John Oliver Has The Solution To The Supreme Court's Refusal To Videotape Supreme Court Hearings: Dogs
from the not-cats? dept
For many years, we’ve discussed the pure ridiculousness of the Supreme court’s adamant refusal to allow cameras in the courtroom, along with the Justices’ questionable justifications of the ban. Now it appears that John Oliver has taken up the issue as well, but unlike those just whining about it, Oliver (thanks to the resources of HBO) has a possible “solution.” Dogs.
His solution — using “an almost immoral amount of resources” — is to present video representations of the entire Supreme Court… using dogs (and a couple of birds in supporting roles). And, Oliver claims, they’re making those videos freely available to any other news provider who would like to create complete reenactments of any court case in a way that is cute and guaranteed to draw more attention than the court renderings, or, hell, actual videos if they were ever allowed. You can see the full ten minutes of footage (and, yes, I watched it all) right here:
Please feel free to use it, post your videos, and tag them #RealAnimalsFakePaws so we can find them.
The only disappointment is that whoever put it up, still officially left it under a “standard” license, rather than the Creative Commons license that YouTube makes available. Still, nice move by Oliver and his team.
Filed Under: cameras, cameras in court, dogs, john oliver, supreme court, video, video of supreme court
Comments on “John Oliver Has The Solution To The Supreme Court's Refusal To Videotape Supreme Court Hearings: Dogs”
Should have just used Muppets
Muppets don’t need to fed or walked.
And I’d like to hear Statler and Waldorf heckle the justices.
Re: Should have just used Muppets
I’d prefer to have a dog represent Scalia; I doubt any Muppet could drool as comically or reproduce Scalia’s patented expression of self-satisfied approval after having just sniffed his own balls.
Re: Re: Should have just used Muppets
An unused muppet would capture Thomas’ utter detachment from the proceedings, though.
Re: Re: Re: Should have just used Muppets
No way! Imagine the copyright fiasco that would ensue were Muppets used! It’d be a copyright tsunami!
Why isn’t EVERYTHING recorded? Anything I do in court is. Double standard anyone?
Re: Re:
Because for hundreds of years, it wasn’t. Traditionalism and all that.
Re: Re:
it is recorded. Audio only.
overbearing laughtrack
I wish John Oliver would use a different laughtrack, or at least a different laughtrack operator, as the current guy the show uses has a very heavy hand. Maybe it’s supposed to be reminiscent of the 1970s era British TV comedies, with their overbearing laughtracks, but it would be most appreciated if there was some way to turn the volume down, or off.
Re: overbearing laughtrack
Just like the Chicken, Picky.
Use the link above to YouTube. No sound.
Re: overbearing laughtrack
nice try. but we can see what you’re doing here.
As soon as I saw this I thought “Techdirt will post something about this!” and I was right! Sometimes it is good to be right.
Genius
Just pure genius.
Re: Genius
Paw five!
Ahem.
…you know what would be nice?
Being able to watch the show without using VPNs and proxies until 72 hours later.