The Tech Policy Greenhouse is an online symposium where experts tackle the most difficult policy challenges facing innovation and technology today. These are problems that don't have easy solutions, where every decision involves tradeoffs and unintended consequences, so we've gathered a wide variety of voices to help dissect existing policy proposals and better inform new ones.

That's A Wrap: Techdirt Greenhouse Content Moderation Edition

from the building-a-better,-more-ethical-internet dept

When we launched Techdirt Greenhouse, we noted that we wanted to build a tech policy forum that not only tackled the thorniest tech policy issues of the day, but did so with a little more patience and nuance than you’ll find at many gadget-obsessed technology outlets. After our inaugural panel tackled privacy, we just wrapped on our second panel subject: content moderation. We’d like to thank all of those that participated in the panel, and all of you for reading.

You’d be hard pressed to find a thornier, more complicated subject than content moderation. On one hand, technology giants have spent years prioritizing ad engagement over protecting their user base from malicious disinformation and hate speech, often with fatal results. At the same time, many of the remedies being proposed cause more harm than good by trampling free speech, or putting giant corporations into the position of arbiters of acceptable public discourse. Moderation at this scale is a nightmare. One misstep in federal policy and you’ve created an ocean of new problems.

Whether it’s the detection and deletion of live-streaming violence, or protecting elections from foreign and domestic propaganda, it’s a labyrinthine, multi-tendriled subject that can flummox even experts in the field. We’re hopeful that this collection of pieces helped inform the debate in a way that simplified some of these immensely complicated issues. Here’s a recap of the pieces from this round in case you missed them:

  • Michael Karanicolas examined how localized content moderation decisions can have a massive, often unpredictable global impact, as disinformation-fueled genocide makes abundantly clear.
  • Robert Hamilton explored the need to revisit the common law liability of online intermediaries before Section 230, helping us better understand how we got here.
  • Jess Miers explored how getting rid of Section 230 won’t magically eliminate the internet’s most problematic content.
  • Aye Min Thant took a closer look at how conflating Facebook with “the internet” in locations like Myanmar, without understanding the culture or having adequate safeguards in place, threw accelerant on the region’s genocide.
  • Matthew Feeney examined how evidence “supporting” the repeal of Section 230 is shaky at best, and the fixation on Section 230 is hugely myopic.
  • John Bergmayer argued that it doesn’t make sense to treat ad the same as user-generated content, and that websites should face the legal risk for ads they run as print publishers.
  • Brandi Collins-Dexter explored how the monetization of polarization has had a heartbreaking impact on America’s deep, longstanding relationship with bigotry.
  • Emma Llanso discussed how the sharing of content moderation knowledge shouldn’t provide a backdoor to cross-platform censorship.
  • David Morar explored how many of the problems currently being blamed on “big tech,” are simple, ordinary, human fallibility.
  • Yosef Getachew examined how social media could easily apply many of the content moderation practices they’ve custom-built for COVID-19 to the battle to protect election integrity from domestic and foreign disinformation.
  • Adelin Cai and Clara Tsao offered a useful primer for trust and safety professionals tasked with tackling the near-impossible task of modern content moderation at scale.
  • Gaurav Laroia & Carmen Scurato discussed how fighting online hate speech requires keeping Section 230, not discarding it.
  • Taylor Rhyne offered a useful content moderation primer for startups facing a daunting challenge without the bottomless budgets of their “big tech” counterparts.
  • Graham Smith took a closer look at the content moderation debate and how it intersects with existing post-Brexit headaches in the UK.
  • Daphne Keller took a deep dive into what policy makers can do if they don’t like existing platform free speech rules, and how none of the options are particularly great.
  • Much like the privacy debate, crafting meaningful content moderation guidelines and rules (and ensuring consistent, transparent enforcement) was a steep uphill climb even during the best of times. Now the effort will share fractured attention spans and resources with an historic pandemic, recovering from the resulting economic collapse, and addressing the endless web of socioeconomic and political dysfunction that is the American COVID-19 crisis. But, much like the privacy debate, it’s an essential discussion to have all the same, and we hope folks found this collection informative.

    Again, we’d like to thank our participants for taking the time to provide insight during an increasingly challenging time. We’d also like to thank Techdirt readers and commenters for participating. In a few weeks we’ll be announcing the next panel; one that should prove timely during an historic health crisis that has forced the majority of Americans to work, play, innovate, and learn from the confines of home.

    Filed Under: ,

    Rate this comment as insightful
    Rate this comment as funny
    You have rated this comment as insightful
    You have rated this comment as funny
    Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
    You have flagged this comment
    The first word has already been claimed
    The last word has already been claimed
    Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

    Comments on “That's A Wrap: Techdirt Greenhouse Content Moderation Edition”

    Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment

    I have really appreciated the work of everyone authoring posts for this, even those with which i had a good deal of disagreement. You have done a smashing job of documenting and analyzing the current and possible future landscapes, among other things, and have provided a great deal of clarity on the subject (or allied subjects), which provides high-grade thinking fuel.

    Add Your Comment

    Your email address will not be published.

    Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

    Comment Options:

    Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

    What's this?

    Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

    Follow Techdirt

    Techdirt Daily Newsletter

    The Tech Policy Greenhouse is a special project by Techdirt, with support from:

    • Knight Foundation

    • Internet Society

      Golden Frog

      Electronic Frontier Foundation

    Techdirt Insider Discord
    The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
    This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it