Thai Government Demands Popular Chat App Reveal Any Time Any User Insults The King

from the encrypted-chats-are-important dept

I spent some time in Asia earlier this year, and while people in the US focus on Facebook Messenger, Snapchat, Google Hangouts and a variety of other chat apps, the chat app of choice over there was Line. Basically everyone used it. A year ago, Line moved towards true end-to-end encryption. Earlier this year, the company made end-to-end encrypted chats the default, rather than as a user option (Thank you Snowden!).

Good timing. The company has apparently now refused to obey a Thai government demand that it alert the government to anyone insulting the Thai royal family on the messaging app. For years, we’ve written about Thailand’s ridiculous lese majeste laws, which make it a crime to insult the king. As we’ve noted, the law is used as a way to censor and crack down on political opponents. And, of course, with the death of the Thai king last month, there’s been a sudden uptick in Thai officials going after people for supposed lese majeste violations.

But Line is telling the government that it just can’t help out here.

“We do not monitor or block user content. User content is also encrypted, and cannot be viewed by LINE,” the statement sent to DPA said.

Of course, there’s been some controversy in the past over this. Back in 2014, Thailand announced that it was instituting a broad surveillance program to snoop on basically all internet communications for the sake of seeking out and punishing lese majeste violators. A few months later, Thai government officials flat out claimed that this included monitoring Line messages, something that the company flat out denied (though, that may have also inspired the move to encryption). While Thai officials have, at times, even claimed the ability to read encrypted messages, it seemed like that was just idle boasting, rather than a legitimate revelation of surveillance capabilities.

There is one oddity about Line’s response to the Thai government, though:

“We ask the authorities seeking to obtain user data to make official requests through diplomatic channels and have so advised the Thai authorities,” LINE added.

So, uh, if the messages are all end-to-end encrypted and there’s no way for Line to access them to share with any government, why is it asking the Thai government to use diplomatic channels to make an official request?

Filed Under: , , , , , ,
Companies: line

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Thai Government Demands Popular Chat App Reveal Any Time Any User Insults The King”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
36 Comments
zboot (profile) says:

I’m guessing it (request that requests go through an official channel) is a neat way to funnel requests through a single source where sequesters can be told “sorry” by someone with legal authority over them.

Now, instead of every single police office, government agency, etc all making requests and threats when they don’t get fulfilled, just one single agency acts as gatekeeper for requests and threats.

Grey (profile) says:

I started using Line while chaperoning teenagers on an exchange trip to Hiroshima.

I rather like it, outside of the cutesy stuff my younger kids love.

The file sharing, gif making on PC (just slap a border down and hit record) and getting my messages on PC and phone at the same time make it quite handy, the encryption is a nice touch. Video phone has worked well too.

Easy enough that my elderly mother even figured it out.

That One Guy (profile) says:

The ultimate irony

The punchline to the whole joke of course is that the law against ‘insulting’ the king is more insulting than anything it might stop, as it makes it clear that mere words are enough to grievously insult the loser on the throne(or at this point the corpse of said loser apparently).

The law itself is a greater insult to the ‘dignity’ and ‘majesty’ of the royal family by implying that they’re such thin-skinned buffoons that despite being in such powerful positions they are so immature that they just can’t handle mean words.

(Before someone else points it out, yes I’m aware that it’s being used to crack down on dissent, that being it’s actual function, my comment is based upon the lie of what it’s claimed to be for.)

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: The ultimate irony

You should also know that the previous Thai King that recently passed away didn’t like the law, but as he’s just a figure head, it’s basicly a military tribunal in charge, and while he’s been king, there’s been at least 2 known coup, but due to his popularity, none of the tribunal tried to overthrow him, since it would lead to civil war with the civilian population.

Anonymous Coward says:

Insulting the President

You think the Thai government is special? HA! If you insult the President of Germany you will end up in prison for no less than 3 months to up to 5 years. The insult must happen publicly, or in an assembly, or through writing.

So given I am German and that this is writing if I were to say, in theory, and these following words are just an example of what not to say: The President of Germany is a….
Honestly, I am afraid to say what I think of him because I really don’t want to end up in jail because the honored Judge Wilhelm Gerhard recently said,paraphrased, that people are not subject to be protected from harm by the German Gov when in prison and are kind of supposed to be raped.

sciamiko (profile) says:

There is one oddity about Line’s response to the Thai government, though:

"We ask the authorities seeking to obtain user data to make official requests through diplomatic channels and have so advised the Thai authorities," LINE added.

So, uh, if the messages are all end-to-end encrypted and there’s no way for Line to access them to share with any government, why is it asking the Thai government to use diplomatic channels to make an official request?

Perhaps because asking for data about an account (eg. names, telephone numbers, contact lists, etc.) can be answered even though messages cannot be read.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...