DailyDirt: People Colored

from the urls-we-dig-up dept

There used to be Crayola crayons labeled "flesh" -- which was re-named to "peach" in 1962, and now Crayola has a pack of eight crayons specifically called "multicultural" that includes: black, sepia, peach, apricot, white, tan, mahogany and burnt sienna. However, there are other colors that have been used to label people, like red and blue. The history of these color associations isn't so black and white. Here are just a few interesting links on how we've changed looking at colors over the years. If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) Techdirt post.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: babies, blue, color, crayons, democrat, perception, red, republican
Companies: crayola


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Nov 2012 @ 5:27pm

    Check this out: "1927 Baby Boys Wore Pink"
    http://www.newstrick.com/2012/04/1927-baby-boys-wore-pink.html

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Nov 2012 @ 5:28pm

    a crayon labeled flesh!

    that sounds like it's teaching kids to become cannibals or something. yuck.

    kids can dip their flesh crayons in glue and munch away.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Pirate Prats, 8 Nov 2012 @ 6:46pm

    The red/blue was flipped in the 2000 election. It's the tradition way with 'left' parties being red and 'right' being blue.
    But Fox changed it in 2000.

    For a REALLY funny thing, we've all heard about 'purple states' (Ohio, Iowa, Florida, Virginia, etc were Purple States this election), What happens when you get a guy barely out of his teens, who has most of his political experiance as a candidate in Canada running a US party? Yes, he decides that the party color should be PURPLE, because that's what it was in Canada...

    This happened with the US Pirate Party, while the person in question was SUPPOSED to be working on statutes.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Andrew Norton (profile), 8 Nov 2012 @ 6:52pm

    Actually, the baby colours is wrong. before the 30s/40s, red/pink was for boys, and blue was for girls, because red was a strong colour, for blood and war and such. Blue was considered a soft colour.
    QI told me so - https://sites.google.com/site/qitranscripts/transcripts/7x07

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Leigh Beadon (profile), 9 Nov 2012 @ 10:01am

      Re:

      That was my first reaction too (and QI rules!) but if you read the full article it's clear that they are well aware of the switching around and it was never quite as clear-cut as that QI episode made it sound. At the same time that some were promoting pink for boys, blue for girls, others were promoting the reverse and others still were saying it had nothing to do with gender and should be based on hair colour and stuff like that.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Andrew Norton (profile), 9 Nov 2012 @ 11:03am

        Re: Re:

        I think it's the opposite.
        I think the smithsonian piece focuses more on a few personal choices after the event (like FDR in a white dress 140 years ago) rather than contemporary accounts in the media showing surprise.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Andrew D. Todd, 9 Nov 2012 @ 1:12am

    Slightly Off-Topic

    Wikipedia has a table of Crayola colors, with 24-bit equivalents, so that you can paste them into a paint program.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Crayola_crayon_colors

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    AG Wright (profile), 9 Nov 2012 @ 4:08am

    Colors for kids

    Personally back in the day when I had babies I usually dressed them in yellow. Leave them guessing.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    JJ Joseph, 9 Nov 2012 @ 2:32pm

    Red vs Blue?

    The commies will always be "the reds". Their flags are always red, and they self-identify as reds. Everywhere in the world, Conservative parties are blue, as in "blue blooded". So, yes, it is odd that the Republicans label themselves as the red party.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat

Warning: include(/home/beta6/deploy/itasca_20201215-3691-c395/includes/right_column/rc_promo_discord_chat.inc): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/beta6/deploy/itasca_20201215-3691-c395/includes/right_column/rc_module_promo.inc on line 8

Warning: include(): Failed opening '/home/beta6/deploy/itasca_20201215-3691-c395/includes/right_column/rc_promo_discord_chat.inc' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/share/pear:/home/beta6/deploy/itasca_20201215-3691-c395:/home/beta6/deploy/itasca_20201215-3691-c395/..') in /home/beta6/deploy/itasca_20201215-3691-c395/includes/right_column/rc_module_promo.inc on line 8
Recent Stories
.

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.