GOP Confirms Unqualified Simington to FCC With Eye On Crippling Biden FCC

from the minority-rule dept

The Senate voted 49-46 Tuesday afternoon along strict party lines to appoint Trump ally NTIA advisor Nathan Simington to the FCC. Simington is hugely unqualified, and his appointment sets another new low in the modern GOP’s campaign of sleazy and blisteringly hypocritical politics at the cost of a functioning government or the public interest.

Simington has absolutely no experience in telecom issues, consumer protection, or the other complicated issues facing the FCC. He was nominated because he literally helped write Donald Trump’s idiotic and dangerous attack on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, and is expected to continue (at least performatively for distraction’s sake) the campaign at the FCC. If you ask Trumpland, the campaign is necessary to stop “censorship” of conservatives online. In reality, that censorship doesn’t exist (in fact reality indicates the opposite). The campaign is really about bullying tech giants into not policing disinformation and hate speech, now cornerstones of GOP power.

While the 230 drama will get all the press attention, Simington’s appointment was rushed through primarily for another reason: to help Mitch McConnell (read: AT&T, Verizon, and Comcast) gridlock the FCC at 2-2 Commissioners for at least the next two years, preventing the reversal of hugely unpopular Trump FCC policies by the Biden FCC.

By law, the party that wins the White House controls a 3-2 majority at the FCC, and gets to appoint the agency boss. But back in August Trump fired Republican FCC Commissioner Mike O’Rielly for some pretty timid comments (correctly) suggesting Trump’s planned attack on social media didn’t make much sense. With both O’Rielly and Ajit Pai leaving the agency on January 20, that left the FCC with a 2-1 Democratic majority in the new year. So despite the FCC attack on 230 now crippled with Trump’s election loss, and despite Simington being an unqualified Trump sycophant, the GOP rushed the nomination through anyway, knowing he would create 2-2 agency gridlock.

Most every telecom expert and consumer advocate I’ve spoken to now expect the GOP, should it retain control of the Senate after the Georgia run off elections, to block the appointment of any Democratic FCC boss with a spine, ensuring that the FCC remains mired in partisan gridlock indefinitely. With Democratic FCC Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel’s term up at the end of 2021, her replacement is likely to be blocked as well, resulting in a GOP 2-1 FCC majority — despite losing the election. Whatever representative democracy is supposed to look like, this sure as shit isn’t it.

The GOP’s ploy is a huge gift to telecom giants like AT&T and Comcast, which don’t want the Biden administration reversing any of the Trump FCC’s hugely unpopular policies, be it the attack on net neutrality, the neutering of the agency’s overall consumer protection authority, or the attack on decades-old, bipartisan media consolidation rules.

Gridlocked at 2-2 or even 2-1, the Biden FCC also won’t be able to pass any COVID-relief efforts that meaningfully challenges the broadband industry (the whole point), be they restrictions on arbitrary and punitive usage caps, or policies aimed at preventing ISPs from kicking struggling Americans offline for nonpayment. Angry voters will then blame the Biden FCC for the dysfunction foisted upon them by the GOP, a story you’ll see playing out across numerous regulatory agencies and policy fights in the coming year as the GOP shifts from Trump sycophancy (and attacks on fundamental democracy) back to obstructionism.

With that as context, Simington’s role as a Section 230 attack dog is largely going to be an afterthought and distraction. Though as TechFreedom’s Berin Szoka notes, that doesn’t mean he can’t throw a wrench into the numerous ongoing litigation efforts related to content moderation:

Still, the primary goal here now for Mitch McConnell isn’t Section 230. It’s protecting the four-year ass kissing the Trump administration gave the telecom industry. An industry every bit as problematic as the “big tech” giants the GOP’s faux-populist wing (Josh Hawley quickly comes to mind) exploits for political benefit. “Big telecom” has waged an incredibly successful four-year campaign exploiting the often legitimate anger at “big tech,” to call for heavier regulation of the industries it wants to compete with in the ad space, while eliminating most meaningful oversight of its own highly monopolistic sector.

Now, with the GOP’s help, they’re hoping to keep things that way for as long as is humanly possible. In a functioning country, crippling the nation’s top telecom regulator in the middle of a pandemic (one showing how affordable broadband is essential for survival) because some lobbyists told you to would be met with real consequences and scorn. Here, if the press can even be bothered to report on what telecom and the GOP are even doing, it will be met with a shrug and around thirty seconds’ worth of attention span.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “GOP Confirms Unqualified Simington to FCC With Eye On Crippling Biden FCC”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
72 Comments

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Bring Out Your Dead -- Oh, got themselves out! says:

Re: "Jeroen Hellingman" with silly labeling.

Calling populists "faux-populists" is not necessary

You’re yet another ancient yet sparse "account" with name change and LONG absence:

Jeroen or Jeroen Hellingman: 94 (9), 1 in 2017, 1 in 2016; 22 mo gap to 2013; 1 Jul 2010

https://www.techdirt.com/user/jhellingman — ODD bunch of websites given w name

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Uriel-238 (profile) says:

Re: Re: McConnell is a poison pill for democracy

We need to not only strip McConnell of his power (and then make an example of him — which is unlikely) but we then need to make sure no future McConnell-wannabes can do what he does, in crippling the federal government via procedural shenanigans.

This is one of those situations where I think the fourth box of liberty might be opened, not to assassinate a senator, but to hold the Senate hostage until ironclad provisions are installed that assure no given ten officials can obstruct lawmaking under any circumstances.

Though I certainly have fantasies of shelling the the Senate if the siege takes more than a week. Maybe with 3-inch Ordnance Rifles to reduce costs of history books.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Mike Masnick (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: FCC best & brightest

…without having worked for the telecom industry in the past.

There are plenty of people who meet that criteria, including those who have worked on Capital Hill on telco issues, or worked at the FCC previously, or worked at any one of the non-profits focused on teclo related issues…

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re: FCC best & brightest

There are loads of people who understand telecom but who haven’t defended or lobbied the industry’s business practices. Hell, there are enough who haven’t even worked in telecom.

It’s a high level of fallaciousness to insist someone can’t know about x if they themselves have never been x. It’s ridiculous, and frequently a way to seek to avoid any accountability, among other things.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: FCC best & brightest

Someone who actually has experience and knowledge about telecom and administrative law?

Equally as important knowledge of admin and telecom law, work at the FCC requires a solid technical grounding.

While it’s just barely possible to pick up the required background knowledge informally, it’s more likely that any good candidate would have at minimum a bachelor’s in electrical engineering (BSEE) or equivalent.

Knowlege of Maxwell’s Laws is important at the FCC.

Or do you just want call those the most foundational of “telecom” laws?

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re: FCC best & brightest

Better yet, government appointees should listen to employees with relevant knowledge for technical information. I.e. they do not need to understand the reasoning, but rather accept an expert opinion, such as data caps do not help managing congestion, and make decisions based on that acceptance.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:2 FCC best & brightest

Better yet, government appointees should listen to employees with relevant knowledge for technical information.

Certainly I’m not suggesting that a candidate needs a Ph.D. in physics!

But if you can’t, won’t or haven’t done the math at some point in your life, then you just don’t speak the language.

I totally agree that the FCC commissioners should listen to genuine experts, including the FCC’s technical staff, as well as others. The more you learn, the more you realize how much you don’t know yourself, and how much you just have to rely on advice.

But you really need the fundamental background.

Is there any possible excuse for doing spectrum management without ever having done your homework in Fourier analysis? I just don’t think so.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Bring Out Your Dead -- Oh, got themselves out! says:

So... You admit in Freudian slip, it doesn't "doesn't exist"!

In reality, that censorship doesn’t exist (in fact reality indicates the opposite).

YES, reality IS the "opposite" of your lying "doesn’t exist".

And anyway, a President is ENTITLED by will of the majority to appoint whoever he wants and surely to implement his notions.

You’re not actually in favor of "democracy" when don’t get your way. You just start shrieking that all is illegimate.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
PaulT (profile) says:

Re: So... You admit in Freudian slip, it doesn't "doesn't exist"

"a President is ENTITLED by will of the majority to appoint whoever he wants and surely to implement his notions"

The public is also entitled to question, criticise and attack his choices to any degree they wish – especially when a majority has already stated that their will is for him to leave office at the next available opportunity. You seem strangely opposed to others exercising that freedom.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
James Burkhardt (profile) says:

Re: So... You admit in Freudian slip, it doesn't "doesn't exist"

And anyway, a President is ENTITLED by will of the majority to appoint whoever he wants and surely to implement his notions.

Which is why there is a lot of anger over Mitch McConnel’s decision to hold up Obama appointees, fast track Trump Appointees, and his stated intent to not confirm Biden appointees.

The article noted that FCC nominees are normally appointed in partisan pairs (one R, one D) to avoid the very problem this appointment would present.

While this appointee is unqualified, Its the history of appointments and stated future environment for appointments that is the real issue being discussed.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: So... You admit in Freudian slip, it doesn't "doesn't exist"

" President is ENTITLED by will of the majority"

Donald Trump lost the majority vote, twice.
But yes, you are correct in that Donald considers himself to be entitled to whatever he wants because he thinks he is king.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Bring Out Your Dead -- Oh, got themselves out! says:

Re: Can anyone translate "America First" into English

Can anyone translate "America First" into English for me?

Yes. Down with Royalists.

A serf in thrall to Royalists of course can’t understand the principle of rational national self-interest — and especially the NOT of allowing furriners to set our interests — because carefully indoctrinated from birth to BE a serf: your monarch is your god / nation and you’re devoted.

David says:

Re: Re: Can anyone translate "America First" into Engl

Well, "Down with Royalists" does not seem to match what is happening here, "Royalists" meaning people entrenched with maintaining an inherited order rather than one established through individual merit. And "America" and "nation" to me naively refers to a populace governed by common principles, not to some select part of it.

So I don’t really figure out how to apply your explanation to the usage of that phrase.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
James Burkhardt (profile) says:

Re: Can anyone translate "America First" into English for me?

Your issue might be that at least 3 dialects of American English make use of the phrase.

In the trump supporter Dialect, "America first" generally means "do things that upset people online".

In the Trump donor Dialect, it means "My bank account first".

In the Trump Dialect, it means "An eternal war to spin what makes my bank account bigger to get cheers from the people whose bank accounts I am draining."

There is a lot of nuance in the various Trump Dialects, to a near Groot degree.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
TKnarr (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

Only if the Democrats go along with it. As Schumer’s already shown, there’s a procedural method to force a floor vote in the Senate over the Majority Leader’s objection. The Democrats merely need to be willing to use it regularly enough on things they can successfully pass (at worst they only need to swing a couple of GOP Senators to succeed) to break McConnell’s illusion of control.

And even the Majority Leader’s control of the agenda isn’t part of the Senate rules. By the rules the Vice President as presiding officer controls the agenda and which items go to a floor vote when, it’s only tradition that that gets delegated to the Majority Leader and tradition can’t be enforced.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Re:

It would, if the GOP hadn’t already perfected the tactic to deal with that: Refuse to even consider any non-GOP nominations. So long as they have any veto power they’ve made clear the only people they consider acceptable for government positions is someone on their side, and if you’re not that you’re not getting in.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Mike Masnick (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Historically, what has happened is that the FCC opens up 2 seats at a time: one for each party. Then there’s a consensus agreement that the Senate will approve filling both seats at once.

But the move to push Simington on now, rather than wait until January, effectively ends that practice. And now the GOP-led Senate (assuming victories in Georgia) can just block the FCC from ever appointing a new Dem.

That One Guy (profile) says:

'Our way or not at all.'

Ah the GOP, not even pretending to be there to serve or represent the public(or if they are, saying far too much about the kind of person that they’re representing). No, much like monarchs of old they are there to rule and the only quality needed for any office is loyalty to the party, with everything else a distant second.

dickeyrat says:

To envision the Trump regime, simply imagine a gang of four-year olds, hopped up on caffeine, speed and crystal meth, then turned loose in the Nursery after being told to destroy everything they could find. And cheering them on, a larger gang of purely Amerikan (with some Russians on the sidelines) drooling idiots, waving their MAGA skullcaps in the air, hollering with unrestrained glee. SO we have there what our own, homebred Amerikan Fascists have been able to craft, with the help of a completely incompetent Democrat opposition warbling "Kumbayah", and screaming slogans of hatred at Jimmy Carter, for all of the past forty years. ‘Nuff said.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...