s case.

That Anonymous Cowardsays:

Re:

As others have mentioned, many people don’t have lawyer friends or a friend who has had need of a lawyer.

People, often to their detriment, assume that being a member of the bar is some sort of reflection that they are good guys. (My long running most favorite lawyer anecdote – Lawyer in prison for murder for 8 years before the bar moved to disbar him.)

Guessing that being in extreme pain, most likely on pain killers, that doing a deep dive into people wasn’t on the plate.

While consumers should check them out before signing, shouldn’t those charged with providing oversight actually do that job?

blue skiessays:

Re: Re:

I’ve been in pain and on strong painkillers once. It taught me that you’re in no condition to think straight. Like, at all. Most strong painkillers really impacts your ability to think and reason (it’s called “being on drugs” by us laypeople for a reason).

Add to that the aftershock of the accident, and no lawyer in the family or friend circle to ask advice from, and the mistake this young girl made is an easy one to make for anyone in her condition.

PaulTsays:

Re:

“…which kind of makes me wonder, why did she go with them in the first place? If I needed representation, I’d do some research”

A 20 year old student with major physical injuries probably isn’t going to be someone who does careful research before contacting someone for legal advice. In fact, the article doesn’t mention how they were contacted initially, so they may have been the ones to make the initial contact. Sleazy ambulance chasing, blame them rather than the victim.

No onesays:

Here is how it works

I have a friend that works for a personal injury PI law firm. He is an ex-cop, injury on the job.

He drives around once a week to all the police departments in the area and gets a copy of every new accident report. At first the departments were so-so with him, but when they found out he was once one of them, they welcomed him and would have a copy of reports waiting.

He knows how cops write the reports, what to look for, how to spot if someone got hurt and the other person screwed up.

Those reports that pass first muster he sends on, and the firm sends out a standard letter to them. If they call back and want the firm to get money for them, he is the one sets up an appointment and takes a copy of the standard agreement to them to sign.

At that point it is up to the lawyers at the firm to follow up.

No bullies, at least with his firm. They might send a second letter a few weeks later if they get no response. Also no need to bully, if it is a bad case to start with, that is, the facts in the police report show it is going to be hard to prove fault, he doesn’t forward those cases.

Anonymoussays:

Re: Re: Here is how it works

Texas. While “ambulance chasing” is both still illegal in Texas and sanctionable by the state bar, in practice an attorney has to either be utterly public and shameless about it, or other factors have to come into play (live key stealing from clients) before action gets taken.

If the attorney is sufficiently circumspect and otherwise professional, they can get away with it indefinitely. It sounds like the firm in question is neither.

Anonymoussays:

“He also points out that the firm’s reputation was pretty much an open sewage line well before Cai expressed her opinion, so it’s unlikely the office can prove yet another negative review caused any actual damage to the firm itself.”

But if you want to fix your reputation by suing all your many critics you have to start somewhere.

Anonymouse Cowardsays:

A three letter answer: IRS

I had a difficulty with a law firm multiple billing me for a job. I decided to pay the multiple bills, (I could afford it) but take the whole paper pile to the IRS. An involved third party asked me to wait until the third party talked to the law firm. It got straightened out without me paying anything more what I was contracted for. According to repute, law firms are not on the IRS’s “most trusted list”. So, if money is changing hands, keep the IRS in mind. But remember, no funny business, the IRS takes a dim view of deceit. (Remember also the state tax authority may be useful.) Tax audits are very expensive!

GWBsays:

Knowing lawyers

This is why it pays to have legal insurance. Some employers and some insurance/aid groups offer a program of paying a small fee and getting a free consult or two, and access to a probably reputable legal firm when you need it. They usually offer the boilerplate legal stuff (like wills and PoAs and such) for a really low cost or free, as well.
Look into it before you get into a bad situation. (Saved me some big bucks with a rental car issue, when my free consult told me I had the evidence on my side and shouldn’t even need a lawyer if the company pursued me – but they were available if I did.)

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop ┬╗

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...
Older Stuff
13:40 It's Great That Winnie The Pooh Is In The Public Domain; But He Should Have Been Free In 1982 (Or Earlier) (35)
12:06 Norton 360 Now Comes With Crypto Mining Capabilities And Sketchy Removal Process (28)
10:45 Chinese Government Dragnet Now Folding In American Social Media Platforms To Silence Dissent (14)
10:40 Daily Deal: The 2022 Ultimate Cybersecurity Analyst Preparation Bundle (0)
09:29 A Fight Between Facebook And The British Medical Journal Highlights The Difficulty Of Moderating 'Medical Misinformation' (9)
06:29 Court Ruling Paves The Way For Better, More Reliable Wi-Fi (4)
20:12 Eighth Circuit (Again) Says There's Nothing Wrong With Detaining Innocent Minors At Gunpoint (15)
15:48 China's Regulatory War On Its Gaming Industry Racks Up 14k Casualties (10)
13:31 Chinese Government Fines Local Car Dealerships For Surveilling While Not Being The Government (5)
12:08 Eric Clapton Pretends To Regret The Decision To Sue Random German Woman Who Listed A Bootleg Of One Of His CDs On Ebay (29)
10:44 ICE Is So Toxic That The DHS's Investigative Wing Is Asking To Be Completely Separated From It (29)
10:39 Daily Deal: The 2022 Complete Raspberry Pi And Arduino Developer Bundle (0)
09:31 Google Blocked An Article About Police From The Intercept... Because The Title Included A Phrase That Was Also A Movie Title (24)
06:22 Wireless Carriers Balk At FAA Demand For 5G Deployment Delays Amid Shaky Safety Concerns (16)
19:53 Tenth Circuit Denies Qualified Immunity To Social Worker Who Fabricated A Mother's Confession Of Child Abuse (35)
15:39 Sci-Hub's Creator Thinks Academic Publishers, Not Her Site, Are The Real Threat To Science, And Says: 'Any Law Against Knowledge Is Fundamentally Unjust' (34)
13:32 Federal Court Tells Proud Boys Defendants That Raiding The Capitol Building Isn't Covered By The First Amendment (25)
12:14 US Courts Realizing They Have A Judge Alan Albright Sized Problem In Waco (17)
10:44 Boston Police Department Used Forfeiture Funds To Hide Purchase Of Surveillance Tech From City Reps (16)
10:39 Daily Deal: The Ultimate Microsoft Excel Training Bundle (0)
09:20 NY Senator Proposes Ridiculously Unconstitutional Social Media Law That Is The Mirror Opposite Of Equally Unconstitutional Laws In Florida & Texas (25)
06:12 Telecom Monopolies Are Exploiting Crappy U.S. Broadband Maps To Block Community Broadband Grant Requests (7)
12:00 Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of 2021 At Techdirt (17)
10:00 Gaming Like It's 1926: Join The Fourth Annual Public Domain Game Jam (6)
09:00 New Year's Message: The Arc Of The Moral Universe Is A Twisty Path (33)
19:39 DHS, ICE Begin Body Camera Pilot Program With Surprisingly Good Policies In Place (7)
15:29 Remembering Techdirt Contributors Sherwin And Elliot (1)
13:32 DC Metro PD's Powerful Review Panel Keeps Giving Bad Cops Their Jobs Back (6)
12:11 Missouri Governor Still Expects Journalists To Be Prosecuted For Showing How His Admin Leaked Teacher Social Security Numbers (39)
10:48 Oversight Board Overturning Instagram Takedown Of Ayahuasca Post Demonstrates The Impossibility Of Content Moderation (10)
More arrow
This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it