Dear Americans: Be Very, Very Afraid Of The EU's New Copyright Rules

from the the-closing-of-the-open-internet dept

Former MEP Julia Reda, who lead the fight to block the problematic parts of the EU Copyright Directive (and who came very close to succeeding against huge odds, but eventually lost) has published a really important piece for the Berkman Klein Center at Harvard about why the new Copyright Directive should terrify every American who recognizes the importance of an open internet. First off, these laws mostly target American companies -- many of which may just choose to follow the new EU rules globally.

Not only are European policy-makers keener than their US counterparts to regulate the mostly American tech companies that have gained significant market power over the last two decades. For better or for worse, the European Union has increasingly become capable of setting global regulatory standards, through the inclusion of its internet legislation in trade agreements, or by making compliance with these rules a precondition for accessing the vast EU market of over 500 million consumers.

That also means that the legacy entertainment and publishing industries who pushed so hard for the Copyright Directive in the past, are already looking at using the EU Copyright Directive as a wedge to get this put into the law elsewhere.

There is a tried-and-tested tradition of Hollywood companies lobbying for stricter copyright in Europe, just to turn around to US policy-makers to demand the same extensions be enacted in domestic law, in order to “stay competitive”. This strategy was successful in the case of the Sonny Bono Copyright Act of 1998, which extended copyright terms to 70 years after the death of the author, following a similar term extension in Europe in 1993. The purpose of the term extension, according to the Senate report, was to “provide significant trade benefits by substantially harmonizing U.S. copyright law to that of the European Union”. Of course, the EU would have been unlikely to extend its copyright terms to begin with, had it not been for the lobbying by American entertainment companies. It should therefore not come as a surprise that the US Copyright Office has repeatedly referred to the work on the new EU copyright directive as a reason for considering the overhaul of the US framework for copyright liability of online platforms, enshrined on section 512 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

She then goes on to explain how Article 17 (what had been Article 13) will change the way internet platforms operate -- in a manner that will make it much more difficult for new startups platforms to be created, and where platforms will be forced to make it more difficult for anyone to post their own content. The whole thing will be an absolute mess, with significant litigation early on.

It’s impossible for platform operators to predict which copyrighted works by which rightsholders will be uploaded to their platform. Since copyright arises at the moment that a work is created, nowadays every person with a smartphone is a copyright holder, and most people frequently upload their works to the web (mostly in the form of pictures). It is therefore absolutely impossible for platforms to contact all rightsholders in the world and ask them for a license, on the off chance that one of their works might be uploaded to the platform at some point in the future. The directive is also silent on whether platforms would be forced to accept unfair license conditions at any cost to their own business.

The real effects of Article 17 will depend on the interpretation of “best efforts”. What level of diligence in blocking content, identifying rightsholders and negotiating license agreements can be expected of platforms depends on many factors, including their size, profitability and the types of content they host. Article 17 exposes platform operators to a lot of legal uncertainty and it will take many years for courts to hash out what these rules will mean in practice. The outcome is likely to privilege large, commercial rightsholders like the entertainment industry giants over independent artists.

The full article is worth reading -- highlighting how poorly filters actually work, and how the last minute attempts by EU lawmakers to "protect' user's rights has only resulted in contradictory requirements, which the first country (France) to try to implement a law based on the directive has "solved" by just ignoring the user rights parts.

And get ready, because next year you can bet that entertainment industry lobbyists are going to try to bring that law into the US as well. They're going to try to do it before it becomes evidence just what a complete and utter mess it created in the EU.

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: article 13, article 17, copyright, eu copyright directive, filters, intermediary liability, julia reda


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Thread


  1. This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 24 Dec 2019 @ 10:06am

    Going to close out 2019 with a statement which aligns with the overall consensus regarding the internet: Give up. You've already lost.

    No matter how many articles Techdirt has written, the reality of truth is everything they've complained about happening has happened, with a few exceptions.

    I've been stating for years on this site, under various names and accounts, Techdirt and its readers have no chance of winning the war against protecting the internet. The battle is over. The ruse is just placating the few who believe there's still a chance.

    Let me preface this by starting with the biggest contributor to the destruction of the internet: Google.

    Single-handedly, this company has ruined anything I'd call "internet", by washing its search results of anything the company deems bad, replacing it with links disguised as ads.

    Following Google is the US entertainment industry, which forces companies all over the world to bow to its demands of more money. Each and every day, rules and regulations are stripped because old people governing citizens think the internet is nothing but a haven to pedophiles and thieves. Every. Single. Day. New legislation is brought to the table to "curb" both freedom of speech and people's right to access knowledge.

    We've seen law enforcement with "wins" regarding bills like FOSTA. We've seen a temporary win against SOPA, but it's coming back (no way is Disney going to let go of its mouse, especially now with billions in its pockets) in pieces and parts.

    Then there are the grassroots and gaslighting campaigns which spurn continuously to push agendas to change people's minds regarding how evil the internet is.

    Recently, Techdirt wrote about one of these shills: Creative Future.

    While I cannot disclose the heinous nature of this group, it is one in which everyone should scrutinize to the Nth degree. To underestimate this group will be the biggest mistake of 2020, if not the years later.

    This organization can, and has, single-handedly destroyed our internet protections, one bill at a time. This group is also a large contributor and supporter (and many will claim authors) of the Articles which recently passed in the EU.

    This is done because it's well established that by taking away freedoms piece by piece, no one sees it coming. Try to take it all at once, as SOPA tried, and it will fail.

    The EU attack "against" American corporations is a planned assault, nearly 9 years in the making.

    American corporations will pay no levy, no fines, nor taxes to the EU for "failing" to meet its regulatory standards.

    It will simply comply, then pass this restrictive nature to the US.

    It's literally how copyright laws of the Berne Convention, which the US adamantly defended against due to its draconian restrictions, found its way into our copyright laws, and will continue to do so until all avenues are extinguished.

    I truly hope many of you still have the energy to fight this battle, but for me, I've long since exhausted my energy.

    It is impossible to fight and win against stupid.

    I fondly remember when people celebrated far too early when the FCC changed the rules, and Pai's succession proved why the celebration was too soon.

    I challenged everyone then they were fighting the wrong battle, but they did not listen.

    2020 is going to be the worst year on record when it comes to the internet.

    I guarantee in 2021, the internet you know today will not be around.

    And there's not a damn thing you can do to stop it. The fight started years ago and most of you didn't even notice it.


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories
.

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.