Ocean Spray Seeks Declaratory Relief After Soda Company Threatens It With Confused Trademark C&D

from the hang-ten dept

While we’ve seen plenty of instances of confused attempts at trademark bullying backfire on a company, this post will deal with one of the worst I’ve seen. Most of you will likely be familiar with the company Ocean Spray, best known as a purveyor of all kinds of cranberry-infused fruit drinks. You will likely be less familiar with Wedge Water, LLC, a company that makes fruit juice infused water products. The company also does business as Wave Soda, promoting its soda-alternative drinks.  

Well, according to a lawsuit filed by Ocean Spray seeking declaratory relief that it did not infringe any trademarks with its own “wave” branding, Wedge Water / Wave Soda sent a cease and desist notice to Ocean Spray demanding that it cease using its own federally registered trademark. More on that in a moment, but here is what the complaint notes about the C&D.

The Letter accuses Ocean Spray of infringing “Wave Soda’s” trademark and trade dress rights through Ocean Spray’s line of OCEAN SPRAY WAVE products. According to the USPTO database, there is no registration for the mark NEW WAVE owned by an entity named Wave Soda, LLC. As noted above, according to the USPTO database, Wedge Water, LLC is the owner of record of U.S. Registration No. 5571632 for mark NEW WAVE.

The Letter advises that Wave Soda, LLC, is a “rapidly growing beverage company based in San Marcos, California.” A search of the database of the California Secretary of State, however, reveals no record for an LLC named Wave Soda, LLC in San Marcos, California, or at all. Despite the fact that there are many brands of sparking water with fruit juice and a small amount of caffeine for sale on Amazon, Mr. Levine’s letter claims that his client “pioneered an entirely new product category.”

The Letter emphasizes that the surfer motif is an important part of Wave Soda’s branding: “Wave’s growing team shares [the founder’s] passion for beverages and an active lifestyle—the Wave Soda Surfboard and VW van are not just for show” (emphasis added).

It goes on from there. The complaint, which includes the C&D letter in full, notes that the notice didn’t offer any specifics as to what was infringing, offered no possibility of a settlement other than the cessation of Ocean Spray using its own mark, and that the letter in general is “utterly confusing as to who owns the trademarks and trade dress claimed in The Letter.” All of this, the complaint goes on, has led the company to seek declaratory relief.

Frankly, the C&D is fairly shitty as far as these things go. But the actual legal claims, based on the suit, seem to be even more confused. This dispute led Ocean Spray’s legal team to start looking into the trademarks claimed by Wedge Water. The complaint notes that Wedge Water applied for a mark for “New Wave” on a variety of goods, but the “intent to use” application failed to demonstrate that the applied for marks were actually in use in commerce. Instead, Wedge Water’s attorneys appear to have supplied some art renderings of what the branding would be. In other words, Wedge Water wasn’t actually using the marks in question before July of 2018. The filing notes that Ocean Spray was using its federally registered “Wave” trademark since at least 2013.

Plaintiff Ocean Spray requests an order declaring that its use of the marks WAVE as part of the mark OCEAN SPRAY WAVE, and the OCEAN SPRAY WAVE trade dress do not infringe Wedge Water’s alleged trademark and trade dress rights. With respect to the word marks WAVE as part of the mark OCEAN SPRAY WAVE and OCEAN SPRAY WAVE, Ocean Spray asserts priority over Wedge Water. Even if the marks are confusingly similar, (which Ocean Spray does not concede), Ocean Spray has prior rights and is not infringing any claimed rights of Wedge Water.

And because of that priority, and likely because of Wedge Water’s attempt to play trademark bully, the lawsuit includes a second count beyond the declaratory relief, seeking also to cancel Wedge Water’s trademark in favor of Ocean Spray’s.

Ocean Spray has standing to request cancellation of the NEW WAVE Registration because it has reason to believe that it will be injured by the continued registration of same. Ocean Spray has reason to believe that it will be injured because Defendant/Registrant or its alter ego, the purported Wave Soda, LLC, has asserted in The Letter that Ocean Spray’s use of its OCEAN SPRAY WAVE trademark infringes the NEW WAVE mark. The Letter asserts, and thus admits, that there is a likelihood of confusion between OCEAN SPRAY WAVE and NEW WAVE.

Whoops. What retort could Wedge Water possibly have? Its own C&D letter suggested that there would be public confusion between the marks…and the trademark registrations sure do indicate that Ocean Spray’s mark was registered first.

Live by the trademark, die by the trademark and all of that. You have to imagine at this point that Wedge Water is regretting having ever sent that threat letter to begin with.

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: ocean spray, wave soda, wedge water

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Ocean Spray Seeks Declaratory Relief After Soda Company Threatens It With Confused Trademark C&D”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Samuel Abramsays:

Disagree; think there's confusion

I looked at the document and saw Ocean Spray’s soda cans and then plaintiff’s soda cans I think there’s definitely a possibility of confusion so I think Wedge Water’s complaint is valid. I could see how someone who sees Wedge’s Wave soda might think that Ocean Spray had redesigned their Wave products. In that respect, I think Wedge Water has a point here.

That Anonymous Cowardsays:

Re: Disagree; think there's confusion

Except Ocean Sprays been around since before this little shitty brand even thought about being a company.

Wedge infringed Ocean Sprays mark & then had the nerve to claim Ocean Spray copied them & sent their competing product back in time to screw with them.

They point out other shuttered mark holders used the word wave with fruit juice drinks before Wedge had & Wedge has changed their trade dress a few times.

My neighbor set little Timmy up with a Lemonaid Stand, she then sued Country Time Lemonaid for stealing the rustic look & lettering she used on Timmys stand. Karen is not very smart.

The lawyers for Wedge should hope they have malpractice coverage, pursuing legal antics against a multinational corporation who CLEARLY held & used the mark long before you did claiming the multinational stole your idea is actively lying in legal documents & a complete failure at due diligence.


Re: Re: Disagree; think there's confusion

But what you’ve totally failed to grasp is that the lawyers own a time machine and will send their product back in time to before Ocean Spray used the wave mark and then they will win.

It worked for the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, so why not for random fruit drinks.


Re: Disagree; think there's confusion

"In that respect, I think Wedge Water has a point here."

If this were a case of a brand releasing a new product long after a smaller player had succeeded in carving out a niche, I would agree.

But, here? From what I’m reading, Ocean Spray was using the mark for 5 years before Wedge started using it, so there doesn’t seem to be fault there. The mark itself is a standard English language word that’s directly associated with ocean spray (certainly closer the "wedge"), so you can’t even claim that they were trying to be clever with their branding. If there’s confusion over the placing and format of the branding, it seems they were beaten to market on that.

I’d normally root for the small guy, but I don’t see the reason why anyone would consider Ocean Wave to be in the wrong here.

Samuel Abramsays:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Disagree; think there's confusion

I got up to this point:

The Letter accuses Ocean Spray of infringing ?Wave Soda?s? trademark and trade dress rights through Ocean Spray?s line of OCEAN SPRAY WAVE products. According to the USPTO database, there is no registration for the mark NEW WAVE owned by an entity named Wave Soda,

And then I scrolled completely down to the PDF, looking for pictures of the trademark. I jumped to conclusions based on limited information and lack of reading comprehension.

Mea culpa maxima.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Older Stuff
13:40 It's Great That Winnie The Pooh Is In The Public Domain; But He Should Have Been Free In 1982 (Or Earlier) (35)
12:06 Norton 360 Now Comes With Crypto Mining Capabilities And Sketchy Removal Process (28)
10:45 Chinese Government Dragnet Now Folding In American Social Media Platforms To Silence Dissent (14)
10:40 Daily Deal: The 2022 Ultimate Cybersecurity Analyst Preparation Bundle (0)
09:29 A Fight Between Facebook And The British Medical Journal Highlights The Difficulty Of Moderating 'Medical Misinformation' (9)
06:29 Court Ruling Paves The Way For Better, More Reliable Wi-Fi (4)
20:12 Eighth Circuit (Again) Says There's Nothing Wrong With Detaining Innocent Minors At Gunpoint (15)
15:48 China's Regulatory War On Its Gaming Industry Racks Up 14k Casualties (10)
13:31 Chinese Government Fines Local Car Dealerships For Surveilling While Not Being The Government (5)
12:08 Eric Clapton Pretends To Regret The Decision To Sue Random German Woman Who Listed A Bootleg Of One Of His CDs On Ebay (29)
10:44 ICE Is So Toxic That The DHS's Investigative Wing Is Asking To Be Completely Separated From It (29)
10:39 Daily Deal: The 2022 Complete Raspberry Pi And Arduino Developer Bundle (0)
09:31 Google Blocked An Article About Police From The Intercept... Because The Title Included A Phrase That Was Also A Movie Title (24)
06:22 Wireless Carriers Balk At FAA Demand For 5G Deployment Delays Amid Shaky Safety Concerns (16)
19:53 Tenth Circuit Denies Qualified Immunity To Social Worker Who Fabricated A Mother's Confession Of Child Abuse (35)
15:39 Sci-Hub's Creator Thinks Academic Publishers, Not Her Site, Are The Real Threat To Science, And Says: 'Any Law Against Knowledge Is Fundamentally Unjust' (34)
13:32 Federal Court Tells Proud Boys Defendants That Raiding The Capitol Building Isn't Covered By The First Amendment (25)
12:14 US Courts Realizing They Have A Judge Alan Albright Sized Problem In Waco (17)
10:44 Boston Police Department Used Forfeiture Funds To Hide Purchase Of Surveillance Tech From City Reps (16)
10:39 Daily Deal: The Ultimate Microsoft Excel Training Bundle (0)
09:20 NY Senator Proposes Ridiculously Unconstitutional Social Media Law That Is The Mirror Opposite Of Equally Unconstitutional Laws In Florida & Texas (25)
06:12 Telecom Monopolies Are Exploiting Crappy U.S. Broadband Maps To Block Community Broadband Grant Requests (7)
12:00 Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of 2021 At Techdirt (17)
10:00 Gaming Like It's 1926: Join The Fourth Annual Public Domain Game Jam (6)
09:00 New Year's Message: The Arc Of The Moral Universe Is A Twisty Path (33)
19:39 DHS, ICE Begin Body Camera Pilot Program With Surprisingly Good Policies In Place (7)
15:29 Remembering Techdirt Contributors Sherwin And Elliot (1)
13:32 DC Metro PD's Powerful Review Panel Keeps Giving Bad Cops Their Jobs Back (6)
12:11 Missouri Governor Still Expects Journalists To Be Prosecuted For Showing How His Admin Leaked Teacher Social Security Numbers (39)
10:48 Oversight Board Overturning Instagram Takedown Of Ayahuasca Post Demonstrates The Impossibility Of Content Moderation (10)
More arrow
This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it