Kazakhstan Cops Protect Citizens' Free Speech Rights By Arresting A Protester Holding A Blank Sign

from the i'm-sorry-i-cannot-help-you-make-sense-of-this dept

Kazakhstan police unintentionally helped a protester prove his point. To protest the lack of free speech protections in the country, Aslan Sagutdinov engaged in a physical representation of a thought experiment.

To test the limits of his right to peacefully demonstrate in Kazakhstan, Aslan Sagutdinov, 22, stood in a public square holding a blank sign, predicting he would be detained.

He was right.

Sometimes it sucks to be right. Sagutdinov hoped to point out the “idiocy” of his country and its laws. Protesting nothing in particular, he was arrested by police and taken to the station. So far, there’s been nothing reported as to which charges, if any, he’ll be facing. But it’s too late for the cops and his idiotic country. The point has already been made.

The police argued — via an official statement — that order must be maintained or something. According to the police, officers had “received a report” of an “unknown male” holding a blank placard and drawing a small crowd of curious onlookers. Rather than align themselves with the content of Sagutdinov’s placard and do nothing, officers chose to something. And that “something” was to drive their irony-proof squad car to the scene and detain the protester.

The official explanation does not make the country look any less idiotic.

The police statement maintained that the authorities “were acting within the boundaries of the law.”

And then, because it couldn’t possibly drill Sagutdinov’s point home any harder, the police released another statement asserting the protester was wrong because he was right.

Bolatbek Beldibekov, the head of the local police department’s press service, told the newspaper Uralskaya Nedelya that the offense was not that he demonstrated with the blank placard. Rather, he said, Mr. Sagutdinov ran afoul of the law by making the political statement that “there is no democracy and free speech in Kazakhstan” in a public place.

Feel free to take as much time as you need to wrap your head around that statement.

Apparently, protesters in Kazakhstan have a Constitutional right to “peacefully” engage in “rallies, demonstrations, street processions, and pickets.” But those rights are more like privileges and come with several caveats attached. Multiple court decisions and amendments have watered down this right from a given to a theoretical by allowing individual government agencies to decide whether or not they’ll allow protests in front of their buildings or whether “peaceful processions” will actually be allowed to proceed from one place to another.

The protections are also badly-written, allowing the government to determine almost anything citizens believe would be protected expression to be unprotected and subject to criminal charges. Here are just a few of the many, many problems of this so-called right, as explained by Kazakhstan human rights activists.

The Law, together with decisions of local representative agencies limits the places for holding assemblies of citizens and public associations. In a series of cities, are established strictly out-of-the way places, as a rule, located on the outskirts of the city. Higher officials and local authorities, and also some political organizations, for the holding of assemblies, have the unfounded exclusive right to use squares in the city center, in comparison with citizens and their associations, which is discrimination. In addition to the element of discrimination, this is a violation of the essence of freedom of assembly. In fact, there can be no reasonable substantiation, from the viewpoint of international standards, to bind the realization of freedom of assembly to one location. Moreover, not all forms of assembly can be held in such conditions, since pickets, demonstrations or processions virtually cannot be contained to one place in the city.

[…]

The Law does not give clear definitions of types of peaceful assembly, which violates the principles of legal predictability and specificity. Any cluster of people in such a situation could be potentially termed an assembly in the sense of the Law, and correspondingly, illegal, if there was no permission given by an executive agency of the government. In other words, citizens seeking to lay flowers on a memorial or carrying a petition to the authorities, participants of flash mobs, courtyard meetings of apartment residents, etc may be held to administrative accountability. In addition, the Law does not contain a distinction between who is considered a participant in an assembly and who is not. This makes it possible to hold accountable anyone found in the location where an assembly is held.

This is why someone holding a blank sign can be arrested for protesting nothing. The sanctity of the whatever-the-fuck must be maintained by the immediate subduing of dissenting voices, even when it isn’t immediately clear what they’re dissenting from. The government has made an ass of itself and confirmed what many citizens already feared: their right to protest isn’t being protected by their government.

Filed Under: , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Kazakhstan Cops Protect Citizens' Free Speech Rights By Arresting A Protester Holding A Blank Sign”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
36 Comments
That One Guysays:

'I tried to tell them...' -Admiral Ackbar

Bolatbek Beldibekov, the head of the local police department?s press service, told the newspaper Uralskaya Nedelya that the offense was not that he demonstrated with the blank placard. Rather, he said, Mr. Sagutdinov ran afoul of the law by making the political statement that ?there is no democracy and free speech in Kazakhstan? in a public place.

"… which we proceeded to confirm for him and everyone else by arresting him for engaging in free speech via a blank placard."

Not only oppressive and dictatorial, but monumentally stupid too, nice combo.

AnonyOpssays:

Re: Re:

Which leaves the door open for a virtual form of Tienanmen Square website to gather and speak in real time about real subjects that demand immediate attention without the government interfering in the conversation. Which is something Facebutt is against at this very moment.

This could create a new form of social networking and facilitate change?

How about even a virtual guillotine erected in the virtual square with a real time translation system and crowd voting system that enables machine translation to the words splashed on the screen?

Implausible you say? You’d be surprised what crowd sourcing can achieve. Red Square Online has quite the ring to it.

PaulTsays:

"The police statement maintained that the authorities ?were acting within the boundaries of the law.?"

What a shame that they don’t understand that something need not be illegal in order for it to be both stupid and counter-productive. It’s believe it’s perfect legal for me to fly a kite near overhead power lines, but that doesn’t mean I’m not an idiot if I try it.

Daydreamsays:

It's obvious which kinds of expression are protected.

Only protests and pickets that speak favourably of the government are allowed.

Everyone should organise a huge demonstration, praising the Kazakhstan government for supporting free speech, never arresting a protester for petty reasons, and that there’s absolutely no substance to any of the myriad terrible things that the government’s been accused of.

…And hold it on Opposite Day.

AnonyOpssays:

Re: Re: It's obvious which kinds of expression are protected.

They could be arrested based on the tone of /sarcasm remember the law there doesn’t specify a reason for the arrest only differentiates those whom the law wants to arrest selectively. Any protest would need be large enough to fight the police or military if necessary to fend off illegitimate arrests.

The same sex types in Khazakhstan have been disappeared or are in hiding from their own murderous government, because of their very existence.

What the government gets away with today Karma will return in vengeance 10 fold. It will be their own children who will turn on their elders and then the parents whose children have been destroyed by that same government with its murderous intent.

Anonymoussays:

i am curious as to how many countries now behave in the same way? remember, millions died protecting what was supposedly free speech, the right to protest, etc, etc. almost every country, everywhere in the world is behaving in the exact opposite manner, where anyone doing nothing, as in this case, can be and is arrested. this ‘big brother’ syndrome is exactly what the people dont want but is exactly what governments, the rich, the famous do want because then they can complain about anything found out about them and broadcast everywhere, and get it stopped and the perpetrators jailed! on the other hand, they want to be able have access to everyone else whole life. sounds very much like the very opposite to what should be happening, what was fought for and why the war(s) were fought in the first place! those mentioned above, the so-called ‘1%’ cant bear the thought of their lives being open or not being able to control everyone else! what a despicable place this planet is now. why the hell any Aliens, if they exist, would want anything to do with us is beyond me!!

Bruce C.says:

Thinking of the "free speech zones" used even in the US to isolate protesters from government officials and onlookers, I fear it won’t take much to water down our own freedom of speech to the same level. The migration of expression to online platforms that filter/censor speech according to their own needs as defined in their terms of service just makes the problem even worse.

Anonymous Anonymous Cowardsays:

Re: Re:

"The migration of expression to online platforms that filter/censor speech according to their own needs as defined in their terms of service just makes the problem even worse."

That depends upon your point of view. The US Government, I’ll bet, is overjoyed with the way things are going. Not too much further into the future things will be such a mess that they will be able to do what they like and blame it on the platforms. The street protest will continue to decline until the ‘couch potato resistance’ becomes the defacto method, and the police will have to fear for their lives from electronic messages (which will happen).

Anonymoussays:

Re: Re:

Kazakhstan has been getting America’s "red carpet treatment" ever since breaking away from the Soviet Union nearly 3 decades ago, and despite its rapid evolution into an undemocratic authoritarian state with an atrocious human rights record, that friendship remains rock solid, as is the case with numerous former Soviet republics (Russia being the glaring exception).

Kazakhstan is a NATO partner, though not yet a full-fledged member, and as an important strategic ally against Russia, these sorts of abuses, numerous as they are, are naturally forgiven.

Garysays:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

Russia being the glaring exception

Russia being our super-best bud last time I checked?

?I do have a relationship and I can tell you that he?s very interested in what we?re doing here today,? he said on MSNBC. ?He?s probably very interested in what you and I are saying today, and I?m sure he?s going to be seeing it in some form, but I do have a relationship with him and I think it?s very interesting to see what?s happened.?
https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2017/03/politics/trump-putin-russia-timeline/

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Report this ad??|??Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...
Older Stuff
12:25 Australian Privacy Commissioner Says 7-Eleven Broke Privacy Laws By Scanning Customers' Faces At Survey Kiosks (6)
10:50 Missouri Governor Doubles Down On 'View Source' Hacking Claim; PAC Now Fundraising Over This Bizarrely Stupid Claim (45)
10:45 Daily Deal: The All-in-One Microsoft, Cybersecurity, And Python Exam Prep Training Bundle (0)
09:43 Want To Understand Why U.S. Broadband Sucks? Look At Frontier Communications In Wisconsin, West Virginia (8)
05:36 Massachusetts College Decides Criticizing The Chinese Government Is Hate Speech, Suspends Conservative Student Group (71)
19:57 Le Tigre Sues Barry Mann To Stop Copyright Threats Over Song, Lights Barry Mann On Fire As Well (21)
16:07 Court Says City Of Baltimore's 'Heckler's Veto' Of An Anti-Catholic Rally Violates The First Amendment (15)
13:37 Two Years Later, Judge Finally Realizes That A CDN Provider Is Not Liable For Copyright Infringement On Websites (21)
12:19 Chicago Court Gets Its Prior Restraint On, Tells Police Union Head To STFU About City's Vaccine Mandate (158)
10:55 Verizon 'Visible' Wireless Accounts Hacked, Exploited To Buy New iPhones (8)
10:50 Daily Deal: The MacOS 11 Course (0)
07:55 Suing Social Media Sites Over Acts Of Terrorism Continues To Be A Losing Bet, As 11th Circuit Dumps Another Flawed Lawsuit (11)
02:51 Trump Announces His Own Social Network, 'Truth Social,' Which Says It Can Kick Off Users For Any Reason (And Already Is) (100)
19:51 Facebook AI Moderation Continues To Suck Because Moderation At Scale Is Impossible (26)
16:12 Content Moderation Case Studies: Snapchat Disables GIPHY Integration After Racist 'Sticker' Is Discovered (2018) (11)
13:54 Arlo Makes Live Customer Service A Luxury Option (8)
12:05 Delta Proudly Announces Its Participation In The DHS's Expanded Biometric Collection Program (5)
11:03 LinkedIn (Mostly) Exits China, Citing Escalating Demands For Censorship (14)
10:57 Daily Deal: The Python, Git, And YAML Bundle (0)
09:37 British Telecom Wants Netflix To Pay A Tax Simply Because Squid Game Is Popular (32)
06:41 Report: Client-Side Scanning Is An Insecure Nightmare Just Waiting To Be Exploited By Governments (35)
20:38 MLB In Talks To Offer Streaming For All Teams' Home Games In-Market Even Without A Cable Subscription (10)
15:55 Appeals Court Says Couple's Lawsuit Over Bogus Vehicle Forfeiture Can Continue (15)
13:30 Techdirt Podcast Episode 301: Scarcity, Abundance & NFTs (0)
12:03 Hollywood Is Betting On Filtering Mandates, But Working Copyright Algorithms Simply Don't Exist (66)
10:45 Introducing The Techdirt Insider Discord (4)
10:40 Daily Deal: The Dynamic 2021 DevOps Training Bundle (0)
09:29 Criminalizing Teens' Google Searches Is Just How The UK's Anti-Cybercrime Programs Roll (19)
06:29 Canon Sued For Disabling Printer Scanners When Devices Run Out Of Ink (41)
20:51 Copyright Law Discriminating Against The Blind Finally Struck Down By Court In South Africa (7)
More arrow