Survey: 27% Think A Gigabyte Is a Type Of South American Insect [Update: Or Not]

from the I-see-dumb-people dept

Update: Or not. It appears that this survey may be bogus. Still, the key point, that we’ve noted for years, is that the average person has no idea how much a gigabyte really is — and we’d bet that’s still true, even if this “survey” appears to be just a marketing stunt.

A new survey from a UK company unsurprisingly found that more than a few people are slightly clueless when it comes to technology terms. The multiple-choice survey, which polled 2,392 U.S. men and women 18 years of age or older, found that one in ten Americans believe that html is some form of sexually-transmitted disease. While most survey respondents knew the definition of more general terms (like “dialect”), the full survey (pdf) found that even basic tech terms confused many people. 42% thought a motherboard was a deck on a cruise ship, 15% thought that software was comfortable clothing, and 77% of respondents didn’t know what SEO meant.

Interestingly, while 67% respondents knew that a gigabyte was a unit of measurement of digital information (though the survey didn’t ask them how much information is contained in a gigabyte), 27% believed that a gigabyte was a type of South American insect. That’s actually a better statistic than I’ve seen in the past. A 2008 poll suggested that 87% of those polled had no idea what a gigabyte was or how many they use. The New York Times did an entirely unscientific street poll a few years back and found that few, if any, passers by knew what a megabyte is:

“If a sampling of pedestrians on the streets of Brooklyn is any guide, most people have only a vague idea. One said a megabyte was “the amount of something we have to use the Internet,” adding, “We should have three or four.” Miranda Popkey, 24, was closer: “It’s a measure of how much information you store. If there are too many of them, I can’t send my e-mail attachment.”

The thing is, most people can get away with not knowing what a motherboard is without losing a limb. Thinking that USB is an acronym for a country in Europe may not make you the smartest person in the room, but it’s not going to hurt your wallet. Even the 29% of survey respondents who thought a migraine was a type of rice should probably make it through the day without any major repercussions (assuming they don’t choke on their own tongue or something). But with both fixed line and wireless carriers increasingly charging by the megabyte and gigabyte, people might want to brush up on the term before they have to take out a second mortgage to fund their Angry Birds habit.

Filed Under: , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Survey: 27% Think A Gigabyte Is a Type Of South American Insect [Update: Or Not]”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
66 Comments
Michael Whitetail says:

Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Mar 14th, 2014 @ 6:50pm

Generational gap detected!

When I went to public high school in 1990, they were just getting a real computer education program setup with the cutting edge 286 pc clones.

Hell, just the year before in middle school, we eere still on 2e’s!

Some people never had the chance to learn computers in public schools.

Instead of blaming the schools, I blame those that didn’t strive to learn something so important after the fact!

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

In response to fake survey results depicting an uneducated populace, you take a denigrating swipe at the system of education. Typical wingnut response to a fake story.

Yes, even if the educational system sucks and you are somewhat lacking knowledge, the obvious thing to do is whine and bemoan your situation rather than picking up a book and begin fixing the problem.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

“It doesn’t take a fake survey to depict an uneducated populace. You can see it yourself by looking just about anywhere.”

Indeed. I would estimate the percentage of people needed further education at 100%. Anyone who claims they know it all are clearly incorrect. But that is not the point.

Violynne (profile) says:

“But with both fixed line and wireless carriers increasingly charging by the megabyte and gigabyte, people might want to brush up on the term before they have to take out a second mortgage to fund their Angry Birds habit.”
Do me a favor, Karl. Take a quick trip to Netflix and find me information on the amount of data will be used to play the video about to stream.

Okay, now head to Facebook and see if you can find a quick reference on the data push there. Amazon? Techdirt?

I’ve learned long ago people don’t care about space and limits. All they care about is accessing content. When customers get bill shocked, they’ll simply cut back on frivolous websites like Techdirt and The Wall Street Journal so they can spend more time on Facebook without punishment.

Because a website doesn’t tell people how much data it’s pushing, nor does it engage people with caution notices a stream is going to be over 500MB. People don’t realize the true impact of many images over the course of time.

All they want is to access it.

I understand the point you’re trying to make, but I think you’re overshadowing the true culprit here: websites don’t state how much data they’re pushing because to do so may actually get visitors to leave, and not come back.

Instead of trying to blame consumers, blame the carriers and ISPs who are purposely gouging customers because they’re well aware how much data they’re using, and precisely where to cap them.

Educate them to fight this stupidity, not learn what a gigabyte is.

That’s my job, as a web developer, as it’s necessary to streamline the content with as little as data as possible since it also costs us to push it.

🙂

zip says:

Re: Re:

Visiting many websites is like opening a mail-bomb. It would be nice if all browsers had the option of user-defined limits on page size, image size, etc. – better than being at the mercy of the coder. Even Google.com has probably 10 or 20 times the amount of code as it did originally, although on the surface it’s barely changed. Just like the trend of increasingly-bloated software, there are extremely few websites that are optimized to use as little code as possible and load as fast as possible. If anything, it’s the total opposite.

Lawrence D?Oliveiro says:

Re: Re: Re: o one I know in the tech community uses those terms either

So how does your ?tech community? calculate how many hertz there are in a gigahertz?

If your ?tech community? were to design a comms channel that can transmit 1 bit per second with a 1Hz clock, how fast could it transmit with a 1GHz clock?

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:2 o one I know in the tech community uses those terms either

I agree it’s a mess that should have been cleaned up a long time ago (or never have been started by adopting prefixes based on an approximation) but it’s going to take a much bigger effort than what has been made to get the public to adopt it.

John Fenderson (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:2 o one I know in the tech community uses those terms either

I’d never head of “gibi-” either. Nor have my coworker, and we work on large units of bits all the time.

“So how does your ?tech community? calculate how many hertz there are in a gigahertz?”

As the AC said, this prefix business is a mess. However, the rule I was taught was that you determine exactly what these prefixes mean (the same problem exists with kilo-, mega-, tera-, etc) from context: if you’re talking about units of memory, it’s the power of 1024 prefix. Anytime else, you’re talking about the power of 10 prefix. So gigahertz is 10^9 hertz, but a gigabyte is 2^30 bytes.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:3 o one I know in the tech community uses those terms either

Actually, you probably have and just never noticed.
Most commonly it’s from formatting hard drives, such that a
500 GB drive shows up as ~= 465.66 GiB available.

GB is ISO/IEC’s notation for base 10, and GiB is the notation for base 2. So according to ISO/IEC, 2^30 bytes is technically a Gibibyte and that is shown as available space on most *nix and Windows computers. Apple decided to go with base 10 notation at Snow Leopard, so you show about the same as the box.

More info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_prefix

Honestly, I think of it as an advertizing scam on customers for the most part and feel we should just stick with binary on computers.

The Wanderer (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:3 o one I know in the tech community uses those terms either

you determine exactly what these prefixes mean (the same problem exists with kilo-, mega-, tera-, etc) from context: if you’re talking about units of memory, it’s the power of 1024 prefix. Anytime else, you’re talking about the power of 10 prefix.

Exactly this. I’ve been arguing this every time I get too aggravated with the “gibi-” crowd to avoid getting sucked into a discussion about the subject for quite some time; it’s good to see someone else advocating the same guideline.

The Wanderer (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:4 Just under 120MB/s

If I did the measurements enough to notice, then yes, I would.

I base that on the fact that I’ve felt ripped off after buying a hard drive with an advertised capacity of 1GB and discovering that it had an actual capacity of only about 950MB.

(The original numbers were smaller; I think I first noticed this back around the time when 60GB was a midsize-to-large hard drive. Didn’t make it any less noticeable to me, though.)

That said: yes, using different values for the multiplier prefixes for the different contexts (count of data size vs. count of anything else) does make the math harder, and the potential for confusion greater, when converting between them. However, the “powers of two” meaning of the prefixes in a data context were far too long-established before anyone tried to come up with replacement terminology. They left it too late; there’s no going back and changing it now, and trying to do so is high-handed and offensive.the established one

oxguy3 says:

Highly questionable

Would love to see some description of the methodology. Based solely on the answers they offered, I’m not convinced this isn’t garbage. Supplying people with answers gives soooo much bias — people might remember the answer solely because it was provided to them, they might choose one of the wrong answers because it’s so wrong it’s funny, etc. This should have really been run as a “define this term” sort of deal (and it would probably have to have been administered orally so that the surveyors could question ambiguous answers).

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...