Right. Because the FBI's word is so credible.
The other of the most blatantly hypocritical political parties being, of course, the Democrats...
Don't worry. They're safe and sound in their garden, protected by the wall...
Apparently, we the people are watching "Dancing With the Stars" and "American Idol" instead.
Wait - who was this allegedly principled San Diego politician? I have not met a single one who wasn't in somebody's pocket.
BJ and the Bear No More Monkeyshines Political Fecal-Matter-Flinging Consortium for the Betterment of the Political Process.
Er, whoosh?
Because all that any of those petitions do is give the White House staff the opportunity to use their weasel words in order to blow us off.
Er, why are you bringing me into this?
If she were to throw in Evelyn Evelyn as an opening act, I'd gladly give $30,000 (in the alternate reality that I could afford it, that is... le sigh).
getting sued on your way to an IPO is like a Silicon Valley fraternity hazing ritual
Funny, it seems like it's the Democrats' Justice Department that is trying to make the live-or-die decision.
Whoopsie. Did your partisan cover get blown?
As long as his writing continues to hold up...
Has enough underwear to last a week without needing to do laundry.
That's nothing. Last Thursday, some Thai chick beat me at ping-pong... and she wasn't using a paddle.
Well, if final revision of the bill contains provisions for warrantless tracking by Big Media, then you can be assured that Franken was involved.
Am I the only one who is beginning to think that LulzSec is really a PsyOp?
Unfortunately, I don't see it succeeding.
1. Big Media lets it be known that if this passes, they will refuse to buy any more cocaine from Mexico.
2. Mexican drug cartels pressure the government to approve ACTA.
3. ACTA passes.
4. ???
5. PROFIT!
Re: Re: Re: Re: What do App developers need UDID's for?
And a pretty piss-poor job they've been doing, at that. Unless you consider siding with corporate and media interests over the people "serving the public." Oh, wait - judging by your history, you do.And the FBI would never stoop to criminal behavior. They would never manufacture evidence. They would never lie in court. They would never wiretap without warrant.
Given the FBI's storied history of lying through their proverbial teeth and not giving and apparent rat's ass about how it affects their public image, I would have to say that Anonymous would.