Left Hand Brewery Attempts To Trademark 'Nitro' For Its Beer Line

from the gassy-brew-ha-ha dept

Here we go again. Beer-makers and trademark seem to be becoming something of an item these days. Previously, we've noted trademarks and battles over last names, common sports phrases, and (sigh) whether a six looks too much like a nine. Seriously. These applications and battles tend to revolve around some common term or name being used in association with a beer brand. Where trademark was chiefly developed as a resource for consumers to keep from being duped, it has evolved into a language-grab for companies looking to knee-cap the competition.

Such is the latest case, in which Left Hand Brewing out of Colorado wants to trademark the term "nitro" for their beer brands. Unfortunately, this presents a problem.

Colorado's Left Hand Brewing is attempting to trademark the term "nitro"—as in, nitrogen. The Longmont company is thus far the only US brewer to bottle with nitrogen as opposed to carbon dioxide, something it says it achieved at a steep cost: years of effort, and hundreds of thousands of dollars. "We have a bottle that is pretty unique," president Eric Wallace tells the Denver Post. But here's what's not unique: Plenty of breweries pour nitro beer on draft, and others have announced or implied plans for nitro beer in bottles or cans. If the trademark is granted, Left Hand could send cease-and-desist letters to those breweries, a lawyer explains.
I'm not sure how accurate that last bit is. Instead, C&D letters would go out to other breweries using the label of nitro to denote a nitrogen infused beer, not breweries that simply partake in the process. Still, we see the problem of this evolution in trademark usage. What is likely to become an industry standard process, and one that is already done in other parts of the industry, is going to be locked up in terms of branding. Denoting a nitrogen-infused bottle isn't terribly different from denoting a beer as 'lite/light', yet other breweries would be deprived the ability to do inform their customers of what they're drinking if this mark goes through. That wasn't the purpose of the law at the outset.

Other publications, and companies, appear to agree.
The Week sees nitro as a "descriptor"—"imagine if, say, Budweiser tried to trademark 'refreshing,'" it quips. But Wallace says the trademark seeks to protect the name of its "Nitro Series" of beers, "not the style—not nitrogenated beers." But a rep for Anheuser-Busch—which has until June to decide if it will oppose the application—notes, "As a brewer, we have produced our own nitrogenated beers and, like many other brewers, large and small, we need to maintain the ability to identify them to consumers."
We'll have to see if the trademark is granted, but it sure shouldn't be if the intent of trademark law is followed.

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: beer, nitro, trademark
Companies: left hand brewery

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Thread

  1. identicon
    techinabox, 28 Mar 2014 @ 5:50pm

    Damn it!

    I really their beer too.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Mar 2014 @ 6:23pm

    Re: Damn it!

    I just accidentally a whole Nitro Milk Stout too!

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Pixelation, 28 Mar 2014 @ 6:39pm

    Re: Re: Damn it!

    Relax, don't worry, have a Nitro beer!

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Guinness Gulper, 28 Mar 2014 @ 6:40pm

    I used to like those moron's beer....


    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    confused Guinness Gulper, 28 Mar 2014 @ 6:43pm

    Re: Wrong

    Just read that article. The little plastic ball has nitrogen, or so I've been told. This article says it's c02. Judging from the results, I doubt it's C02...

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Wally, 28 Mar 2014 @ 7:17pm


    Guinness uses a nitrogen ball as opposed to CO2...It's a term they often use to describe the process...and it's certainly nothing new. If they were branding the name of a brew that used Nitrogen as "Nitro"...that's acceptable witting that realm.

    Japan commonly uses hydrogen for its beer.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7. icon
    btrussell (profile), 29 Mar 2014 @ 1:55am

    Re: Beer

    "Japan commonly uses hydrogen for its beer."

    So does Canada. 2:1 ratio with oxygen.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Honest Abe, 29 Mar 2014 @ 9:08am


    More like Dog Sweat Beer.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    slick8086, 29 Mar 2014 @ 10:44pm

    Left Handed Brewing is just sinister.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 31 Mar 2014 @ 5:24am

    Re: Beer

    The magic of the Left Hand Brewing solution is that they don't need to put a little N2 ball inside the bottle which is a technique that Guinness (and other nitro beers) use. It is indeed quite a unique solution and dealing with some of the reps for it, they are certainly proud of it. That in no way suggests that they should own the term "nitro", though. Luckily enough for me there are plenty of other fine nitro beers to enjoy, so I won't need to reach for Left Hand anymore.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 31 Mar 2014 @ 6:56am

    I guess I don't see why this is a problem. Brewers would not be precluded from advertising their beers as bottled with Nitrogen, but as I understand it, they would be precluded from branding their beers as 'Nitro' when that differentiator refers to their bottling process.

    I don't think it's the same as 'refreshing' or 'light' ... but if a brewer used a term unique within the industry to market their beer as refreshing or light, such as how Left Hand has used 'Nitro' to refer to nitrogen-bottled, then they'd be doing something similar.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12. icon
    John Fenderson (profile), 31 Mar 2014 @ 9:13am


    "Nitro" is hardly a new or unique term in brewing. Pretty much every microbrewery in my area has had one or two nitro taps for years now. They have all use the term "nitro" to refer to using nitrogen since the very beginning.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13. identicon
    Adam, 31 Mar 2014 @ 11:10am

    1. Their Nitro Milk Stout is delicious and until I read this, was the primary beer used to stock my fridge and gift to others.
    2. Their method is unique in not having to use a widget and they likely deserve credit (possibly a patent) for developing it.
    3. Nitro has been used to describe Nitrogen beers for a very long time. They do not deserve a trademark for this whatsoever.
    4. Shame on them and I plan to tell them that I will no longer be recommending this beer that I've been a huge cheerleader for unless they withdraw this stupid trademark application.
    5. Young's double chocolate stout in a 16 oz can better be ready to take my money.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14. identicon
    dan, 31 Mar 2014 @ 12:59pm


    Ball powder by Winchester or Hemi engine by Dodge. There are sure to be other examples

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15. icon
    Constitutionfirst (profile), 31 Mar 2014 @ 1:28pm

    Please Don't feed the Lawyers

    It's silly to try to trademark such a common word. I've seen lots of the use "Nitro" but unless I see "Left Hand Brewery" I know I'm not getting Nitro Milk Stout. Give your customers the benefit of the doubt about their intelligence. We Microbrew drinkers are an educated lot when it comes to what's offered out there. All you're doing is making a bunch of rich lawyers even richer, in the end we all pay the bill, and you sully your good name in the process. Like Trolls, when you feed lawyers, they keep coming back for more.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16. identicon
    zombyboy, 31 Mar 2014 @ 9:31pm


    A pun that good has to win some kind of an award, doesn't it?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)


Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat

Warning: include(/home/beta6/deploy/itasca_20201215-3691-c395/includes/right_column/rc_promo_discord_chat.inc): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/beta6/deploy/itasca_20201215-3691-c395/includes/right_column/rc_module_promo.inc on line 8

Warning: include(): Failed opening '/home/beta6/deploy/itasca_20201215-3691-c395/includes/right_column/rc_promo_discord_chat.inc' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/share/pear:/home/beta6/deploy/itasca_20201215-3691-c395:/home/beta6/deploy/itasca_20201215-3691-c395/..') in /home/beta6/deploy/itasca_20201215-3691-c395/includes/right_column/rc_module_promo.inc on line 8
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.