Techdirt Podcast Episode 28: Is Car Ownership On The Way Out?
from the the-future-of-mobility dept
The explosive rise of Uber, ride-sharing programs, and other on-demand mobility services has led many to wonder if the whole concept of car ownership is on its way out, at least for city-dwellers. This week we’re joined by Upshift founder Ezra Goldman, who recently wrote a manifesto for the future of mobility and helps us delve far beyond a surface analysis of transportation trends.
Follow the Techdirt Podcast on Soundcloud, subscribe via iTunes, or grab the RSS feed. You can also keep up with all the latest episodes right here on Techdirt.
Filed Under: ezra goldman, mobility, podcast, transportation
Companies: uber, upshift
Comments on “Techdirt Podcast Episode 28: Is Car Ownership On The Way Out?”
Cars mabey, I want my truck.
F350 Superduty, four doors and an eight foot bed. Totally not worried about all ya all stacked into New York City figuring out how to get around.
Re: Cars mabey, I want my truck.
Agreed. It will be a long time before most of these solutions make sense outside of dense urban environments, so we must continue to innovate so more and more people can have access to new transportation options. Autonomous vehicles will make new mobility options viable in lower density areas as well.
Uber and ride sharing, however, both require a decent base of people who own cars.
Re: Re:
For the moment. All those freelance drivers are just the foot in the door.
Once autonomous vehicles become practical, Uber will no doubt replace freelance drivers with their own fleet of driverless cars. Taxi services will no doubt do the same regardless of Uber.
There are exceptions of course. There will always be areas without the detailed 3D mapping or mobile bandwidth required for Google’s fleet. A human driver may be sent based on your pickup and destination addresses.
Hobbies
If you have no hobbies or sports that involve equipment of any size that requires transport then maybe – but a lot of people do so no cars are not on the way out.
Re: Hobbies
Totally agreed, that’s why we are building Upshift to give you access to a car for a day at the push of a button when you need to carry things or go longer distances.
No.
Call me old fashioned but like my songs, games, and other media I own I like to own what I buy.
Re: Re:
That’s a very bizarre comparison… not sure what it means, to be honest.
I’ll keep my truck thank you. From time to time I need to do light hauling. From time to time I need to pull a trailer. I can’t do either of those with Uber. Just yesterday I used my trailer. I didn’t have to pay someone to deliver something to me, I took care of it myself.
Re: Re:
I, too, need to pull a trailer every so often. I’m certainly not going to buy a truck for it, though. It’s much cheaper and easier to rent one.
Re: Re:
“From time to time I need to do light hauling. From time to time I need to pull a trailer.”
Haven’t you heard? It’s “stealing” to do something for yourself that you could hire someone else to do for you.
Re: Re:
From time to time I need to do light hauling. From time to time I need to pull a trailer. I can’t do either of those with Uber.
Did you listen to the podcast? We actually make it clear that Uber alone is not going to get rid of cars. We talk about a variety of other things that might get people to that point.
For example, if, from time to time, you need to pull a trailer, then what if you could just have a rental truck delivered to you at those times, rather than having to own one for all the times you don’t need to pull a trailer?
I hope so
I would be thrilled if there were far fewer cars around, and even more thrilled if I didn’t have to own one. Unfortunately, at least where I live, there is no reasonable alternative and it doesn’t look like there will be one anytime soon.
Re: I hope so
I don’t think I want to become a street person just to avoid owning a car, and that seems to be the alternative.
Re: Re: I hope so
A street person as in a homeless person?
I can assure you, there are lots of non-homeless people who don’t own cars… At least a dozen. Or, y’know, millions.
Re: Re: Re: I hope so
If you are not one of the privileged and have to work for a living, in many places not owning a car will make you unemployed and consequently homeless. Someone told me the other day that our local McDonald’s will not even hire people without their own car because the alternatives are so unreliable that they can’t depend on them getting to work on time.
Re: Re: Re:2 I hope so
If you listened to the podcast, you’d know that we are primarily talking about city-dwellers. If you live in a city, it is far more expensive to own a car. The privileged are those who can afford not just the car and gas and insurance but the high parking prices and the constant, unavoidable tickets; the average person takes transit or walks to work.
Re: Re: Re:3 I hope so
Umm, you do realize that New York City, San Fransisco and Chicago are not the only cities in the world , right? How about San Antonio, the seventh most populated city in the U.S. and where the referenced McDonald’s is located? Not a city? I think many of the residents might disagree. Try walking from a home on one side of the city to a job on the other and tell me how that works out for you. Hint, that’s not how the average person gets to work there.
But, of course, if we’re just fantasizing about future possibilities, I’d say that personal teleportation, a la Star Trek, would replace not only cars but even things like Uber.
Re: Re: Re:4 I hope so
Umm, you do realize that New York City, San Fransisco and Chicago are not the only cities in the world , right? How about San Antonio, the seventh most populated city in the U.S. and where the referenced McDonald’s is located?
Well personally I was thinking of Toronto, where I live. But go ahead and make all the assumptions you want. You’re the one who started out by making the utterly, obviously absurd assumption that not having a car means being homeless.
Re: Re: Re:5 I hope so
Those were the cities mentioned in the podcast. The assumption was that you had listened to it.
Oh, and by the way, there are cities in the world other than Toronto, as well. Unbelievable, I know, but it’s true. And in many cities the average person today cannot hold a job without a car.
Re: Re: Re:6 I hope so
And in many cities the average person today cannot hold a job without a car.
That’s wrong. They cannot hold a job without transportation which is the point of the podcast. If there were alternative forms of transportation that are more effective and cheaper, then they wouldn’t need to own a car.
Which was what we said on the podcast that you’re now slamming.
Re: Re: Re:7 I hope so
That’s wrong.
OK, I’ll bite. What viable “alternative forms of transportation” are available to the average San Antonio McDonald’s worker today?
Re: Re: Re:8 I hope so
Why are you so focused on the one group in one city today, in a conversation that is all about trends and the future?
Re: Re: Re:8 I hope so
OK, I’ll bite. What viable “alternative forms of transportation” are available to the average San Antonio McDonald’s worker today?
Er, the whole point of the podcast is that no one’s replacing their cars today but looking at the trends and where they’re going.
The idea being that down the road enough of these services will be in place to make it perfectly reasonable for a larger segment of the population not to own a car.
Re: Re: Re:7 I hope so
Oh, and by the way, I’m not slamming the podcast, which I actually thought was quite good. I do, however, question whether the statement that “If you live in a city, it is far more expensive to own a car” is generally accurate.
Re: Re: Re:8 I hope so
Nobody is claiming that’s true for every person in every city.
It is currently true for many people in many cities. And there are a number of clear trends and growing services that suggest it’s going to rapidly become true for even more people in even more cities. Perhaps even eventually most people in most cities.
Re: Re: Re:9 I hope so
“Nobody is claiming that’s true for every person in every city.”
Hey, I know of an even better to get to work that wasn’t even mentioned. Just open the door and walk through. Takes about 2 seconds, doesn’t require any transportation devices at all and people are doing it today. Blows those “alternative transportation” ideas completely away!
Re: Re: Re:10 I hope so
Hey, I know of an even better to get to work that wasn’t even mentioned. Just open the door and walk through. Takes about 2 seconds, doesn’t require any transportation devices at all and people are doing it today. Blows those “alternative transportation” ideas completely away!
We actually DID discuss walking as the better alternative in many cases.
Re: Re: Re:2 I hope so
(And I dunno about your local McDonald’s or what “someone told you”, but in my city at least, the majority of McDonald’s employees could never hope to afford a car, unless they are teenagers getting help from mom and dad)
Re: Re: Re:3 I hope so
“(And I dunno about your local McDonald’s or what “someone told you”, but in my city at least, the majority of McDonald’s employees could never hope to afford a car, unless they are teenagers getting help from mom and dad)”
Welcome to the world of the working poor in many cities, where they plow a good portion of their meager earnings back into cars trying to keep a way to get to their measly jobs.
Re: Re: Re:4 I hope so
Your comments are well founded. As I made clear in the podcast, these solutions will start in the major cities like San Francisco, Chicago, NYC, etc. Uber is operating in San Antonio and Zipcar has a car at UT San Antonio. It is difficult to get demand in places where there is not higher density development and parking constraints, all of which I mentioned in the beginning of the talk. It is also true that many of these services are currently too expensive for people with low wage jobs and it is true that they spend a lot of their working hours paying off transportation (and housing) costs. Hopefully, with autonomous networks of shared vehicles, we can provide more affordable and more convenient point-to-point transportation solutions, even for McDonald’s workers in San Antonio. It is going to take time to get there, but that is the long term aim.
Uber
I would like to point out that Uber drivers generally own cars.
I’ll welcome the day I don’t need to own a car, but until then I’ll enjoy my brand spanking new Legacy that I just picked up from the dealership last Tuesday.
It’s shiny.
Is Car Ownership On The Way Out?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_n5E7feJHw0
/thread
Re: Is Car Ownership On The Way Out?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXO5rHMrIY4
/your argument
Re: Re: Is Car Ownership On The Way Out?
You clearly don’t get it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1Y73sPHKxw
Re: Re: Re: Is Car Ownership On The Way Out?
Tell me, honestly: have you listened to the podcast?
If not, I suggest you do that before dismissing the entire idea. There’s a half-hour of detailed discussion there, and your attempt to brush it all off with a youtube clip just makes you look simple.
Re: Re: Re:2 Is Car Ownership On The Way Out?
I’ve worked in driver’s ed and defensive driving over three states for decades, and one thing that has NEVER changed is that the vast majority of vehicles on the road have exactly one person in them – the driver. That doesn’t look to change any time soon. What they talk about in the pod cast is a tiny fraction that is important, but doesn’t reflect the rest of the whole. It’s LAUGHABLE to suggest otherwise, hence the initial post. The idea that car ownership is on the way out because of a barely noticeable blip is retarded. Yes – I went there. 😛
Re: Re: Re:3 Is Car Ownership On The Way Out?
It’s LAUGHABLE to suggest otherwise, hence the initial post. The idea that car ownership is on the way out because of a barely noticeable blip is retarded. Yes – I went there. 😛
Uh. Ok. None of this has anything to do with the actual discussion we were having. I don’t see why you think because of your observations of people on the roads, that it has any impact on the kinds of points being made in the podcast.
Re: Re: Re:4 Is Car Ownership On The Way Out?
Then maybe don’t present your argument with clickbait headlines that you have to defend in almost every comment?
Don’t be Gawker. No-one likes Gawker.
Re: Re: Re:5 Is Car Ownership On The Way Out?
Then maybe don’t present your argument with clickbait headlines that you have to defend in almost every comment?
1. It’s not a clickbait headline.
2. It’s a podcast, and the point is to listen to the whole discussion.
3. The discussion itself was about the question in the headline. In other words, the headline is an accurate portrayal of the question we used as the jumping off point for the podcast.
Re: Re: Re:3 Is Car Ownership On The Way Out?
In the first sentence of the interview, I made the caveat that we are mainly focused on dense urban markets for the foreseeable future.
The average vehicle occupancy is 1.67 per vehicle which has been trending downward aside from social/recreational trips, which tend to be 2.2. You are likely referring to work trips which are at 1.13. See p 33 of the 2009 NHTS: http://nhts.ornl.gov/2009/pub/stt.pdf
As anyone in the tech industry knows, paradigm shifts do not happen overnight, en masse. They start in niche, beachhead markets that seem inconsequential before going viral. Significant shifts in niche markets are to be written off at one’s peril. Change takes time and starts small, but impact will nevertheless be large over time.
No
No its not
Re: No
Care to listen to the podcast and then elaborate on your point?
See page 37 of this report http://nhts.ornl.gov/2009/pub/stt.pdf
Vehicle ownership trends downward as population density trends upward. As more people live in denser environments, fewer people need to own cars. For existing solutions to work, we need high density. Automation may enable us to get to somewhat lower densities as well.