Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt

from the whatcha-sayin' dept

We've got a double first place winner this week, with one comment hitting the top of both the insightful and funny leaderboards. It's an anonymous comment on our post about the judge who ignored the First Amendment and misread a town law in ordering a resident to remove "Fuck Biden" signs from their lawn — and it's a simple callback to another recent First Amendment ruling:

Fuck cheer

In second place on the insightful side, we've got PaulT responding to a pair of incorrect assertions about net neutrality:

"Industry leaders fear net neutrality rules will pave the way for the government to set broadband prices"

If you don't know what net neutrality is or what it does, I suppose it makes sense.

"Net neutrality has become an expensive, time-wasting exercise that has little real world effect,"

Weird, it's the default setting outside of the US, and we have cheaper, better internet access than you do.

As with healthcare debates, I'm sure someone will be along soon to explain why better service at cheaper prices with more freedom to move around and less hidden charges is awful for me.

For editor's choice on the insightful side, we start out with a comment from That One Guy about the "Fuck Biden" signs, and specifically the complaint that a six-year-old might see it and need to have the word explained to them:

It's four letters, not a literally magic word

Ooh, I've got some bad news for you if your kids are going to be interacting with society at all...

Either you'll explain it or someone else will because 'little TImmy/Suzy never hearing the word 'fuck''' is not a viable option for anyone who isn't insanely sheltered from birth to death.

Next, it's an anonymous comment about the latest of the recurring fights between newspaper publishers and Google, and the claim that the latter needs to better account for the value provided by the former:

The newspapers could prove that value by using robots.txt, or Google could prove the value of being listed by de-listing those papers. I know which option would cause much wailing and screaming for government aid, and its not the use of robots.txt.

Over on the funny side, we've already had our first place winner above, so it's straight on to second place with wshuff and another comment about net neutrality:

Look, clearly net neutrality is a horrible thing that should not be allowed. I mean, just look at all the dead people who submitted comments against it, trying to save us from beyond the grave.

For editor's choice on the funny side, we start out with another comment about the "Fuck Biden" signs, this time from Stephen T. Stone in response to the claim that "an argument can be made that free speech is not infringed by requiring the Letters UCK be covered up":

It’d be a terrible argument, sure, but it could be made.

Finally, we head to our post about the shifty "MAGA Freedom Phone" where an anonymous commenter responded to the assertion that "this is precisely why Trump got elected. There is huge demand for this kind of product":

An obsolete, barely functional shitbox, embedded with foreign government spy(ware), that actively promotes its flaws as advantages, and tows an entire fleet of low class grifters and con artists, is pretty on brand for Trump.

That's all for this week, folks!

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Thread


  • identicon
    Bobvious, 25 Jul 2021 @ 3:46pm

    Speaking of stupid

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      That One Guy (profile), 25 Jul 2021 @ 5:51pm

      Working backwards from the assumed conclusion

      It would be laughable if the results weren't so damn dangerous both personally and institutionally how desperate so many people are to believe that multiple audits that all came to the same conclusion, 'the election numbers are accurate, there is no sign of fraud never mind on an election-shifting level' simply have to be fraudulent themselves, and if they just check the numbers one more time, this time with a heavily biased group then the real numbers will be exposed and their Dear Leader can regain his throne and start punishing The Others for being so mean to them and having the audacity to exist.

      As this point I can but hope that the disillusionment and distrust that the republican party has fostered towards the entire election process blows up in their face spectacularly as those that would have voted for them don't even bother since clearly the system is rigged against them anyway, because as the insurrection showed 'people just not voting' is very much on the tame end of possible outcomes from that mindset.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 25 Jul 2021 @ 7:52pm

        Re: Working backwards from the assumed conclusion

        Surely at this point, any Democrat can claim election fraud as well if they fail to be elected? Can we get unending recounts and audits in Blue states if a Republican wins there?

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          That One Guy (profile), 26 Jul 2021 @ 1:49am

          'You said you had awesome evidence so where is it?'

          You could I suppose, it would be fairly easy to take the 'the election system is completely rigged and can't be trusted' narrative the republicans are running and turn it on them for any elections they win but that wouldn't really be a good idea as it would aggravate the problem and make their claims seems like they might actually be credible since both sides were claiming it.

          Better to just hit them with a [Citation Needed] and refuse to let them wiggle out when they pull that stunt, pointing out that they either refuse to answer or when they do they have nothing to show for it that could even begin to withstand legal scrutiny where lying actually carries a penalty and the other side is allowed to check your work.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 26 Jul 2021 @ 10:37am

            Re: 'You said you had awesome evidence so where is it?'

            Conspiracy Theory - if you cast enough doubt on this election, then you implicitly create doubt in the next election, such that a party wishing to take more permanent power (say, for example, one that has power in state legislatures) simply has to declare the vote counts invalid and select their "winner," and it will be welcomed by their supporters.

            Wait, weren't we seeing some state legislatures proposing laws to empower them to do just that?

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 26 Jul 2021 @ 3:06am

          Re: Re: Working backwards from the assumed conclusion

          They could, but they really shouldn't. The Republicans diving deeper into the crazy is a great opportunity for the Democrats to present themselves as the party of common sense for the normal people who just want things to work.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          techflaws (profile), 26 Jul 2021 @ 3:45am

          Re: Re: Working backwards from the assumed conclusion

          Well, that certainly would have saved the US a lot of trouble had the democrats insisted on this back then when George Bush junior was being so damn sure he'd win the election.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 26 Jul 2021 @ 9:23am

        Re: Working backwards from the assumed conclusion

        • and if they just check the numbers one more time, this time with a heavily biased group then the real numbers will be exposed*

        Just give us one more chance to come up with a way to perpetrate a fraud. Then there will be fraud. See? Fraud.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories
.

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.