Vermont's Case Against Notorious Scanner Patent Troll Moves Forward

from the fighting-back dept

Last year, there were a few stories concerning a really despicable (more than usual) patent troll called MPHJ Holdings. Joe Mullin, over at Ars Technica, had dug deep into the details, finding a bunch of shell companies all sending demand letters to various small companies demanding around $1,000 per employee for using a network-connected scanner that includes a "scan to email" feature (i.e., pretty much any scanner on the market today). There were all sorts of sketchy things about MPHJ, and it was pretty clear that it and all its shell companies were effectively shaking down small businesses. It was so egregious that Vermont's Attorney General sued the company, claiming that it was engaged in "unfair and deceptive acts" with its threat letters.

Over the last year, MPHJ has fought hard to get the case out of a Vermont state court and into a federal court, arguing that it was a patent case (which is covered by federal law). The federal district court sent it back to the Vermont state court, saying that it's not really a patent case at all, but about the company's threat letters. Specifically, it stated:
"the State is targeting bad faith conduct irrespective of whether the letter recipients were patent infringers."
MPHJ appealed this ruling to CAFC, the appeals court that handles all patent cases (and is somewhat notorious for constantly expanding patent law through its decisions). Last week, however, CAFC rejected MPHJ's appeal, without even getting into the issue of whether or not this is a patent case. Instead, it simply noted that the law says appeals courts can't review orders remanding a case to a state court. Case closed, no jurisdiction. Pack your bags for Vermont, MPHJ lawyers.

Of course, the more important case involving MPHJ is the one in which it brazenly decided to sue the FTC for investigating its actions. The decision on that case could come at any time. You never can tell how a court will rule, but the odds are not likely to be in MPHJ's favor on that one either...
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: cafc, deceptive practices, extortion, patent troll, scanner patent, vermont
Companies: mphj

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Thread

  • icon
    Anonymous Howard (profile), 19 Aug 2014 @ 1:12am

    Lawyers at work

    You know something is wrong with the system when lawyers ('necessary bad', an overhead on other people's business) on their own without actual clients.

    It's like seeing accountants working for themselves - no plausible reason to be feasible.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Ninja (profile), 19 Aug 2014 @ 5:08am

    And some people want us to believe patents and intellectual property in general are good for innovation and development. Right. How many Apples, Microsofts, Googles were killed in their infancy now?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    gaeliclad (profile), 19 Aug 2014 @ 5:27am

    WE do,nt have have software patents in europe,
    they are good for lawyers,
    for companys like apple ,microsoft to get money from
    smaller companys or reduce competion in the tablet, phone sector.
    I think many of the ms patents on android will be found to be invalid now that they have be revealed in china .
    as some of the apple patents have been shown to have no value ,
    in the case against samsung.
    Meanwhile theres plenty of new software being invented
    in europe without software patents.
    IF someone writes a specific program its still protected
    by copywrite in the eu.
    Most off the big tech companys cross license patents,
    eg i don,t see ibm sueing hp, or apple even though
    ibm has 1000,s of software patents .

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)


Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.