Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
from the comment-one-comment-all dept
This week, we covered the disturbing story of a cop whose huge number of impaired driving arrests turned out to stem from his arbitrary decisions about who was impaired as though it was some sort of magical ability. Roger Strong took a firm line on responding to this, and enough people agreed to make it the first place winner for insightful:
Officer T.T. Carroll is a known serial liar.
The Cobb County police department supports and encourages serial liars.
Cobb County police department arrest records are not credible.
These points should be raised in ANY trial where Cobb County police testimony is presented, or any background check using police records.
In second place, we’ve got a response from JoeCool to the Conan O’Brien joke stealing lawsuit, making the case that some jokes essentially write themselves:
Topical jokes shouldn’t be eligible for copyright
Seriously, I heard that same joke about the MVP truck from a dozen people before it made it online or TV. It was the most obvious joke in the world, and therefore not all that funny. Given how much humans value humor and how many people at least TRY to be funny, I expect that EVERY topical joke is reinvented thousands of times independently. As such, they don’t deserve any sort of protection.
For editor’s choice on the insightful side, we head to our post about Microsoft’s angry response to the NSA following the WannaCry ransomware debacle, which made use of a leaked NSA exploit. First, mcinsand did a good job of summing up the most important lesson for the government to learn here:
Senators Feinstein and Burr Need to Pay Attention
For the slow class, there is an important lesson here. An unintentional weakness created havoc this week, and the NSA’s knowledge hurt national and global security by not working with Microsoft to fix the problem. If an accidental flaw can cause trouble, then a designed-in backdoor has at least the same potential for damaging our security. We will only make our nation less secure by hiding vulnerabilities or, especially, if we actually deliberately create them; we will make our nation more secure, however, if we work to secure our software.
However, PaulT also made a good point that sparked a conversation about Microsoft that is worth checking out in full:
I appreciate MS here, but they have to accept a lot of responsibility for the situation. It’s not just about their historically shoddy record of security (although that’s undoubtedly improved), it’s about how they’ve run their ecosystem for so long.
Many people have had major issues installing Windows updates in the past, so they make sure they’re turned off. Lots of people killed Windows 7/8 updates because they wanted to avoid being forced to install Windows 10 without their permission.
MS has been really bad at separating actual critical updates from other types of changes, so there’s no middle ground in a lot of areas – especially businesses where their updates have been known to kill mission critical production systems if not properly vetted. So, they don’t rush to install new patches unless they’re made aware of an urgent reason to do so.
Part of the reason why some places were still running XP has to do with compatibility issues for certain software and drivers. I can understand why Microsoft wants to get away from supporting such things. But, if they have introduced problems in getting legacy products to run on a new OS, then they’re the reason people didn’t upgrade to an OS that was protected against this attack.
All kudos due to Microsoft for coming out and saying what they have here, and taking a stance against the NSA (although a large part of that is probably self-preservation rather than altruism). But, they have to recognise that their own actions, not just recently but over most peoples’ experience with their products, has led to everyone being less secure. Saying they released a patch a couple of months ago is no good when the reason why the patches weren’t applied on so many machines is because of their own historical behaviour.
Over on the funny side, our first place winner is Roger Strong who had a hilarious response to the BBC’s bizarre new commenting policy that says they might report abusive comments to your boss:
If you’re abusive AND insightful, they let you host Top Gear.
For second place, we head to our post about the Japanese music collection society that wants music schools to pay up for the performance rights to songs they teach to students. My_Name_Here provided a case study in Poe’s Law with a comment that racked up a lot of funny votes despite nobody being quite sure if it was actually a joke:
I know this will be hidden, but
If composers aren’t paid when students are being taught to play songs they’ve already written, why would they write more songs that will simply be performed for free? Masnick doesn’t like thinking about these unfortunate truths, because they don’t mesh with his piratey worldview.
For editor’s choice on the funny side, we start out with one more comment on that post. This time it’s Roger Strong again with a great survival tip:
If I were ever lost alone in the woods, I’d just sing a happy tune.
Because then I could get directions from the collection society representative demanding payment for the public performance.
(And yes, it’s a public performance if animals hear it.)
Finally, we’ve got a different kind of survival tip from Jigsy — a creative response to immigrations officers requesting account passwords:
“Why yes, officer. My password is the last 21 digits of Pi.”
That’s all for this week, folks!
Comments on “Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt”
Last 21 digits of Pi
I was at a special wine tasting dinner on Friday. One of the other guest was a physicist, and another a specialist in ISO 9000. I used this suggestion for a password in our conversion and hilarity ensued. Kudos.
That will be my answer for any question about my passwords in the future. Let them try and figure it out. My bet is that many hours will be spent looking up the ‘last 21 digits of PI’. I wonder if there is any way to track that particular search, and how those searches might be attributed to government officials WHO HAVE NO COMPREHENSION OF THE IMPLICATIONS?
Kudos again.
Re: Last 21 digits of Pi
Of course, if I did that, I would literally set my password to “the last twenty-one digits of PI”, just so that when then finally figure it out I could simultaneously defuse the situation while smugly giving them a second finger.
…I’m not a nice person.
Re: Re: Last 21 digits of Pi
The only problem with that is that there might be many of us with the same password. We might have to organize some variation of letters capitalized or not.:)
Re: Re: Re: Last 21 digits of Pi
Or “last 21 slices of pie”.
Re: Last 21 digits of Pi
Damn you, my password is/was “the last 21 digits of pi” now I’ve had to change it.
Re: Re: Last 21 digits of Pi
Damn, now I have to change the combination on my luggage.
Re: Last 21 digits of Pi
Just a note that security personnel tend not to have a sense of humour.
Particularly if they are armed.
Re: Last 21 digits of Pi
So I turned on the calculator on my computer and I pushed the Pi button and it gave me 32 digits.
So I guess the last 21 digits for me would be 597238334626483239798? That’s using ‘last’ as in ‘most recent’ so they’re in reverse order, by the way…
Re: Re: Last 21 digits of Pi
Your last 21 of 32 digits don’t look right.
Re: Last 21 digits of Pi
I can’t.
A 21 digit numeric password doesn’t meet my corporate password policy that requires at least one upper case letter.
Funny Comment
Too bad you wrote the funny comment in my name. Why not use your own name instead?
One look will tell you I didn’t write it, but you know that.
Re: Funny Comment
Man, every other week you piss and moan about why your comments are never featured. And when one finally is, you piss and moan. Why is that? Is it because it was voted funny when you thought it was actually supposed to be insightful?
I think you might have a better track record claiming that John Steele would appeal, and that he would win…
Re: Funny Comment
There’s no shame in being funny. Why deny credit where credit is due? Unless you’re saying that the mystical, magical bogeyman trying to be you is better at being you than you.
Huh. My_Name_Here finally made it to the weekend funnies.
…We’re all fucked, aren’t we?
Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on May 21st, 2017 @ 6:50pm
People don’t realize they are getting trolled by the techdirt that. My name here posts are always held for moderation and would never get votes because nobody would see them until the discussion is all bit over.
Suckers.
Re: Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on May 21st, 2017 @ 6:50pm
Not everyone gets votes, and a cursory search proves that “My name here posts” are regularly responded to, so saying that “nobody would see them until the discussion is all bit over” is a bit moot.
Occam’s razor suggests that My_Name_Here just isn’t that insightful or humorous, save for this one time. And apparently he’s still not happy. I know you can’t please everyone all of the time, but it looks like this guy can’t be pleased any of the time.
Also, if you’re going to post from your mobile phone, pausing to spellcheck phrases like “techdirt that” might help you put your point across instead of looking like a raging douchebag.
I Still Like ...
this one.
Hmm. Perhaps I should avoid Cobb Country for a while.
Speaking of Micros~1 being asshats when it comes to user’s privacy settings:
https://twitter.com/m8urnett/status/866353982217699328
It’s baffling to see them getting away with it, especially with businesses.