Apparent Redaction Failure Leads To Government Confirming Target Of Lavabit Investigation

from the SPOILER-ALERT? dept

The US government has just undercut one of its own gag orders. It imposed one on Lavabit after demanding its source code and encryption key. It has revealed the target of its demands from the encrypted email provider — a person everyone already knew was the target, but one that wasn’t likely to be officially confirmed for years to come. Kim Zetter at Wired has the details:

Ladar Levison, owner of the now defunct email service, has been forbidden since then, under threat of contempt and possibly jail time, from identifying who the government was investigating. In court documents from the case unsealed in late 2013, all information that could identify the customer was redacted.

But federal authorities recently screwed up and revealed the secret themselves when they published a cache of case documents but failed to redact one identifying piece of information about the target: his email address, Ed_Snowden@lavabit.com. With that, the very authorities holding the threat of jail time over Levison’s head if he said anything have confirmed what everyone had long ago presumed: that the target account was Snowden’s.

The unsealed documents were posted to PACER and picked up by Cryptome, which uploaded them yesterday. The inadvertent exposure is contained in the Appeal Cover Sheet, which was apparently left unredacted when the unsealed docs were uploaded to the court’s electronic filing system.


Sometimes inadvertent transparency is the best transparency. Despite this being made public (most likely accidentally), it still doesn’t change the stipulations of the gag order.

When asked for comment, Levison’s lawyer Jesse Binnall told WIRED in a email that “due to the letter and spirit of the court’s January 7, 2016 order, Lavabit has no further comment on the unredacted email address.”

Yes, a gag order can still be violated even though anyone who’s paying attention has known for nearly two years now that the target was Edward Snowden. Unless the government meant to release this document in unredacted form, Ladar Levinson and his lawyers could still face contempt charges for even confirming what thousands of others can see with their own two eyes.

Filed Under: , ,
Companies: lavabit

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Apparent Redaction Failure Leads To Government Confirming Target Of Lavabit Investigation”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
12 Comments
Anon says:

Incompetence or Malice?

Despite what Napoleon is alleged to have said… was this an accident? You have to wonder whether someone stuck in a golden-handcuff quagmire decided to stick it to their employer by “overlooking” a detail in the redaction?

I recall when a child soldier arrested in Afghanistan, then help in Guantanamo for a decade, was being tried for allegedly fighting back in a fire-fight; the government side “inadvertently” released documents to the defense suggesting he was innocent, that someone else could have tossed the grenade.

Just because some higher-ups have it in for the constitution doesn’t mean everyone else goes along willingly.

Monday (profile) says:

Stay on your toes 'cuz they're just aching to make you pay!

“… [gag] order can still be violated even though anyone who’s paying attention has known for nearly two years now that the target was Edward Snowden. Unless the government meant to release this document in unredacted form, Ladar Levinson and his lawyers could still face contempt charges for even confirming…”


Come hell or high water, someone’s going to pay for the Government fucking up all the time.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...