DailyDirt: Storing Energy In Organic Molecules
from the urls-we-dig-up dept
Petroleum products are a pretty convenient way to store energy. It’s just unfortunate that burning the stuff releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Biofuels could be a solution, but relying on natural biological processes can be difficult to scale up — especially if we expect biofuels to try to match up with the current energy demands. Researchers are working on ways to modify biology or circumvent it with chemical engineering to make some carbon neutral hydrocarbon fuels in large quantities. Here are a few possible examples.
- A copper catalyst system can produce ethanol (and acetate) from carbon monoxide at room temperature and pressure — without any kind of fermentation. This copper-based system relies on an electrochemical cell and could be a environmentally-friendly way to produce a non-toxic, renewable fuel. [url]
- Scientists have played with Escherichia coli bacteria that can generate propane gas. The process needs a lot more work to become a practical way to produce propane as a fuel, but a bioreactor to make propane could be viable in a decade or so. (Maybe.) [url]
- Some species of bacteria have been found that can consume pure electricity for food. These naturally-occurring microorganisms usually live near hydrothermal vents on the seafloor, but if they can feed on electrons directly (instead of soluble bits of iron), then they might be able to store energy in biomolecules for us and turn electricity into convenient biofuels. [url]
If you’d like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) Techdirt post via StumbleUpon.
Filed Under: bacteria, biofuel, biotech, carbon dioxide, electricity, energy, ethanol, extremophiles, fuel, hydrocarbons, petroleum, propane
Comments on “DailyDirt: Storing Energy In Organic Molecules”
uh, why propane when bacteria already make plenty of methane?
Re: Re:
The difference between propane and natural gas is like the difference between gasoline and crude oil. It’s just better and more useful all-around when refined from its natural state. Of particular note, methane is a harmful greenhouse gas while propane is not.
Re: Re: Re:
Doesn’t really matter since it is supposed to be burned anyway.
Re: Re: Re: Re:
The object isn’t to just burn them and screw the details. The object is to get useful and efficient energy from them.
Bugs Feeding Only On Electricity May Live, But They Cannot Grow And Reproduce
Just thought I’d point that out.
“Petroleum products are a pretty convenient way to store energy.”
How do we store energy in those products?
I left a can of regular gas plugged in overnight and it didn’t even turn into high-test.
Eh?
Some problems, CO2 is a good gas, plants use it to produce foodstuffs for animals. I like to eat animals, therefore good gas. Second problem, is if cardox is bad, why try to produce more synthetically, making it more expensive to obtain. Now I would agree to more efficient systems, less wasted heat for the amount of gas consumed. Redesigned systems to capture the waste heats and produce something usehul from that.
Re: Eh?
“CO2 is a good gas, plants use it to produce foodstuffs for animals. I like to eat animals, therefore good gas.”
This is much too simplistic. CO2 is a gas that has both good and bad effects. As with most chemicals, whether it’s good or bad depends on a combination of things — mostly where it is and how much of it is there.
Carbon dioxide to ethanol at room temperature
Combine that copper catalyst process that converts carbon monoxide to ethanol, with this Brookhaven room temperature process for converting carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide, and you would really have something.