We are writing to ask you for help on an issue that is one our top business priorities ? content theft on the Internet, which is a major threat to the strength of our business model.
besides that, most ISP's are in cahoots with the media companies. they have a vested interest in being best buds.
But the fact remains that without the content there would be no need for the codec.
Yes, Social Security is really cutting a huge hole in spending. Yes, just keep telling yourself that. In twenty-five years or so, it'll actually be correct.
And hey, let's cut medicare/medicaid. Medical spending will rise even faster with old people unable to collective bargain for care, leading to them dying much sooner (as they can't afford medical care). That's a perfect solution to budget problems. I completely agree that my grandparents should just hurry up and die, so the rest of us don't have to pay for their inevitable health decline.
And Fair Tax. Hmmm. Yes, I think it's completely fair that 10% of the population gets 73% of all income. Nothing at all unfair about that. Nope. Nothing to see here. Move along.
Seems like it, together with a web server, would take care of 90% of this.
Put a wrapper around Git, perhaps, to make it friendlier, and standardize how to contact authors (and where what each author considers authoritative resides; perhaps Git has already tackled each of those problems, even), and you're pretty much there.
Point out that if a campaign used a copyrighted song without permission (I know. That's never happened), their entire campaign could be shut down.
And that's assuming no one issued a bogus shutdown without waiting for actual infringement.
Oh, I like this idea...
Set up a wireless setup next door, maybe with a high-gain antenna, and sell for 1/10th the price...
Of course, you'd have to deal with Maple Leaf fans, but there are always hazards in business...
Leaving aside all discussion of your soul, one important thing that your paper is missing is that most photographers do digital manipulations of their photos (eg: altering the lighting, framing, airbrushing details out, combining multiple exposures) before publishing them, and some amount (sometimes a little, sometimes a lot) of creativity is involved in any of those operations.
Having said that, I still generally agree with the thrust of your argument that a bright line is needed. But I'm surprised to hear you say that, as a lawyer, because you're suggesting getting lawyers out of the determination process. At least a good percentage of the time.
I would dispute the claim that the $9316 was totally wasted. If the movie gets any Oscar nominations, that will drive far more than enough business to make that worthwhile. Which is, of course, why he paid it, even if it irritated him (well, either that, or it was pure ego, which I doubt).
The govt is worse than useless, we'd be better off without it.
It spent five years fighting Google... and won... and then let Google immediately go back to doing what it was doing before.
to keep companies from contractually forcing artists to give up their copyright. If so, a worthy goal, but certainly not the best way to go about it.
The big problem with the "business class" analogy is that almost no one pays for business class for themselves. The people flying business class are almost all there because their company is paying, or because they have frequent flyer miles.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13190424
earlier this morning. Apparently, being a journalist isn't enough to keep someone from seeking one of these injunctions, either.
Sorry, just felt like pointing that out. Carry on.
I live in the area, but didn't know about the article until the lawsuit. So I read it, and I must admit, I didn't realize just how actively hostile Snyder is to Redskins fans. The stuff I'd heard of (not nearly all of it) was stuff where my reaction was something like, "Wow, that's stupid", and then I'd forget about it.
How did this man get enough money to buy the team, again?
I wonder if this means that I can now take a picture of the Capital Building using a tripod, and without having a permit.
I wonder about Mozilla Foundation not being part of the suit, not to mention everyone who makes an RSS reader.
And how far back do xbiff and biff go? I know at least back to '91; that'd be pushing the bounds of patentability even if the patent application did go back that far (which, of course, it isn't even close).
So how is a person to find out that the cheque has actually been validated?
ironic name,
Mr Foss.