I see that Manhacks might become a thing.
[And where are your citations?]
And the big negative is the very-much-there risk of executing someone innocent (which is something that should NOT be happening).
This is a spambot above me.
Some of this came about because Epic decided to break Apple's ToS and set up their own shop within the IOS version of Fortnite so they could get 100% of the profit.
Nope. That's not how it works. You make the claim, you have to supply the proof, and extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Where is your proof of your assertions?
Still hanging on to that crackpot conspiracy theory, eh? How much of a dullard are you, really?
What are your citations? Extraordinary claims REQUIRE extraordinary evidence.
[Citations required]
[Citations needed]
Get outta here, spambot!
Spambot alert!
That one works as well
I wonder if it's possible to report the troll to the FBI. I'm fairly certain he's possibly committed a few crimes (including harassment).
Go away, spambot.
When politicians stop attacking it for whatever misguided (or malicious) reasons they have.
Yeah. That's a chatbot and a spambot in one.
I find myself wondering the following: What was the percentage of posts hidden this year?
More comments from AC Unknown >>
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by AC Unknown.
Submit a story now.
Re: Like sticking your face in a blender
I see that Manhacks might become a thing.
Re:
[And where are your citations?]
Re: Re: A bit more math: policing on the most cost-effective bas
And the big negative is the very-much-there risk of executing someone innocent (which is something that should NOT be happening).
Spambot warning!
This is a spambot above me.
And to think
Some of this came about because Epic decided to break Apple's ToS and set up their own shop within the IOS version of Fortnite so they could get 100% of the profit.
Re: Re: Re: Re: "passive" is what Section 230
Nope. That's not how it works. You make the claim, you have to supply the proof, and extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
Re: Re: Yes, Maz, corporations must OBEY gov'ts.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Where is your proof of your assertions?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Snowden said GOOGLE gives NSA "direct a
Still hanging on to that crackpot conspiracy theory, eh? How much of a dullard are you, really?
Re: Re: With first paragraph, you express desire to restrict spe
What are your citations? Extraordinary claims REQUIRE extraordinary evidence.
Re: Re: "passive" is what Section 230 provides, NOT ed
[Citations required]
Re: Snowden said GOOGLE gives NSA "direct access".
[Citations needed]
Re: Tankabout
Get outta here, spambot!
Re: Finaout
Spambot alert!
Re: Re: Re:
That one works as well
Re:
I wonder if it's possible to report the troll to the FBI. I'm fairly certain he's possibly committed a few crimes (including harassment).
Re:
[Citations needed]
Re: spambot doing a spam
Go away, spambot.
Re:
When politicians stop attacking it for whatever misguided (or malicious) reasons they have.
Re: Re: facbook policy
Yeah. That's a chatbot and a spambot in one.
(untitled comment)
I find myself wondering the following: What was the percentage of posts hidden this year?
More comments from AC Unknown >>
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by AC Unknown.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt