Facebook Abuses Trademark To Give New Prominence To Group Of Facebook Critics Who Are Trying To Shame Company Into More Moderation

from the dumb-idea dept

I'd been meaning to write up something about a new group of very vocal critics of Facebook who have set up a project to try to shame Facebook into being more aggressive with content moderation. They called themselves "The Real Facebook Oversight Board," which is a snarky comment on Facebook's still-not-operational Facebook Oversight Board. As I've said, the Oversight Board is an interesting, but very limited, experiment in removing some level of control over controversial moderation decisions and creating an external "appeals" process. I don't think it will make a huge difference, but it's worth watching.

The new group is made up of a mix of people who I consider serious and thoughtful critics of Facebook... and a bunch of people who I think are creating a moral panic around Facebook without understanding the real issues (and refusing to recognize the nuances involved in what they're complaining about). I don't know in which direction this group will actually go, but the involvement of those I consider to be intellectually dishonest grandstanders struck me as problematic (and I worry it will detract from the legitimate criticisms some of the other members will raise). It's still not entirely clear what this group will do but it claims that it will pull publicity stunts to drive attention to moves by Facebook it disagrees with:

"We will use stunts, viral video, celebrity endorsement and skillful media management to throw a spotlight on the real-time threats to democracy from the misuse of social media platforms and big tech."

As Casey Newton wrote, even if he was initially skeptical of the effort, when viewed as a media-seeking art project, perhaps it can have an impact.

And the first of its "stunts" seems to have been this name, which mocks the actual Oversight Board... and now it appears that Facebook fell face first into the trap. According to reporter Carole Cadwalladr (a very vocal Facebook critic), Facebook filed a trademark complaint about the group's website, realfacebookoversight.com. And the company hosting the website suspended the domain, noting that it violated their anti-phishing rules (which seems... silly).


This seems like an unfortunately stupid move by Facebook. For years we've discussed how parody sites that mock or criticize websites are allowed, even when those sites use the trademarked names of the companies they're criticizing. Facebook could have just let this site stay. It wasn't trying to trick anyone. It was criticizing Facebook and even if I can understand the company's frustration at some of the people involved, and their history of intellectually dishonest criticisms of the company, this move only creates a Streisand Effect that elevates this critical group as something Facebook is afraid of.

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: criticism, domains, oversight board, phishing, sucks sites, trademark
Companies: facebook, real facebook oversight board


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Thread


  • identicon
    Annonymouse, 8 Oct 2020 @ 10:02am

    On the face of it they are not wrong..
    All they had to do was have a name that didn't imply they are part of Facebook but they didn't do that.
    Prudent forethought was not part of the equation here.

    Me? I would have added NotThe at the beginning of the name. Obvious yet getting the message across and as always in this day and age YOU HAVE TO BE BLATANTLY OBVIOUS.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2020 @ 10:45am

      Re:

      What rock are you living under? Claiming to be the "Real" version of something is one of the most obvious ways to display that your group isn't actually affiliated.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2020 @ 11:23am

    "Facebook Abuses Trademark To Give New Prominence To Group Of Facebook Critics Who Are Trying To Shame Company Into More Moderation"

    So... Facebook did a good thing? Well, I don't need to worry about it then!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    ECA (profile), 8 Oct 2020 @ 1:43pm

    CoMuNiCaTion

    "who I think are creating a moral panic around Facebook "

    Love that ideal. Moral? WHOSE Morals?
    Even if you ask Every group what they want, Then Nothing will ever be allowed.
    Even if you use the MOST basic rules "be nice to each other", It can never happen.
    The Most Fowl of Language Iv ever heard a person use was from a religious person. Calling a person by every sin in the book, with expletives.

    But we are talking about Corps. And even a good corp, has no need to be MORAL, let alone those trying to express themselves.

    The Thought that we are born from original sin, means we have to Live with our sin. And Then you add, 'He who has no sin may cast the first stone'. MEANS they should just shut up, dont it?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
.

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.