Flying Car, Already Cleared For Skies, Now Cleared For Roads Too
from the but-where's-my-flying-car dept
Ah, the cry of we-want-the-future-now folks has been “where’s my flying car?” Well, a very simple version of one may finally be coming to market. A year ago, we noted that the Terrafugia Transition “roadable aircraft” had been approved by the FAA for flight as a light sports aircraft (meaning you don’t even need a full pilots license). But it apparently took another year for the Transition to get the necessary “exemptions” from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to let the thing go on the road.
So what kinds of special exemptions does a “roadable aircraft” (best name ever) need? Well, special windows, for one. Regular laminated automotive safety glass is too heavy for the Transition while in the air, and there’s always a danger that a bird could fracture it. (Dang birds!) Instead of glass windows, the Transition will use a polycarbonate material less prone to shattering. NHTSA also signed off on the use of special tires.
Now, of course, this isn’t really the Jetsons-like vision of the flying car people have talked about for ages. The reason it’s called a “roadable aircraft” rather than a “flying car” is that the emphasis here is definitely on the aircraft part, and you still have to take off and land at an airport. It’s just that you can drive to and from the airport in the same vehicle. And it’ll only set you back $250,000 (about $50,000 more than what was reported last year). By the time it actually hits the market next year, perhaps it’ll cost even more.
Filed Under: flying cars, roadable aircraft, transition
Companies: faa, nhtsa, terrafugia
Comments on “Flying Car, Already Cleared For Skies, Now Cleared For Roads Too”
Why is this article here? It has nothing to do with music piracy.
Re: Re:
Maybe because is tech related in a website dedicated to tech things with a focus on jurisprudence but not oblivious to other matters on the field?
Re: Re:
Clue’s in the name: Techdirt.
Re: Re:
It’s a prelude to the inevitable patent/copyright debacle when person A (makers of the roadable aircraft) sues person B (silly fool who dares to make his/her own version) for infringement.
Re: Re:
Why is this comment here? It has nothing to do with calling people freetards.
That was the sound of a thousand insurance actuarial departments collectively facepalming and admitting to themselves they’ve got to get off their asses and actually come up with insurance and rates for this thing.
Re: (SMACK)
–le sigh– No more posting before coffee… there was supposed to be a subject on the first one, but I wrote it with the “
Re: Re: (SMACK)
Don’t feel bad. It also happens if you write
Re: (SMACK)
Oh come ON! stupid HTML. it just ate half my prior comment just like the first subject. Coffee time.
Oh joy...
I can’t wait to read about the stupid things that people do with this. Texting while landing, see how many college kids we can pack into a car/plane/car. I am all giggly with excitement!
Re: Oh joy...
Except not. This thing is an airplane first and a car second.
That means you have to have a small aircraft pilot’s license to be able to do anything in the air with this thing.
With the amount of time, cost, and effort it takes to get a pilot’s license, as well as the cost of the roadable aircraft itself, you can be sure everything you just listed off is not going to happen.
Enjoy the shattering of your dreams.
Re: Re: Oh joy...
Buzzkill!
Re: Re: Oh joy...
According to sportpilot.org it’s only $3-5000 and 20 hours of time in the US.
Yeah it sounds like alot but I live in the Czech Republic where it takes around $1000 and I think (not sure of the exact time) 40 hours of driving to get a car license.
So to me this looks extremely reasonable 🙂
Re: Re: Oh joy...
I sat back and thought about how naive your response to my light-hearted comment was and I briefly hesitated posting this as I don’t want to get into an argument but I couldn’t resist. You are overlooking a few factors… 1) Theft, I’m sure there will be instructions on the web on how to hotwire one of these bad boys. I’m sure somebody with flight simulator will think thatthey can give this thing a whirl.
2) Rich kids not appreciating the value of daddy’s dollar. You are assuming that everyone will be doing what they are supposed to be doing. We all know what happen when you assume.
Re: Re: Re: Oh joy...
Darn it. Should have re-read before posting. Sorry for the typos.
Re: Re: Oh joy...
You’re just mad because your mom will have to lose 500 lbs to fit in one.
Re: Re: Re: Oh joy...
Ooooh, a fat mom joke, how witty. Well, my dad can beat up your dad!
They forgot to get a designer to work with them. Interesting but hella-ugly. I can’t see this competing with the Icon A5. That was designed by an F-16 pilot and a skateboarder and is also ‘roadable’, as in you can pull it on a trailer like a boat and also park it in the driveway. But it has the advantage of being dead sexy and half the price.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMMm_MczGL0
Zero Point Energy
We could be using zero point energy to “fuel” flying cars, among other things, but that makes too much sense.
The TSA has already begun a feasibility study to determine how best to place agents to inspect each car owner before they take to the skies. This will be a boon for the scatter imaging manufactures as each household will be required to purchase, maintain and staff each scanner.
Re: Re:
Please, don’t give them ideas…they’ll use them and never pay you a dime!!!
Airports
> you still have to take off and land at an airport
Why? You don’t even have to take off and land at an airport in an actual *airplane*. People fly out of their own property all the time– crop dusters, private planes landing in fields and on dirt roads, etc.
Oops. Even though the NHTSA approved it does not mean it is going anywhere.
Each state has its own requirements.
Also, how is a state going to know how to tax this thing?