If you can play a video / movie, then you can capture it (even if it is with a handheld camera or other). Composite video out from your DVD player will normally end up giving good enough quality for capture. It won't be the original digital version, but it will be pretty good.
If someone were to die while we wait for the results of a study. So let's ban that activity while we're at it too.
Using XSL it is possible to open the XML file that you want to edit and transform it into an HTML form and send it to the browser. The values of the XML elements will be placed as the values of the HTML input fields. After you make the necessary edits, the edited information can be submitted to the server and the XML file updated.
I think there's still plenty to be worried about before jumping ahead to internet voting.
I'm not sure what that has to do with the DMCA. Sure, that would be lovely if that were the case. But it's not. So why not learn to deal with it?
I'm pretty sure the other operating system was Linux.
Linux is free so it must be illegal!
If the RIAA/MPAA are not careful, there will come a day where they will actually have to pay YouTube to stream their clips.
It looks like someone has decided to poke both with a stick, to see who gets provoked first.
Their website rocks, their Iphone app is pretty impressive, they definitely have the business traveler in their pocket.
I'm constantly amazed at how much invasion of their privacy Brits are willing to put up with.
How would you fell if HP or Dell computers would only allow you to run software bought from them?
How would you fell if HP or Dell computers would only allow you to run software bought from them?
Really, this sounds like a very weak argument to keep from being forced via subpoena to testify as to what s/he witnessed. Granted, this person may be be placing their self in danger, but I would argue that is simply where one has to balance Citizenship against self-preservation.
That is, the hacking, by itself, wouldn't be seen as a crime unless it was a part of a larger criminal activity.
In this case, it may well be that there are already Missouri laws on the books that create a tiered level of licenses by age, making it easy to add new language, even if its irrational and sweeping, to the restrictions already in place.
Good thing, rather than risk a Supreme Court overturn.
I am also sharing with you candid ideology which I believe is behind Los Angeles' extreme views of property rights and how they do not fit within the framework of the United States Copyright and Patent System as a whole. Behind this experience exists a culture few would put up with.
The original claims by Nesson for Tenenbaum, about the unconstitutionality of the statutory fines, was an interesting argument that seemed to at least have some basis in law.
Wrong. There is a HUGE upside for the correctional perspective. At least the Correctional Union perspective. You wonder why so many things get you sooo long in prison? Look at who is to benefit from it.
RE:
The funny part is that print news often quotes interviews given on TV. So it is sort of a snake eating itself here.