Support For Community Broadband Could Be On Chopping Block As 'Bipartisan Broadband Negotiations' Continue

from the concessions-only-go-one-direction dept

We’ve already noted how the Biden broadband plan was good, but arguably vague. As in, the outline proclaims that the government will boost competition and lower prices, but it doesn’t actually get at all specific about how it actually hopes to do that. For example the plan proposes providing more support for community broadband, but with 17 ISP-backed state laws prohibiting such efforts (and new ones popping up in states like Ohio), it’s not clear what that support will actually look like.

Telecom giants like Comcast and AT&T have been relentlessly lobbying both parties. They generally want one thing: more subsidies thrown their direction to fill in the coverage gaps they should have shored up a decade ago, and less money thrown at generating competition across their existing footprints. 83 million Americans live under a broadband monopoly, and incumbents spend countless billable hours covertly working to protect this profitable dysfunction.

As a result, the scope of the Biden broadband plan (and the infrastructure proposal) continue to shrink. The $100 billion plan is now a $65 billion plan, and it seems fairly likely that many of the restrictions AT&T, Verizon, and Comcast have been gunning for will make their way into any final proposal. It’s also pretty unlikely Republicans, who consistently try to ban communities from building better, faster broadband networks, will support community broadband:

“Congressional Republicans have tried to ban municipal broadband nationwide, so it’s highly unlikely that they would have agreed to Biden’s stated goal of giving public networks priority over private ISPs in the next big round of government subsidies.”

When it comes to broadband policy, what’s often passed as “concession and compromise for the sake of bipartisanship” isn’t actually that. In reality it’s usually just select Democrats and Republicans, prodded by AT&T and Comcast to weaken proposal language, pretending their opposition is due to being principled spendthrifts. But the same politicians who don’t want to spend money on broadband now, saw no problem with throwing billions in tax breaks at these same companies for absolutely no reason or beneficial outcome. So there’s no logic to much of this stuff, but we like to pretend otherwise.

It has to be made clear that this country has thrown untold billions in subsidies, tax breaks, and regulatory favors at regional monopolies for networks that are routinely half completed. And notice that when there are “concessions” bandied about, they almost uniformly only seem to go one direction: in the direction of what’s beneficial to regional telecom monopolies not coincidentally tethered to our intelligence-gathering apparatus. It’s a relentless, corrupted process, all covered up by ambiguous and breathless political support for “fixing the digital divide.”

Not to be too cynical; there’s still some notable improvements that could be done with the reconciliation process and some grit. But with broadband, generally the outcome of “bipartisan compromise” is almost always immense fecklessness. As in, a broadband plan that talks a lot about “curing the digital divide” and the “miracle of 5G,” then just throws yet more poorly tracked subsidies at entrenched broadband monopolies. All while refusing to do much to tackle the increasingly obvious reason US broadband remains mired in mediocrity: regional monopolization and corruption.

Filed Under: , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Support For Community Broadband Could Be On Chopping Block As 'Bipartisan Broadband Negotiations' Continue”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
That One Guysays:

'This has repeatedly failed, guess we need to try even harder!'

Community broadband efforts are massive money sinks that do nothing but waste taxpayer dollars on half-baked rollouts that never provide what was promised, so it’s no wonder the totally-not corrupt politicians are so vehemently against them. Now giving huge piles of money to major ISP’s on the other hand is always productive[1], they always deliver[2] and make good use of any and all taxpayer money funneled their way[3], and on the rare occasions when it might appear that they aren’t dedicating 110% of their focus on making the customer experience the best it can be that’s just because they need just a little bit more money[4]!

[1] for company profits
[2] just ask them, no you can’t see the verifiable data that’s private
[3] to pad exec bonuses and buy a few politicians.
[4] roughly ‘all of it’ should do the trick


Why, again.

Does a bunch of rich politicians, Think throwing money at things SOLVE IT?
Anyone remember that Money from the gov. tends to be tax free?

Until you do it yourself, NOTHING will get done.
So what are we going to do?
Cancel every contract created in the last 20-30 years from the major players?
Reverse every State law that has Favoritism to any group?
Tell all of the telecom industry that they are Now to let ANY service use their Last mile lines?
But, who is going to Install the lines? These folks are bill collectors, they dont know how to, would pay others to do the work.
Giving money to the Wrong side of the Problem.


Bears noting, too, that the bipartisan bill is essentially theater, a photo op so that Manchin and Sinema can feel important, and the Democrats are planning to pass a second infrastructure bill on a party-line reconciliation vote.

Doesn’t mean that bill will have community broadband, either. But it doesn’t mean it won’t.

Call your senators. Especially Manchin and Sinema. Even if, speaking from experience, calling Sinema is no more productive, and significantly more frustrating, than talking to a brick wall.


Democrats: We want a big bold package! $20 billion.

Republicans: No, you need to compromise in the name of bipartisanship. We’ll agree to $3 billion.

Democrats: How about $15 billion.

Republicans: No, $3 billion.

Democrats: $10 billion?

Republicans: $3 billion!

Democrats: OK, $3 billion.

Republicans: Did we say $3 billion? We meant $2 billion.

Democrats: $2 billion?!! That’s nowhere near enough!

Republicans: Compromise!

Democrats: OK, $2 billion.

Republicans: See, I knew we could come to a bipartisan deal that both sides would agree on!

Democrats: Huh?

Republicans: Hey people, look at the fantastic deal we negotiated for you. We’re so happy to have the democrats see reason and agree to this completely equitable compromise.


Re: Re: Re: Re:

Again, though, they intend to pass a second infrastructure bill through reconciliation, with no Republican support.

That’s the one to watch. It’s not going to be hampered by Republican compromise, just, y’know, DINO compromise. Unfortunately, working with Sinema and Manchin is the price to get anything done right now.


Re: Re: Re: Re:

It would be so very nice if the democrats would at some point catch on to the ‘republican compromise’ trick and stop falling for it…

Watching democrats deal with republicans is like watching a game of Rock, Paper, Scissors, where the first guy chooses one of the three and the second just punches him in the face and declares himself the winner. Then he asks the first guy if he wants to play again, and the first guy agrees, with exactly the same results.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Report this ad??|??Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Older Stuff
12:25 Australian Privacy Commissioner Says 7-Eleven Broke Privacy Laws By Scanning Customers' Faces At Survey Kiosks (6)
10:50 Missouri Governor Doubles Down On 'View Source' Hacking Claim; PAC Now Fundraising Over This Bizarrely Stupid Claim (45)
10:45 Daily Deal: The All-in-One Microsoft, Cybersecurity, And Python Exam Prep Training Bundle (0)
09:43 Want To Understand Why U.S. Broadband Sucks? Look At Frontier Communications In Wisconsin, West Virginia (8)
05:36 Massachusetts College Decides Criticizing The Chinese Government Is Hate Speech, Suspends Conservative Student Group (71)
19:57 Le Tigre Sues Barry Mann To Stop Copyright Threats Over Song, Lights Barry Mann On Fire As Well (21)
16:07 Court Says City Of Baltimore's 'Heckler's Veto' Of An Anti-Catholic Rally Violates The First Amendment (15)
13:37 Two Years Later, Judge Finally Realizes That A CDN Provider Is Not Liable For Copyright Infringement On Websites (21)
12:19 Chicago Court Gets Its Prior Restraint On, Tells Police Union Head To STFU About City's Vaccine Mandate (158)
10:55 Verizon 'Visible' Wireless Accounts Hacked, Exploited To Buy New iPhones (8)
10:50 Daily Deal: The MacOS 11 Course (0)
07:55 Suing Social Media Sites Over Acts Of Terrorism Continues To Be A Losing Bet, As 11th Circuit Dumps Another Flawed Lawsuit (11)
02:51 Trump Announces His Own Social Network, 'Truth Social,' Which Says It Can Kick Off Users For Any Reason (And Already Is) (100)
19:51 Facebook AI Moderation Continues To Suck Because Moderation At Scale Is Impossible (26)
16:12 Content Moderation Case Studies: Snapchat Disables GIPHY Integration After Racist 'Sticker' Is Discovered (2018) (11)
13:54 Arlo Makes Live Customer Service A Luxury Option (8)
12:05 Delta Proudly Announces Its Participation In The DHS's Expanded Biometric Collection Program (5)
11:03 LinkedIn (Mostly) Exits China, Citing Escalating Demands For Censorship (14)
10:57 Daily Deal: The Python, Git, And YAML Bundle (0)
09:37 British Telecom Wants Netflix To Pay A Tax Simply Because Squid Game Is Popular (32)
06:41 Report: Client-Side Scanning Is An Insecure Nightmare Just Waiting To Be Exploited By Governments (35)
20:38 MLB In Talks To Offer Streaming For All Teams' Home Games In-Market Even Without A Cable Subscription (10)
15:55 Appeals Court Says Couple's Lawsuit Over Bogus Vehicle Forfeiture Can Continue (15)
13:30 Techdirt Podcast Episode 301: Scarcity, Abundance & NFTs (0)
12:03 Hollywood Is Betting On Filtering Mandates, But Working Copyright Algorithms Simply Don't Exist (66)
10:45 Introducing The Techdirt Insider Discord (4)
10:40 Daily Deal: The Dynamic 2021 DevOps Training Bundle (0)
09:29 Criminalizing Teens' Google Searches Is Just How The UK's Anti-Cybercrime Programs Roll (19)
06:29 Canon Sued For Disabling Printer Scanners When Devices Run Out Of Ink (41)
20:51 Copyright Law Discriminating Against The Blind Finally Struck Down By Court In South Africa (7)
More arrow