UK May Have Finally Ditched Its Absurd Porn Filter Plan

from the censor-the-naughty-bits dept

As we’ve noted for years, internet filters don’t work, routinely censor legitimate content by mistake, and implementing them is a massive waste of money, time, resources, and precious calories. In the UK, that’s been a lesson that has been painfully difficult to learn.

The UK has long implemented porn filters in a bid to restrict anybody under the age of 18 from accessing such content. New age verification controls were also mandated as part of the Digital Economy Act of 2017. But as we’ve previously noted, the UK government has seen several fits and starts with its proposal as it desperately tries to convince the public and business sectors that the ham-fisted effort was going to actually work.

Back in April, the UK government announced that after numerous delays the program would effectively be taking effect July 15. Under the proposal, websites that failed to comply with the country’s age verification program face fines up to ?250,000, risk being taken offline, or may lose access to payment services. Randy folks who wanted to view some porn were to be redirected to a special subsite where they’d be prompted for an email address and a password, before verifying your age using a driving license or a passport. They’d then, theoretically, happily be passed off to compliant porn websites.

Of course anybody who has watched anybody with a whit of technical prowess bypass these costly blockades using VPNs or proxies knew this wasn’t going to work. Getting global websites to comply with UK law was largely preposterous, and the creation of a database of porn habits created fairly obvious privacy and security issues.

After years of grumbling, the UK government appears to have now scrapped the proposal “indefinitely.” UK outlets are suggesting that bureaucratic dysfunction — not any epiphany as to the stupidity of the program — was to blame:

“The UK?s age-verification system for online pornography will be delayed for around six months because the government failed to inform the EU of its proposals, the culture secretary has said.

The already delayed policy, which will require all adult internet users wanting to watch legal pornography to prove they are over 18 by providing some form of identification, was due to come into force on 15 July.

However, the culture secretary, Jeremy Wright, told the House of Commons, that would not happen, because of a failure to comply with European law in how statutory instruments are passed.”

Some have argued that the claim of bureaucratic dysfunction is a polite way to kill the program, without making it obvious that the UK government is killing the program. Regardless, the quest to filter out the internet’s naughty bits will now be kicked down the road for the next Prime Minister to worry about.

Hopefully said Prime Minister realizes that 1) collecting everybody’s porn interests poses a terrible potential privacy risk, 2) internet filters routinely wind up censoring legitimate resources, and 3) the filters can be easily bypassed by any halfwit utilizing a proxy or VPN. The solution on the porn front has long been better parenting and parental controls and not putting government in charge of policing porn consumption, but it’s a lesson some government leaders simply refuse to learn. In other words, you can probably expect this dumb idea to resurface down the road with a fresh coat of paint.

Filed Under: , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “UK May Have Finally Ditched Its Absurd Porn Filter Plan”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
18 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

The article frames the issue as a technical issue. It is not. It is a social issue.

One may recall the were two noted Greek philosopher Aristotle 384–322 BC and Plato 428-348 BC.

In modern words Aristotle’s basic philosophy was freedom; Plato’s totalitarianism.

What is being discussed here is just more of the same fight. One side believes they have the right to tell you what to do the other side denies that they have that right.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

What makes you think they expect the private companies to be successful? Only UK companies will have to collect this data, and it’s hard to imagine any viewers making an effort to give up their privacy rather than just going to any of the thousands of foreign sites. That suggests that the government is just trying to kill the local industry while pretending they didn’t.

Anonymous Coward says:

Porn is legal for adults to view in the uk,
its pointless for the government to get involved in monitoring who views
adult websites .
Also theres private companys who will handle the registration of the license to view porn.
How long till the data base is hacked ,
and the viewing habits of millions of uk adults released on the web.
this data will be in the hands of american private companys .
Yes people can uses vpns and proxys to get around it,
but not every uk web user is a tech expert.

PaulT (profile) says:

Re: Hope for Brexit?

I personally suspect that the whole filter plan was as much a method to filter money to some Tory’s family business as it was an actual plan. With Brexit, I’m not so sure, although the damage done to the UK economy and the lengthy ties some Tories have to EU countries does raise the question. Hell, Farage gets a juicy EU pension and has bought German citizenship for his kids to protect them for when the economy inevitable collapses under the weight of the stupidity, so it wouldn’t surprise me if there’s more to it for him.

wereisjessicahyde (profile) says:

Ermm..

"The UK has long implemented porn filters in a bid to restrict anybody under the age of 18 from accessing such content."

That’s a bit misleading. The UK hasn’t long implemented porn filters, some private companies such as ISPs have offered optional filters to consumers. The filters mandated by the "UK" have not been implemented yet, and probably never will be.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...