Lawyers: Trump's Twitter Account Not Presidential; Also: Trump Is President, Can't Be Sued
from the block-chain dept
A lawsuit filed against President Trump alleges a host of First Amendment violations stemming from Trump’s Twitter blocklist. According to the suit filed by the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, an official government account shouldn’t be allowed to block users from reading tweets. Sure, there’s an actual official presidential Twitter account, but nothing of interest happens there. Everything from retweets of questionable GIFs to arguable threats of nuclear war happen at Donald Trump’s personal account. But everything’s all mixed together because the president insists on using his personal account (and its blocklist) to communicate a majority of his thoughts and opinions.
The government’s lawyers are now forced to defend the president (and his blocklist) from these allegations. It’s not an easy job. In fact, as Alison Frankel reports, it requires a significant amount of cognitive dissonance.
First, the government has argued the Twitter account President Trump uses most is not a publicly-owned (read: government) Twitter account.
The brief’s primary argument is that @realdonaldtrump is not a public forum. It’s a private platform governed by the rules of a private company, the Justice Department said. The president opened his account before he was an elected official, the brief said, and his continued operation of the account is not a right conferred by his election to the presidency. “The president does not operate his personal Twitter account by virtue of federal law, nor is blocking made possible because the President is clothed in Article II powers,” the brief said.
This makes some sense, even if Trump’s use of this account to announce positions on issues and potential government action undermine the “not a public forum” argument. He did have this account prior to the presidency, but perhaps he should have abandoned it for the official presidential account once he took office. Even though this argument is somewhat credible, the next argument from the government almost completely undermines it.
President Trump, in other words, is not flexing his presidential power when he tweets as @realdonaldtrump, according to the Justice Department. But at the same time, Justice argued in the summary judgment brief, the president can’t be sued for posting to his private account because he’s acting as the president.
He’s not the president (so to speak) when he tweets from his personal account. But he is the president, so he can’t be sued. No matter how many accounts he blocks. The president, according to White House counsel, is able to occupy two states simultaneously thanks to the magical powers of Twitter.
It sounds ridiculous (and it is), but as Frankel points out, seemingly contradictory arguments are made all the time at this point in the pleadings. The judge is one that decides which arguments move forward — sometimes even without calling out lawyers for arguing against their own arguments.
Stripping the case of all legalese, the account Trump prefers to use should be considered an official account. And if it’s an official account, Trump needs to lay off the “block” button. You can’t force citizens to jump through hoops to view proclamations made in a de facto public square. Even if Trump can’t be sued, he should at least lift the blocks. It’s not very presidential to pointedly lock certain people out of public discussions.
Filed Under: blocks, doj, donald trump, first amendment, free speech, tweets
Companies: knight first amendment institute
Comments on “Lawyers: Trump's Twitter Account Not Presidential; Also: Trump Is President, Can't Be Sued”
It's not contradictory
What I hear is the DoJ saying “Whatever works for us, now go away, we have assets to seize and your petty squabble is costing us money”.
Also, doesn’t Twitter own all Twitter accounts and the user rents the ability (not right) to control a particular account? It appears that the DoJ lawyers have confused themselves.
Trump’s Twitter Account certainly is not Presidential.
Re: Re:
Neither is Trump.
Re: Re: Re:
https://i.redd.it/hjw0c55q23by.jpg
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Hint: Being President is not the same as being presidential.
Just as Republicans, who demonized Obama for being unpresidential for things like wearing a tan suit. (Hard to believe NOW, right?)
Re: Re: Re:2 Re:
Best get used to him. He’ll be there under 2024.
Re: Re: Re:3 Re:
He might be, but all he will be doing is golfing
So, when the “non-official” account causes millions to die because it got us into a nuclear war, Can Trump be tried for war crimes? Mass genocide of his own people.
Ahh the US legal system.
We’ll lie to Judges, make up law, and because we said so is all it should require.
Schrödinger’s President.
Re: Re:
Ah, just this morning Scott Greenfield has an article (Judge Weinstein Takes on Testilying) over at Simple Justice about one Federal Judge pushing back on lies.
Re: Re:
More like Schrodinger’s Anus.
This seems to be the same mathematics they’re using to try and undermine encryption.
Welcome to the future of Quantum Legislation.
Re: Welcome to the future of Quantum Legislation.
The Trumpi Exclusion principle.
They should be grateful
How did they get so lucky as to be blocked from Trumps tweets?
Hopefully every journalist will be blocked next so I don’t have to hear what nonsensical thing Trump will say next.
Re: They should be grateful
How?
I sent him greetings from Pittsburgh then said he was a #fakeleader.
But it seems to be, to borrow a phrase, "modern-day presidential"…
Start tweeting at Trump that the official account is only for those who won the popular vote, then watch what happens.
“Lawyers: Trump’s Twitter Account Not Presidential; Also: Trump Is President, Can’t Be Sued”
The same can also be said for Hillary if she was President. Oh wait…
Re: Not quite.
She was a Senator and Secretary of State.
I would have no problems with Cruz moderating for off topic nonsense.
It’s silly to get butt hurt about being filtered in someone else’s peanut gallery when you have your own soap box on the same website.
Schrödinger’s Trump (Twitter account): A superposition of presidential and non-presidential states. Wavefunction only collapses when observed by the DOJ.
Re: Re:
WIN!
“As discussed in Section II, infra, Defendants contest the premise that the President acted in his official capacity, but even accepting Plaintiff’s premise as true, this Court would lack jurisdiction to grant the relief requested.”
That’s not contradictory. That’s not ridiculous. When discussing a matter of law (not fact), it’s perfectly valid to contemplate that the court might not agree with your legal conclusions, and prepare another legal argument.
Appointments by the President is a reflection of the President’s demeanor, will and agenda. And as one appointed person so succinctly and eloquently pointed out, the President is “a fucking moron!”
Twitter is Not a Public Forum
Twitter, Facebook, etc. are private forums run by private companies, they are not public forums. The companies can cancel accounts and change the rules whenever they want.
The first amendment guarantees the right to speak not the right to hear speech. If you can’t get to location of a speech you do not have first amendment grounds to sue.
Everyone wanting to and actually suing over Trump blocking should be yelling at Twitter instead. Twitter should take away the ability to block or mute other users from anyone they deem to be a public official.
If it is not considered to be an official Twitter account of the President and it is truly an individual account only, it should not be given any latitude on content and therefore be banned for hate speech and threats.
Which is it?
Re: Re:
Wait for it….
A single Trump tweet shaved off about $1.2 billion of Lockheed Martin’s market value. But that’s OK, because he was Making America Great Again.
Meanwhile China aims to become the world’s leading economic power. It’s not at all far-fetched. And a Chinese President has far more control than an American one. There’s ever more investment in China by American companies.
Before long a calculated tweet by President Xi could shave a $billion off an American company’s market value. That’s when the government, the courts and everyone else will demand that Something Be Done about presidents and Twitter.
Re: Re:
Doesn’t matter if it is official or not, still not a public forum. Twitter should treat it however they want, it’s their application.
Re: Re: Re:
(one hour later)
So which is it, Jim?
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Both.
People should be upset with Twitter and demand they change the way public officials are treated on Twitter by removing block and mute. I support this position and think it makes sense.
Twitter as a private business can ignore these demands if they think its in their best interest. Twitter can also censor or delete Trumps account if they believe he has violated their rules. Twitter could also implement the suggestion and make everyone but the President happy.
Bottom line Twitter can do what it wants. The public can yell for change and if Twitter ignores them the public can stop using Twitter. Free enterprise at it’s best.
Spicer already sunk the "not official" argument
http://time.com/4808270/sean-spicer-donald-trump-twitter-statements/
And let’s use the correct word for the contradictory arguments: doublethink.
"Cognitive dissonance" implies that there is conflict in the mind of the person with contradictory views. Clearly with Trump and his supporters, there is no conflict in their minds.
Re: Spicer already sunk the "not official" argument
Doctors declare them “Neuron-free”
Private or Public?
Is twitter privately owned, or is there public capital invested in it?
Shouldn’t officials use publicly available services, instead of privately owned? Email should be run through the government services, so why does twitter have to be different?
Re: Private or Public?
Good point. If mandated by law then yes government officials should only use government services. Until then it’s open season.
Not Official
The same can also be said for Hillary if she was President.
Re: Not Official
The same could also be said for Oprah, William H Macy, my third-grade teacher, or Stephen King if they were president.
But they’re not, so what the fuck is their relevance to the conversation?
Re: Re: Not Official
cuz hillary sold all that plutonium to russia after bill met with putin…
Re: Re: Re: Not Official
Super tweet deals on Twitter… Bay.
President Trump has set policy from his Twitter account, how can it possibly be considered an unofficial, personal account?
People will die! LOL Who is it that won’t die?
Strange decision, considering the White House is literally on record as stating that his personal account should be treated as official government communication.
I am sorry what? People are trying to sue Trump because he has blocked them from posting on his twitter account?
I would think any such lawsuit would be thrown out as laughable to begin with. What happens if we make the rule you cannot block anyone from your twitter account because that violates their rights somehow to read or harass you on it.
It is not the only place to see what Trumps posts, if it was they may have a leg to stand on.
Re: Re:
It actually makes complete sense when you think of the bigger picture. Trump insists on conducting official communication through his Twitter account, which makes it a de facto government forum. Trump is blocking people from that forum based both on personal grudges and for their political views. This means that groups of people do not have their voices heard equally, since while you can read the insane idiocy spouted without an unblocked account, you cannot participate in the public forum.
If this were a physical medium, and political opponents were being loudly excluded, there would rightly be an outcry. I see no reason why this should be different just because Trump prefers to communicate in sound bytes from his phone.
Real-world comparison
Suppose Trump decided to give his State of the Union address at Trump Tower instead of in the Capitol Building.
The Capitol is a government building which is open the public, but Trump Tower is privately owned.
Now suppose Trump told the manager of Trump Tower not to let certain people inside.
Could these people sue because they were blocked from hearing Trump’s State of the Union address?
Re: Real-world comparison
That will be a hoot!
Better make sure I have ample supply of pop corn.
Schrodinger's President
Prior to this year I don’t think I would have been able to comprehend how a person could both be president and not president at the same time. Looking at Trump though, it totally makes sense. That man is not an American President; and yet he is…
Way around the block
I don’t get the fuss; you have only to view the account either while logged out or via another browser on which you’re not logged in. All that blocking does is stop you tweeting @ the president. I’ve been pre-blocked by a few people and that’s what I do if I see an unavailable tweet; fire up another browser to view it in there. Problem solved!
Re: Way around the block
The problem isn’t inability to receive what is sent via this channel; the problem is the inability to send via this same channel, or more particularly, the selective denial of that ability to specific people.
The inability to address the President via what is apparently one of his primary acting-as-President official channels, when other people are able to do so, is itself the problem at hand.
If he didn’t make himself accessible via Twitter at all, that would be one thing; there’s no right to a direct channel to the President from members of the public. (Maybe there should be, but that would probably be impractical, and in any case would be a separate argument.)
Similarly, if he made himself accessible via Twitter only on a "whitelist" basis – e.g. setting it up so that the only @realDonaldTrump tweets he sees are those from his actual friends, et cetera – that would not be a public forum in any meaningful sense, and the large majority of people who do not have access to contact him that way would have no standing to complain over lack of that access.
But if he’s making himself accessible via Twitter to most of the public, while denying the rest of the public that access on a "blacklist" basis, the people to whom he is denying that access have a legitimate complaint.
Re: Re: Way around the block
Even that might not be a problem except tha Trump is both a) expressly blocking people based on political and other views, and b) often using Twitter as the sole method of communication on certain issues.
Re: Way around the block
So, it’s ok for the government to exclude you and people who agree with you on certain communication channels, so long as you have the ability to use a workaround to read what they said (but not reply, as people who have not been blocked can do easily)?
You may not have thought through the actual issues being raised.
Your arguments on other Twitter accounts are not the same as one which the president has opted to use as a de facto exclusive platform for official policy.
Twitter Posts
President Trump tends to speak whatever is on his mind on Twitter, but he cannot be sued because they are not personally harming one’s rights. If he did, would he be sued or would it just go under Congress’ attention?
Trump
Meanwhile China aims to become the world’s leading economic power. It’s not at all far-fetched. And a Chinese President has far more control than an American one. There’s ever more investment in China by American companies.
That’s great article. Looking forward to it.