FCC Boss Being Investigated By His Own Agency For Being Too Cozy With The Industry He Regulates

from the not particularly shocking dept

If you watched FCC boss Ajit Pai’s rushed repeal of net neutrality there really shouldn’t be any question about where Pai’s loyalties lie, and it certainly isn’t with smaller companies, healthy competition, transparency, openness, innovation, or American consumers. The agency head repeatedly lied about the justifications for the repeal, casually using fabricated data to justify what may just be the least popular policy decision in this history of modern technology. Pai’s fealty to giant monopolies runs so deep, his agency now just directs reporters to lobbying talking points when they question the flimsy logic propping up the repeal.

So for those paying attention, it’s probably not too surprising to see news that the FCC’s own Inspector General is investigating the agency boss for being a bit too cozy with the giant companies he’s supposed to be holding accountable:

“Last April, the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, Ajit Pai, led the charge for his agency to approve rules allowing television broadcasters to greatly increase the number of stations they own. A few weeks later, Sinclair Broadcasting announced a blockbuster $3.9 billion deal to buy Tribune Media — a deal those new rules made possible.

By the end of the year, in a previously undisclosed move, the top internal watchdog for the F.C.C. opened an investigation into whether Mr. Pai and his aides had improperly pushed for the rule changes and whether they had timed them to benefit Sinclair, according to Representative Frank Pallone of New Jersey and two congressional aides.”

Sinclair’s $3.9 billion acquisition of Tribune Media has already faced broad, bipartisan opposition by those concerned that the merger will dramatically damage both competition and opinion diversity across countless markets nationwide. The Sinclair Tribune tie up would give Sinclair ownership of more than 230 local broadcast stations around the nation, allowing it to reach 72% of the public with “reporting” frequently lamented as grotesquely distorted on a good day.

Sinclair’s latest merger couldn’t occur without Pai’s decision to gut numerous media consolidation rules over the last few months, including several decades old rules specifically designed to prevent any one company from unfairly dominating a media market and crushing local competition. Unsurprisingly, consumer groups were quick to seize on the news suggesting that the agency should suspend its review of the merger until the Inspector General inquiry is complete:

“Until the inspector general’s investigation is complete, Chairman Pai and any other FCC staff subject to this inquiry should recuse themselves from all dealings related to Sinclair’s proposed takeover of Tribune Media,” Free Press Senior Counsel Jessica J. González said in a statement. “If the investigation finds that Pai or any other FCC staff did indeed let their own bias and favoritism shape decisions related to the deal, they must not be permitted to vote on this matter and they should be subject to other appropriate ethics-review processes.”

Of course if you’re familiar with Pai’s work, you know that won’t be happening, and in Pai’s ideologically-blinded brain this will all be dismissed as the errant rantings of partisans. But again, opposition to this deal is fairly uniform across the spectrum. Conservatives don’t like it because they realize Sinclair is going to squeeze smaller media outlets out of the equation unfairly. Liberals don’t like it because they know Sinclair is going to fill the airwaves with more nonsense just as we’re trying to get a hold on problems inherent in foreign influence, disinformation, and discourse quality.

Regardless, Pai’s going to have a very busy few years. He’s already facing several different inquiries into why his agency made up DDOS attacks and turned a blind eye to identity theft as part of an apparent attempt to downplay massive public opposition to his policies. He’s also facing several law enforcement inquiries (one of which he’s actively blocking) and numerous lawsuits into his agency’s blatant disregard of the public interest. And while this particular inquiry may not conclude that Pai technically broke the law or violated agency rules, it’s pretty hard to act confused about where Pai’s loyalties truly lie.

Filed Under: , , , , ,
Companies: sinclair broadcasting, tribune media

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “FCC Boss Being Investigated By His Own Agency For Being Too Cozy With The Industry He Regulates”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment

Re: self-dealing?

Yes, that level of self-dealing is par for the course.

There are legal limits on how many stations the same people can own in the same market (so, for instance, someone holding separate full-power affiliate stations in two of the big four networks in the same city would be a no-no) and there are ways around these limits.

For instance, there are local marketing agreements (LMA) and shared service arrangements (SSA). Both do something similar; one company owns a station but has some other company run the station for them. In LMA, the company running the station just rents the entire station’s airtime to put their own content and ads there (they collect the ad revenue and pay the nominal station owner), in SSA the station owner collects the ad dollars and uses them to pay the other folks to run the station. The result is the same.

Sinclair and Cunningham Broadcasting are infamous for this. They’re nominally separate licensees, but they’re controlled by members of the same family – ie: Mummy and Daddy own Sinclair, Grandma owns Cunningham and sets that company’s stock aside as the grandkids’ inheritance, Grandma then has Mummy and Daddy run her stations for her with an LMA or SSA and the whole thing ends up automated from the same site.

That’s the level of what could be done to circumvent concentration of ownership restrictions in the days before Ajit Pai. It’s only gotten worse since then. Commercial radio is just as bad, with companies like Clear Channel (iHeartRadio) free to own 2 AM + 6 FM stations in the largest cities – which could let them tie up a quarter of the dial.

Is it any wonder that all the pap sounds the same?

Sinclair’s $3.9 billion acquisition of Sinclair is self-dealing, but it’s nothing new and it fits the pattern.


"while this particular inquiry may not conclude that Pai technically broke the law or violated agency rules" -- it's good enough for minion to base yet another attack piece on.

"He’s already facing several different inquiries into why his agency made up DDOS attacks and turned a blind eye to identity theft as part of an apparent attempt to downplay massive public opposition to his policies."

Back to lying about you don’t KNOW occurred by any intent, just whining and smear.

Machin Shinsays:

Re: Re: "while this particular inquiry may not conclude that Pai technically broke the law or violated agency rules" -- it's good enough for minion to base yet another attack piece on.

Ok, we don’t “KNOW” what happened, but why is that? If this DDOS really happened shouldn’t he have given the logs over to the proper agencies to investigate? This is a DDOS against a federal agency and their response is to shrug?

This is the Federal Communication Commission. Communication is literally in their fucking name, how can they suck so hard at communicating?


Re: Re: "while this particular inquiry may not conclude that Pai technically broke the law or violated agency rules" -- it's good enough for minion to base yet another attack piece on.

We KNOW that there was massive comment fraud and he has done nothing about and is actively resisting at least one investigation. Those are known facts, not whining and smear. Not even Pai is denying those facts, he just doesn’t care.

You, however, are lying about putting up a video on youtube proving how Mike REALLY feels about free speech. So why should we believe anything you say?


Re: Re: "while this particular inquiry may not conclude that Pai technically broke the law or violated agency rules" -- it's good enough for minion to base yet another attack piece on.

At some point you should look at what you write and learn something about yourself.

I don’t expect you to see it now, but in time it may help: Whining and smear is not limited to your adversaries here…


Re: Re:

why is this amazing?

This not a shock, it was expected.

History of the world in a nutshell.

Weak and Scare people ask for government to protect them from things they should be doing for themselves. Bad actor shows up and abuses that power.

Humans have a really bad habit of willfully accepting lesser evils just to staff off the bigger evils never realizing all the while that those lesser evils are causing more damage over time when compared to the greater short lived evils.

History teaches that humans never learn from it!


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

Probably because they are too stupid to understand that “government regulatory agency” is not the only way to solve that problem, just that it is the only path offered by their political superiors.

When you ask for government to solve a problem you and your fellow citizens should be solving, you become a peasant. Of course you will be treated like the dirt you have allowed yourself to become.


Re: Re: Re:2 Re: Re: Re: Re:

No, it’s because in our form of government, the government is supposed to be the collective hand of the people to smack down bullshit that is larger and more widespread than any people can handle themselves.

The only way for the population to control any such things would be to take illegal measures, fire, and pitchforks to every bad actor ever, and suffer mass casualties. (There were actually times when things like this happened, and they usually did not work out in favor of the public or workers.) Most people would not have a job doing anything else.

Philly Bobsays:

Re: Re:

“A bit too cozy? No seriously, I could describe this with colorful sexual terms but I’ll just say it’s about time he starts being punished for said relationship.”

He’ll be punished alright… by acquiring a nice 7 figure salary at one of these big companies he lobbied for. And IF he were to go to jail (which I’m sure he won’t) he’ll still have that 7 figure job. Plus all the payola he got already and be out in short time. He wins no matter what.


Re: Re:


It is almost completely speculative, so a lot of things to dig into, but the amount of data and the ways it has been carried out certainly points towards a “mutually beneficial arangement” between a public administation employee and a private group of people.

Particularly the UHF-case and the JTA-situation is beyond disturbing.

Unfortunately I am not seeing any of it making enough for a court-case. Expect it to end in a few sharp words about the insufficiencies in Pais procedures in relation to documentation of the meeting with Don Smith and some grave words about how a lot of it certainly doesn’t look proper.

But since nobody reads those documents, the “no smoking gun” will be interpreted as “not guilty” and the ivolvement of a democrat will make conspiracy a good word to use, to ensure that the proper partisans know their story. If nobody else creates a shitstorm to keep Pai, his life-partner Don Smiths media-empire, Sinclair will protect their asset.


Re: Re: Re: Re: Worth noting...

I know. Shocking, isn’t it? I can barely contain my astonishment.

Less snarkily, just like in any neighborhood, if you want to know the good stuff, all you have to do is hang out in the right bars and restaurants, or know the people who work at the golf courses, retail stores, and hair salons, or talk to neighbors and classmates.

Yes, I’m sure you can see it from wherever you are, because you’re observing their words and actions and drawing the correct conclusions. But locally, we see it directly.

These are truly awful people.

Not an Electronic Rodentsays:


Isn’t the FCC noted for historically being pretty damn cozy with the industry is regulates anyway? This in a political arena where regulatory capture, special interest and buying votes is so normal it barely raises comment. If he’s managed to actually twitch the agency’s own “investigate-ometer”, you have to wonder just how far from the political pack he’s strayed.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Report this ad??|??Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Older Stuff
12:25 Australian Privacy Commissioner Says 7-Eleven Broke Privacy Laws By Scanning Customers' Faces At Survey Kiosks (6)
10:50 Missouri Governor Doubles Down On 'View Source' Hacking Claim; PAC Now Fundraising Over This Bizarrely Stupid Claim (45)
10:45 Daily Deal: The All-in-One Microsoft, Cybersecurity, And Python Exam Prep Training Bundle (0)
09:43 Want To Understand Why U.S. Broadband Sucks? Look At Frontier Communications In Wisconsin, West Virginia (8)
05:36 Massachusetts College Decides Criticizing The Chinese Government Is Hate Speech, Suspends Conservative Student Group (71)
19:57 Le Tigre Sues Barry Mann To Stop Copyright Threats Over Song, Lights Barry Mann On Fire As Well (21)
16:07 Court Says City Of Baltimore's 'Heckler's Veto' Of An Anti-Catholic Rally Violates The First Amendment (15)
13:37 Two Years Later, Judge Finally Realizes That A CDN Provider Is Not Liable For Copyright Infringement On Websites (21)
12:19 Chicago Court Gets Its Prior Restraint On, Tells Police Union Head To STFU About City's Vaccine Mandate (158)
10:55 Verizon 'Visible' Wireless Accounts Hacked, Exploited To Buy New iPhones (8)
10:50 Daily Deal: The MacOS 11 Course (0)
07:55 Suing Social Media Sites Over Acts Of Terrorism Continues To Be A Losing Bet, As 11th Circuit Dumps Another Flawed Lawsuit (11)
02:51 Trump Announces His Own Social Network, 'Truth Social,' Which Says It Can Kick Off Users For Any Reason (And Already Is) (100)
19:51 Facebook AI Moderation Continues To Suck Because Moderation At Scale Is Impossible (26)
16:12 Content Moderation Case Studies: Snapchat Disables GIPHY Integration After Racist 'Sticker' Is Discovered (2018) (11)
13:54 Arlo Makes Live Customer Service A Luxury Option (8)
12:05 Delta Proudly Announces Its Participation In The DHS's Expanded Biometric Collection Program (5)
11:03 LinkedIn (Mostly) Exits China, Citing Escalating Demands For Censorship (14)
10:57 Daily Deal: The Python, Git, And YAML Bundle (0)
09:37 British Telecom Wants Netflix To Pay A Tax Simply Because Squid Game Is Popular (32)
06:41 Report: Client-Side Scanning Is An Insecure Nightmare Just Waiting To Be Exploited By Governments (35)
20:38 MLB In Talks To Offer Streaming For All Teams' Home Games In-Market Even Without A Cable Subscription (10)
15:55 Appeals Court Says Couple's Lawsuit Over Bogus Vehicle Forfeiture Can Continue (15)
13:30 Techdirt Podcast Episode 301: Scarcity, Abundance & NFTs (0)
12:03 Hollywood Is Betting On Filtering Mandates, But Working Copyright Algorithms Simply Don't Exist (66)
10:45 Introducing The Techdirt Insider Discord (4)
10:40 Daily Deal: The Dynamic 2021 DevOps Training Bundle (0)
09:29 Criminalizing Teens' Google Searches Is Just How The UK's Anti-Cybercrime Programs Roll (19)
06:29 Canon Sued For Disabling Printer Scanners When Devices Run Out Of Ink (41)
20:51 Copyright Law Discriminating Against The Blind Finally Struck Down By Court In South Africa (7)
More arrow