Offering Solutions Rather Than Criticism

from the stop-bashing-your-head dept

stop bashing your head

Inspired by responses to Let’s Make More Regulations.

Filed Under: , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Offering Solutions Rather Than Criticism”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
40 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

For a while I was associated with a Professional Placement Network in the 1980s.

It was surprising how many professional candidates first response upon becoming unemployed was not to do any activity that would eliminate their unemployment but instead engage for months at a time in the creation of forms and procedures that other candidates were required [in the opinion of the creditor] to complete and follow in order secure a new position. Not surprising most of these forms and procedures were in conflict with the forms and procedures created by other equal minded candidates or that most were completely ludicrous.

out_of_the_blue says:

So let's have your solutions!

You need to label your characters for a start; I can’t disambiguate the contradictory demand for solution with the character bashing itself on the head. I think that if you DO have a solution (to copyright, I presume, it’s also left to imagination), then the industry actually /is/ waiting to hear it.

So indeed, let’s hear the solution. — You MUST consider that for the industry, getting rid of copyright is a complete non-starter, will be rejected out of hand, won’t get a hearing, they definitely and entirely won’t accept it. — So with regard to that REALITY, taking it as chiseled into granite, DISH.

darryl says:

Re: So let's have your solutions!

her solution is MORE RULES, starting with rule 1.

You are not allowed to bash your head, and he is enforcing that rule.

Criticism would have been “You are not doing it right”, or “that club is not big enough” or “you are doing it all wrong”.

A Solution would be:

“use that club, its bigger”, “use a steel club”, “put nails in it”, “use a gun”.

darryl says:

Re: So let's have your solutions!

her solution is MORE RULES, starting with rule 1.

You are not allowed to bash your head, and he is enforcing that rule.

Criticism would have been “You are not doing it right”, or “that club is not big enough” or “you are doing it all wrong”.

A Solution would be:

“use that club, its bigger”, “use a steel club”, “put nails in it”, “use a gun”.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: So let's have your solutions!

So indeed, let’s hear the solution. — You MUST consider that for the industry, getting rid of copyright is a complete non-starter, will be rejected out of hand, won’t get a hearing, they definitely and entirely won’t accept it.

Translation: You MUST consider that for the industry, not bashing one’s own head is a complete non-starter, will be rejected out of hand, won’t get a hearing, they definitely and entirely won’t accept it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Its another rule - enforced "stop bashing your head"

Nina did you read what you ‘wrote’ ????

He DID offer a solution, and he DID NOT make any criticism.

his solution STOP BASHING YOUR HEAD

So not only is it stupid, it’s WRONG….

It is NOT critiscism to say “STOP BASHING YOUR HEAD”

You might even say, it is a RULE
I thought you were against more rules….

Doesn’t that cartoon (for want of a better name), state that MORE RULES are better ?

He made a rule, that people are not allowed to bash their heads, and he is enforcing rule by stating “stop bashing your head” !.

When you start telling people what they can do, and what they cannot do, that is making RULES..

Nina dont give up your day job…
You do not appear to really think much through Nina. Makes you lose what little credability you might of had, if any…

xenomancer (profile) says:

Re: Its another rule - enforced "stop bashing your head"

I’m fairly certain that “stop bashing your head!” was more of an emphatic plea for sanity (a solution!) than a draconian mandate (often a problem). Again, glad you found a problem and shared. Please let the rest of the class know when you come up with a solution.

darryl says:

Re: Re: Its another rule - enforced "stop bashing your head"

its still one person trying to enforce their will onto another person.

that’s a rule… enacted..

Does that guy have any rights over who can or cannot bash their own heads ?
Does he have a patent on it, or copyright.

What if it said “Keep bashing your head” ?

He wants to achieve a result, he wants to bash his head, a solution would be to make it easier for him to do it, but it appears he allready has found that solution, his solution is to use a club.

He had a problem he needed to solve (to bash his head), he developed A METHOD to solve that problem, (using the club). He applied that solution to his problem, and some idiot comes up and tells him it is against ‘his’ rules and to STOP.

Problem and solution:

it this case, it appears the SOLUTION, is MORE RULES.

Rule 1. Do not bash your head
Rule 2. Do as I say.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re: Its another rule - enforced "stop bashing your head"

He wants to achieve a result, he wants to bash his head, a solution would be to make it easier for him to do it, but it appears he allready has found that solution, his solution is to use a club.

Darryl talking about himself in the third person like that is kind of creepy.

doughless (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Its another rule - enforced "stop bashing your head"

To start, I will admit Nina’s cartoons can be hit or miss to me, but I can’t help but notice this one either went way over your head, or you’re being intentionally disingenuous (most people here assume the latter from you, which is why they keep labelling you as a troll).

Your and others’ comments are criticizing Nina’s use of the word criticism by mentioning that the character didn’t actually offer any criticism. If I’m interpreting the comic right, I think that’s the whole point. The only person in the comic that misinterpreted the suggestion as criticism is the person bashing their head. Again, I’m interpreting that Nina’s entire point is that most of the Techdirt community are trying to give rational suggestions to others that are interpreted as criticism.

Second, that is really a stretch to say that offering a suggestion to someone else is enforcing a rule. When I offer a suggestion, you can choose (or not) to follow it. I see no attempt by the character in the final frame trying to force anything on the other.

Anonymous Coward says:

An ironic cartoon given that this blog complains endlessly about nearly everything, yet, when pressed for solutions they are either barely-sketched, wildly implausible, or some variant of “can’t we just apply the scientific method to every economic/legal/social/political process and, you know, see what happens?” (Answer, by the way: no.)

xenomancer (profile) says:

Re: Re:

I don’t see why we can’t apply the scientific method in those cases. Its pretty straight forward: guess, check, LEARN SOMETHING, rinse, repeat. There’s a higher reason the United States was nicknamed “the grand experiment.” Its not just because we were flying by the seat of our collective pants at its inception.

“Our nation was founded as an experiment in human liberty.”
-John Foster Dulles

“The preservation of the sacred fire of liberty . . is finally staked, on the experiment entrusted to the hands of the American People.”
– George Washington

“I believe that there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachment of those in power, than by violent and sudden usurpation’s.”
– James Madison

The Dude says:

Eh... I've used this argument before...

I had a professor who was going to the media with something that the university was doing to ‘save money’ that was infact losing it money… but he was just going forward with a complaint. I told him “You should do a cost/benifit analysis of this action vrs any other action for saving money you can do, and bring that to both the press and the heads of the university. You shouldn’t just scream a complaint, it makes you look like a pointless complainer still fighting against the Vietnam war.”

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...