US Patent Office Making Some Changes To The Rules

from the good-for-them dept

With Congress debating patent reform and the Supreme Court correcting the mistakes of lower courts when it comes to patent laws, it seems that the US Patent and Trademark Office is finally starting to realize that there’s widespread dissatisfaction with how it’s going about things. Perhaps it’s starting to realize that the purpose of the USPTO isn’t to grant patents, but to promote innovation. To that end, it’s making some minor, but still important, changes to the rules for patent examiners, hoping to improve the quality of patents being approved. The latest change is to try to cut down on overly broad patents and patents where the actual invention isn’t entirely clear, by forcing applicants to only include a single invention in a claim. This way the examiners know what the invention is that they’re actually supposed to be examining. The fact that this wasn’t in place before (along with the suggestion that patent examiners weren’t entirely sure what they were examining) should say something about the state of our patent system.

Filed Under: , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “US Patent Office Making Some Changes To The Rules”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
6 Comments
Mystified says:

Let's Hope

Let’s hope the process will become a continuing, incremental tuning of the system and not a one-time shot in the dark.

Let’s applaud and encourage their efforts and not be too cynical or skeptical. Don’t forget – if you aren’t part of the solution you are part of the problem. Speak up to your congressmen and tell them what’s needed, or at least what is wrong. Complaining to nobody in particular gets you nowhere.

First?

Bill says:

Even though these slight changes have come, won’t all submissions prior be grand-fathered? Fixing future submissions doesn’t do a whole lot if we’re stuck with the incompetence of the past. While I applaud these baby steps, unless they are a prelude to sweeping changes, I don’t see this as anything more than “business as usual”.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...