Publix Gets Social Media Accounts Advertising Its Sandwiches Taken Down For Some Reason

from the biting-the-hand dept

For sure, the most frustrating examples of dumb trademark disputes are when one party bullies into silence another party for doing something that actually helps the bully. If you need an example of this, you can look to the time Olive Garden tried to take down AllOfGarden.com, a site with a satirical take on the Olive Garden menu. That example is particularly instructive for two reasons. First, AllOfGarden was essentially a tongue-in-cheek love letter to the restaurant chain run by someone who was very much a fan of said chain. Second, Olive Garden eventually apologized and rescinded its threat, due in part to the public backlash and the fact that it must certainly have realized that the site, if anything, helped drive some measure of interest in the restaurant itself.

We will have to see if supermarket chain Publix ends up handling this the same way, because it has apparently bullied someone running social media accounts alerting fans to the availability of a particular sandwich into silence.

The account “Are Publix Chicken Tender Subs On Sale?” — with nearly 40,000 followers — has been dormant since March 11. One of its final tweets noted that the subs were, indeed, on sale, and added ominously: “This may be our last Tweet.” Since then, it stopped sharing updates altogether. An accompanying Facebook page also went silent.

A big clue about what happened: In another post, the Twitter account said it had received a cease-and-desist order from Publix objecting to a related text-message notification service. The account promised more details “later this week,” but never shared more information. Since then, dozens of hungry Twitter users have tweeted at the account asking where they went, whether everything was OK and earnestly asking which subs might be on sale.

So, who is behind the social media accounts and text messaging service? A 26 years old named Bryan Dickey who also works for marketing firm Postscript in California. According to Dickey, Publix contacted him upset that his texting and social media accounts were alerting the public as to when these chicken tender sandwiches went on sale. He had initially said he was going to keep his social media accounts running while taking down the text message service, but those socials have, again, since gone silent. To be clear, this was something of a commercial operation, though admittedly not much of one.

Dickey tweeted from his personal account earlier this month that Publix was objecting to a related text-message service he set up in January that allowed users to be notified about sub sales if they texted “PUBSUB” to a listed phone number. It wasn’t clear how Dickey was profiting from the service, but apparently that was too much for Publix. He said as early as January 2018 that he was making money off his Publix subs ventures and last year said he had made more than $5,000.

“Publix is bullying me with C&D’s for the SMS VIP club. Haven’t talked about it publicly yet. Basically all paths to profitability are legal red taped for now, but I can keep the socials running,” he said.

All the normal excuses for Publix's actions are trotted out in the Tampabay.com post by third parties on the chain's behalf. If the Twitter account or text service suddenly did something offensive, Publix would get the blame. If it didn't go after the use of its name in this case, someone else could argue that Publix had abandoned its trademark.

But as we've discussed before, there are other options beyond bullying to death something like this. Working out a way to make the service or social media accounts "legitimate" through cheap or free licenses alleviates the concern about trademark abandonment. Working out an arrangement would similarly allow some flavor of quality control over the content of these accounts.

Or, as Publix chose to do, it could silence activity that was actively promoting its own products, almost certainly leading to sales that would have otherwise not occurred.

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: bryan dickey, chicken tender subs, trademark, trademark bullying
Companies: publix, twitter


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Thread


  • identicon
    Pixelation, 28 Apr 2021 @ 9:38pm

    Publix...Pub Licks, tastes like ash tray and stale beer.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    That Anonymous Coward (profile), 28 Apr 2021 @ 10:01pm

    How dare you make a profit off of our inability to notice our customers WANTED this information & we didn't share it in an easy to find way so someone else did.

    Have we tested the trademark lawyers for lead exposure?
    How else can one explain these idiotic tonedeaf attempts to earn their retainers.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 29 Apr 2021 @ 10:53pm

      Re:

      Have we tested the trademark lawyers for lead exposure?

      You shouldn't need to. :P

      How else can one explain these idiotic tonedeaf attempts to earn their retainers.

      Well if you can ban speech because you own a web service, it stands reasonable that you can ban speech over IP that you own. Neither form of speech originates from the owner, and therefore is only permitted by the owner's ignorance of said speech or the owner's willingness to make the effort to remove said speech. The only difference is scope of the ban. Techdirt can just as easily ban anything they want on their site. Techdirt really shouldn't be complaining that another owner decided to do the same.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    icon
    TheNextDecor (profile), 29 Apr 2021 @ 4:56am

    What is 3D Metal Wall Art

    Lovely Couple Metal Wall Art is designed from 1 mm high quality metal steel, painted with powder coating provide us rich experience. Finishing with black Pulver gives extra life for wall art. Hang once at your room and turn back how stylish your living room.

    Perfect for your bedroom, kitchen, dining hall, bar, hotels room and offices.

    A beautiful gift for your love’s ones, relatives, family and friends.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    CSMcDonald (profile), 29 Apr 2021 @ 11:29am

    New updates to the story

    From the Orlando Sentinel, who knows what's actually gong on here.

    https://www.orlandosentinel.com/business/os-ne-publix-twitter-pubsub-dispute-20210429-hqomjrnr oraizpq7t3kswn3cny-story.html

    Dickey said Publix did not demand that he shut down the social media account, just two related businesses that were profitable for him. Last year, Dickey said he had made $5,000.

    “I’ve decided that I’m not going to let not making money get in the way of me living out that mission statement of bringing joy to the internet and connecting people through Publix subs,” Dickey said.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    ECA (profile), 29 Apr 2021 @ 12:44pm

    Stand still foot.

    Stay there, I want to shoot you.
    Quit running away, you only make this harder.
    FOOT, STAY. quit bouncing around, I cant shoot you this way.
    BANG!
    OW!
    Foot, look what you have done, now I have a hole in my (Fill in the blank).

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      XcOM987 (profile), 29 Apr 2021 @ 11:31pm

      Re: Stand still foot.

      I can't believe how much that made me laugh, comment of the year!

      Bravo!

      Foot, look what you have done, now I have a hole in my Public image

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 30 Apr 2021 @ 9:46am

    I complained directly to the source

    Since Publix doesn't seem to know how to use social media, I complained via email:
    https://www.publix.com/contact/contact-us

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories
.

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.