Cop Who Obtained Warrant To Take Photo Of Teen's Erect Penis For Sexting Case Sues Teen's Lawyer For Defamation

from the STOP-CALLING-ME-CRAZY dept

One of the more remarkable intersections of law enforcement and sexting this year involved the Manassas City (VA) police department and a 17-year-old boy’s erect penis.

Briefly: two teens — a 15-year-old girl and a 17-year-old boy — exchanged nude photos. Apparently, the boy went further, sending a nude video to the 15-year-old. The parents of the girl brought this to the police, who then sought to charge the 17-year-old with “possession of child pornography and manufacturing child pornography,” mainly because the law remains mostly “a ass” when it comes to teens sexting.

In order to secure proof that the penis in the offending video actually belonged to the teen being charged, police obtained a search warrant to manufacture child pornography chemically induce an erection and take a photo of the suspect’s erect penis. This bizarre action was prompted by the teen’s refusal to plead guilty. And was taken despite the fact that police already had taken photos of his non-erect penis during his post-arrest detainment at the juvenile jail.

This strange tactic was criticized publicly by the teen’s lawyer, Jessica Foster, in an interview with the Washington Post, in which she specifically complained about Detective David Abbott:

Foster said Detective Abbott told her that after obtaining photos of the teen’s erect penis he would ‘use special software to compare pictures of this penis to this penis. Who does this? It’s just crazy.’

This, of course, was only one of hundreds of similar reactions, most of which also arrived at the same conclusion: inducing an erection in a teen suspect and taking pictures of it is “crazy.” But only one person is being sued (so far) for expressing their opinion of Det. Abbott and his warrant.

The lead detective in a high-profile teen “sexting” case from last summer, in which Prince William County authorities sought to take sexually explicit photos of a 17-year-old teen to compare with the evidence, has filed a defamation lawsuit against the teen’s attorney for making critical comments about the investigation in The Washington Post. […]

Abbott’s lawsuit claims that Foster’s comment “materially misstates Abbott’s discussions with Foster,” and that claiming such an investigative approach was “crazy” in turn “asserts unfitness to perform the duties of his office or employment, with a direct intention to bring Abbott under scrutiny from the media and from the public.”

Abbott’s lawsuit is at least as ridiculous as the police activity that inadvertently prompted it. Foster’s lawyers have already filed a response pointing out that the statement is not defamatory and is “constitutionally protected opinion and rhetorical hyperbole.”

Even Abbott’s own department isn’t interested in backing this lawsuit.

Manassas City Police Chief Douglas Keen said Abbott filed the suit independently and did not consult him, and Keen said he had no position on the civil case.

The department, however, still backs the decision to create child porn in order to charge someone else with child porn creation and distribution. A close look at its statement indicates that there’s a bit of post-debacle blame-shifting going on, leaving the attorney’s office holding the “teen penis photo” bag.

In the sexting case that has recently garnered so much attention, the investigating detective with the Manassas City Police Department was instructed by a member of the Commonwealth’s Attorneys’ Office to obtain a search warrant in order to photograph, for evidentiary purposes, the genitalia of the defendant. Upon consultation with the identification expert, the prosecutor subsequently authorized a second search warrant seeking a photograph of the erect penis of the defendant…

Many have expressed concern at what they believe to be an extreme measure in this type of case. However, when a criminal defendant, adult or juvenile, decides to exercise his or her right to a trial, it is necessary for the prosecution to explore all legal avenues of evidence collection in order to prepare for trial…

What Abbott seems to object to most (beyond being called “crazy”) is Foster’s insinuation that this erect penis photography session was all his idea.

“This statement implies that Abbott conceived of the idea, that he desired to obtain the photographs, that he would take actual photographs, and that he would personally execute the comparison.”

Abbott may resent this implication, but as Scott Greenfield points out, the detective did nothing to head off this regrettable warrant application, no matter who actually ordered it.

Just following orders, eh? The old Nuremberg defense. Yeah, that’s persuasive. Of course, it was Abbott’s name on the warrant, and at no time did Abbott say or do anything to suggest he wasn’t all-in on the dick pics. Indeed, until news of this outrage went public, there was always the possibility he could get a medal for his bravery and a photo of his own in the local papers for “hero cop convicts saves society from sexting teen by erect penis comparison.” So proud…

Detective Abbott, if you don’t want the world to think you’re some sick, disgusting pervert, don’t be one.

Finally, the lawsuit notes that Abbott has suffered immensely since the story blew up back in July, listing all of the following:

“intense media and public scrutiny, embarrassment, shame…injury to his reputation as a law enforcement official…hundreds of emails that included pornographic or threatening material…telephone calls threatening death or other actions…” […] “severe emotional distress…which resulted in counseling with a psychologist and the need for medication.”

Well, I can only imagine what a second wave of coverage centering on Abbott’s involvement with the production of photos of teen’s erect penis is going to do to him. The media had long since moved on from this story, but Abbott’s decision to pursue a shaky defamation suit has just reset the clock.

Filed Under: , , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Cop Who Obtained Warrant To Take Photo Of Teen's Erect Penis For Sexting Case Sues Teen's Lawyer For Defamation”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
59 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

“Finally, the lawsuit notes that Abbott has suffered immensely since the story blew up back in July, listing all of the following:
“intense media and public scrutiny, embarrassment, shame…injury to his reputation as a law enforcement official…hundreds of emails that included pornographic or threatening material…telephone calls threatening death or other actions…” […] “severe emotional distress…which resulted in counseling with a psychologist and the need for medication.””

umm and how did he think it would make the teenager feel?

Anonymous Coward says:

claiming such an investigative approach was “crazy” in turn “asserts unfitness to perform the duties of his office or employment, with a direct intention to bring Abbott under scrutiny from the media and from the public.”

Yes, yes it does. When public officials use their office in a manner that is arguably or clearly against the public interest, calling them “crazy” and directing media scrutiny upon them is one of the quickest and safest ways to dissuade them. If he doesn’t want to be called crazy, maybe he should avoid acting in a way that is so obviously contrary to the public interest.

hundreds of emails that included pornographic … material

Maybe it’s particularly disturbing material, but my first thought on reading that was that he should appreciate that he no longer needs spend even the slightest bit of effort to find porn. After all, where before he had to secure a warrant to justify producing it, now people are sending it to him for free!

velox (profile) says:

What about the Judge?

It’s a given that the detective and the district attorney may be unfit for their jobs given such behaviour, but where is the judge’s name and conduct in this discussion?
Doesn’t the willingness to sign such a warrant call into question one’s fitness to be a judge? Isn’t the reason we call them judge is because they are expected to be able to exercise good judgement?

Rich Kulawiec (profile) says:

Say...this gives me an idea!

“Foster said Detective Abbott told her that after obtaining photos of the teen’s erect penis he would ‘use special software to compare pictures of this penis to this penis.”

Hey folks, I need venture capital for my new startup. We’re gonna make Penis Recognition Software. Facial recognition? Piffle. Meh. THIS is the next big thing.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

why is there no indignation against the judge that rubber stamped this …?

Judges who rubberstamp warrants are not exactly news.

See, for example, the public reaction —or rather, public non-reaction— to Orin Kerr’s post back on November 6th, “Magistrate issues arrest warrants for 17 years but is new to ‘probable cause’ .” The story had no legs. People were not really shocked.

Q. And during your 17 years of swearing in criminal complaints with requests for arrest warrants, did you know what probable cause was?
A. No.
Q. Had you ever made a probable cause determination?
A. No.
* * *
Q. Did any of [your] training include making a probable cause determination?
A. No, it did not.

Anonymous Coward says:

According to the referenced WaPo article, Det. Abbot took exception to the following paragraph:

“[Defense Attorney] Foster said Detective Abbott told her that after obtaining photos of the teen’s erect penis he would ‘use special software to compare pictures of this penis to this penis. Who does this? It’s just crazy.’”

However:

Foster’s lawyers responded by filing an e-mail Wednesday that Abbott sent to Foster on June 14. Abbott wrote that the teen “preferred us take pictures of his genitals to compare and prove that it is in fact his penis in the movie…The comparison process is quite extensive and I have reached out to Homeland Security where I am a TFO and they have agreed to assist — however I only want to go this route if you think there will be a trial.”

So. The detective claims the process of comparing two penises is “quite extensive”. The detective further claims to have asked for the assistance of a federal agency in this penis scheme, and that they agreed.

And he’s concerned that she only called him ‘crazy’?

Anonymous Coward says:

I for one am glad I no longer own a cell phone. God forbid some teen girl or boy sent such pictures to the wrong number, that number being mine. Seems like a two way street here as both parties sent pictures, so if not legal was at least consentual. To be young and foolish again, sure glad we didn’t have this technology when I was a teenager. As a parent of either teen I would have had a frank and earnest conversation with the other teens patents, to get the police involved at that stage was not warranted.

Socratease says:

So much stupid going around

1. Teenage kids do something stupid. (Like that never happens.) Parents find out.
2. Parents do something stupid and take it to cops instead of dealing with it themselves.
3. Cops, instead of telling parents how stupid it is, take the stupid to the next level and make a criminal case out of it. Big Mistake with inevitable consequences.
4. Having been called stupid by a lawyer, cop doubles down on stupid and sues lawyer for telling the truth.

Moral: Adding government to a problem rarely makes it smaller.

Damian says:

Where do you draw the line

This is what happens when you live in a filthy feminist society, when you grow breasts, you can do what ever you want, God forbid a pair of tits gets put on trial, its absolutely understandable that her retarded parents need to protect their perverted daughter and exploit any dick in her vicinity. Im surprised hes not being charged with rape. But not to worry everybody, as long as the Virginia Pedophile Police Department gets all the child penis photos they want, the feminist society we live in will be ok.
Its not like we have more important things to worry about in this world, HOW FUCKING RETARDED IS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA THAT WHAT A BOY DOES WITH HIS PENIS BECOMES THE CRIME OF THE CENTURY. Whats next, your gonna start flogging men in the public square for getting erections, and everybody born with a pair of tits automatically becomes a victim, regardless of how filthy and perverted they are? Her’s a thought, why dont you idiots just outlaw dicks all together, this way the sick feminist whores can feel good about their retarded existence.

Damian says:

Dont get me wrong people, were not much better here in Canada, especially with our sick CAMH institutions who test human beings in disgusting and inhumane ways, seems like they are finishing the work of the Nazis. While the rest of the world is getting smarter and stronger, all we can focus on is what men and boys do with their dicks and in the mean time cater to women in every aspect of their lives as if they were god’s themselves. Feminism will bring North America to its knees and by the time we realize it it will be to late.

Damian says:

John, I have nothing against Germany, I believe Germany is and always was a great nation, but unfortunately in the past Germany was plagued by the sickness brought by the Nazis, just like North America today is plagued by feminism. I don’t blame Germany for taking action after the Treaty of Versailles, just as I don’t blame women for fighting for their rights, but greed is a sick disease, and some people just don’t know when to stop. It happened in the past, and its happening now, lets hope that cooler heads prevail.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...