Content Moderation Case Study: Bing Search Results Erases Images Of 'Tank Man' On Anniversary Of Tiananmen Square Crackdown (2021)

from the tank-man's-gone-missing dept

Summary: On the 32nd anniversary of the Tiananmen Square protests, internet users noticed Microsoft’s Bing search engine was producing some interesting results. Or, rather, it wasn’t producing expected search results for some possibly interesting reasons.

Users searching for the most iconic image of the protests — that of the unidentified person known only as “Tank Man” — were coming up empty. It appeared that Microsoft’s search engine was blocking results for an image that often serves as shorthand for rebellion against the Chinese government.

As was reported by several web users, followed by several news outlets, the apparent blocking of search results could be observed in both the United States and the United Kingdom, leaving users with the impression the Chinese government had pressured Microsoft to moderate search results for “tank man” in hopes of reducing any remembrance of the Tiananmen Square Massacre, which resulted in the deaths of 2,500-3,500 protesters.

The apparent censorship was blamed on Microsoft’s close relationship with the Chinese government, which allowed its search engine to be accessed by Chinese residents in exchange for complying with government censorship requests.

This led to Microsoft being criticized by prominent politicians for apparently allowing the Chinese government to dictate what users around the world could access in relation to the Tiananmen Square protests.

Company Considerations:

  • When complying to one government’s interests, how can Microsoft ensure these considerations don’t affect users located elsewhere in the world?
  • How can compliance departments assist in handling edge cases and/or overly-broad moderation demands? 
  • What are the tradeoffs for content providers when weighing offended users against offended governments?
  • What ethical concerns should be taken into consideration when entering markets controlled by oppressive governments? Is there a line companies should not be willing to cross when seeking to expand their user base so as not to offend or alienate the user base they already have? 

Issue Considerations:

  • What options can companies pursue when seeking to do business in countries with historically-censorial/repressive regimes to prevent collateral moderation damage to users located elsewhere?
  • What sort of cost/benefit analysis, both human and fiscal, should take place before offering a product in countries with known human rights issues?

Resolution: Shortly after the apparent censorship of the iconic “Tank Man” image was reported, Microsoft claimed the very timely removal of relevant search results was the byproduct of “accidental human error.” 

However, the company refused to offer any additional explanation. And, while searching the term “Tank Man” produced search results in Bing, it did not generate the expected results.

Image via The Verge

Several hours after the first “fix,” things returned to normal, with “Tank Man” searches bringing up the actual Tank Man, rather than just tanks or tanks with men near or on the tanks.

Image via Twitter user Steven F

More clarification and comment was sought, but Microsoft apparently had nothing more to say about this “human error” and its conspicuous timing. Nor did it offer any details on whether or not this “human error” originated with its Beijing team. It also didn’t explain why the first fix resulted in images very few people would associate with the term “Tank Man.”

Originally posted to the Trust & Safety Foundation website.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,
Companies: microsoft

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Content Moderation Case Study: Bing Search Results Erases Images Of 'Tank Man' On Anniversary Of Tiananmen Square Crackdown (2021)”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
33 Comments
Kobysays:

Obvious

More clarification and comment was sought, but Microsoft apparently had nothing more to say about this "human error" and its conspicuous timing….

When the mysterious "glitch" occurs, and there’s no explanation, we know that they’re lying. This is obvious if it favors a repressive government. But for some strange reason, when it’s utilized over here in the United States for political censorship, suddenly a lot of folks begin apologizing for the tech corporation.

That One Guysays:

First rule of lying Microsoft...

‘Human error’ that kicked in on the anniversary and resulted in the removal of a search result that china really would rather people not know/talk about? Yeah Microsoft should have just admitted that either they folded temporarily to pressure or an employee went rogue and blocked the search result against the company’s wishes, because an excuse that laughably bad just leaves the company looking even worse than if they’d just owned it.

PaulTsays:

" And, while searching the term "Tank Man" produced search results in Bing, it did not generate the expected results"

To be fair, Bing is a shockingly poor search engine in a lot of ways. I have had it set to my default for a couple of months to gather some additional MS reward points and I’d say 8 times out of 10 I have to switch to Google to find what I’m looking for. I don’t do much image searching, but whether it’s a technical query, searching news or just a general search on another subject, it rarely returns what I’m actually looking for. Sometimes, the opposite, such as when I’m looking for info on facts relating to a particular issue and the first page of results is just right-wing opinion pieces, whereas Google’s first results will be the primary sources.

Valissays:

Humanity vs brutality

What has always struck me about this clip is how hard the tank driver is trying to avoid hitting the protester. This shows how much humanity and empathy Chinese people have compared to US Americans. If that tank driver had been a US American he would’ve just driven over the protester, killing him dead (Especially if the protester had been black, that American tank driver would’ve crushed him into a bloody smear on the pavement). But then some people are more civilised than others.

OGquakersays:

Who Do THEY think THEY Are? Blocking history! The horror, the...

Yea, The Japanese bombed Chung King and other Chinese cities from the air, killing dozens at a time. The US strafed the roads out of Dresden after "Bomber Harris" annihilated that wooden city the night before. Lord Louis Mountbatten was so delighted with the result that my father spent weeks at Culver City film studios designing a firestorm so as not to burn the Palace in the Shitamachi Prefect. 15 sq.mi. and 88 thousand people died that morning… But wait https://imgur.com/a/KioLQHo

Anonymoussays:

Re:

I’ve been telling you to do it for years

Hi antidirt. Glad to see you’re finally moving onto the acceptance part of your grief, but it looks like you’re still struggling with the bargaining part. Does your wife know that you still need to insult the site in order to get an erection? How’s that Paul Hansmeier fund coming along, by the way?

PaulTsays:

Re:

"Nobody fucking cares"

Apparently you do, since it got you so angry. A person who doesn’t care wouldn’t be mashing the keyboard in a fit of rage.

"I’ve been telling you to do it for years"

Nobody gives 2 shits about what you want. However, someone with a passing relationship to reality would understand that by hate reading every article and whining about what you read, generates more traffic than just not coming here. Me replying to you here and mocking your childish inability to control your own impulses increases traffic here, and thus ensures you will never get your wish.

That does seem to be the modus operandi of your type – you’re unable to stop doing things to yourself that directly cause the problems you whine about.

"My facebook page gets more comments then your stupid fucking blog site."

Are the comments from similar drooling morons, or from people laughing at you the same way we do here? Not that "not as popular as Facebook" means anything to intelligent people, but without context we can’t tell if you get support over there, or that your idiocy just provides comedy value to a wider audience.

Paul Bsays:

Re: Re: Re: First rule of lying Microsoft...

China creates "outrage" for anything on a long list of stuff China does not like. The local population cant really access Western websites at all. So when a basketball says something semi pro Taiwan or Hong Kong the censors are the ones creating the "Outrage Storm".

This is on top of the current storm of, If you are a Tech Mogul, Actor, or other highly popular person, you better follow the party line or we can come for you even if your a billionaire.

If Jack Ma can be jailed and stuff for a minor comment, you have no hope but to pull the party line in China.

OGquakersays:

1,000,000 or 2,000,000 or 110k is just a number

The two A-bombs are a distraction, a B-29 Navigator friend told me 106 Japanese cities were burned, and he (they) burned EVERYTHING above the 38th parallel. Another of my mentors was shan@rand org.
Even the image of Queensland Times front page wanders in & out and crosses up facts. AIG insurance had more to do with the design of Operation Meetinghouse than LeMay who takes the rap: midnight 9-10 March 1945 is sheep-dipped and lied about everywhere. Douglas Aircraft/ Rand was commissioned to research and develop Strategic weapons (mass urbancide) and analyze their use, CalTech’s Vista Project (1950) put the lie to "Strategic" and the PI (Oppenheimer) got buried.

P.S. Louis Francis Albert Victor Nicholas Mountbatten 1st Earl Mountbatten of Burma, Sir Arthur Travers "Bomber" Harris 1st Baronet GCB, OBE, AFC, and my Father got a (United States) Legion of Merit… I have pics of them walking together on the UK bomb test range.
P.P.S. Vista Project paid for our house. See https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305748812000266

OGquakersays:

What? Never happened.

Late in 1997, about 400 UCLA students converged a protest against Armand Hammer & Occidental petroleum in front of his Westwood headquarters, eventually 12 or 15 locked hands in steel tubes across Wilshire Blvd. LAPD had a few horse cops stomping around, TV helicopters were incessant for hours, cops started cutting kids out of the pipes. We locked up the boulevard from 3 to 6PM on Friday. Not one frame or mention was made on LA’s 3-5 TV new channels that night or that week. Never happened. https://nvdatabase.swarthmore.edu/content/uwa-people-block-occidental-petroleum-colombia-1995-2001

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »