Biden Has Wasted A Year Failing To Fill Top Telecom Oversight Spots

from the do-not-pass-go,-do-not-collect-$200 dept

Consumer groups have grown increasingly annoyed at the Biden administration’s failure to pick a third Democratic Commissioner and permanent FCC boss nearly eight months into his term. After the rushed Trump appointment of unqualified Trump BFF Nathan Simington to the agency (as part of that dumb and now deceased plan to have the FCC regulate social media), the agency now sits gridlocked at 2-2 commissioners under interim FCC head Jessica Rosenworcel.

While the FCC can still putter along tackling its usual work on spectrum and device management, the gridlock means it can’t do much of anything controversial, like reversing Trump-era attacks on basic telecom consumer protections, media consolidation rules, or the FCC’s authority to hold telecom giants accountable for much of, well, anything. If you’re a telecom giant like AT&T or Comcast, that’s the gift that just keeps on giving.

As the Washington Post notes, the Biden camp hasn’t appointed anybody to lead the other top telecom regulatory agency, the NTIA. The inaction on both the NTIA and FCC appointments are setting records:

“Nearly eight months into his presidency, Biden has yet to pick permanent leaders for the Federal Communications Commission and the Commerce Department?s National Telecommunications and Information Administration, which together oversee and set policy for the broadcast and Internet service industries. For the FCC, that?s slower than any president since Jimmy Carter in 1977 ? just by a few days ? and for NTIA, it?s the longest ever since the agency?s founding in 1978.

Adding some complexity to this mess is the fact that interim FCC boss Jessica Rosenworcel’s term is up at the end of the year. So if this trend of telecom policy apathy continues, there’s the possibility that the GOP could enjoy a 2-1 Commissioner majority at the Biden FCC. Which, you know, isn’t great if you care about doing absolutely anything to hold regional telecom monopolies accountable. During a pandemic. In which broadband has been shown to be essential infrastructure. And during a climate crisis. When companies are showing their networks still aren’t resilient enough. It’s bad, is what I’m saying. Even if your primary goal isn’t restoring net neutrality and FCC authority.

While the Biden administration certainly inherited a lot to deal with, there’s really no excuse for the delay. It’s not as if the administration is being asked to build a nuclear reactor out of string cheese and lint — it’s just some regulatory appointments and hearings. At this rate, by the time the FCC appoints somebody, it will take most of the rest of the year to get them seated. So whereas the Trump GOP set about dismantling telecom consumer protection with a brutal efficiency, the Biden team will have wasted an entire year. Consumer groups are being polite about it, but it’s a big screw up:

“We’ve had a lost year in policymaking because of the slowness of the Biden administration to name a full FCC,? said Christopher Lewis, president and CEO of consumer group Public Knowledge, which backs reinstating the Obama-era net neutrality rules. ?It’s probably the biggest missed opportunity we have had in communications policy this year.”

The Ajit Pai Donald Trump GOP assault on the FCC’s consumer protection authority was relentless, ruthless, and incredibly efficient. Nathan Simington, generally viewed as unqualified for the role given his lack of telecom experience, got his FCC spot with a 31 day rushed appointment. The Democrats had an opportunity to be equally efficient and ruthless in appointing their picks and restoring FCC authority, and instead they’ve chosen to trip over their own asses. Nobody I’ve spoken to anywhere in DC can provide a functional reason why telecom oversight has simply been forgotten.

Though it is worth reminding folks that the myopic DC internet policy focus on “big tech” is something telecom and media giants (from AT&T to Rupert Murdoch) have actively and repeatedly encouraged. They want the focus exclusively on the large tech giants whose ad empires they covet and not on their own monopolization, privacy, or other problems. It’s also worth reminding folks that there was no such delay, controversy, or consternation when it came time to give Comcast lobbyist David Cohen (a top Biden fundraiser) a kushy job as Canadian Ambassador.

At some point you have to assume that whoever has Biden’s ear likes having an FCC whose consumer protection authority has been largely lobotomized courtesy of one of the most scandal prone and unpopular policy proceedings in internet policy history.

Filed Under: , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Biden Has Wasted A Year Failing To Fill Top Telecom Oversight Spots”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
44 Comments
Anonymoussays:

Re: Re:

It?s also the fault of Congressional Democrats for not pushing him harder to get the fucking job done??and done right, might I add.

Eh, do you have proff most of those actually have done so much as flirt with competency (where that’s not defined in terms of ability to exploit corruption/dysfunction)?

If not: seems kind of like blaming 5 year olds for not forcing a toddler to clean his/her crib.

Federicosays:

Pending Nominations on the Executive Calendar (Civilian)

To be fair, it’s not like the US Senate seems in a hurry to handle the pending nominations either.

Pending Nominations on the Executive Calendar (Civilian)
117th Congress.
Total: 74 Nominations

https://www.cop.senate.gov/legislative/nom_cal_civ.htm

A couple other nominations with the Commerce committee seem to be pending still:

Nomination of Ms. Carol A. Petsonk, of the District of Columbia, to be Assistant Secretary of Transportation (PN438)
Nomination of Ms. Karen J. Hedlund, of Colorado, to be a Member of the Surface Transportation Board (PN535)

https://www.commerce.senate.gov/2021/8/executive-session

Thadsays:

Re: Re: Pending Nominations on the Executive Calendar (Civilian)

He has a lot fewer confirmations than Obama did at this point in 2009, with a similarly slim majority. (There were 60 Democrats then, sort of, as opposed to 50 now, but that was before Democrats eliminated the filibuster for executive nominees, so, then as now, every Democrat had to support a nominee in order to confirm.)

Federicosays:

Pending Nominations on the Executive Calendar (Civilian)

To be fair, it’s not like the US Senate seems in a hurry to handle the pending nominations either.

Pending Nominations on the Executive Calendar (Civilian)
117th Congress.
Total: 74 Nominations

https://www.cop.senate.gov/legislative/nom_cal_civ.htm

A couple other nominations with the Commerce committee seem to be pending still:

Nomination of Ms. Carol A. Petsonk, of the District of Columbia, to be Assistant Secretary of Transportation (PN438)
Nomination of Ms. Karen J. Hedlund, of Colorado, to be a Member of the Surface Transportation Board (PN535)

https://www.commerce.senate.gov/2021/8/executive-session

Anonymoussays:

Re: Re:

Indeed… the timeline moved from "just over 7 months" to "almost 8 months" to "a year" in short order.

And the "wasted" is a bit disingenuous — He’s going to have to fight the senate to get this finished, and likely concluded that the effort would provide a greater return elsewhere. So "diverted effort for" would be a better term.

All that said, I personally started getting annoyed at this situation back in June.

R.H.says:

Re: Re:

The article points out that even if he nominated someone today, it would take most of the rest of the year to actually get them confirmed. It also points out that Interim Chairperson Rosenworcel’s term ends at the end of the year which will require another nomination and set of confirmation hearings. I had thoughts like yours after reading the title and before reading the article but, the article cleared up the issues for me.

Anonymoussays:

So much time with control of all three parts of the lawmaking process has been wasted we might look back on 2021-2023 as the Democrats proving they’re just as impotent as the Republicans trying to repeal Obamacare with the same control.

But hey Joe Manchin’s daughter got rich as fuck by jacking up the price or EpiPens and Kyrsten Sinema disingenuously started her career in the green party but ended up becoming an insufferable centrist since that was her ticket to more power.

Anonymoussays:

So much time with control of all three parts of the lawmaking process has been wasted we might look back on 2021-2023 as the Democrats proving they’re just as impotent as the Republicans trying to repeal Obamacare with the same control.

But hey Joe Manchin’s daughter got rich as fuck by jacking up the price or EpiPens and Kyrsten Sinema disingenuously started her career in the green party but ended up becoming an insufferable centrist since that was her ticket to more power.

Anonymoussays:

Re: Re:

If he nominated someone and the Republicans attack them for no good reason, like they’ve done other nominees, that’s on them. But not nominating someone entirely is neglecting the duties you should be expected to carry out as president. Obama didn’t skip nominating a new supreme court justice because the republicans said they were going to sabotage it. Nominate someone and let the asshole Republicans like John Kennedy embarrass themselves trying to hold Democratic nominees to an absurdly high standard of conduct no one on their side could meet.

That One Guysays:

Oh I can think of a few reasons...

Nobody I’ve spoken to anywhere in DC can provide a functional reason why telecom oversight has simply been forgotten.

Just a teeny tiny bit down the article:

It’s also worth reminding folks that there was no such delay, controversy, or consternation when it came time to give Comcast lobbyist David Cohen (a top Biden fundraiser) a kushy job as Canadian Ambassador.

At this point I struggle to see this delay as anything but intentional given Cohen’s quick nomination and placement as ambassador. A few weeks or maybe a month or two I could see, Biden inherited one hell of a mess to deal with, but letting the FCC stand at a deadlocked 2-2 for this long is downright absurd and it’s only getting harder to see it as a bug rather than a feature.

That One Guysays:

Oh I can think of a few reasons...

Nobody I’ve spoken to anywhere in DC can provide a functional reason why telecom oversight has simply been forgotten.

Just a teeny tiny bit down the article:

It’s also worth reminding folks that there was no such delay, controversy, or consternation when it came time to give Comcast lobbyist David Cohen (a top Biden fundraiser) a kushy job as Canadian Ambassador.

At this point I struggle to see this delay as anything but intentional given Cohen’s quick nomination and placement as ambassador. A few weeks or maybe a month or two I could see, Biden inherited one hell of a mess to deal with, but letting the FCC stand at a deadlocked 2-2 for this long is downright absurd and it’s only getting harder to see it as a bug rather than a feature.

Anonymoussays:

Re:

It’s also the fault of Congressional Democrats for not pushing him harder to get the fucking job done⁠—and done right, might I add.

Eh, do you have proff most of those actually have done so much as flirt with competency (where that’s not defined in terms of ability to exploit corruption/dysfunction)?

If not: seems kind of like blaming 5 year olds for not forcing a toddler to clean his/her crib.

Anonymoussays:

Re:

If he nominated someone and the Republicans attack them for no good reason, like they’ve done other nominees, that’s on them. But not nominating someone entirely is neglecting the duties you should be expected to carry out as president. Obama didn’t skip nominating a new supreme court justice because the republicans said they were going to sabotage it. Nominate someone and let the asshole Republicans like John Kennedy embarrass themselves trying to hold Democratic nominees to an absurdly high standard of conduct no one on their side could meet.

Anonymoussays:

Re:

Indeed… the timeline moved from "just over 7 months" to "almost 8 months" to "a year" in short order.

And the "wasted" is a bit disingenuous — He’s going to have to fight the senate to get this finished, and likely concluded that the effort would provide a greater return elsewhere. So "diverted effort for" would be a better term.

All that said, I personally started getting annoyed at this situation back in June.

R.H.says:

Re:

The article points out that even if he nominated someone today, it would take most of the rest of the year to actually get them confirmed. It also points out that Interim Chairperson Rosenworcel’s term ends at the end of the year which will require another nomination and set of confirmation hearings. I had thoughts like yours after reading the title and before reading the article but, the article cleared up the issues for me.

Thadsays:

Re: Pending Nominations on the Executive Calendar (Civilian)

He has a lot fewer confirmations than Obama did at this point in 2009, with a similarly slim majority. (There were 60 Democrats then, sort of, as opposed to 50 now, but that was before Democrats eliminated the filibuster for executive nominees, so, then as now, every Democrat had to support a nominee in order to confirm.)

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Report this ad??|??Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...
Older Stuff
12:25 Australian Privacy Commissioner Says 7-Eleven Broke Privacy Laws By Scanning Customers' Faces At Survey Kiosks (6)
10:50 Missouri Governor Doubles Down On 'View Source' Hacking Claim; PAC Now Fundraising Over This Bizarrely Stupid Claim (45)
10:45 Daily Deal: The All-in-One Microsoft, Cybersecurity, And Python Exam Prep Training Bundle (0)
09:43 Want To Understand Why U.S. Broadband Sucks? Look At Frontier Communications In Wisconsin, West Virginia (8)
05:36 Massachusetts College Decides Criticizing The Chinese Government Is Hate Speech, Suspends Conservative Student Group (71)
19:57 Le Tigre Sues Barry Mann To Stop Copyright Threats Over Song, Lights Barry Mann On Fire As Well (21)
16:07 Court Says City Of Baltimore's 'Heckler's Veto' Of An Anti-Catholic Rally Violates The First Amendment (15)
13:37 Two Years Later, Judge Finally Realizes That A CDN Provider Is Not Liable For Copyright Infringement On Websites (21)
12:19 Chicago Court Gets Its Prior Restraint On, Tells Police Union Head To STFU About City's Vaccine Mandate (158)
10:55 Verizon 'Visible' Wireless Accounts Hacked, Exploited To Buy New iPhones (8)
10:50 Daily Deal: The MacOS 11 Course (0)
07:55 Suing Social Media Sites Over Acts Of Terrorism Continues To Be A Losing Bet, As 11th Circuit Dumps Another Flawed Lawsuit (11)
02:51 Trump Announces His Own Social Network, 'Truth Social,' Which Says It Can Kick Off Users For Any Reason (And Already Is) (100)
19:51 Facebook AI Moderation Continues To Suck Because Moderation At Scale Is Impossible (26)
16:12 Content Moderation Case Studies: Snapchat Disables GIPHY Integration After Racist 'Sticker' Is Discovered (2018) (11)
13:54 Arlo Makes Live Customer Service A Luxury Option (8)
12:05 Delta Proudly Announces Its Participation In The DHS's Expanded Biometric Collection Program (5)
11:03 LinkedIn (Mostly) Exits China, Citing Escalating Demands For Censorship (14)
10:57 Daily Deal: The Python, Git, And YAML Bundle (0)
09:37 British Telecom Wants Netflix To Pay A Tax Simply Because Squid Game Is Popular (32)
06:41 Report: Client-Side Scanning Is An Insecure Nightmare Just Waiting To Be Exploited By Governments (35)
20:38 MLB In Talks To Offer Streaming For All Teams' Home Games In-Market Even Without A Cable Subscription (10)
15:55 Appeals Court Says Couple's Lawsuit Over Bogus Vehicle Forfeiture Can Continue (15)
13:30 Techdirt Podcast Episode 301: Scarcity, Abundance & NFTs (0)
12:03 Hollywood Is Betting On Filtering Mandates, But Working Copyright Algorithms Simply Don't Exist (66)
10:45 Introducing The Techdirt Insider Discord (4)
10:40 Daily Deal: The Dynamic 2021 DevOps Training Bundle (0)
09:29 Criminalizing Teens' Google Searches Is Just How The UK's Anti-Cybercrime Programs Roll (19)
06:29 Canon Sued For Disabling Printer Scanners When Devices Run Out Of Ink (41)
20:51 Copyright Law Discriminating Against The Blind Finally Struck Down By Court In South Africa (7)
More arrow