In 2009, NYPD Issued 'Surveillance Request' To 'Identify' Anonymous Members During Their Anti-Scientology Rally

from the people-wearing-masks-are-inherently-suspicious dept

Recently, Adrian Chen tweeted out something interesting: a link to an internal NYPD document detailing a “surveillance request” to stake out a rally by Anonymous at the Church of Scientology. Its purpose? To “identify as many members of as possible.” The report goes on to note that the difficulty level of this task might be upped significantly.

Please note that members of the group frequently wears masks covering their entire faces.

This is an important distinction, as certain members of the surveillance unit might have been more inclined to snoop on more easily identified, unmasked citizens. Now, I can understand why the NYPD might want to uncover the identities of Anonymous members as the (not really an) organization has wreaked a lot of havoc in various areas, most of them online. But there is something unsettling about a police force attending demonstrations and rallies to perform intel rather than to keep the peace.

But actions taken during Occupy Wall Street show that the PD’s agenda usually means treating protesters (as well as anyone with a camera) as criminals. And attempting to “unmask” participants in an Anonymous rally lumps all attendees in with the activist group, even if many of them have never actively participated in any illegal activities. It also shows a fundamental misunderstanding of Anonymous’ “structure,” i.e., there is none. There’s no “head” to capture and mount on the metaphorical wall. There’s also no “tail” to drag off to HQ and sweat down in hopes of it offering up higher-ranked members.

While it’s true that you may find some criminals within the ranks of protesters for any cause, heading into protests with the intent of compiling a “To Arrest” list puts police officers into entirely the wrong mindset. There’s enough “us vs. them” attitude floating around already. This simply creates an antagonism that skews the perception of every witnessed activity. Peaceful protests are now just riots waiting to happen. It’s not people united for a single cause, it’s a hive mind operating under a devious directive. The whole thing is unhealthy for both the police and the public.

Also worth noting is the fact that this occurred before the Occupy protests, when Anonymous targeted the NYPD for its acts of brutality against the protesters, meaning this attempt to unmask members wasn’t a retaliatory act (which isn’t OK but is at least a rationale) or an attempt to find those who made threats against the department.

That being said, the surveillance request (what there is of it) contains the following sentence, which is notable both for a.) the inventive disgustingness of the act and b.) not being accompanied by a drunk and disorderly citation.

Most recently, a member ran into the church covered in vaseline and pubic hairs.

Yeah. This actually happened. And it also included nail clippings. This extremely random act of civil disobedience was denounced by irritated, non-Anonymous Scientology critics and the greased-up pube delivery system was arrested, briefly investigated and discharged by the NYPD.

Most notably, there’s no reason given for the surveillance unless you count Vaseline Man as a valid impetus. The entire form is almost completely blank, giving the whole thing an appearance of “just because.” Maybe the NYPD felt No One’s Personal Army posed a threat to Mayor Bloomberg’s Personal Army. Or maybe the Church of Scientology wields just as much power as people attribute to it.

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “In 2009, NYPD Issued 'Surveillance Request' To 'Identify' Anonymous Members During Their Anti-Scientology Rally”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
20 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

It is more like NYPD is anti any kind of demonstrations or people thinking about doing anything they do not like. To me it is a wrong mindset to try to actively stop something before anything gets from pure thoughts to suspect actions. The possibility that NYPD will take actions against innocents on account of mistaken interpretations is just not a good thing for NYPDs respect among the people or their budget…

It is a sign of a very bad administration when they cannot tolerate people with other opinions than their own. Bloomberg draws clear resemblance to autocrats with his disregard for the legal system and peoples rights.

anonymouse says:

You can read over a lot of the internet about how people are against wearing the Guy Fawkes mask, All of those people misunderstand why the mask is popular and are actually doing the regimes job for them by trying to stop people using them,I would suspect most who say the mask is stupid are professional shills trying and succeeding in many cases to shame people into not wearing the masks so they can identify them. I would say the masks are the best way to retain your identity and if most are wearing them they cannot or will not arrest all of them and if they do well it just proves the case more and more that we live in a police state.

Anonymous Coward says:

Anyone who participates in protests, against corporations or governments, are considered ‘extremists’ according to a Department of Defense training manual. The Founding Fathers of the United States are listed as ‘extremists’ in this manual.

“A Department of Defense teaching guide meant to fight extremism advises students that rather than ?dressing in sheets? modern-day radicals ?will talk of individual liberties, states? rights, and how to make the world a better place,? and describes 18th-century American patriots seeking freedom from the British as belonging to ?extremist ideologies.?

http://dailycaller.com/2013/08/23/defense-department-guide-calls-founding-fathers-extremist/

James (profile) says:

from the "I didn't speak up because I wasn't ____________" dept.

Ask any motorcyclist who’s been riding for more than 15 years or so, and this kind of behavior will bring back (not so fond) memories.

Any gathering of more than, say, a dozen bikes would draw the attention of the local constabulary. There were a handful of times I saw cops going down a line of bikes, taking down license plate numbers and sometimes checking VINs.

Not for any enforcement action … simply because there were a lot of bikes around, and that meant danger.

Never mind that I, and the people I rode with, didn’t belong to motorcycle clubs (in the gangster sense), and the most illegal thing we did was ride too fast.

But actions taken during Occupy Wall Street show that the PD’s agenda usually means treating protesters (as well as anyone with a camera) as criminals. And attempting to “unmask” participants in an Anonymous rally lumps all attendees in with the activist group, even if many of them have never actively participated in any illegal activities. It also shows a fundamental misunderstanding of Anonymous’ “structure,” i.e., there is none. There’s no “head” to capture and mount on the metaphorical wall. There’s also no “tail” to drag off to HQ and sweat down in hopes of it offering up higher-ranked members.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...